REVIEW 12 cited by
Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiences
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiences
read the original abstract
In recent years, the field of explainable AI (XAI) has produced a vast collection of algorithms, providing a useful toolbox for researchers and practitioners to build XAI applications. With the rich application opportunities, explainability is believed to have moved beyond a demand by data scientists or researchers to comprehend the models they develop, to an essential requirement for people to trust and adopt AI deployed in numerous domains. However, explainability is an inherently human-centric property and the field is starting to embrace human-centered approaches. Human-computer interaction (HCI) research and user experience (UX) design in this area are becoming increasingly important. In this chapter, we begin with a high-level overview of the technical landscape of XAI algorithms, then selectively survey our own and other recent HCI works that take human-centered approaches to design, evaluate, and provide conceptual and methodological tools for XAI. We ask the question "what are human-centered approaches doing for XAI" and highlight three roles that they play in shaping XAI technologies by helping navigate, assess and expand the XAI toolbox: to drive technical choices by users' explainability needs, to uncover pitfalls of existing XAI methods and inform new methods, and to provide conceptual frameworks for human-compatible XAI.
Forward citations
Cited by 12 Pith papers
-
What Should Explanations Contain? A Human-Centered Explanation Content Model for Local, Post-Hoc Explanations
A 14-code content model for local post-hoc AI explanations, derived from 325 user statements and validated by experts with high reliability scores.
-
XPlainVerse: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Explainable Deepfake Detection
A million-scale deepfake benchmark with Edit-Check filtering, dual expert/lay explanations, and EntityScore/EvidenceScore shows fine-tuned detectors collapse under generator shift while surface fluency remains.
-
"It became a self-fulfilling prophecy": How Lived Experiences are Entangled with AI Predictions in Menstrual Cycle Tracking Apps
Users entangle their lived experiences with AI predictions in menstrual tracking apps, leading to self-fulfilling prophecies, limited critical awareness from UI, and isolation for non-normative users.
-
Skin-Deep Bias: How Avatar Appearances Shape Perceptions of AI Hiring
Racial mismatch between applicant and AI avatar increased perceived ethnic bias, while sharing only one identity trait lowered fairness ratings compared to full or no match.
-
SketchXplain: Intuitive Visual Explanations of Image Classifiers with Sketches
SketchXplain produces sketch-based explanations for image classifiers that users interpret faster and more coherently than saliency maps on face expression and skin lesion tasks.
-
CANote: Empowering Fact-checking Note Writing Through Scaffolded and Provenance-based Human-AI Collaboration
CANote is an AI-assisted tool that scaffolds fact-checking note writing via subclaim extraction, provenance links, and neutral drafts, with user studies showing improved quality and lay users matching experts.
-
A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Accountability in Public-Sector AI
A framework combining legal ontology, rule extraction, and solver reasoning verifies whether AI explanations for CalFresh eligibility align with statutory constraints.
-
Why Johnny Can't Use Agents: Industry Aspirations vs. User Realities with AI Agents
Industry markets AI agents for orchestration, creation, and insight, but a usability study with 31 participants reveals users face challenges from capability misalignment and lack of meta-cognition in tools like Opera...
-
Using Learning Theories to Evolve Human-Centered XAI: Future Perspectives and Challenges
Infusing learning theories into the XAI lifecycle offers a learner-centered path to improve human agency and mitigate explanation-related risks in AI systems.
-
Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions
A position paper argues that post-hoc XAI explanations are unfaithful and paradoxical, proposing a shift to expert-based verification and certification of AI systems.
-
Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions
Current XAI methods for DNNs and LLMs rest on paradoxes and false assumptions that demand a paradigm shift to verification protocols, scientific foundations, context-aware design, and faithful model analysis rather th...
-
Towards a Humanized Social-Media Ecosystem: AI-Augmented HCI Design Patterns for Safety, Agency & Well-Being
Five browser-side design patterns (rewriter, integrity meter, feed curator, micro-withdrawal, recovery mode) aim to give users control over social feeds through an explainable AI intermediary, with evaluation still pending.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.