Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Query-Dependent Prompt Evaluation and Optimization with Offline Inverse RL

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.06553 v4 pith:VTTSU3OX submitted 2023-09-13 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords optimizationpromptofflinelearningllmsarithmeticdatadatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this study, we aim to enhance the arithmetic reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) through zero-shot prompt optimization. We identify a previously overlooked objective of query dependency in such optimization and elucidate two ensuing challenges that impede the successful and economical design of prompt optimization techniques. One primary issue is the absence of an effective method to evaluate prompts during inference when the golden answer is unavailable. Concurrently, learning via interactions with the LLMs to navigate the expansive natural language prompting space proves to be resource-intensive. To address this, we introduce Prompt-OIRL, which harnesses offline inverse reinforcement learning to draw insights from offline prompting demonstration data. Such data exists as by-products when diverse prompts are benchmarked on open-accessible datasets. With Prompt-OIRL, the query-dependent prompt optimization objective is achieved by first learning an offline reward model. This model can evaluate any query-prompt pairs without accessing LLMs. Subsequently, a best-of-N strategy is deployed to recommend the optimal prompt. Our experimental evaluations across various LLM scales and arithmetic reasoning datasets underscore both the efficacy and economic viability of the proposed approach.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Knowing How to Edit: Reliable Evaluation Signals for Diagnosing and Optimizing Prompts at Query Level

    cs.AI 2025-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    An execution-free evaluator that predicts prompt-quality metrics guides per-query prompt rewriting, but the reported consistent gains are not supported by the paper's own tables.

  2. Fast or Slow? Integrating Fast Intuition and Deliberate Thinking for Enhancing Visual Question Answering

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FOCUS improves VQA accuracy by routing easy questions through fast zero-shot answering and hard questions through question-conditioned image segmentation before the final answer.

  3. SI-Agent: An Agentic Framework for Feedback-Driven Generation and Tuning of Human-Readable System Instructions for Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a multi-agent loop (instructor, follower, feedback) to auto-generate human-readable system prompts, claiming good benchmark performance and readability, but the supporting experiments are not reprod...

  4. Tournament of Prompts: Evolving LLM Instructions Through Structured Debates and Elo Ratings

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    DEEVO evolves better LLM prompts by debating outputs and selecting survivors with Elo ratings, without requiring labeled data or a hand-written fitness function.

Pith tools