REVIEW 2 cited by
Interpolating between low and high energy QCD via a 5D Yang-Mills model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We describe the Goldstone bosons of massless QCD together with an infinite number of spin-1 mesons. The field content of the model is SU(Nf)xSU(Nf) Yang-Mills in a compact extra-dimension. Electroweak interactions reside on one brane. Breaking of chiral symmetry occurs due to the boundary conditions on the other brane, away from our world, and is therefore spontaneous. Our implementation of the holographic recipe maintains chiral symmetry explicit throughout. For intermediate energies, we extract resonance couplings. These satisfy sum rules due to the 5D nature of the model. These sum rules imply, when taking the high energy limit, that perturbative QCD constraints are satisfied. We also illustrate how the 5D model implies a definite prescription for handling infinite sums over 4D resonances. Taking the low energy limit, we recover the chiral expansion and the corresponding non-local order parameters. All local order parameters are introduced separately.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Tensor meson transition form factors in holographic QCD and the muon $g-2$
Holographic QCD predicts a positive tensor-meson contribution of about +11e-11 to the muon g-2, driven by a previously omitted doubly-virtual form factor.
-
Longitudinal short-distance constraints on hadronic light-by-light scattering and tensor meson contributions to the muon $g-2$
In hard-wall holographic QCD, the infinite tower of tensor mesons fills most of the missing symmetric longitudinal short-distance constraint and yields a total hadronic light-by-light contribution of about +11 x 10^-1...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.