Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 146 references

Multifractional Brownian motion with telegraphic, stochastically varying exponent

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a smoothed telegraph process for the Hurst exponent yields a tractable multifractional Brownian motion, and a single autocovariance measurement can tell it apart from fixed- and random-exponent fractional Brownian…

desk verdict The TeMBM model is a genuinely useful addition, but the classification method needs a firmer statistical baseline before I would trust the empirical claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14546 v1 pith:VUS7IXJ2 submitted 2025-04-20 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.softphysics.bio-ph

Micha{l} Balcerek , Samudrajit Thapa , Krzysztof Burnecki , Holger Kantz , Ralf Metzler , Agnieszka Wy{l}omańska , Aleksei Chechkin This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.softphysics.bio-ph MSC 60G2260G1862M10
keywords telegraphicmultifractionalBrownianmotionHurstexponentsmoothedtelegraphprocessbetadistributionautocovarianceclassificationfractionalsingle-particletrackinganomalousdiffusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Multifractional Brownian motion has lacked a simple analytical model that lets the Hurst exponent $H(t)$ wander along a single trajectory while remaining bounded and tractable. This paper supplies one: model $H(t)$ as a smoothed telegraph process, a two-level random switch filtered through a relaxation time. The smoothed process has a stationary beta distribution, matching exponent histograms seen in biological single-particle tracking, and the paper derives its autocovariance. It then gives a practical procedure that separates this telegraphic multifractional Brownian motion from plain fractional Brownian motion and from fractional Brownian motion with a random exponent: the autocovariance of estimated Hurst exponents is decaying for TeMBM, constant for FBMRE, and zero for FBM. The paper demonstrates the procedure on simulated trajectories and on real data from biology, climate, and finance.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the smoothed telegraph process $H(t)$, generated by $dH/dt=-H+H_{TP}(t)/\tau$, where $H_{TP}$ is a two-state telegraph switching between $H_1$ and $H_2$ with rates $\lambda_{12}$ and $\lambda_{21}$. The smoothing filter $\tau$ produces continuous, bounded paths and a stationary $\beta$ distribution with unimodal or bimodal shapes. Its autocovariance, Eq. (8), is $\langle(H(t)-\langle H\rangle)(H(s)-\langle H\rangle)\rangle = \frac{\lambda_{12}\lambda_{21}(H_2-H_1)^2}{4\lambda^2(4\lambda^2\tau^2-1)}\left(2\lambda\tau e^{-|t-s|/\tau}-e^{-2\lambda|t-s|}\right)$. The classification protocol rests on comparing the sample autocovariance of estimated Hurst exponents against the three ideal shapes that this formula predicts.

What would settle it

Apply the estimation algorithm to simulated TeMBM where the telegraph switching rate is much faster than the estimation segment length, so that smoothing hides most switches within segments; if the sample autocovariance of estimated Hurst exponents shows a constant plateau instead of the exponential decay of Eq. (8), the classifier would mislabel TeMBM as FBMRE in a resolvable and physically plausible parameter regime.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, telegraphic multifractional Brownian motion (TeMBM) is defined through the spectral representation $B_{H(t)}(t)=C(H(t))\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{e^{i\omega t}-1}{|\omega|^{H(t)+1/2}}dB(\omega)$, with $H(t)$ a stationary smoothed telegraph process independent of $B(t)$. This renders the Hurst exponent bounded, smooth, and random along a single trajectory, and its stationary law is the $\beta$ distribution $p(h)\propto(h-H_1)^{\lambda_{12}\tau-1}(H_2-h)^{\lambda_{21}\tau-1}$. The central discovery for data analysis is that the ensemble autocovariance of segment-wise estimated Hurst exponents reproduces the autocovariance of $H(t)$: zero for fixed-exponent FBM, constant for FBMRE, and the decaying exponential combination of Eq. (8) for TeMBM. The paper uses these three signatures to classify trajectories and reports TeMBM-like decay for electricity prices, FBMRE-like plateaus for quantum dots in cells and beads in mucin gels, and FBM-like zero for temperature anomalies.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the assumption that Hurst exponents estimated from short overlapping TAMSD segments are accurate enough for the ensemble autocovariance of those estimates to preserve the true autocovariance shape (zero, constant, or decaying) of $H(t)$, yet the paper specifies no quantitative rule for choosing the segment length $w$ and overlap $o$ that guarantee this.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any data set whose exponent autocovariance decays as in Eq. (8) can be represented by TeMBM, and the fit gives its switching levels, rates, and relaxation time.
  • In single-particle tracking, a decaying exponent autocovariance indicates the medium or the particle's state is changing in time, whereas a constant plateau indicates static heterogeneity between trajectories.
  • The distinguishing procedure does not need a priori knowledge of the model and applies to any multifractional Brownian motion, because the three shape categories are defined by the autocovariance of the estimated exponent.
  • Fitting the beta distribution to exponent histograms and Eq. (8) to their autocovariance yields a complete parametrisation of TeMBM from experimental trajectories.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the three-way autocovariance diagnostic could be turned into a formal model-selection test by deriving the finite-sample distribution of the estimated autocovariance under each model; that would supply the missing quantitative threshold for segment length and overlap.
  • The same smoothed-telegraph construction could be applied to stochastic diffusivity instead of the Hurst exponent, coupling time-varying mobility and time-varying memory in one analytically tractable process; the paper notes the need for such combined models but does not construct one.
  • Because the beta-distribution match in earlier data is between the model and histograms of estimated exponents, the fitted parameters may partly absorb the estimator's smoothing; a direct check would compare the switching times implied by fitted rates with switches detected in individual trajectories.
  • If the electricity-price result holds up, the time-dependent Hurst exponent becomes a quantitative, continuously varying measure of market efficiency, giving the qualitative adaptive-market narrative a concrete observable; the paper hints at this interpretation but does not develop it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces telegraphic multifractional Brownian motion (TeMBM), in which the Hurst exponent H(t) follows a stationary smoothed telegraph process with a beta stationary density. The authors derive the conditional autocovariance of the process, the stationary beta density of H(t), and the autocovariance function of H(t) itself. They then propose an estimation and classification scheme: segment-wise TAMSD slopes yield estimates of H along a trajectory, and the ensemble sample ACVF of these estimates is claimed to be zero for FBM, constant nonzero for FBMRE, and decaying for TeMBM. The model is validated on simulations, and the classification procedure is applied to temperature-anomaly data, quantum-dot trajectories, mucin-gel bead trajectories, and electricity-price data, with the authors concluding FBM, FBMRE, FBMRE, and TeMBM, respectively.

Significance. If the classification methodology were fully validated, TeMBM would be a valuable analytically tractable model for within-trajectory Hurst-exponent fluctuations, with a stationary beta marginal that matches previously reported experimental fits. The analytical derivations of Eqs. (2)-(3), (6), and (8) are standard and internally consistent, and the simulation checks against the analytical stationary density and ACVF are encouraging. The provision of code on GitHub is also a strength. The main weakness is that the distinguishing methodology is not yet calibrated: the zero baseline for FBM is asserted from a property of H(t) rather than demonstrated for the finite-sample estimator, only one FBM parameter is tested, and no quantitative decision rule is provided. The model contribution is solid, but the paper's claim to provide 'a methodology to identify our model in experimental data' needs substantial additional validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text, Eq. (5)] The defining equation for H(t) is dimensionally inconsistent as printed. Eq. (5) reads dH/dt = -H(t) + H_TP(t)/tau; if tau is a relaxation time, the first term should be -H(t)/tau, i.e., dH/dt = (H_TP(t) - H(t))/tau. This is exactly the equation used in Supplement Sec. II (where f(x) = -gamma x with gamma = 1/tau) and in Supplement Sec. V, step 2(b), and it is the equation that yields the beta density in Eq. (6). Please correct Eq. (5) and make the main text consistent with the Supplement.
  2. [Fig. 3(a) and Supplement Secs. VI-VII] The claimed zero baseline for FBM is a property of the constant underlying H(t), not of the estimated segment-wise Hurst exponents that the algorithm actually analyzes. Finite-sample TAMSD slope estimates are correlated across overlapping segments (o > 0 is permitted by Supplement Sec. VI), and for persistent FBM with H > 1/2 the long-range dependence of increments can induce correlated estimation errors even for disjoint segments. Consequently, a constant-H FBM can produce a nonzero, decaying sample ACVF at small lags, which is precisely the TeMBM signature. Figure 3(a) tests FBM only at H = 0.1 and with one unstated choice of w and o, so it does not establish the baseline. Please add simulations for persistent FBM (e.g., H = 0.6 and H = 0.8), for both disjoint and overlapping segmentation, and report the resulting ACVFs with confidence bands.
  3. [Supplement Sec. VII and Fig. 3(b)] The classification step is performed by visual inspection of whether the sample ACVF 'stabilizes at zero,' 'stabilizes at a non-zero level,' or 'decays.' No quantitative decision rule is specified, and the key algorithm parameters w (segment length) and o (overlap) are not given numerical values anywhere in the main text or the Supplement. Without these values and a calibrated decision criterion, the method cannot be applied objectively to new data. Please specify w and o, justify them through a sensitivity analysis over w, o, trajectory length N, and ensemble size M, and define the decision rule used for the classifications in Fig. 3(b).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Supplement Sec. VII, Eq. (20)] Equation (20) defines gamma(j,k) as an unnormalized sum over trajectories; for a sample ACVF it should be divided by M (or M-1).
  2. [Fig. 3] The 95% confidence bands in Fig. 3 are not defined; please state how they are computed, for example by bootstrap, analytically, or from across-trajectory variation.
  3. [Supplemental Material title page] The Supplemental Material author line contains corrupted names ('Micha/suppress l Balcerek' and 'Wy/suppress loma´ nska'); the published PDF must render the author names correctly.
  4. [Supplement Sec. VII] The statement that the diffusion coefficient can be ignored 'under certain conditions' should specify those conditions, since short-window log-log slope estimates can be affected by the noise level and the fitting range.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the TeMBM derivation is self-contained; only minor, non-load-bearing self-citations to the authors' prior data fits occur.

full rationale

The core derivation is self-contained and does not reduce to its own inputs. The stationary beta density in Eq. (6) is obtained from the smoothed telegraph SDE in Eq. (5) through the dichotomic-Markov formalism of FitzHugh [73], with the detailed calculation given in Supplemental Section II. The ACVF in Eq. (8) follows from the same telegraph-process statistics in Supplemental Section III, and the MBM covariance in Eq. (2) is derived from the spectral representation in Eq. (1) in Supplemental Section I. None of these steps assumes the paper's conclusions. The classification methodology in Supplemental Section VII compares sample ACVFs of segment-wise TAMSD-based Hurst estimates and is validated numerically against simulations; the statement that FBM gives a zero ACVF is a claim about constant-H processes rather than a parameter fitted from data, so it is not circular, although the finite-sample estimator dependence is a robustness concern. The only noteworthy self-citation is Ref. [74], by overlapping authors, used to state that beta-distributed Hurst exponents were previously fitted to datasets 2 and 3 and to label those datasets as FBMRE. That prior work is external data fitting performed in a separate paper and is not needed to derive Eqs. (6) or (8); the ACVF-based classification in Fig. 3(b) provides independent demonstration. Thus no prediction is forced by definition or by a self-citation chain, and the paper earns a low score reflecting only minor, non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard telegraph-process statistics, FitzHugh Ref. [73], standard MBM spectral theory, and the TAMSD scaling of FBM. The parameters H1, H2, lambda12, lambda21, and tau are inputs, not fitted values; no ad hoc entities are introduced. The main unverified load is the estimation procedure, not the analytic formulas.

free parameters (2)
  • Model parameters for the simulation study (H1, H2, lambda12, lambda21, tau) = H1=0.1, H2=0.8, lambda12=1, lambda21=1.5, tau=3 (unimodal), tau=1/4 (bimodal)
    Chosen by hand for Fig. 1 and the classification demonstration; not fitted to data, so they illustrate rather than validate the model.
  • TAMSD segment length w and overlap o = not reported in main text
    The estimation algorithm in Supplemental Section VI requires these; the decay signature and classification depend on them, and no sensitivity analysis is given.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The spectral representation in Eq. (1) defines a well-defined Gaussian MBM conditional on a random H(t), with H(t) independent of the Brownian spectral measure.
    Relies on the MBM existence theory cited in Refs. [27-33], especially Ayache and Taqqu.
  • domain assumption H(t) is stationary and independent of B(t).
    Stated after Eq. (1); ensures self-similarity, Theorem 4.1 of Ref. [30], but excludes ageing dynamics.
  • standard math The smoothed telegraph process has the stationary beta density of Eq. (6) and the ACVF of Eq. (8).
    Derived in Supplemental Section II via Sancho and Shapiro-Loginov and attributed to FitzHugh Ref. [73].
  • domain assumption For FBM and FBMRE, TAMSD scales as Delta^(2H), so a log-log slope estimates the local Hurst exponent.
    Cited to Refs. [77,78]; underlies the estimation algorithm.
  • standard math The self-similarity of the MBM with random exponent is taken from Theorem 4.1 of Ayache and Taqqu.
    Invoked in the closing discussion; part of the mathematical background.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multifractional Brownian motion with telegraphic, stochastically varying exponent." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VUS7IXJ2

@misc{pith2026250414546,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multifractional Brownian motion with telegraphic, stochastically varying exponent},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VUS7IXJ2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14546}
}
read the original abstract

The diversity of diffusive systems exhibiting long-range correlations characterized by a stochastically varying Hurst exponent calls for a generic multifractional model. We present a simple, analytically tractable model which fills the gap between mathematical formulations of multifractional Brownian motion and empirical studies. In our model, called telegraphic multifractional Brownian motion, the Hurst exponent is modelled by a smoothed telegraph process which results in a stationary beta distribution of exponents as observed in biological experiments. We also provide a methodology to identify our model in experimental data and present concrete examples from biology, climate and finance to demonstrate the efficacy of our approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14546 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Single trajectories of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: PDFs of estimated values of the Hurst exponent for (a) unimodal case, (b) bimodal case. The parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) Sample ACVFs as function of the rescaled lag time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Representative shapes of the beta distribution (Eq. (6) in the main text) highlights its flexibility via specific choice of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Sample paths of the OUP with parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Sample paths of MBM with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Sample ACVFs as function of the lag time ∆ for the estimated Hurst exponents from 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Results of the process-distinguishing procedure for electricity price data for different starting points [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Frisch,Turbulence: The Legacy of A.N

    U. Frisch,Turbulence: The Legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov (Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    1995

  2. [2]

    A. N. Kolmogorov, Curves in a Hilbert space invariant with respect to a one-parameter group of motions, C.R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS (NS)26, 6 (1940)

    1940

  3. [3]

    A. N. Kolmogorov, Wienersche Spiralen und einige an- dere interessante Kurven im Hilbertschen raum, C.R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS (NS)26, 115 (1940)

    1940

  4. [4]

    A. M. Yaglom and M. S. Pinsker, Random processes withstationaryincrementsoforder n,Dokl.Acad.Nauk USSR 90, 731 (1953)

    1953

  5. [5]

    A. M. Yaglom, Correlation theory of processes with random stationary nth increments, Matematicheskii Sbornik 79, 141 (1955)

    1955

  6. [6]

    A. M. Yaglom,Correlation theory of stationary and re- lated random functions: Supplementary notes and ref- erences (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    B. B. Mandelbrot and J. W. V. Ness, Fractional Brown- ian Motions, Fractional Noises and Applications, SIAM Review 10, 422 (1968)

    1968

  8. [8]

    Mishura,Stochastic calculus for fractional Brownian motion and related processes(Springer, 2008)

    Y. Mishura,Stochastic calculus for fractional Brownian motion and related processes(Springer, 2008)

    2008

Show all 146 references
  1. [9]

    M. M. Meerschaert and A. Sikorskii,Stochastic mod- els for fractional calculus, Vol. 43 (Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    I. M. Sokolov, Models of anomalous diffusion in crowded environments, Soft Matter8, 9043 (2012)

    2012

  3. [11]

    Höfling and T

    F. Höfling and T. Franosch, Anomalous transport in the crowded world of biological cells, Rep. Prog. Phys.76, 046602 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    Metzler, J

    R. Metzler, J. H. Jeon, A. G. Cherstvy, and E. Barkai, Anomalous diffusion models and their properties: non- stationarity, non-ergodicity, and ageing at the cente- nary of single particle tracking, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 24128 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Doukhan, Stochastic Models for Time Series (Springer, 2018)

    P. Doukhan, Stochastic Models for Time Series (Springer, 2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Struzik, M

    Z. Struzik, M. Dekking, J. Lévy-Véhel, E. Lutton, and C. Tricot, Fractals: Theory and application in engineer- ing, in Chap. Local Effective Hölder Exponent Estima- tion on the Wavelet Transform Maxima Tree(Springer Verlag, 1999) pp. 93–112

    1999

  7. [15]

    Jennane, W

    R. Jennane, W. J. Ohley, S. Majumdar, and G. Lem- ineur, Fractal analysis of bone X-ray tomographic mi- croscopy projections, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20, 443 (2001)

    2001

  8. [16]

    Miville-Deschênes, F

    M.-A. Miville-Deschênes, F. Levrier, and E. Falgarone, On the use of fractional Brownian motion simulations to determine the three-dimensional statistical properties of interstellar gas, Astrophys. J.593, 831 (2003)

    2003

  9. [17]

    Thapa, A

    S. Thapa, A. Wyłomańska, G. Sikora, C. E. Wagner, D. Krapf, H. Kantz, A. V. Chechkin, and R. Met- zler, Leveraging large-deviation statistics to decipher the stochastic properties of measured trajectories, New J. Phys. 23, 013008 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    I. M. Jánosi, A. Padash, J. A. C. Gallas, and H. Kantz, Passive tracer advection in the equatorial pacific region: statistics, correlations and a model of fractional Brow- nian motion, Ocean Sci.18, 307 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Korvin,Fractal Models in the Earth Sciences(Else- vier, New York, 1992)

    G. Korvin,Fractal Models in the Earth Sciences(Else- vier, New York, 1992)

    1992

  12. [20]

    O. Vilk, E. Aghion, R. Nathan, S. Toledo, R. Metzler, and M. Assaf, Classification of anomalous diffusion in animal movement data using power spectral analysis, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55, 334004 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    O. Vilk, E. Aghion, T. Avgar, C. Beta, O. Nagel, A. Sabri, R. Sarfati, D. K. Schwartz, M. Weiss, D. Krapf, et al., Unravelling the origins of anomalous diffusion: from molecules to migrating storks, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033055 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Ernst, M

    D. Ernst, M. Hellmann, J. Köhler, and M. Weiss, Frac- tional Brownian motion in crowded fluids, Soft Matter 8, 4886 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    Krapf, N

    D. Krapf, N. Lukat, E. Marinari, R. Metzler, G. Os- hanin, C. Selhuber-Unkel, A. Squarcini, L. Stadler, M. Weiss, and X. Xu, Spectral content of a single non- Brownian trajectory, Phys. Rev. X9, 011019 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Janušonis, N

    S. Janušonis, N. Detering, R. Metzler, and T. Vojta, Serotonergic axons as fractional brownian motion paths: Insights into the self-organization of regional densities, Front. Comput. Neurosci.14, 56 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Gatheral, T

    J. Gatheral, T. Jaisson, and M. Rosenbaum, Volatility is rough, inCommodities (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2022) pp. 659–690

    2022

  18. [26]

    Lévy-Véhel and R

    J. Lévy-Véhel and R. Peltier, Multifractional Brownian motion: definition and preliminary results, Rapport de recherche de l’INRIA2645 (1995)

    1995

  19. [27]

    Benassi, S

    A. Benassi, S. Jaffard, and D. Roux, Elliptic Gaussian random processes, Rev. Math. Iberoam.13, 19 (1997)

    1997

  20. [28]

    Cohen, From self-similarity to local self-similarity: the estimation problem, inFractals: theory and appli- cations in engineering(Springer, 1999) pp

    S. Cohen, From self-similarity to local self-similarity: the estimation problem, inFractals: theory and appli- cations in engineering(Springer, 1999) pp. 3–16

    1999

  21. [29]

    Ayache, S

    A. Ayache, S. Cohen, and J. L. Véhel, The covariance structure of multifractional Brownian motion, with ap- plication to long range dependence, in2000 IEEE In- ternational Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37100), Vol. 6 (IEEE, 2...

    2000

  22. [30]

    Ayache and M

    A. Ayache and M. S. Taqqu, Multifractional processes with random exponent, Publicacions Matemàtiques49, 459 (2005)

    2005

  23. [31]

    S. A. Stoev and M. S. Taqqu, How rich is the class of multifractional Brownian motions?, Stoc. Proc. Appl. 116, 200 (2006)

    2006

  24. [32]

    Ryvkina, Fractional Brownian Motion with variable Hurst parameter: Definition and properties, J

    J. Ryvkina, Fractional Brownian Motion with variable Hurst parameter: Definition and properties, J. Theor. Probab. 28, 866 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Ayache and P

    A. Ayache and P. R. Bertrand, A process very similar to multifractional Brownian motion, inRecent develop- ments in fractals and related fields(Springer, 2010) pp. 311–326

    2010

  26. [34]

    Bianchi, A

    S. Bianchi, A. Pantanella, and A. Pianese, Modeling stock prices by multifractional Brownian motion: an improved estimation of the pointwise regularity, Quant. Finance 13, 1317 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    Bianchi and A

    S. Bianchi and A. Pianese, Multifractional processes in finance, Risk Decis. Anal.5, 1 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    C. S. Tapiero, O. J. Tapiero, and G. Jumarie, The price of granularity and fractional finance, Risk Decis. Anal. 5, 7 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    Combrexelle, H

    S. Combrexelle, H. Wendt, N. Dobigeon, J.-Y. Tourneret, S. McLaughlin, and P. Abry, Bayesian es- timation of the multifractality parameter for image tex- ture using a whittle approximation, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24, 2540 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Mastalerz-Kodzis, Application of the multifractional Brownian motion process in spatial analyses, Argu- menta Oeconomica Cracoviensia , 83 (2018)

    A. Mastalerz-Kodzis, Application of the multifractional Brownian motion process in spatial analyses, Argu- menta Oeconomica Cracoviensia , 83 (2018). 7

    2018

  31. [39]

    Biol.24, 1905 (2014)

    N.Pawar, C.Donth,andM.Weiss,Anisotropicdiffusion of macromolecules in the contiguous nucleocytoplasmic fluid during eukaryotic cell division, Curr. Biol.24, 1905 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Schweizer, N

    N. Schweizer, N. Pawar, M. Weiss, and H. Maiato, An organelle-exclusion envelope assists mitosis and under- lies distinct molecular crowding in the spindle region, J. Cell Biol. 210, 695 (2015)

    2015

  33. [41]

    Stiehl and M

    O. Stiehl and M. Weiss, Heterogeneity of crowded cel- lular fluids on the meso-and nanoscale, Soft Matter12, 9413 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    C. E. Wagner, B. S. Turner, M. Rubinstein, G. H. McKinley, and K. Ribbeck, A rheological study of the association and dynamics of MUC5ac gels, Biomacro- molecules 18, 3654 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    A. A. Sadoon and Y. Wang, Anomalous, non-Gaussian, viscoelastic, and age-dependent dynamics of histonelike nucleoid-structuring proteins in live Escherichia coli, Phys. Rev. E98, 042411 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    A. G. Cherstvy, O. Nagel, C. Beta, and R. Metzler, Non-Gaussianity, population heterogeneity, and tran- sient superdiffusion in the spreading dynamics of amoe- boid cells, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.20, 23034 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    A. G. Cherstvy, S. Thapa, C. E. Wagner, and R. Met- zler, Non-Gaussian, non-ergodic, and non-Fickian diffu- sion of tracers in mucin hydrogels, Soft Matter15, 2526 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Thapa, N

    S. Thapa, N. Lukat, C. Selhuber-Unkel, A. G. Cherstvy, and R. Metzler, Transient superdiffusion of polydisperse vacuoles in highly motile amoeboid cells, J. Chem. Phys. 150 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Sabri, X

    A. Sabri, X. Xu, D. Krapf, and M. Weiss, Elucidating the origin of heterogeneous anomalous diffusion in the cytoplasm of mammalian cells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 058101 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    D. Han, N. Korabel, R. Chen, M. Johnston, A. Gavrilova, V. J. Allan, S. Fedotov, and T. A. Waigh, Deciphering anomalous heterogeneous intracel- lular transport with neural networks, ELife 9, e52224 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Benelli and M

    R. Benelli and M. Weiss, From sub- to superdiffusion: Fractional Brownian motion of membraneless organelles in early C. elegans embryos, New J. Phys.23, 063072 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    Speckner and M

    K. Speckner and M. Weiss, Single-particle tracking re- veals anti-persistent subdiffusion in cell extracts, En- tropy 23, 892 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Janczura, M

    J. Janczura, M. Balcerek, K. Burnecki, A. Sabri, M.Weiss,andD.Krapf,Identifyingheterogeneousdiffu- sion states in the cytoplasm by a hidden Markov model, New J. Phys.23, 053018 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    H. T. Perkins, V. J. Allan, and T. A. Waigh, Network organisation and the dynamics of tubules in the endo- plasmic reticulum, Sci. Rep.11, 16230 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Korabel, D

    N. Korabel, D. Han, A. Taloni, G. Pagnini, S. Fedotov, V. Allan, and T. A. Waigh, Local analysis of hetero- geneous intracellular transport: Slow and fast moving endosomes, Entropy 23, 958 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    T. A. Waigh and N. Korabel, Heterogeneous anomalous transport in cellular and molecular biology, Rep. Prog. Phys. (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    [56–61], for additional information about the ana- lytical calculations, numerical simulations and the ana- lyzed datasets

    See Supplemental Material at [url], which includes Refs. [56–61], for additional information about the ana- lytical calculations, numerical simulations and the ana- lyzed datasets

  48. [56]

    J. M. Sancho, Stochastic processes driven by dichoto- mous markov noise: Some exact dynamical results, J. Math. Phys. 25, 354 (1984)

    1984

  49. [57]

    formulae of differen- tiation

    V. E. Shapiro and V. M. Loginov, “formulae of differen- tiation” and their use for solving stochastic equations, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl.91, 563 (1978)

    1978

  50. [58]

    A. V. Skorokhod, Stochastic equations for diffusion pro- cesses in a bounded region, Theory of Probability & Its Applications 6, 264 (1961)

    1961

  51. [59]

    Giorno, A

    V. Giorno, A. G. Nobile, and L. Ricciardi, On some diffusion approximations toqueueingsystems, Advances in Applied Probability18, 991 (1986)

    1986

  52. [60]

    A.R.WardandP.W.Glynn,Adiffusionapproximation for a Markovian queue with reneging, Queueing Systems 43, 103 (2003)

    2003

  53. [61]

    M. Balcerek, Python notebook including the simulation and estimation codes,https://github.com/MichalBal cerek/Multifractional-Brownian-motion-with-tel egraphic-stochastically-varying-exponent (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    S. T. Eada, V. Pozdnyakov, and J. Yan, Discretely ob- served Brownian motion governed by telegraph signal process: Estimation and application to finance, Stat. Inference Stoch. Process.28, 1 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    Ratanov, Telegraph Processes with Random Jumps and Complete Market Models, Methodol

    N. Ratanov, Telegraph Processes with Random Jumps and Complete Market Models, Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab. 17, 677 (2015)

    2015

  56. [64]

    López and N

    O. López and N. Ratanov, Option Pricing Driven by a Telegraph Process with Random Jumps, J. Appl. Probab. 49, 838 (2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    A.D.KolesnikandN.Ratanov, Telegraph Processes and Option Pricing (Springer Series in Statistics, 2013)

    2013

  58. [66]

    Paulsson, Models of stochastic gene expression, Phys

    J. Paulsson, Models of stochastic gene expression, Phys. Life Rev. 2, 157 (2005)

    2005

  59. [67]

    L. S. Tsimring, Noise in biology, Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 026601 (2014)

    2014

  60. [68]

    Mizuno, C

    D. Mizuno, C. Tardin, C. F. Schmidt, and F. C. MacK- intosh, Nonequilibrium mechanics of active cytoskeletal networks, Science 315, 370 (2007)

    2007

  61. [69]

    F. C. MacKintosh and A. J. Levine, Nonequilibrium mechanics and dynamics of motor-activated gels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 018104 (2008)

    2008

  62. [70]

    C. P. Brangwynne, G. H. Koenderink, F. C. MacKin- tosh,andD.A.Weitz,Nonequilibriummicrotubulefluc- tuations in a model cytoskeleton, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 118104 (2008)

    2008

  63. [71]

    M. Guo, A. J. Ehrlicher, M. H. Jensen, M. Renz, J. R. Moore, R. D. Goldman, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, F. C. Mackintosh, and D. A. Weitz, Probing the stochastic, motor-driven properties of the cytoplasm using force spectrum microscopy, Cell158, 822 (2014)

    2014

  64. [72]

    Gradziuk, G

    G. Gradziuk, G. Torregrosa, and C. P. Broedersz, Ir- reversibility in linear systems with colored noise, Phys. Rev. E 105, 024118 (2022)

    2022

  65. [73]

    FitzHugh, Statistical properties of the asymmetric random telegraph signal, with applications to single- channel analysis, Mathematical Biosciences 64, 75 (1983)

    R. FitzHugh, Statistical properties of the asymmetric random telegraph signal, with applications to single- channel analysis, Mathematical Biosciences 64, 75 (1983)

    1983

  66. [74]

    Balcerek, K

    M. Balcerek, K. Burnecki, S. Thapa, A. Wyłomańska, and A. Chechkin, Fractional Brownian motion with ran- dom Hurst exponent: accelerating diffusion and persis- tence transitions, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science32, 093114 (2022). 8

    2022

  67. [75]

    Beck, Dynamical foundations of nonextensive statis- tical mechanics, Phys

    C. Beck, Dynamical foundations of nonextensive statis- tical mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 180601 (2001)

    2001

  68. [76]

    C.BeckandE.G.Cohen,Superstatistics,Phys.A:Stat. Mech. Appl. 322, 267 (2003)

    2003

  69. [77]

    Deng and E

    W. Deng and E. Barkai, Ergodic properties of fractional Brownian-Langevin motion, Phys. Rev. E 79, 011112 (2009)

    2009

  70. [78]

    Woszczek, A

    H. Woszczek, A. Wylomanska, and A. Chechkin, Riemann-Liouville fractional Brownian motion with random Hurst exponent, E-print arXiv:2410.11546 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    A. M. G. K. Tank, J. B. Wijngaard, G. P. Kön- nen, R. Böhm, G. Demarée, A. Gocheva, M. Mileta, S. Pashiardis, L. Hejkrlik, C. Kern-Hansen, R. Heino, P. Bessemoulin, G. Müller-Westermeier, M. Tzanakou, S. Szalai, T. Pálsdóttir, D. Fitzgerald, S. Rubin, M. Ca- paldo, M. Maugeri,...

    2002

  72. [80]

    European Climate Assessment & Dataset project web- page, http://www.ecad.eu (2024)

    2024

  73. [81]

    J. M. Wallace and P. V. Hobbs,Atmospheric science: an introductory survey, Vol. 92 (Elsevier, 2006)

    2006

  74. [82]

    ENTSO-E webpage,entsoe.eu (2024)

    2024

  75. [83]

    Massah and H

    M. Massah and H. Kantz, Confidence intervals for time averages in the presence of long-range correlations, a case study on earth surface temperature anomalies, Geophys. Res. Lett.43, 9243 (2016)

    2016

  76. [84]

    I. Wong, M. Gardel, D. Reichman, E. R. Weeks, M. Valentine, A. Bausch, and D. A. Weitz, Anomalous diffusion probes microstructure dynamics of entangled F-actin networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 178101 (2004)

    2004

  77. [85]

    Levin, G

    M. Levin, G. Bel, and Y. Roichman, Measurements and characterization of the dynamics of tracer particles in an actin network, J. Chem. Phys.154, 144901 (2021)

    2021

  78. [86]

    Bianchi and A

    S. Bianchi and A. Pianese, Multifractional properties of stock indices decomposed by filtering their pointwise Hölder regularity, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance11, 567 (2008)

    2008

  79. [87]

    E. F. Fama, Efficient capital markets, J. Finance25, 383 (1970)

    1970

  80. [88]

    B. G. Malkiel, The efficient market hypothesis and its critics, J. Econ. Perspect.17, 59 (2003)

    2003

  81. [89]

    asymmetric paternalism

    C. Camerer, S. Issacharoff, G. Loewenstein, T. O’Donoghue, and M. Rabin, Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151, 1211 (2003)

    2003

  82. [90]

    Muradoglu and N

    G. Muradoglu and N. Harvey, Behavioural finance: the role of psychological factors in financial decisions, Re- view of Behavioural Finance4, 68 (2012)

    2012

  83. [91]

    A. W. Lo, The adaptive markets hypothesis: Market efficiency from an evolutionary perspective, Journal of Portfolio Management, Forthcoming (2004)

    2004

  84. [92]

    A. V. Weigel, B. Simon, M. M. Tamkun, and D. Krapf, Ergodic and nonergodic processes coexist in the plasma membrane as observed by single-molecule tracking, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.108, 6438 (2011)

    2011

  85. [93]

    S. A. Tabei, S. Burov, H. Y. Kim, A. Kuznetsov, T.Huynh, J.Jureller, L.H.Philipson, A.R.Dinner,and N. F. Scherer, Intracellular transport of insulin granules is a subordinated random walk, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.110, 4911 (2013)

    2013

  86. [94]

    B. Wang, S. M. Anthony, S. C. Bae, and S. Granick, Anomalous yet Brownian, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 15160 (2009)

    2009

  87. [95]

    B. Wang, J. Kuo, S. C. Bae, and S. Granick, When Brownian diffusion is not Gaussian, Nat. Mater.11, 481 (2012)

    2012

  88. [96]

    M. V. Chubynsky and G. W. Slater, Diffusing diffusiv- ity: a model for anomalous, yet Brownian, diffusion, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 098302 (2014)

    2014

  89. [97]

    Jain and K

    R. Jain and K. L. Sebastian, Diffusion in a crowded, rearranging environment, J. Phys. Chem. B120, 3988 (2016)

    2016

  90. [98]

    A. V. Chechkin, F. Seno, R. Metzler, and I. M. Sokolov, Brownian yet non-Gaussian diffusion: from superstatis- tics to subordination of diffusing diffusivities, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021002 (2017)

    2017

  91. [99]

    Tyagi and B

    N. Tyagi and B. J. Cherayil, Non-Gaussian Brownian diffusion in dynamically disordered thermal environ- ments, J. Phys. Chem. B121, 7204 (2017)

    2017

  92. [100]

    Lanoiselée, N

    Y. Lanoiselée, N. Moutal, and D. S. Grebenkov, Diffusion-limited reactions in dynamic heterogeneous media, Nat. Commun.9, 4398 (2018)

    2018

  93. [101]

    Sposini, A

    V. Sposini, A. V. Chechkin, F. Seno, G. Pagnini, and R. Metzler, Random diffusivity from stochastic equa- tions: comparison of two models for Brownian yet non- Gaussian diffusion, New J. Phys.20, 043044 (2018)

    2018

  94. [102]

    W. Wang, A. G. Cherstvy, A. V. Chechkin, S. Thapa, F. Seno, X. Liu, and R. Metzler, Fractional Brownian motion with random diffusivity: emerging residual non- ergodicity below the correlation time, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 474001 (2020)

    2020

  95. [103]

    W. Wang, F. Seno, I. M. Sokolov, A. V. Chechkin, and R. Metzler, Unexpected crossovers in correlated random-diffusivity processes, New J. Phys.22, 083041 (2020)

    2020

  96. [104]

    Barkai and S

    E. Barkai and S. Burov, Packets of diffusing particles ex- hibit universal exponential tails, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 060603 (2020)

    2020

  97. [105]

    Pastore, A

    R. Pastore, A. Ciarlo, G. Pesce, F. Greco, and A. Sasso, Rapid Fickian yet non-Gaussian diffusion after subdif- fusion, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 158003 (2021)

    2021

  98. [106]

    J. M. Miotto, S. Pigolotti, A. V. Chechkin, and S. Roldán-Vargas, Length scales in Brownian yet non- Gaussian dynamics, Phys. Rev. X11, 031002 (2021)

    2021

  99. [107]

    Rusciano, R

    F. Rusciano, R. Pastore, and F. Greco, Fickian non- Gaussian diffusion in glass-forming liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 168001 (2022)

    2022

  100. [108]

    Großmann, L

    R. Großmann, L. S. Bort, T. Moldenhawer, M. Stange, S. S. Panah, R. Metzler, and C. Beta, Non-Gaussian displacements in active transport on a carpet of motile cells, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 088301 (2024)

    2024

  101. [109]

    Arutkin and S

    M. Arutkin and S. Reuveni, Doubly stochastic contin- uous time random walk, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L012033 (2024)

    2024

  102. [110]

    Y. Chen, X. Wang, and M. Ge, Lévy-walk-like Langevin dynamics with random parameters, Chaos: An Interdis- ciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science34 (2024)

    2024

  103. [111]

    W. Wang, M. Balcerek, K. Burnecki, A. V. Chechkin, S. Janušonis, J. Ślęzak, T. Vojta, A. Wyłomańska, 9 and R. Metzler, Memory-multi-fractional Brownian mo- tion with continuous correlations, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L032025 (2023)

    2023

  104. [112]

    Ślęzak and R

    J. Ślęzak and R. Metzler, Minimal model of diffusion with time changing Hurst exponent, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56, 35LT01 (2023)

    2023

  105. [113]

    Balcerek, A

    M. Balcerek, A. Wyłomańska, K. Burnecki, R. Metzler, and D. Krapf, Modelling intermittent anomalous diffu- sion with switching fractional Brownian motion, New J. Phys. 25, 103031 (2023)

    2023

  106. [114]

    J. Krog, L. H. Jacobsen, F. W. Lund, D. Wüstner, and M.A.Lomholt,Bayesianmodelselectionwithfractional brownian motion, J. Stat. Mech.2018, 093501 (2018)

    2018

  107. [115]

    Thapa, M

    S. Thapa, M. A. Lomholt, J. Krog, A. G. Cher- stvy, and R. Metzler, Bayesian analysis of single- particle tracking data using the nested-sampling algo- rithm: maximum-likelihood model selection applied to stochastic-diffusivity data, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 29018 (2018)

    2018

  108. [116]

    Thapa, S

    S. Thapa, S. Park, Y. Kim, J. H. Jeon, R. Metzler, and M. A. Lomholt, Bayesian inference of scaled versus fractional Brownian motion, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 55, 194003 (2022)

    2022

  109. [117]

    Muñoz-Gil, G

    G. Muñoz-Gil, G. Volpe, M. A. Garcia-March, E. Aghion, A. Argun, C. B. Hong, T. Bland, S. Bo, J. A. Conejero, N. Firbas, Ò. Garibo i Orts, A. Gentili, Z. Huang, J.-H. Jeon, H. Kabbech, Y. Kim, P. Kowalek, D. Krapf, H. Loch-Olszewska, M. A. Lomholt, J.-B. Masson, P. G. Meyer, S...

    2021

  110. [118]

    Seckler and R

    H. Seckler and R. Metzler, Bayesian deep learning for error estimation in the analysis of anomalous diffusion, Nat. Commun. 13, 6717 (2022)

    2022

  111. [119]

    microscopic density

    H. Seckler, J. Szwabinski, and R. Metzler, Machine- learningsolutionsfortheanalysisofsingle-particlediffu- sion trajectories, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.14, 7910 (2023). Supplemental Material for Multifractional Brownian motion with telegraphic, stochastically varying exponent Micha/...

    2023 arXiv

  112. [120]

    The algorithm depends on the type of the process

    Simulate the trajectory of the process H(t) in times t1,t 2,...,t n. The algorithm depends on the type of the process. Below we present how to simulate the sample trajectory of the smoothed telegraph process

  113. [121]

    (2) in the main text

    GivenH(tk) for k = 1, 2,...,n construct the autocovariance matrix of vector [BH(t1),BH(t2),...,B H(tn)]′, that is Σ = [⟨BH(ti)BH(tj)⟩]1≤i,j≤n, where⟨BH(ti)BH(tj)⟩ is the ACVF of the MBM given in Eq. (2) in the main text

  114. [122]

    decompose matrix Σ to find the lower triangular matrix L, and then   BH(t1) BH(t2)

    Use Cholesky algorithm, i.e. decompose matrix Σ to find the lower triangular matrix L, and then   BH(t1) BH(t2) ... BH(tn)   =L·   Z1 Z2 ... Zn   whereZ1,Z 2,...,Z n are independent identically distributed standard normal random variables. For example, it c...

  115. [123]

    a random number 0 or 1

    First, generate telegraph process HTP (t) in the same times t1,t 2,...,t n: (a) Set current state state = rand(0,1) , i.e. a random number 0 or 1. If a stationary version of the telegraph process is required, choose 0 with probability λ12 λ12+λ21 , and 1 with probability λ21 λ...

  116. [124]

    (4) in the main text

    To obtain smoothed telegraph process: (a) Set H(t1) = rand(B), a random number from stationary STP distribution given by beta distribution in Eq. (4) in the main text. (b) For k = 2, 3,...,n − 1 setH(tk+1) =H(tk) + ∆·HTP (tk)−H(tk) τ . VI. Estimation algorithm Let us consider ...

  117. [125]

    We select a segment length w and an overlapping length o

  118. [126]

    We denote them as Xi,1 N , Xi,2 N ,..., Xi,m N , where m is the total number of segments constructed from the i-th trajectory

    Each sample trajectory Xi N , i = 1, 2...,M is divided into segments of length w with the overlapping length of o points. We denote them as Xi,1 N , Xi,2 N ,..., Xi,m N , where m is the total number of segments constructed from the i-th trajectory

  119. [127]

    The estimated values are denoted as Hi,j, i = 1, 2,...,M , j = 1, 2,...,m

    For each segment Xi,j N we use TAMSD-based approach to estimate the Hurst exponent. The estimated values are denoted as Hi,j, i = 1, 2,...,M , j = 1, 2,...,m . VII. Distinguishing algorithm We consider M random samples of length N , see Eq. (19) for the notation. To discern wh...

  120. [128]

    For each sample trajectory Xi N , i = 1, 2...,M we estimate the Hurst exponents Hi,j, i = 1, 2,...,M , j = 1, 2,...,m , according to the estimation algorithm presented above

  121. [129]

    For each j,k = 1, 2,...,m we estimate the sample ACVF γ(j,k ) = M∑ i=1 ( Hi,j−Hj )( Hi,k−Hk ) , (20) where Hj = 1 M ∑M i=1Hi,j

  122. [130]

    Monday”, “Tuesday

    For fixed j we analyze the function γ(j,k ). More precisely, if for large values of k γ(j,k ) stabilizes at zero level, then the sample trajectories correspond to FBM. On the other hand, if γ(j,k ) stabilizes at some non-zero level, then the sample trajectories correspond to F...

    1955

  123. [131]

    J. M. Sancho, J. Math. Phys. 25, 354 (1984)

    1984

  124. [132]

    V. E. Shapiro and V. M. Loginov, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 91, 563 (1978)

    1978

  125. [133]

    FitzHugh, Mathematical Biosciences 64, 75 (1983)

    R. FitzHugh, Mathematical Biosciences 64, 75 (1983)

    1983

  126. [134]

    A. V. Skorokhod, Theory of Probability & Its Applications 6, 264 (1961)

    1961

  127. [135]

    Giorno, A

    V. Giorno, A. G. Nobile, and L. Ricciardi, Advances in Applied Probability 18, 991 (1986)

    1986

  128. [136]

    A. R. Ward and P. W. Glynn, Queueing Systems 43, 103 (2003)

    2003

  129. [137]

    Python notebook including the simulation and estimation codes,

    M. Balcerek, “Python notebook including the simulation and estimation codes,” https://github.com/MichalBalcerek/ Multifractional-Brownian-motion-with-telegraphic-stochastically-varying-exponent (2024)

    2024

  130. [138]

    A. M. G. K. Tank, J. B. Wijngaard, G. P. K¨ onnen, R. B¨ ohm, G. Demar´ ee, A. Gocheva, M. Mileta, S. Pashiardis, L. Hejkrlik, C. Kern-Hansen, R. Heino, P. Bessemoulin, G. M¨ uller-Westermeier, M. Tzanakou, S. Szalai, T. P´ alsd´ ottir, D. Fitzgerald, S. Rubin, M. Capaldo, M. ...

    2002

  131. [139]

    European Climate Assessment & Dataset project webpage,

    “European Climate Assessment & Dataset project webpage,” http://www.ecad.eu (2024)

    2024

  132. [140]

    Massah and H

    M. Massah and H. Kantz, Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 9243 (2016)

    2016

  133. [141]

    Thapa, A

    S. Thapa, A. Wy/suppress loma´ nska, G. Sikora, C. E. Wagner, D. Krapf, H. Kantz, A. V. Chechkin, and R. Metzler, New J. Phys. 23, 013008 (2021)

    2021

  134. [142]

    Sabri, X

    A. Sabri, X. Xu, D. Krapf, and M. Weiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 058101 (2020)

    2020

  135. [143]

    Balcerek, K

    M. Balcerek, K. Burnecki, S. Thapa, A. Wy/suppress loma´ nska, and A. Chechkin, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 32, 093114 (2022)

    2022

  136. [144]

    C. E. Wagner, B. S. Turner, M. Rubinstein, G. H. McKinley, and K. Ribbeck, Biomacromolecules 18, 3654 (2017)

    2017

  137. [145]

    A. G. Cherstvy, S. Thapa, C. E. Wagner, and R. Metzler, Soft Matter 15, 2526 (2019)

    2019

  138. [146]

    ENTSO-E webpage,

    “ENTSO-E webpage,” entsoe.eu (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.