REVIEW 2 cited by
The Use of Large Language Models (LLM) for Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) in Cybercrime Forums
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) can be used to analyze cyber threat intelligence (CTI) data from cybercrime forums, which contain extensive information and key discussions about emerging cyber threats. However, to date, the level of accuracy and efficiency of LLMs for such critical tasks has yet to be thoroughly evaluated. Hence, this study assesses the performance of an LLM system built on the OpenAI GPT-3.5-turbo model [8] to extract CTI information. To do so, a random sample of more than 700 daily conversations from three cybercrime forums - XSS, Exploit_in, and RAMP - was extracted, and the LLM system was instructed to summarize the conversations and predict 10 key CTI variables, such as whether a large organization and/or a critical infrastructure is being targeted, with only simple human-language instructions. Then, two coders reviewed each conversation and evaluated whether the information extracted by the LLM was accurate. The LLM system performed well, with an average accuracy score of 96.23%, an average precision of 90% and an average recall of 88.2%. Various ways to enhance the model were uncovered, such as the need to help the LLM distinguish between stories and past events, as well as being careful with verb tenses in prompts. Nevertheless, the results of this study highlight the relevance of using LLMs for cyber threat intelligence.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Uncovering Vulnerabilities of LLM-Assisted Cyber Threat Intelligence
LLMs assisting cyber threat intelligence fail mainly due to spurious correlations, contradictory knowledge, and constrained generalization that stem from the threat landscape itself.
-
From Text to Actionable Intelligence: Automating STIX Entity and Relationship Extraction
Fine-tuned LLMs extract STIX entities and relationships from threat reports with per-module F1 scores of 84.4%, 88.5%, 95.5%, and 84.6%, backed by a new 4,011-entity annotated dataset.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.