REVIEW 1 cited by
Disparate Impact in Differential Privacy from Gradient Misalignment
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As machine learning becomes more widespread throughout society, aspects including data privacy and fairness must be carefully considered, and are crucial for deployment in highly regulated industries. Unfortunately, the application of privacy enhancing technologies can worsen unfair tendencies in models. In particular, one of the most widely used techniques for private model training, differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DPSGD), frequently intensifies disparate impact on groups within data. In this work we study the fine-grained causes of unfairness in DPSGD and identify gradient misalignment due to inequitable gradient clipping as the most significant source. This observation leads us to a new method for reducing unfairness by preventing gradient misalignment in DPSGD.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Steps Adaptive Decay DPSGD: Enhancing Performance on Imbalanced Datasets with Differential Privacy with HAM10000
SAD-DPSGD, a step-adaptive decay schedule for noise and clipping in DP-SGD, reports about 1% higher accuracy than Auto-DPSGD on HAM10000 under differential privacy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.