Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 65 references

Advancing Autonomous Racing: A Comprehensive Survey of the RoboRacer (F1TENTH) Platform

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read RoboRacer platform emerges as leading testbed for autonomous driving research.

desk verdict A readable but overclaimed survey of F1TENTH; the descriptive content is fine, the 'comprehensive' label and several citations do not hold up. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.15899 v1 pith:VXZWNMJF submitted 2025-06-18 cs.RO cs.SYeess.SY

Israel Charles , Hossein Maghsoumi , Yaser Fallah This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ROcs.SYeess.SY
keywords AutonomousracingRoboRacerF1TENTHdrivingtestbedSimulation-to-realitygapReinforcementlearningControlalgorithmsBenchmarkdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey argues that the RoboRacer (F1TENTH) platform has become a leading testbed for autonomous driving research by combining a 1/10-scale car with open-source hardware and software, standardized datasets, simulators, and international competitions. The authors' intended conclusion is that the platform accelerates progress in perception, planning, and control for autonomous racing, and that its lessons extend to robotics and full-scale driving. A sympathetic reader should see the paper as a consolidation of the platform's ecosystem, cataloging the hardware, software, benchmarks, datasets, and competitions that make results comparable across labs. The significance claim is the pith: if the platform is as central as the survey contends, it becomes a shared proving ground where algorithms can be tested, replicated, and improved by a wide community.

What carries the argument

The central object is the RoboRacer (F1TENTH) platform itself: a typically 1/10-scale autonomous vehicle with modular, open-source hardware and software. Its load-bearing components are the NVIDIA Jetson onboard computer, 2D LiDAR and camera/IMU sensing, the ROS software stack, and a simulation ecosystem including F1TENTH Gym, Gazebo, and CARLA that supports staged development from virtual to physical testing. What this machinery does is convert an otherwise idiosyncratic research setup into a standardized testbed, so that same chassis, sensors, maps, shared datasets, and recurring competitions allow algorithms to be compared, replicated, and refined across the community.

What would settle it

A direct test would deploy a perception or control policy trained on RoboRacer hardware or simulators onto a full-scale vehicle at comparable speed and see whether it transfers without major re-tuning. A cheaper bibliometric test would count how many advances in full-scale autonomous driving cite RoboRacer-derived results as their source; if that count is near zero, the claimed bridge role is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that RoboRacer (F1TENTH) is a versatile and widely adopted framework for accelerating autonomous driving research, not just a hobbyist car. The authors ground this in the platform's modular architecture, its pairing of a Traxxas Slash chassis with LiDAR, camera, IMU, and an NVIDIA Jetson computer running ROS, and its ecosystem of simulators, LiDAR and vision datasets, trajectory datasets, and standardized algorithms. They survey classical controllers (PID, Pure Pursuit, Stanley), learning-based methods (RL, RNN/LSTM), MPC, and Follow-the-Gap, and they catalog the conferences hosting RoboRacer competitions. The intended discovery is that this combination of reproducibility, low cost, and community competition makes the platform a bridge between simulation and real-world deployment.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on two unstated premises, that the surveyed works are representative of the field and that results from a 1/10-scale platform transfer to full-scale vehicles; if either fails, the platform's broader significance weakens.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Standardized RoboRacer datasets and benchmarks let researchers compare lap times, trajectory fidelity, and collision rates across labs, which speeds up algorithm development.
  • The platform's simulator-to-real workflow gives reinforcement learning and control researchers a safe place to iterate before hardware deployment.
  • Competitions at major robotics and intelligent-transportation conferences create repeatable head-to-head tests of perception, planning, and control at the limits of handling.
  • The modular open-source design lowers the cost of entry for research labs and classrooms, so more groups can participate in autonomous driving research.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that if the RoboRacer community standardizes its benchmarks further, the platform could become for high-speed autonomous racing what urban driving datasets are for perception research, a default comparison point.
  • The survey's emphasis on community resources suggests the platform's main contribution may be organizational, shared maps, datasets, and events, rather than any single algorithm, and future work could quantify that contribution.
  • A natural extension the paper does not state is a scaling study measuring how much of the Sim2Real gap remains when a RoboRacer-trained policy is deployed on a full-scale vehicle with comparable dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a survey of the RoboRacer (F1TENTH) platform, a 1/10th-scale autonomous racing testbed. It reviews the platform's hardware and software architecture, simulation environments, sim-to-real transfer strategies, datasets and research resources, control algorithms, and global competitions. The paper presents several comparison tables (platforms, simulators, control algorithms, competitions) and concludes that RoboRacer is a vital resource for autonomous racing and robotics research. No new experiments or derivations are presented; the contribution is intended to be a comprehensive synthesis of existing work.

Significance. If the survey's claims were fully supported, this would be a useful entry point for researchers new to the F1TENTH/RoboRacer ecosystem, particularly for its structured comparison of hardware, simulators, and competitions. The authors correctly identify the platform's modularity, open-source community, and role in education. However, the central claim of being 'comprehensive' is not backed by an explicit literature selection methodology, and several key claims are supported by references that are not about the F1TENTH platform or autonomous racing at all. The descriptive material on the platform itself appears largely accurate, and the competition table is informative; yet the evidence base for the survey's analytical statements—especially in the sim-to-real and datasets sections—does not meet the standard expected of a comprehensive review. The incremental contribution over the prior F1TENTH survey (ref. [17]) is not clearly delineated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V (Sim2Real), first paragraph] The sentence 'Artificial intelligence plays an increasingly vital role in enabling robust transfer from simulation to reality [33], [34]' is not supported by the cited references: [33] is a wireless-sensor-network indoor lighting paper and [34] is a video motion search algorithm paper, neither of which discusses sim-to-real transfer or autonomous racing. This is a load-bearing citation error because the stated role of AI in sim-to-real is a central theme of the section. The authors should either replace these citations with relevant works on domain randomization/adaptation for F1TENTH or hedge the claim to match the available evidence. A similar check is needed at Section II.A, where [13] (a recurrent neural network control paper) is cited for 'multi-agent competitive dynamics'; that reference does not support the claim.
  2. [Title, Abstract, Section IX (Conclusion)] The manuscript calls itself 'comprehensive' but provides no literature search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, database list, or time window for the survey. Without a documented selection process, 'comprehensive' is an unsupported assertion, and the conclusion that RoboRacer's significance is demonstrated by the survey does not follow. Additionally, the relationship to the existing survey by Evans et al. (ref. [17]) is not discussed; the authors should state what this survey adds beyond [17] (e.g., updated competition list, new datasets, different scope) and support any uniqueness claim.
  3. [Section VI (Research Resources), paragraphs A and B] The datasets section inflates the evidence base with unrelated references. Section VI opens with 'Datasets are critical... [38]' where [38] is a lane-detection dataset survey for general autonomous driving, not F1TENTH. In paragraph B, the claim that hosted vision resources 'provide a quick start for vision-based research [46], [47], [48]' cites a motion detection paper, a lane detection preprocessing paper, and another motion detection paper, none of which are F1TENTH datasets or RoboRacer resources. These references create the impression of a rich F1TENTH dataset ecosystem that the cited sources do not actually establish. The authors should replace them with actual F1TENTH community resources or retract the specific claims.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II.B, paragraph 1] There is a typo: 'Each competitions offers' should be 'Each competition offers'.
  2. [Reference [51]] Reference [51] for the TUM global trajectory optimization tool points to the GitHub URL 'https://github.com/HyberionBrew/f110 datasets', which appears to be the same repository as refs. [49]/[50] (the F1TENTH dataset) rather than a distinct global planning tool; please verify the URL and correct the reference.
  3. [Section VI.A and Figure 1] The text in Section VI.A refers to 'Fig. 1' for track maps, but Figure 1 appears later in Section VII; either move the figure to its first citation or adjust the reference.
  4. [Table I and Reference [2]] The table lists 'Roborace' with reference [2], which is a 2004 paper about a different, unrelated contest; clarify the naming to avoid confusion with the RoboRacer (F1TENTH) platform.
  5. [Abstract and Section I] The claim that F1TENTH was 'recently rebranded as RoboRacer' is stated without a citation; a source or a date for the rebranding would help readers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the survey makes no derivation, and its claims do not reduce to self-cited inputs.

full rationale

This is a survey paper with no formal derivation, fitted parameters, or prediction loop. Its central claim that RoboRacer/F1TENTH is a significant autonomous-racing testbed is supported by descriptive summaries of hardware, simulators, datasets, controllers, and competitions, and by references to external work such as F1TENTH Gym [20], CARLA [25], Learn-to-Race [31], and the prior unifying survey [17]. There is no equation in which an output quantity is defined in terms of itself, and no parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then relabeled as a prediction. The self-citations that appear (e.g., [1], [12], [33], [34], [38], [46], [48]) are not used to justify a derived result; at worst they are questionable or irrelevant support for background claims, which is a citation-quality or correctness concern rather than circularity. The conclusion is an evaluative summary, not a forced consequence of a self-referential argument. No circular step can be exhibited by quote and reduction, so the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on the representativeness of its literature sample and the transferability of small-scale results to full-scale vehicles. Neither premise is argued for; they are assumed implicitly. There are no free parameters or invented entities because the paper is a survey.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The surveyed literature is representative of the field of RoboRacer research.
    The paper selects references without a stated systematic process (Section VI) yet draws broad conclusions about the platform's significance from this sample.
  • domain assumption Results from 1/10th-scale F1TENTH experiments transfer to full-scale autonomous driving.
    The conclusion positions RoboRacer as driving forward autonomous racing and robotics, implying transferability that the paper does not establish.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Advancing Autonomous Racing: A Comprehensive Survey of the RoboRacer (F1TENTH) Platform." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VXZWNMJF

@misc{pith2026250615899,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Advancing Autonomous Racing: A Comprehensive Survey of the RoboRacer (F1TENTH) Platform},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VXZWNMJF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.15899}
}
read the original abstract

The RoboRacer (F1TENTH) platform has emerged as a leading testbed for advancing autonomous driving research, offering a scalable, cost-effective, and community-driven environment for experimentation. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the platform, analyzing its modular hardware and software architecture, diverse research applications, and role in autonomous systems education. We examine critical aspects such as bridging the simulation-to-reality (Sim2Real) gap, integration with simulation environments, and the availability of standardized datasets and benchmarks. Furthermore, the survey highlights advancements in perception, planning, and control algorithms, as well as insights from global competitions and collaborative research efforts. By consolidating these contributions, this study positions RoboRacer as a versatile framework for accelerating innovation and bridging the gap between theoretical research and real-world deployment. The findings underscore the platform's significance in driving forward developments in autonomous racing and robotics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.15899 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Collage of F1Tenth (RoboRacer) Track Maps. Locations: (A) Spielberg, Austria; (B) Yas Marina, Abu Dhabi, UAE; (C) Zandvoort, Netherlands; (D) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [17]

    Unifying f1tenth autonomous racing: Survey, methods and benchmarks,

    Benjamin David Evans, Raphael Trumpp, Marco Caccamo, Felix Jah- ncke, Johannes Betz, Hendrik Willem Jordaan, and Herman Arnold Engelbrecht, “Unifying f1tenth autonomous racing: Survey, methods and benchmarks,” 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [33]

    Scalable multipurpose smart indoor lighting system for wireless sensor networks,

    A. Seyedolhoseini, R. Nemati, H. Maghousmi, S. Karimian, and N. Ma- soumi, “Scalable multipurpose smart indoor lighting system for wireless sensor networks,” in2021 29th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), 2021, pp. 182–186

    work page 2021

  3. [34]

    Unequal- arm adaptive rood pattern search (uarps) algorithm with accurate initial points,

    Hadi Amirpour, Hossein Maghsoumi, and Amir Mousavinia, “Unequal- arm adaptive rood pattern search (uarps) algorithm with accurate initial points,” in2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technol- ogy (ICIT), 2015, pp. 1786–1790

    work page 2015

  4. [13]

    On recurrent neural networks for learning-based control: recent results and ideas for future developments,

    Fabio Bonassi, Marcello Farina, Jing Xie, and Riccardo Scattolini, “On recurrent neural networks for learning-based control: recent results and ideas for future developments,”Journal of Process Control, vol. 114, pp. 92–104, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [38]

    Lane detection and tracking datasets: Efficient investigation and new mea- surement by a novel “dataset scenario detector

    Hossein Maghsoumi, Nasser Masoumi, and Babak Nadjar Araabi, “Lane detection and tracking datasets: Efficient investigation and new mea- surement by a novel “dataset scenario detector” application,”IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 73, pp. 1–16, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [46]

    An im- proved motion detection algorithm using vibe,

    Ehsan Mahoor, Hossein Maghsoumi, and Davud Asemani, “An im- proved motion detection algorithm using vibe,” in2015 6th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technolo- gies (ICCCNT), 2015, pp. 1–5

    work page 2015

  7. [47]

    Preprocessing Methods of Lane Detection and Tracking for Autonomous Driving

    Akram Heidarizadeh, “Preprocessing methods of lane detection and tracking for autonomous driving,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.04755, 2021

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  8. [48]

    An efficient adaptive algorithm for motion detection,

    Hossein Maghsoumi, Davud Asemani, and Hadi Amirpour, “An efficient adaptive algorithm for motion detection,” in2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), 2015, pp. 1630–1634

    work page 2015

Show all 65 references
  1. [1]

    Roadsave: A robust lane detection method based on validity borrowing from reliable lines,

    Hossein Maghsoumi, Nasser Masoumi, and Babak Nadjar Araabi, “Roadsave: A robust lane detection method based on validity borrowing from reliable lines,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 14571– 14582, 2023

    2023

  2. [2]

    The roborace contest,

    J.M. Rieber, H. Wehlan, and F. Allgower, “The roborace contest,”IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 57–60, 2004

    2004

  3. [3]

    Au- tonomous vehicles on the edge: A survey on autonomous vehicle racing,

    Johannes Betz, Hongrui Zheng, Alexander Liniger, Ugo Rosolia, Phillip Karle, Madhur Behl, Venkat Krovi, and Rahul Mangharam, “Au- tonomous vehicles on the edge: A survey on autonomous vehicle racing,” IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 3, pp. 458–488, 2022

    2022

  4. [4]

    Indy autonomous challenge - autonomous race cars at the handling limits,

    Alexander Wischnewski, Maximilian Geisslinger, Johannes Betz, To- bias Betz, Felix Fent, Alexander Heilmeier, Leonhard Hermansdorfer, Thomas Herrmann, Sebastian Huch, Phillip Karle, Felix Nobis, Levent ¨Ogretmen, Matthias Rowold, Florian Sauerbeck, Tim Stahl, Rainer Trauth, Ma...

    2021

  5. [5]

    Robust environment perception for the audi autonomous driving cup,

    Florian Kuhnt, Micha Pfeiffer, Peter Zimmer, David Zimmerer, Jan- Markus Gomer, Vitali Kaiser, Ralf Kohlhaas, and J. Marius Z ¨ollner, “Robust environment perception for the audi autonomous driving cup,” in2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transporta- tion...

    2016

  6. [6]

    Duckietown: An open, inexpensive and flexible platform for autonomy education and research,

    Liam Paull, Jacopo Tani, Heejin Ahn, Javier Alonso-Mora, Luca Car- lone, Michal Cap, Yu Fan Chen, Changhyun Choi, Jeff Dusek, Yajun Fang, Daniel Hoehener, Shih-Yuan Liu, Michael Novitzky, Igor Franzoni Okuyama, Jason Pazis, Guy Rosman, Valerio Varricchio, Hsueh-Cheng Wang, Dmi...

    2017

  7. [7]

    Jetracer,

    NVIDIA AI-IOT Community, “Jetracer,” https://github.com/ NVIDIA-AI-IOT/jetracer

  8. [8]

    Self-driving scale car trained by deep reinforcement learning,

    Qi Zhang, Tao Du, and Changzheng Tian, “Self-driving scale car trained by deep reinforcement learning,” 2019

    2019

  9. [9]

    Roboracer (f1tenth),

    F1TENTH Community, “Roboracer (f1tenth),” https://roboracer.ai

  10. [10]

    Abu dhabi autonomous racing league (a2rl),

    A2RL Community, “Abu dhabi autonomous racing league (a2rl),” https: //a2rl.io/

  11. [11]

    Formula driverless,

    FSD Community, “Formula driverless,” https://www.formula-ata.it/ formula-driverless/

  12. [12]

    Openconvoy: Universal platform for real-world testing of cooperative driving systems,

    Owen Burns, Hossein Maghsoumi, Israel Charles, and Yaser Fallah, “Openconvoy: Universal platform for real-world testing of cooperative driving systems,” in2024 IEEE 100th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2024-Fall), 2024, pp. 1–7

    2024

  13. [14]

    Building the f1tenth car,

    F1TENTH Community, “Building the f1tenth car,” https://roboracer.ai/ build.html

  14. [15]

    Introduction to ros, f110 & the simulator,

    F1TENTH Community, “Introduction to ros, f110 & the simulator,” https://roboracer.ai/learn.html

  15. [16]

    F1tenth: Enhancing autonomous systems education through hands-on learning and competition,

    Johannes Betz, Hongrui Zheng, Felix Jahncke, Zirui Zang, Florian Sauerbeck, Y . Rosa Zheng, Joydeep Biswas, Venkat Krovi, and Rahul Mangharam, “F1tenth: Enhancing autonomous systems education through hands-on learning and competition,”IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles,...

    2024

  16. [18]

    F1tenth resources,

    Boston University F1TENTH Community, “F1tenth resources,” https: //bu2024-race.f1tenth.org/f1tenth\ ressources.html

  17. [19]

    F1tenth@ucf,

    University of Central Florida F1TENTH Community, “F1tenth@ucf,” https://f1tenth.cecs.ucf.edu/

  18. [20]

    F1tenth: An open-source evaluation environment for continuous control and reinforcement learning,

    Matthew O’Kelly, Hongrui Zheng, Dhruv Karthik, and Rahul Mang- haram, “F1tenth: An open-source evaluation environment for continuous control and reinforcement learning,” inProceedings of the NeurIPS 2019 Competition and Demonstration Track, Hugo Jair Escalante and Raia Hadsell...

    2019

  19. [21]

    F1tenth gym documentation,

    F1TENTH Community, “F1tenth gym documentation,” https:// f1tenth-gym.readthedocs.io/en/main/

  20. [22]

    F1tenth gym ros,

    F1TENTH Community, “F1tenth gym ros,” https://github.com/f1tenth/ f1tenth\ gym\ ros

  21. [23]

    Autodrive simulator: A simulator for scaled autonomous vehicle research and education,

    Tanmay Vilas Samak, Chinmay Vilas Samak, and Ming Xie, “Autodrive simulator: A simulator for scaled autonomous vehicle research and education,” inProceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Control, Robotics and Intelligent System, New York, NY , USA, 2021, CCRIS ’...

    2021

  22. [24]

    Autodrive ecosystem,

    Tinker Twins, “Autodrive ecosystem,” https://autodrive-ecosystem. github.io/

  23. [25]

    CARLA: An open urban driving simulator,

    Alexey Dosovitskiy, German Ros, Felipe Codevilla, Antonio Lopez, and Vladlen Koltun, “CARLA: An open urban driving simulator,” in Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2017, pp. 1–16

    2017

  24. [26]

    Carla Community, “Carla,” https://carla.org/

  25. [27]

    Awsim document,

    AWSIM Community, “Awsim document,” https://tier4.github.io/ AWSIM/

  26. [28]

    Awsim: End-to-end digital twin simulation platform,

    Wojciech Jaworski Samet Kutuk, Piotr Zyskowski, “Awsim: End-to-end digital twin simulation platform,” https://autoware.org/ awsim-end-to-end-digital-twin-simulation-platform/, 2023

    2023

  27. [29]

    Gazebo Community, “Gazebo,” https://gazebosim.org/home

  28. [30]

    Lgsvl simulator: A high fidelity simulator for autonomous driving,

    Guodong Rong, Byung Hyun Shin, Hadi Tabatabaee, Qiang Lu, Steve Lemke, M ¯artin ¸ˇs Mo ˇzeiko, Eric Boise, Geehoon Uhm, Mark Gerow, Shalin Mehta, Eugene Agafonov, Tae Hyung Kim, Eric Sterner, Keunhae Ushiroda, Michael Reyes, Dmitry Zelenkovsky, and Seonman Kim, “Lgsvl simulato...

    2020

  29. [31]

    Learn-to-race: A multimodal control environment for autonomous racing,

    James Herman, Jonathan Francis, Siddha Ganju, Bingqing Chen, Anirudh Koul, Abhinav Gupta, Alexey Skabelkin, Ivan Zhukov, Max Kumskoy, and Eric Nyberg, “Learn-to-race: A multimodal control environment for autonomous racing,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conferenc...

    2021

  30. [32]

    Learn-to-race challenge 2022: Bench- marking safe learning and cross-domain generalisation in autonomous racing,

    Jonathan Francis, Bingqing Chen, Siddha Ganju, Sidharth Kathpal, Jyotish Poonganam, Ayush Shivani, Sahika Genc, Ivan Zhukov, Max Kumskoy, Anirudh Koul, et al., “Learn-to-race challenge 2022: Bench- marking safe learning and cross-domain generalisation in autonomous racing,”arX...

    2022 arXiv

  31. [35]

    Bypassing the simulation-to-reality gap: Online reinforcement learning using a su- pervisor,

    Benjamin David Evans, Johannes Betz, Hongrui Zheng, Herman A. Engelbrecht, Rahul Mangharam, and Hendrik W. Jordaan, “Bypassing the simulation-to-reality gap: Online reinforcement learning using a su- pervisor,” in2023 21st International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), ...

    2023

  32. [36]

    Understanding domain randomization for sim-to-real transfer,

    Xiaoyu Chen, Jiachen Hu, Chi Jin, Lihong Li, and Liwei Wang, “Understanding domain randomization for sim-to-real transfer,” 2022

    2022

  33. [37]

    Domain adaptation for semantic segmentation of autonomous driving with contrastive learning,

    Qiuyue Li, Shichun Yang, Mohan Xu, Bingtao Ren, Xiaoyu Yan, and Fan Zhou, “Domain adaptation for semantic segmentation of autonomous driving with contrastive learning,” in2024 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), 2024, pp. 1–8

    2024

  34. [39]

    F1tenth racetracks,

    F1Tenth Community, “F1tenth racetracks,” https://github.com/f1tenth/ f1tenth\ racetracks

  35. [40]

    F1tenth simulator - maps,

    F1Tenth Community, “F1tenth simulator - maps,” https://github.com/ f1tenth/f1tenth\ simulator/tree/master/maps

  36. [41]

    Tinylidarnet,

    Mohammed Misbah Zarrar, Qitao Weng, Bakhbyergyen Yerjan, Ah- met Soyyigit, and Heechul Yun, “Tinylidarnet,” https://github.com/ zarrar1607/TinyLidarNet

  37. [42]

    Tinylidarnet: 2d lidar-based end-to-end deep learning model for f1tenth autonomous racing,

    Mohammed Misbah Zarrar, Qitao Weng, Bakhbyergyen Yerjan, Ahmet Soyyigit, and Heechul Yun, “Tinylidarnet: 2d lidar-based end-to-end deep learning model for f1tenth autonomous racing,” in2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2024, pp. 2878–2884

    2024

  38. [43]

    Lab 8: Vision lab,

    F1Tenth Community, “Lab 8: Vision lab,” https://github.com/f1tenth/ f1tenth\ lab8\ template

  39. [44]

    Top f1tenth datasets,

    F1Tenth Community, “Top f1tenth datasets,” https://universe.roboflow. com/browse/robotics/f1tenth

  40. [45]

    Robotics: F1tenth,

    F1Tenth Community, “Robotics: F1tenth,” https://universe.roboflow. com/search?q=like-tag:robotics%2Ff1tenth

  41. [49]

    F1tenth orl dataset,

    Fabian Kresse, “F1tenth orl dataset,” https://github.com/HyberionBrew/ f1tenth\ orl\ dataset

  42. [50]

    F1tenth dataset,

    Fabian Kresse, “F1tenth dataset,” https://github.com/HyberionBrew/ f110\ datasets

  43. [51]

    Global racetrajectory optimization,

    TUMFTM, “Global racetrajectory optimization,” https://github.com/ HyberionBrew/f110\ datasets

  44. [52]

    F1tenth benchmarks,

    Benjamin David Evans, Raphael Trumpp, Marco Caccamo, Felix Jah- ncke, Johannes Betz, Hendrik Willem Jordaan, and Herman Arnold En- gelbrecht, “F1tenth benchmarks,” https://github.com/BDEvan5/f1tenth\ benchmarks

  45. [53]

    F1tenth coursekit: Wall following lab,

    F1Tenth Development Team, “F1tenth coursekit: Wall following lab,” https://f1tenth-coursekit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/assignments/labs/ lab3.html

  46. [54]

    F1tenth coursekit: Pure pursuit lab,

    F1Tenth Development Team, “F1tenth coursekit: Pure pursuit lab,” https://f1tenth-coursekit.readthedocs.io/en/stable/lectures/ModuleD/ lecture13.html

  47. [55]

    Autonomous automobile trajectory tracking for off- road driving: Controller design, experimental validation and racing,

    Gabriel M Hoffmann, Claire J Tomlin, Michael Montemerlo, and Sebastian Thrun, “Autonomous automobile trajectory tracking for off- road driving: Controller design, experimental validation and racing,” in 2007 American control conference. IEEE, 2007, pp. 2296–2301

    2007

  48. [56]

    Ppo rl agent for f1tenth racing github,

    Matthew O’Kelly, Hongrui Zheng, Dhruv Karthik, and Rahul Mang- haram, “Ppo rl agent for f1tenth racing github,” https://github.com/ meraccos/f1tenth\ reinforcement\ learning

  49. [57]

    F1tenth coursekit: Model predic- tive control,

    F1Tenth Development Team, “F1tenth coursekit: Model predic- tive control,” https://f1tenth-coursekit.readthedocs.io/en/stable/lectures/ ModuleF/lecture21.html

  50. [58]

    F1tenth coursekit: Follow-the-gap lab,

    F1Tenth Development Team, “F1tenth coursekit: Follow-the-gap lab,” https://f1tenth-coursekit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/assignments/labs/ lab4.html

  51. [59]

    15th f1tenth autonomous grand prix,

    F1TENTH Community, “15th f1tenth autonomous grand prix,” https: //icra2024-race.f1tenth.org/

  52. [60]

    22nd f1tenth autonomous grand prix,

    F1TENTH Community, “22nd f1tenth autonomous grand prix,” https: //cdc2024-race.f1tenth.org

  53. [61]

    20th f1tenth autonomous grand prix,

    F1TENTH Community, “20th f1tenth autonomous grand prix,” https: //itsc2024-race.f1tenth.org

  54. [62]

    Ieee iv 2024 call for participation: F1tenth autonomous racing competition,

    F1TENTH Community, “Ieee iv 2024 call for participation: F1tenth autonomous racing competition,” https://ieee-itss.org/ ieee-iv-2024-call-for-participation-f1tenth-autonomous-racing-competition

    2024

  55. [63]

    19th f1tenth autonomous grand prix,

    F1TENTH Community, “19th f1tenth autonomous grand prix,” https: //ieeesm.org/f1tenth-competition/

  56. [64]

    21st f1tenth autonomous grand prix,

    F1TENTH Community, “21st f1tenth autonomous grand prix,” https: //iros2024-race.f1tenth.org/

  57. [65]

    17th f1tenth autonomous grand prix,

    F1TENTH Community, “17th f1tenth autonomous grand prix,” https: //cpsweek2024-race.f1tenth.org/

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.