pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.08012 · v2 · pith:W46P6R4Dnew · submitted 2024-11-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.stat-mech· physics.bio-ph

Non-equilibrium phase transitions in hybrid Voronoi models of cell colonies

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 17:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-ph
keywords Voronoi modelcell coloniesnon-equilibrium phase transitionsnuclear compressibilitymotility-induced phase separationmesenchymal transitionsteric repulsionself-propelled cells
0
0 comments X

The pith

Adding short-range repulsions for nuclear compressibility to the self-propelled Voronoi model produces multiple non-equilibrium phase transitions controlled by nucleus size.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how a stiff nucleus affects collective cell behavior in a model of cell colonies. It adds short-range repulsive forces to the standard Voronoi tessellation to represent nuclear and cellular compressibility, then shows that these forces compete with the vertex interactions that stand for cell-cell adhesion and cytoskeleton effects. This competition produces transitions among motility-induced phase separation, mesenchymal-like states, and disordered confluent configurations. Adjusting the effective size or compressibility of the nucleus moves the system across these phase boundaries, reproducing trends seen in experiments.

Core claim

In the hybrid Voronoi model, steric repulsions representing nuclear compressibility compete with vertex interactions that mimic adhesion and cytoskeletal organization; the resulting non-equilibrium dynamics yield phase transitions from motility-induced phase separation through mesenchymal-like phases to disordered confluent states, with nucleus effective size providing an independent control parameter that crosses phase boundaries in agreement with experimental observations.

What carries the argument

Hybrid self-propelled Voronoi model with added short-range repulsive forces that encode nuclear compressibility.

If this is right

  • Cells with larger or stiffer nuclei remain in confluent disordered states over wider ranges of motility and adhesion parameters.
  • Lowering nuclear compressibility allows the system to enter mesenchymal-like phases even at moderate adhesion strengths.
  • The same repulsion term suppresses motility-induced phase separation when nucleus size is increased.
  • Phase diagrams in the space of repulsion strength, motility, and adhesion strength contain at least three distinct non-equilibrium regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Nuclear mechanics could serve as a tunable handle in tissue engineering to steer collective cell migration without altering adhesion molecules.
  • The model suggests that nuclear size variation within a single tissue could create spatial heterogeneity in cell packing and motility.
  • If the repulsion term is made dependent on local cell density, the transitions might sharpen into first-order lines rather than crossovers.

Load-bearing premise

The short-range repulsive forces added to the Voronoi tessellation accurately capture the quantitative effects of nuclear compressibility without needing extra subcellular details or direct experimental calibration.

What would settle it

Measure the phase boundary locations in cell colonies while varying nuclear size or stiffness (for example via lamin mutations) and check whether the observed shifts match the locations predicted by changing the repulsion strength in the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08012 by Giancarlo Ruocco, Matteo Paoluzzi, Mattia Miotto.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Eukaryotic cells are characterized by a stiff nucleus whose effect in modeling the collective behavior of cell aggregates is usually underestimated. However, increasing experimental evidence links nuclear modifications with phenotypic transition, like the one between epithelial and mesenchymal states. In this work, we explore the effect of short-range repulsive forces in the non-equilibrium dynamics of the self-propelled Voronoi model. We show that the competition between steric repulsions (representing nuclear/cellular compressibility) and Vertex interactions (mimicking cell-cell adhesion/interaction and cytoskeleton organization) generate a variety of non-equilibrium phase transitions from Motility-Induced Phase Separation to mesenchymal-like phases up to disordered confluent configurations. Notably, we found that tuning the nucleus's effective size/compressibility provides an additional way to cross the boundary between the different possible phases in line with experimental observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a hybrid self-propelled Voronoi model augmented with short-range repulsive forces intended to represent nuclear/cellular compressibility. It claims that competition between these repulsions and standard vertex interactions produces a sequence of non-equilibrium phase transitions, from motility-induced phase separation through mesenchymal-like states to disordered confluent configurations, and that varying the effective nuclear size or compressibility provides an additional control parameter that crosses these boundaries in a manner consistent with experimental observations on nuclear modifications during epithelial-mesenchymal transitions.

Significance. If the mapping from the added repulsion to nuclear mechanics can be placed on a quantitative footing and the phase boundaries shown to be robust, the work would supply a computationally tractable way to incorporate nuclear stiffness into vertex-based models of cell colonies and would identify nuclear compressibility as a tunable parameter for collective transitions. The simulation framework itself appears straightforward to implement and could be useful for exploring parameter space once calibrated.

major comments (1)
  1. [Model definition and results (abstract and main text)] The central claim that tuning the nucleus's effective size/compressibility crosses phase boundaries 'in line with experimental observations' rests on an uncalibrated identification of the short-range repulsive term with nuclear compressibility. No derivation relating the repulsion amplitude or range to measured nuclear Young's modulus, lamin stiffness, or nuclear volume data is supplied, nor are simulated transition loci compared quantitatively to experimental parameter ranges for EMT-related nuclear changes. This mapping is load-bearing for the biological interpretation but remains an assumption without supporting evidence or sensitivity analysis.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'a variety of non-equilibrium phase transitions' are generated but provides no quantitative metrics (order parameters, transition loci, error bars, or system-size dependence) that would allow a reader to assess robustness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major concern regarding the mapping of the repulsive term to nuclear compressibility below, clarifying the phenomenological nature of the model while agreeing that additional discussion is needed.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim that tuning the nucleus's effective size/compressibility crosses phase boundaries 'in line with experimental observations' rests on an uncalibrated identification of the short-range repulsive term with nuclear compressibility. No derivation relating the repulsion amplitude or range to measured nuclear Young's modulus, lamin stiffness, or nuclear volume data is supplied, nor are simulated transition loci compared quantitatively to experimental parameter ranges for EMT-related nuclear changes. This mapping is load-bearing for the biological interpretation but remains an assumption without supporting evidence or sensitivity analysis.

    Authors: We agree that the identification of the short-range repulsion with nuclear compressibility is phenomenological rather than derived from a first-principles mapping to Young's modulus or lamin stiffness. The term is introduced as a minimal representation of nuclear excluded volume and stiffness within the hybrid Voronoi framework, motivated by the established role of nuclear mechanics in cell aggregates. The central result is that varying the effective nuclear size and repulsion strength provides an additional control parameter that induces the reported sequence of non-equilibrium transitions; the statement that this occurs 'in line with experimental observations' refers to the qualitative direction of EMT-related nuclear changes (e.g., softening or volume alteration facilitating mesenchymal states), not a quantitative match. We have performed extensive parameter sweeps on repulsion amplitude and range that demonstrate robustness of the phase boundaries, but we acknowledge the absence of direct quantitative comparison to experimental nuclear parameter ranges. In the revised manuscript we will add an expanded discussion section that (i) explicitly states the phenomenological character of the mapping, (ii) includes sensitivity analysis on the repulsion parameters with the resulting phase diagrams, and (iii) places the chosen parameter values in the context of available literature values for nuclear stiffness, while noting the limitations and the need for future calibration. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; phases emerge from explicit simulation of added model terms

full rationale

The paper defines a hybrid self-propelled Voronoi model by adding short-range repulsive forces as a modeling choice to represent nuclear compressibility, then runs simulations to observe emergent non-equilibrium phases from competition with vertex interactions. No equations or results reduce a claimed prediction or phase boundary to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing step rely on a self-citation chain that itself assumes the target result. The work is a self-contained simulation study whose outputs are not forced by redefinition of inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; ledger populated from stated modeling assumptions. The central claim rests on the Voronoi representation plus one added repulsion term whose mapping to nuclear biology is asserted but not derived.

free parameters (1)
  • nuclear repulsion strength and range
    Controls effective nuclear size/compressibility and is tuned to cross phase boundaries; value not specified in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Voronoi tessellation plus vertex interactions adequately capture cell-cell adhesion and cytoskeleton effects
    Standard modeling choice invoked to represent collective cell behavior.
  • domain assumption Short-range repulsions map directly to nuclear/cellular compressibility
    Central modeling step stated in abstract without further justification.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5677 in / 1216 out tokens · 21066 ms · 2026-05-23T17:38:58.902637+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    4: Nucleus size as a driver for the Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal transition in cell colonies

    Geometrical force The geometrical force acting on the nucleus center of cell i is obtained deriving the total Vertex energy: ⃗F i v = − dEv d⃗ ri = − dEi v d⃗ ri − X j∈N (i) dEj v d⃗ ri (5) 7 /uni00A0=/uni00A00.05 /uni00A0=/uni00A00.25 /uni00A0=/uni00A00.5 /uni00A0=/uni00A00.75 /uni00A0=/uni00A00.85 /uni00A0=/uni00A00.9 /uni00A0=/uni00A01.0 (i) (ii) (iii)...

  2. [2]

    Repulsive force The repulsive force acting on the nucleus center of cell i is obtained by deriving the total repulsive energy ⃗F i r = − dϕr d⃗ ri = X j∈N (i) dϕj r d⃗ ri (22) and dΦj r drα i = −12 σ12 0 r13 ij ! (rα i − rα j ) rij (23) B. Observables As order parameters describing the global proper- ties of the system, we compute (i) the average long- ti...

  3. [3]

    Physical models of col- lective cell migration

    Ricard Alert and Xavier Trepat. Physical models of col- lective cell migration. Annual Review of Condensed Mat- ter Physics , 11(1):77–101, 2020

  4. [4]

    Mesoscale physical prin- ciples of collective cell organization

    Xavier Trepat and Erik Sahai. Mesoscale physical prin- ciples of collective cell organization. Nature Physics , 14(7):671–682, 2018

  5. [5]

    Physical mod- els of collective cell motility: from cell to tissue

    Brian A Camley and Wouter-Jan Rappel. Physical mod- els of collective cell motility: from cell to tissue. Journal of physics D: Applied physics , 50(11):113002, 2017

  6. [6]

    Active vertex model for cell-resolution description of epithelial tissue mechanics

    Daniel L Barton, Silke Henkes, Cornelis J Weijer, and Rastko Sknepnek. Active vertex model for cell-resolution description of epithelial tissue mechanics. PLoS compu- tational biology, 13(6):e1005569, 2017

  7. [7]

    Emergent structures and dynamics of cell colonies by con- tact inhibition of locomotion

    Bart Smeets, Ricard Alert, Jir? Pesek, Ignacio Pag- onabarraga, Herman Ramon, and Romaric Vincent. Emergent structures and dynamics of cell colonies by con- tact inhibition of locomotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 113(51):14621–14626, 2016

  8. [8]

    Dense active matter model of motion patterns in confluent cell monolayers

    Silke Henkes, Kaja Kostanjevec, J Martin Collinson, Rastko Sknepnek, and Eric Bertin. Dense active matter model of motion patterns in confluent cell monolayers. Nature communications, 11(1):1–9, 2020

  9. [9]

    Giant fluctuations and structural effects in a flocking epithelium

    Fabio Giavazzi, Chiara Malinverno, Salvatore Corallino, Francesco Ginelli, Giorgio Scita, and Roberto Cerbino. Giant fluctuations and structural effects in a flocking epithelium. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics , 50(38):384003, 2017

  10. [10]

    From motility-induced phase-separation to glassi- ness in dense active matter

    Matteo Paoluzzi, Demian Levis, and Ignacio Pagonabar- raga. From motility-induced phase-separation to glassi- ness in dense active matter. Communications Physics , 5(1), May 2022

  11. [11]

    From flocking to glassiness in dense disordered polar active matter

    Matteo Paoluzzi, Demian Levis, and Ignacio Pagonabar- raga. From flocking to glassiness in dense disordered polar active matter. Communications Physics , 7(1):57, 2024

  12. [12]

    Computational model for cell morphodynamics

    Danying Shao, Wouter-Jan Rappel, and Herbert Levine. Computational model for cell morphodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:108104, Sep 2010

  13. [13]

    Wenzel and A

    D. Wenzel and A. Voigt. Multiphase field models for collective cell migration. Phys. Rev. E , 104:054410, Nov 2021

  14. [14]

    Inter- cellular friction and motility drive orientational order in cell monolayers

    Michael Chiang, Austin Hopkins, Benjamin Loewe, M Cristina Marchetti, and Davide Marenduzzo. Inter- cellular friction and motility drive orientational order in cell monolayers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(40):e2319310121, 2024

  15. [15]

    Entropy evalua- tion sheds light on ecosystem complexity

    Mattia Miotto and Lorenzo Monacelli. Entropy evalua- tion sheds light on ecosystem complexity. Phys. Rev. E , 98:042402, Oct 2018

  16. [16]

    Cristina Marchetti

    Austin Hopkins, Michael Chiang, Benjamin Loewe, Da- vide Marenduzzo, and M. Cristina Marchetti. Local yield and compliance in active cell monolayers. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129:148101, Sep 2022

  17. [17]

    Cristina Marchetti

    Benjamin Loewe, Michael Chiang, Davide Marenduzzo, and M. Cristina Marchetti. Solid-liquid transition of de- formable and overlapping active particles. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:038003, Jul 2020

  18. [18]

    Yeomans, and Amin Doost- mohammadi

    Romain Mueller, Julia M. Yeomans, and Amin Doost- mohammadi. Emergence of active nematic behavior in monolayers of isotropic cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 122:048004, Feb 2019

  19. [19]

    Fran ¸ cois Graner and James A. Glazier. Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended potts model. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 69:2013–2016, Sep 1992

  20. [20]

    Theory and simulation for equilibrium glassy dynamics in cellular potts model of confluent biological tissue

    Souvik Sadhukhan and Saroj Kumar Nandi. Theory and simulation for equilibrium glassy dynamics in cellular potts model of confluent biological tissue. Phys. Rev. E, 103:062403, Jun 2021. 10

  21. [21]

    Belousov, S

    R. Belousov, S. Savino, P. Moghe, T. Hiiragi, L. Rondoni, and A. Erzberger. Poissonian cellular potts models reveal nonequilibrium kinetics of cell sorting. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 132:248401, Jun 2024

  22. [22]

    Glazier and Fran ¸ cois Graner

    James A. Glazier and Fran ¸ cois Graner. Simulation of the differential adhesion driven rearrangement of biological cells. Phys. Rev. E , 47:2128–2154, Mar 1993

  23. [23]

    A dynamic cell model for the formation of epithelial tissues

    Tatsuzo Nagai and Hisao Honda. A dynamic cell model for the formation of epithelial tissues. Philosophical Mag- azine B , 81(7):699–719, 2001

  24. [24]

    A density-independent rigidity transition in bi- ological tissues

    Dapeng Bi, JH Lopez, Jennifer M Schwarz, and M Lisa Manning. A density-independent rigidity transition in bi- ological tissues. Nature Physics, 11(12):1074–1079, 2015

  25. [25]

    Cristina Marchetti, and M

    Dapeng Bi, Xingbo Yang, M. Cristina Marchetti, and M. Lisa Manning. Motility-driven glass and jamming transitions in biological tissues. Phys. Rev. X , 6:021011, Apr 2016

  26. [26]

    Flocking transitions in confluent tissues

    Fabio Giavazzi, Matteo Paoluzzi, Marta Macchi, Dapeng Bi, Giorgio Scita, M Lisa Manning, Roberto Cerbino, and M Cristina Marchetti. Flocking transitions in confluent tissues. Soft matter , 14(18):3471–3477, 2018

  27. [27]

    A geometrically controlled rigidity transition in a model for confluent 3d tissues

    Matthias Merkel and M Lisa Manning. A geometrically controlled rigidity transition in a model for confluent 3d tissues. New Journal of Physics , 20(2):022002, 2018

  28. [28]

    A minimal-length approach unifies rigidity in underconstrained materials

    Matthias Merkel, Karsten Baumgarten, Brian P Tighe, and M Lisa Manning. A minimal-length approach unifies rigidity in underconstrained materials. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 116(14):6560–6568, 2019

  29. [29]

    Effect of cellular rearrangement time delays on the rheology of vertex models for confluent tissues

    Gonca Erdemci-Tandogan and M Lisa Manning. Effect of cellular rearrangement time delays on the rheology of vertex models for confluent tissues. PLoS computational biology, 17(6):e1009049, 2021

  30. [30]

    Genome hetero- geneity drives the evolution of species

    Mattia Miotto and Lorenzo Monacelli. Genome hetero- geneity drives the evolution of species. Phys. Rev. Res. , 2:043026, Oct 2020

  31. [31]

    Cor- relating cell shape and cellular stress in motile confluent tissues

    Xingbo Yang, Dapeng Bi, Michael Czajkowski, Matthias Merkel, M Lisa Manning, and M Cristina Marchetti. Cor- relating cell shape and cellular stress in motile confluent tissues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 114(48):12663–12668, 2017

  32. [32]

    The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on ep- ithelial packing

    Reza Farhadifar, Jens-Christian R¨ oper, Benoit Aigouy, Suzanne Eaton, and Frank J¨ ulicher. The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on ep- ithelial packing. Current biology, 17(24):2095–2104, 2007

  33. [33]

    Collective behav- ior and self-organization in neural rosette morphogenesis

    Mattia Miotto, Maria Rosito, Matteo Paoluzzi, Valeria de Turris, Viola Folli, Marco Leonetti, Giancarlo Ruocco, Alessandro Rosa, and Giorgio Gosti. Collective behav- ior and self-organization in neural rosette morphogenesis. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology , 11, August 2023

  34. [34]

    Collective cell durotaxis emerges from long-range intercellular force transmission

    Raimon Sunyer, Vito Conte, Jorge Escribano, Alberto Elosegui-Artola, Anna Labernadie, L´ eo Valon, Daniel Navajas, Jos´ e Manuel Garc´ ıa-Aznar, Jos´ e J Mu˜ noz, Pere Roca-Cusachs, et al. Collective cell durotaxis emerges from long-range intercellular force transmission. Science, 353(6304):1157–1161, 2016

  35. [35]

    Tuning collective cell migration by cell?cell junction regulation

    Peter Friedl and Roberto Mayor. Tuning collective cell migration by cell?cell junction regulation. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology , 9 (4):a029199, 2017

  36. [36]

    Tolomeo, a novel machine learning algorithm to measure information and order in correlated networks and predict their state

    Mattia Miotto and Lorenzo Monacelli. Tolomeo, a novel machine learning algorithm to measure information and order in correlated networks and predict their state. En- tropy, 23(9):1138, August 2021

  37. [37]

    Mitchel, Nader Taheri Qazvini, Kelan Tan- tisira, Chan Young Park, Maureen McGill, Sae-Hoon Kim, Bomi Gweon, Robert Steward Jr Jacob Notbohm, Stephanie Burger, Scott H

    Jin-Ah Park, Jae Hun Kim, Dapeng Bi, Jen- nifer A. Mitchel, Nader Taheri Qazvini, Kelan Tan- tisira, Chan Young Park, Maureen McGill, Sae-Hoon Kim, Bomi Gweon, Robert Steward Jr Jacob Notbohm, Stephanie Burger, Scott H. Randell, Alvin T. Kho, Dhananjay T. Tambe, Corey Hardin, Stephanie A. Shore, Elliot Israel, David A. Weitz, Daniel J. Tschumperlin, Eliza...

  38. [38]

    Pragya Arora, Souvik Sadhukhan, Saroj Kumar Nandi, Dapeng Bi, A. K. Sood, and Rajesh Ganapathy. A shape- driven reentrant jamming transition in confluent mono- layers of synthetic cell-mimics. Nature Communications, 15(1), July 2024

  39. [39]

    How motility drives the glassy dynamics in confluent epithelial monolayers? bioRxiv, March 2024

    Souvik Sadhukhan, Manoj Kumar Nandi, Satyam Pandey, Matteo Paoluzzi, Chandan Dasgupta, Nir Gov, and Saroj Kumar Nandi. How motility drives the glassy dynamics in confluent epithelial monolayers? bioRxiv, March 2024

  40. [40]

    Beznoussenko, Dimos Poulikakos, Kok Haur Ong, Marina Uroz, Xavier Trepat, Dario Parazzoli, Paolo Maiuri, Weimiao Yu, Aldo Ferrari, Roberto Cerbino, and Giorgio Scita

    Chiara Malinverno, Salvatore Corallino, Fabio Gi- avazzi, Martin Bergert, Qingsen Li, Marco Leoni, Andrea Disanza, Emanuela Frittoli, Amanda Oldani, Emanuele Martini, Tobias Lendenmann, Gianluca De- florian, Galina V. Beznoussenko, Dimos Poulikakos, Kok Haur Ong, Marina Uroz, Xavier Trepat, Dario Parazzoli, Paolo Maiuri, Weimiao Yu, Aldo Ferrari, Roberto ...

  41. [41]

    A novel jamming phase diagram links tumor invasion to non-equilibrium phase separation

    Wenying Kang, Jacopo Ferruzzi, Catalina-Paula Spatarelu, Yu Long Han, Yasha Sharma, Stephan A Koehler, Jennifer A Mitchel, Adil Khan, James P Butler, Darren Roblyer, et al. A novel jamming phase diagram links tumor invasion to non-equilibrium phase separation. Iscience, 24(11), 2021

  42. [42]

    Mitchel, Amit Das, Michael J

    Jennifer A. Mitchel, Amit Das, Michael J. O’Sullivan, Ian T. Stancil, Stephen J. DeCamp, Stephan Koehler, Oscar H. Oca˜ na, James P. Butler, Jeffrey J. Fredberg, M. Angela Nieto, Dapeng Bi, and Jin-Ah Park. In pri- mary airway epithelial cells, the unjamming transition is distinct from the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Nature Communications, 11(1)...

  43. [43]

    Cell deformability drives fluid-to-fluid phase transition in active cell monolayers

    Nen Saito and Shuji Ishihara. Cell deformability drives fluid-to-fluid phase transition in active cell monolayers. Science Advances, 10(19), May 2024

  44. [44]

    Dealing with the nucleus during cell migra- tion

    Francisco J Calero-Cuenca, C´ atia S Janota, and Edgar R Gomes. Dealing with the nucleus during cell migra- tion. Current Opinion in Cell Biology , 50:35–41, Febru- ary 2018

  45. [45]

    Banavar, and Otger Camp` as

    Arthur Boutillon, Samhita P. Banavar, and Otger Camp` as. Conserved physical mechanisms of cell and tis- sue elongation. Development, 151(10), May 2024

  46. [46]

    Willis, Robert M

    Katarina Wolf, Mariska te Lindert, Marina Krause, Stephanie Alexander, Joost te Riet, Amanda L. Willis, Robert M. Hoffman, Carl G. Figdor, Stephen J. Weiss, and Peter Friedl. Physical limits of cell migration: Con- trol by ecm space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. Journal of Cell Biology , 201(7):1069–1084, June 2013

  47. [47]

    Sussman, Fr´ ed´ eric Renner, Pablo Gottheil, Erik W

    Steffen Grosser, J¨ urgen Lippoldt, Linda Oswald, Matthias Merkel, Daniel M. Sussman, Fr´ ed´ eric Renner, Pablo Gottheil, Erik W. Morawetz, Thomas Fuhs, Xiao- fan Xie, Steve Pawlizak, Anatol W. Fritsch, Benjamin 11 Wolf, Lars-Christian Horn, Susanne Briest, Bahriye Ak- tas, M. Lisa Manning, and Josef A. K¨ as. Cell and nu- cleus shape as an indicator of ...

  48. [48]

    Schwarz, and Falko Ziebert

    Robert Chojowski, Ulrich S. Schwarz, and Falko Ziebert. The role of the nucleus for cell mechanics: an elastic phase field approach. Soft Matter , 20(22):4488–4503, 2024

  49. [49]

    Tailleur and M

    J. Tailleur and M. E. Cates. Statistical mechanics of interacting run-and-tumble bacteria. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 100:218103, May 2008

  50. [50]

    Full phase diagram of active brownian disks: from melting to motility-induced phase separation

    Pasquale Digregorio, Demian Levis, Antonio Suma, Leti- cia F Cugliandolo, Giuseppe Gonnella, and Ignacio Pag- onabarraga. Full phase diagram of active brownian disks: from melting to motility-induced phase separation. Phys- ical review letters , 121(9):098003, 2018

  51. [51]

    Confinement-induced transition between wavelike col- lective cell migration modes

    Vanni Petrolli, Magali Le Goff, Monika Tadrous, Kirsten Martens, C´ edric Allier, Ondrej Mandula, Lionel Herv´ e, Silke Henkes, Rastko Sknepnek, Thomas Boudou, et al. Confinement-induced transition between wavelike col- lective cell migration modes. Physical review letters , 122(16):168101, 2019