Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Exploring Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialogues using LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.16490 v2 pith:WBGFSR3J submitted 2024-09-24 cs.CL cs.CYcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.CYcs.LG
keywords knowledgellmsstudenttutoringdialoguemethodstracingdialogues
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to the development of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tutoring chatbots, showing promise in providing broad access to high-quality personalized education. Existing works have studied how to make LLMs follow tutoring principles, but have not studied broader uses of LLMs for supporting tutoring. Up until now, tracing student knowledge and analyzing misconceptions has been difficult and time-consuming to implement for open-ended dialogue tutoring. In this work, we investigate whether LLMs can be supportive of this task: we first use LLM prompting methods to identify the knowledge components/skills involved in each dialogue turn, i.e., a tutor utterance posing a task or a student utterance that responds to it. We also evaluate whether the student responds correctly to the tutor and verify the LLM's accuracy using human expert annotations. We then apply a range of knowledge tracing (KT) methods on the resulting labeled data to track student knowledge levels over an entire dialogue. We conduct experiments on two tutoring dialogue datasets, and show that a novel yet simple LLM-based method, LLMKT, significantly outperforms existing KT methods in predicting student response correctness in dialogues. We perform extensive qualitative analyses to highlight the challenges in dialogueKT and outline multiple avenues for future work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Combining Log Data and Collaborative Dialogue Features to Predict Project Quality in Middle School AI Education

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Log data best predicts training phrase quantity, dialogue best predicts phrase content richness, and multimodal fusion helps only for some outcomes.

  2. Position: LLMs Can be Good Tutors in English Education

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A literature-based taxonomy casts LLMs as data enhancers, task predictors, and agents, arguing they can be effective tutors in English education without presenting new experiments.

Pith tools