Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Divide, Evaluate, and Refine: Evaluating and Improving Text-to-Image Alignment with Iterative VQA Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.04749 v2 pith:WF6OMV5T submitted 2023-07-10 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LGcs.MMstat.ML

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.MMstat.ML
keywords alignmenttext-to-imageassertionsgivenmodelsscoresapproachassertion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The field of text-conditioned image generation has made unparalleled progress with the recent advent of latent diffusion models. While remarkable, as the complexity of given text input increases, the state-of-the-art diffusion models may still fail in generating images which accurately convey the semantics of the given prompt. Furthermore, it has been observed that such misalignments are often left undetected by pretrained multi-modal models such as CLIP. To address these problems, in this paper we explore a simple yet effective decompositional approach towards both evaluation and improvement of text-to-image alignment. In particular, we first introduce a Decompositional-Alignment-Score which given a complex prompt decomposes it into a set of disjoint assertions. The alignment of each assertion with generated images is then measured using a VQA model. Finally, alignment scores for different assertions are combined aposteriori to give the final text-to-image alignment score. Experimental analysis reveals that the proposed alignment metric shows significantly higher correlation with human ratings as opposed to traditional CLIP, BLIP scores. Furthermore, we also find that the assertion level alignment scores provide a useful feedback which can then be used in a simple iterative procedure to gradually increase the expression of different assertions in the final image outputs. Human user studies indicate that the proposed approach surpasses previous state-of-the-art by 8.7% in overall text-to-image alignment accuracy. Project page for our paper is available at https://1jsingh.github.io/divide-evaluate-and-refine

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Evaluating Robustness of Prompt Adherence in Text to Image Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    New benchmark results show that Stable Diffusion 3.x and Janus Pro models struggle to place simple geometric shapes in the correct image quadrant, with best F1 scores around 0.41 to 0.5.

Pith tools