Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ManipBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Low-Level Robot Manipulation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.09698 v2 pith:WFY4KFIC submitted 2025-05-14 cs.RO cs.AI

classification cs.ROcs.AI
keywords vlmsmanipulationreasoningacrossbenchmarklow-levelmanipbenchmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have revolutionized artificial intelligence and robotics due to their commonsense reasoning capabilities. In robotic manipulation, VLMs are used primarily as high-level planners, but recent work has also studied their lower-level reasoning ability, which refers to making decisions about precise robot movements. However, the community currently lacks a clear and common benchmark that can evaluate how well VLMs can aid low-level reasoning in robotics. Consequently, we propose a novel benchmark, ManipBench, to evaluate the low-level robot manipulation reasoning capabilities of VLMs across various dimensions, including how well they understand object-object interactions and deformable object manipulation. We extensively test 33 representative VLMs across 10 model families on our benchmark, including variants to test different model sizes. Our evaluation shows that the performance of VLMs significantly varies across tasks, and there is a strong correlation between this performance and trends in our real-world manipulation tasks. It also shows that there remains a significant gap between these models and human-level understanding. See our website at: https://manipbench.github.io.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unified Embodied VLM Reasoning with Robotic Action via Autoregressive Discretized Pre-training

    cs.RO 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 6K-question embodied-reasoning benchmark plus a flow-matching action tokenizer let one 3B vision-language model reason and manipulate better than continuous- or discrete-action VLA baselines.

  2. HRIBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Real-Time Human Perception in Human-Robot Interaction

    cs.RO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HRIBench is a new 1,000-question VQA benchmark for five HRI perception domains; state-of-the-art vision-language models are neither accurate enough nor fast enough for real-time human-robot interaction.

Pith tools