Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Measuring Variety, Balance, and Disparity: An Analysis of Media Coverage of the 2021 German Federal Election

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.03531 v1 pith:WHW4COHN submitted 2023-08-07 cs.CL cs.AI

Measuring Variety, Balance, and Disparity: An Analysis of Media Coverage of the 2021 German Federal Election

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords diversitynewsarticleselectionmeasuringtopicsvarietyanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Determining and measuring diversity in news articles is important for a number of reasons, including preventing filter bubbles and fueling public discourse, especially before elections. So far, the identification and analysis of diversity have been illuminated in a variety of ways, such as measuring the overlap of words or topics between news articles related to US elections. However, the question of how diversity in news articles can be measured holistically, i.e., with respect to (1) variety, (2) balance, and (3) disparity, considering individuals, parties, and topics, has not been addressed. In this paper, we present a framework for determining diversity in news articles according to these dimensions. Furthermore, we create and provide a dataset of Google Top Stories, encompassing more than 26,000 unique headlines from more than 900 news outlets collected within two weeks before and after the 2021 German federal election. While we observe high diversity for more general search terms (e.g., "election"), a range of search terms ("education," "Europe," "climate protection," "government") resulted in news articles with high diversity in two out of three dimensions. This reflects a more subjective, dedicated discussion on rather future-oriented topics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.