Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

The I=2 three-pion lattice spectrum is shown to be dominated by a repulsive rho-pi S-wave interaction, with effective phase shifts of about -20 to -40 degrees, in line with a leading-order chiral Lagrangian.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 08:24 UTC pith:WITGDIBK

load-bearing objection Solid FVU extension and a defensible repulsive rho-pi signal, but frozen two-body input and sparse spectrum mean the quantitative phase-shift range is not yet controlled. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2601.16916 v3 pith:WITGDIBK submitted 2026-01-23 hep-lat hep-phnucl-th

Coupled-channel approach to isotensor πππ scattering from lattice QCD

Yuchuan Feng , Chris Culver , Michael D\"oring , Maxim Mai , Andrei Alexandru , Frank X. Lee This is my paper
classification hep-lat hep-phnucl-th PACS 12.38.Gc13.75.Lb
keywords lattice QCDthree-body scatteringquantization conditioncoupled channelsisospin-2rho mesonphase shiftschiral Lagrangian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper extracts the infinite-volume three-pion scattering amplitude in the isospin-2, spin-parity 1+ channel from lattice QCD finite-volume spectra at two unphysical pion masses. It extends the finite-volume unitarity three-body quantization condition to a coupled-channel system built from a rho-pion isobar and a scalar isotensor two-pion cluster (dubbed the 'isograviton'). The central finding is that the dominant rho-pi S-wave interaction is repulsive, with an effective phase shift between about -20 and -40 degrees, matching the prediction of a leading-order effective Lagrangian. The same three-body force, with two-body input adjusted for the lighter pion mass, reproduces the lighter-pion spectrum, suggesting a mild quark-mass dependence of the three-body interaction.

Core claim

The authors show that the I=2 three-pion system, despite hosting the rho resonance in a subchannel and being a coupled-channel problem with a second isobar (the isotensor 'isograviton' G), has a repulsive rho-pi S-wave interaction at the considered pion masses. Quantitatively, the effective phase shift in the narrow-rho limit is negative, roughly -20 to -40 degrees for center-of-mass energies between 3.4 and 4.8 pion masses at m_pi about 315 MeV. The repulsion is too large to be explained by pion exchange (which is slightly attractive) or the G channel (slightly repulsive), requiring a short-range three-body force. This extracted interaction pattern agrees, at the quantitative level allowed

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the coupled-channel finite-volume unitarity (FVU) quantization condition, Eqs. (2.23) and (2.38), which maps the discrete finite-volume spectrum to the infinite-volume amplitude. It includes the rho-pi isobar-spectator channels of helicities -1, 0, +1 and the scalar isograviton channel, with one-pion exchange, finite-volume self-energies matched to infinite-volume ones, and a momentum-, energy-dependent three-body contact term. A subtraction scheme for the one-pion-exchange term (over-subtraction, Eq. 2.36) suppresses large spectator momenta and reduces cutoff dependence, and a form factor regulates the three-body force. In the narrow-rho limit the coupled system red

Load-bearing premise

The two-body pi-pi phase shifts (delta_11 and delta_20 at unphysical pion masses) are taken as frozen inputs from a separate lattice-based analysis, including their extrapolation below threshold, and their systematic uncertainties are not propagated into the fitted three-body contact terms; the pion-mass independence of the three-body force is also assumed when predicting the lighter-mass spectrum.

What would settle it

A lattice calculation at a third volume with the same pion mass that is not reproduced by the fitted parameters, or a shift of the input delta_11/delta_20 within their quoted systematic errors that moves the extracted rho-pi phase shift outside the -20 to -40 degree band.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The repulsive rho-pi S-wave interaction in the I=2 channel can be used to constrain the short-range three-body force in chiral effective field theories.
  • The method extends to other coupled-channel three-body systems, such as the a1(1260) and omega channels, providing a unified framework for extracting infinite-volume amplitudes.
  • The successful prediction of the lighter-pion-mass spectrum supports the assumption of a mild pion-mass dependence of the three-body contact term, enabling chiral extrapolations toward the physical point.
  • The effective phase shifts in the narrow-rho limit provide a bridge to standard two-body phase-shift analyses and to comparisons with bound-state rho analyses at heavier pion masses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The agreement with the leading-order effective Lagrangian suggests that, at these pion masses, the three-body force is dominated by short-distance physics that chiral EFT can already capture at leading order; testing this at physical quark masses would determine whether higher-order terms are needed.
  • The singular behavior of the fitted contact term as a function of cutoff is a place where the FVU and other three-body formalisms could be compared at the level of renormalization-group properties, potentially clarifying the role of three-body forces in finite volume.
  • The pattern of small attractions/repulsions (pion exchange slightly attractive, G channel slightly repulsive) suggests that the I=2 system is a clean benchmark for three-body formalisms because it is non-resonant yet has a resonant subchannel; more precise data at multiple volumes could sharpen the phase-shift bands and discriminate between parameterizations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends the finite-volume unitarity (FVU) three-body quantization condition to the coupled-channel I=2 three-pion system with J^PC=1^{+-}, including a π-ρ isobar with helicities and an isotensor ππ S-wave isobar ("isograviton"). Two lattice ensembles from GWQCD (m_pi≈315 MeV and ≈224 MeV) are used; the 315 MeV spectrum is fitted with two-parameter three-body contact terms, and the resulting infinite-volume amplitudes are used to study the πρ interaction. The authors extract production amplitudes, take a narrow-ρ limit to define effective two-body phase shifts, and compare with the leading-order effective Lagrangian of Birse (Ref. [100]). They also report an out-of-sample prediction of the 224 MeV spectrum using the same three-body force. The central physics claim is that the dominant (πρ) S-wave is repulsive, with effective phase shifts of roughly -20° to -40°.

Significance. If the result holds, this is a useful step toward coupled-channel three-body analyses from lattice QCD: it is the first FVU treatment of the I=2 three-pion system with a resonant subchannel and an isotensor channel, and it provides a first-principles indication that the πρ S-wave at I=2 is repulsive, consistent with simple effective-Lagrangian expectations. The paper also contains a technically useful over-subtraction scheme for the one-particle exchange term, which visibly reduces hard-cutoff artifacts (Fig. 2). The lattice spectra and covariance matrices are presented explicitly, and the use of model averaging for the energy levels is a positive feature. The main limitations are the sparsity of the data (four levels in a single volume/irrep at the heavier pion mass), the frozen external two-body input, and the spread among acceptable fit forms; these limit the quantitative strength of the claimed -20° to -40° range.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III.B, Eq. (2.21), Eq. (2.28), Eq. (3.5)] The two-body input is treated as exact: the IAM phase shifts δ11 and δ20 from Ref. [109] enter through Eq. (2.21), the sub-threshold K-matrix is fixed at σ0=4mπ² in Eq. (2.28), and the fits in Eq. (3.5) vary only gS and gD. No uncertainty from the external two-body analysis is propagated into the contact terms or into the infinite-volume phase shifts of Fig. 13. Since the fitted lattice levels lie near the πρ threshold, a systematic shift in the ρ pole position/width or in the I=2 S-wave could be partially absorbed by re-fitting gS,gD and would move the extracted -20°/-40° band. Please propagate the two-body uncertainties, or demonstrate by explicit variation of the IAM input that the quoted band is stable. The statement that the unphysical-region K-matrix has only a minor effect is based on pilot studies that are not shown; this claim should either be quantified or softened.
  2. [Table II and Fig. 13] The quoted 'typical size -20° to -40°' in the conclusions is taken from fits 1 and 2 only. Fit 7 in Table II is also statistically acceptable (χ²/dof=1.48/2=0.74) but produces substantially more negative phase shifts in Fig. 13, with a different balance between c00 and c11. The spread among acceptable parametrizations is therefore larger than the quoted range, and the statement that both sign and size are determined is not supported unless all acceptable fits are included in the uncertainty band or a criterion is given for excluding fit 7. This is load-bearing because the paper's central quantitative claim rests on this range.
  3. [§III.B and Conclusions] The prediction for the 2464 ensemble is presented as a 'successful prediction' and the abstract/conclusions refer to 'chiral extrapolations'. However, the prediction explicitly assumes that the three-body force C is independent of the pion mass, an assumption that is not tested, and the 2464 data have very large uncertainties (e.g., the E1 eigenvalue error is O(m_pi)). χ²/dof≈1 against data with such errors provides only a weak consistency check. Please rephrase this as a consistency check under an stated assumption, and clarify what is actually being extrapolated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: 'lattice QC' should be 'lattice QCD'.
  2. [Table II] Fit 9 is labelled by m_pi=224 but is not discussed in the text. If it is a fit to the 2464 data, explain how it relates to the 'prediction' of the 2464 spectrum in §III.B.
  3. [§V.B / Fig. 13 caption] The notation 'fits 1' and '2' after cutoff exchange (fits 1' and 2') is confusing; consider using a different symbol, e.g., '1*', to avoid suggesting a new fit.
  4. [Fig. 5 text] 'residuum' should be 'residue' throughout.
  5. [§II.B, Eq. (2.23) and (2.38)] The relation between Method 1 and Method 2 would be clearer if the text explicitly stated that ˘B also appears in the infinite-volume equation used for the amplitude extraction, not only in the quantization condition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: fitted three-body contacts feed standard amplitude extraction; the 2464 prediction is out-of-sample and the self-cited two-body input is external.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. New lattice spectra (Eq. 3.4) are inputs; the FVU quantization condition (Eq. 2.38) is solved with two-body phase shifts from Ref. [109] (Eq. 2.21) and three-body contact parameters fitted to the 2448 levels (Eq. 3.5). The infinite-volume amplitudes (Eq. 2.11) and the narrow-rho phase shifts (Eq. 5.5) are deterministic functionals of those fitted parameters; this is standard amplitude extraction rather than a renamed fit. The 2464 spectrum is genuinely predicted without using 2464 data in the fit ('assuming that the obtained three-body force C does not change with the pion mass'), so the out-of-sample claim is not forced. The comparison with the leading-order effective Lagrangian (Eqs. 4.8-4.10; Fig. 13) uses an independent external framework, even though it shares pion-mass and rho parameters with Ref. [109]. The main weaknesses -- frozen IAM input from a largely overlapping collaboration and no propagated uncertainty from that input -- are robustness concerns, not circularity: no equation in the paper reduces by construction to its own input. Score 2 reflects the presence of a significant self-citation for the two-body input without the central claim depending on an unverified self-citation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on: (1) external two-body phase shifts from an overlapping-author prior analysis that are not re-fit or re-validated here; (2) a set of fitted three-body contact terms whose values and uncertainties depend on the chosen form and cutoff; (3) an assumed pion-mass independence of the three-body force for the chiral prediction; (4) an unproven assertion that the over-subtraction scheme preserves unitarity. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • gS (rho-pi S-wave three-body contact, fit 1 / fit 2) = 4.929 / 5.377
    Fitted to the four LQCD levels in the elastic window at m_pi~315 MeV (Eq. 3.5); encodes c00 in Table II (24.3 / 28.9).
  • gD (rho-pi D-wave three-body contact, fit 1 / fit 2) = 2.063 / 2.296
    Fitted to the same lattice spectrum (Eq. 3.5); c22 = 4.3 / 5.3 in Table II.
  • c01, c11, c12 (coupling to isograviton channel) = fits 4 & 7: c01*m_pi=13.4, c11*m_pi^2=14.5, c12*m_pi=-; other fits set to zero
    Optional couplings to the pi-G channel; only constrained in some fit variants (Table II), showing that the isograviton strength is poorly determined.
  • form-factor cutoff Lambda_bar = 2 m_pi (chosen)
    Cutoff in the three-body force form factor, Eq. (2.37); chosen by hand, not fitted.
  • matching point sigma_0 = 4 m_pi^2 (chosen)
    Matching point for the two-body K-matrix below threshold, Eq. (2.28); chosen based on a pilot study, not varied in the final analysis.
  • production parameters lambda, Df0, Df2, Df1 = lambda=0.5 m_pi^{-1}, Df0=Df2=m_pi, Df1=1
    Regulate the production vertex in Eq. (5.2); chosen by hand and only affect the lineshape representation, not the amplitude extraction.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The FVU quantization condition (Eqs. 2.23, 2.38) is valid for the coupled rho-pi / pi-G channel space with a finite-width rho
    The entire extraction rests on the correctness of the FVU framework as extended here from Refs. [32, 46, 94, 104].
  • domain assumption The two-body pi-pi phase shifts from the inverse amplitude method of Ref. [109] at m_pi~315 and 224 MeV are the correct input, including the sub-threshold region down to sigma_0 = 4 m_pi^2
    Eq. (2.21) uses these phase shifts as fixed input; uncertainties are not propagated, and the sub-threshold extrapolation is not independently verified.
  • domain assumption The three-body force is independent of the pion mass
    Stated in Section III.B when predicting the 2464 ensemble spectrum: 'assuming that the obtained three-body force C does not change with the pion mass'.
  • ad hoc to paper The over-subtracted one-particle exchange term B_tilde = (s/s_on) B preserves the physical on-shell amplitude and unitarity
    Method 2 uses this subtraction scheme (Eqs. 2.33-2.36) to reduce cutoff dependence; the claim that it does not spoil unitarity is asserted from Ref. [104], not proven in the text.
  • ad hoc to paper The factorized form of the three-body contact term (gS, gD) spans the relevant coupling space
    Eq. (3.5) and Table II: c00=gS^2, c22=gD^2, c02=gS*gD, with alternative forms tested only in fits 3 and 6. The extracted amplitudes depend on this choice, as shown by the spread between fits 2 and 7.
  • standard math Standard partial-wave projection and Wigner-D / O_h group-theory machinery
    Used throughout Section II (Eqs. 2.7-2.10, 2.29); standard background in the field, not proven in the paper.
invented entities (1)
  • No new physical entities no independent evidence
    purpose: The 'isograviton' G is a label for the isospin-2 S-wave pi-pi isobar, a conventional isobar channel, not a new particle.
    The paper does not postulate new forces, particles, or conserved quantities; the coupled-channel space is built from known pi-pi and rho-pi channels.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 31706 in / 10855 out tokens · 117693 ms · 2026-08-03T08:24:39.991081+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The quest to understand three-body dynamics from first-principle QCD includes the study of non-resonant and resonant systems. The isospin $I=2$ system is of particular interest having no three-body resonance but featuring a resonance in a sub-channel, while also being a coupled-channel problem. In this study, we calculate the finite-volume spectrum from lattice QCD at two different pion masses, map the amplitude to the infinite volume through a generalized Finite-Volume Unitarity (FVU) three-body quantization condition, investigate the limit of a narrow $\rho$, and compare with an effective Lagrangian prediction at leading order. Chiral extrapolations between different pion masses are performed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.16916 by Andrei Alexandru, Chris Culver, Frank X. Lee, Maxim Mai, Michael D\"oring, Yuchuan Feng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Kinematical coverage of the considered heavy (left panel) and light pion mass (right panel) finite-volume setups. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Cutoff dependence test between method 1 (left panel) and method 2 (right panel). In both figures the ground state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Summary of the lattice results for ensembles in Tab. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example of the level determination through the FVU approach. Top panel: Fit 2 (see Tab. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Residua of the determined finite-volume energy eigenvalue states for the heavy pion mass setup (fit 2). Residua [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Different contributions to the ground state energy eigenvalue for the heavy pion mass using method 1 (unsubtracted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Best fit values of ˜c 0 00 in method 1 of the FVU quantization condition (c.f. Eq. (2.23)) fitted to the ground state energy E0 of the heavy pion mass ensemble at different cutoff values (maximal shell imax). All other coefficients (˜c k L′L) are set to zero. The gray thick line is a crude interpolation added to guide the eye. Note that this equation is still defined in the plane-wave basis. In light of Eq… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: Black and brown solid lines: Lattice propagator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: S-wave projected πρ interaction at the leading order from the effective Lagrangian of Ref. [100] (red solid line). The shaded areas show values for C˜eff 00 allowed to 1σ by the ground state energy E0 from lattice QCD. These areas depend on the cutoff as indicated (shells 2-4 considered). The unusual cutoff dependence is discussed in the text. Right: Dependence of C˜eff 00 (p ′ , p) on incoming and o… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: An example of the SMC mapped to the isobar sub-energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Top panel: The production amplitude [real(solid lines) and imaginary(dashed lines) parts)] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The normalized physical 1 → 3 production amplitude Γ˘L, (L = 0, 1, 2) for fixed √ s = 4mπ in terms of spectator momentum (upper panel), and for fixed q = qmax/2 in terms of three-body energy (lower panel), for fits 2, 6, 7 shown in red, blue, and green, respectively. The black dashed curves show the “disconnected” amplitude, corresponding to a lineshape without three-body interaction. The solid black vert… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Left: πρ S-wave “phase shifts” for the mπ = 315 MeV ensemble assuming a stable ρ-meson and omitting the (πρ)D and πG channels. The black curves show results obtained from the central values of some fits to the LQCD data (fits 1, 2, and 7 according to Tab. II). The blue dashed lines show the predictions from the effective Lagrangian of Eq. (4.8) and their inherent cut-off dependence by using different cuto… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Higher order quantization conditions for two-body scattering with spin

    hep-lat 2026-02 accept novelty 7.0

    Higher-order finite-volume quantization conditions for spin-1/2 + spin-0 scattering are derived to J=11/2 and numerically checked to agree with independent box spectra to six significant figures.

  2. The $a_1(1420)$ in a Unitary Coupled-Channel Three-Body Approach

    hep-ph 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.5

    Nine-channel unitary three-body fits to COMPASS lineshapes reproduce the a1(1420) enhancement by triangle singularity without requiring a genuine a1(1420) pole.

  3. Three-body unitary determination of the $f_1(1285)$ and $f_1(1420)$ pole positions

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Fitting a spectator-isobar three-body unitary amplitude to BESIII K0S K0S pi0 data yields poles at (1277±2±1)-i(12±1±0) MeV for f1(1285) and (1435±2±7)-i(40±2±1) MeV for f1(1420), with the latter traced to a K Kbar* q...

  4. The $a_1(1420)$ in a Unitary Coupled-Channel Three-Body Approach

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Unitary coupled-channel three-body model fitted to COMPASS data reproduces the a1(1420) enhancement via triangle singularity, indicating no genuine resonance pole is required.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 112 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    threshold

    The dashed vertical line shows the infinite-volumeπρ“threshold” defined as √s=m π +m ρ such from the condition{ √σ=m ρ|cotδ 11(√σ) = 0}. The thin vertical line, showing the finite-volume energy without any interactions betweenπandρ, is shifted to higher energies due to the small but finite width of theρ-meson. See text for further explanations. IV. COUPLE...

  2. [2]

    washed out

    Note also the compensating factor 2g2 1 in Eq. (4.5). For the numerical comparison, we usef π = 0.336m π,m ρ = 2.463m π at the heavy pion mass of mπ ≈315 MeV determined on the same ensemble [109], andg 1 = 5.8 as before. In the same plot, we show limits allowed by the lattice, i.e., the values of the ˜Cdetermined from a fit of method 1 of Eq. (2.23) to th...

  3. [3]

    Towards a theory of hadron resonances,

    Maxim Mai, Ulf-G. Meißner, and Carsten Urbach, “Towards a theory of hadron resonances,” Phys. Rept.1001, 1–66 (2023), arXiv:2206.01477 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Updated analysis of pi N elastic scattering data to 2.1-GeV: The Baryon spectrum,

    Richard A. Arndt, Igor I. Strakovsky, Ron L. Workman, and Marcello M. Pavan, “Updated analysis of pi N elastic scattering data to 2.1-GeV: The Baryon spectrum,” Phys. Rev. C52, 2120–2130 (1995), arXiv:nucl-th/9505040

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  5. [5]

    On the nature of the Roper resonance,

    L. Alvarez-Ruso, “On the nature of the Roper resonance,” inMini-Workshop Bled 2010: Dressing Hadrons(2010) pp. 1–8, arXiv:1011.0609 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Coupled-channel dynamics in the reactions piN –>piN, etaN, KLambda, KSigma,

    D. R¨ onchen, M. D¨ oring, F. Huang, H. Haberzettl, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, S. Krewald, U. G. Meißner, and K. Nakayama, “Coupled-channel dynamics in the reactions piN –>piN, etaN, KLambda, KSigma,” Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 44 (2013), arXiv:1211.6998 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    Pion-nucleon scattering in the Roper channel from lattice QCD,

    C. B. Lang, L. Leskovec, M. Padmanath, and S. Prelovsek, “Pion-nucleon scattering in the Roper channel from lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D95, 014510 (2017), arXiv:1610.01422 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Search for low-lying lattice QCD eigenstates in the Roper regime,

    Adrian L. Kiratidis, Waseem Kamleh, Derek B. Leinweber, Zhan-Wei Liu, Finn M. Stokes, and Anthony W. Thomas, “Search for low-lying lattice QCD eigenstates in the Roper regime,” Phys. Rev. D95, 074507 (2017), arXiv:1608.03051 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Hamil- tonian effective field theory study of theN ∗(1440) resonance in lattice QCD,

    Zhan-Wei Liu, Waseem Kamleh, Derek B. Leinweber, Finn M. Stokes, Anthony W. Thomas, and Jia-Jun Wu, “Hamil- tonian effective field theory study of theN ∗(1440) resonance in lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D95, 034034 (2017), arXiv:1607.04536 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Two- and three-pion finite-volume spectra at maximal isospin from lattice QCD,

    Ben H¨ orz and Andrew Hanlon, “Two- and three-pion finite-volume spectra at maximal isospin from lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 142002 (2019), arXiv:1905.04277 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Three pion spectrum in theI= 3 channel from lattice QCD,

    Chris Culver, Maxim Mai, Ruair ´ ı Brett, Andrei Alexandru, and Michael D¨ oring, “Three pion spectrum in theI= 3 channel from lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D101, 114507 (2020), arXiv:1911.09047 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Scattering of two and three physical pions at maximal isospin from lattice QCD,

    Matthias Fischer, Bartosz Kostrzewa, Liuming Liu, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, Martin Ueding, and Carsten Urbach, “Scattering of two and three physical pions at maximal isospin from lattice QCD,” Eur. Phys. J. C81, 436 (2021), arXiv:2008.03035 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Energy-Dependentπ +π+π+ Scattering Amplitude from QCD,

    Maxwell T. Hansen, Raul A. Brice˜ no, Robert G. Edwards, Christopher E. Thomas, and David J. Wilson (Hadron Spectrum), “Energy-Dependentπ +π+π+ Scattering Amplitude from QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 012001 (2021), arXiv:2009.04931 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Finite- volume energy spectrum of theK −K −K − system,

    Andrei Alexandru, Ruair ´ ı Brett, Chris Culver, Michael D¨ oring, Dehua Guo, Frank X. Lee, and Maxim Mai, “Finite- volume energy spectrum of theK −K −K − system,” Phys. Rev. D102, 114523 (2020), arXiv:2009.12358 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Interactions of two and three mesons including higher partial waves from lattice QCD,

    Tyler D. Blanton, Andrew D. Hanlon, Ben H¨ orz, Colin Morningstar, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Interactions of two and three mesons including higher partial waves from lattice QCD,” JHEP10, 023 (2021), arXiv:2106.05590 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Charged multihadron systems in lattice QCD+QED,

    S. R. Beaneet al.(NPLQCD, QCDSF), “Charged multihadron systems in lattice QCD+QED,” Phys. Rev. D103, 054504 (2021), arXiv:2003.12130 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Finite-volume effects and meson scattering in the 2-flavour Schwinger model,

    Patrick B¨ uhlmann and Urs Wenger, “Finite-volume effects and meson scattering in the 2-flavour Schwinger model,” PoS LA TTICE2021, 463 (2022), arXiv:2112.15228 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Three-Body Dynamics of the a1(1260) Resonance from Lattice QCD,

    Maxim Mai, Andrei Alexandru, Ruair ´ ı Brett, Chris Culver, Michael D¨ oring, Frank X. Lee, and Daniel Sadasivan (GWQCD), “Three-Body Dynamics of the a1(1260) Resonance from Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 222001 (2021), arXiv:2107.03973 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Three-body resonances in theφ 4 theory,

    Marco Garofalo, Maxim Mai, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, Akaki Rusetsky, and Carsten Urbach, “Three-body resonances in theφ 4 theory,” JHEP02, 252 (2023), arXiv:2211.05605 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Interactions ofπK,ππK and KKπsystems at maximal isospin from lattice QCD,

    Zachary T. Draper, Andrew D. Hanlon, Ben H¨ orz, Colin Morningstar, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Interactions ofπK,ππK and KKπsystems at maximal isospin from lattice QCD,” JHEP05, 137 (2023), arXiv:2302.13587 26 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    ωMeson from Lattice QCD,

    Haobo Yan, Maxim Mai, Marco Garofalo, Ulf-G. Meißner, Chuan Liu, Liuming Liu, and Carsten Urbach, “ωMeson from Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 211906 (2024), arXiv:2407.16659 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Finite- and infinite-volume study of DDπ scattering,

    Sebastian M. Dawid, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Finite- and infinite-volume study of DDπ scattering,” JHEP01, 060 (2025), arXiv:2409.17059 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Emergence of theπ(1300) Resonance from Lattice QCD,

    Haobo Yan, Maxim Mai, Marco Garofalo, Yuchuan Feng, Michael D¨ oring, Chuan Liu, Liuming Liu, Ulf-G. Meißner, and Carsten Urbach, “Emergence of theπ(1300) Resonance from Lattice QCD,” (2025), arXiv:2510.09476 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Multi-Pion Systems in Lattice QCD and the Three-Pion Interaction,

    Silas R. Beane, William Detmold, Thomas C. Luu, Kostas Orginos, Martin J. Savage, and Aaron Torok, “Multi-Pion Systems in Lattice QCD and the Three-Pion Interaction,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 082004 (2008), arXiv:0710.1827 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  25. [25]

    Three particles in a finite volume,

    K. Polejaeva and A. Rusetsky, “Three particles in a finite volume,” Eur. Phys. J. A48, 67 (2012), arXiv:1203.1241 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [26]

    Three-particle scattering amplitudes from a finite volume formalism,

    Raul A. Brice˜ no and Zohreh Davoudi, “Three-particle scattering amplitudes from a finite volume formalism,” Phys. Rev. D87, 094507 (2013), arXiv:1212.3398 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    Spectrum of three-body bound states in a finite volume,

    Ulf-G. Meißner, Guillermo R ´ ıos, and Akaki Rusetsky, “Spectrum of three-body bound states in a finite volume,” Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 091602 (2015), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 117, 069902 (2016)], arXiv:1412.4969 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    Relativistic, model-independent, three-particle quantization condition,

    Maxwell T. Hansen and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Relativistic, model-independent, three-particle quantization condition,” Phys. Rev. D90, 116003 (2014), arXiv:1408.5933 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Finite volume corrections to the binding energy of the X(3872),

    M. Jansen, H. W. Hammer, and Yu Jia, “Finite volume corrections to the binding energy of the X(3872),” Phys. Rev. D92, 114031 (2015), arXiv:1505.04099 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Expressing the three-particle finite-volume spectrum in terms of the three- to-three scattering amplitude,

    Maxwell T. Hansen and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Expressing the three-particle finite-volume spectrum in terms of the three- to-three scattering amplitude,” Phys. Rev. D92, 114509 (2015), arXiv:1504.04248 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    Perturbative results for two and three particle threshold energies in finite volume,

    Maxwell T. Hansen and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Perturbative results for two and three particle threshold energies in finite volume,” Phys. Rev. D93, 014506 (2016), arXiv:1509.07929 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    Threshold expansion of the three-particle quantization condition,

    Maxwell T. Hansen and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Threshold expansion of the three-particle quantization condition,” Phys. Rev. D93, 096006 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 96, 039901 (2017)], arXiv:1602.00324 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    One spatial dimensional finite volume three-body interaction for a short-range potential,

    Peng Guo, “One spatial dimensional finite volume three-body interaction for a short-range potential,” Phys. Rev. D95, 054508 (2017), arXiv:1607.03184 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Three-body Unitarity in the Finite Volume,

    M. Mai and M. D¨ oring, “Three-body Unitarity in the Finite Volume,” Eur. Phys. J. A53, 240 (2017), arXiv:1709.08222 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    Volume Dependence of N-Body Bound States,

    Sebastian K¨ onig and Dean Lee, “Volume Dependence of N-Body Bound States,” Phys. Lett. B779, 9–15 (2018), arXiv:1701.00279 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Three-particle quantization condition in a finite volume: 1. The role of the three-particle force,

    Hans-Werner Hammer, Jin-Yi Pang, and A. Rusetsky, “Three-particle quantization condition in a finite volume: 1. The role of the three-particle force,” JHEP09, 109 (2017), arXiv:1706.07700 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Three particle quantization condition in a finite volume: 2. general formalism and the analysis of data,

    H. W. Hammer, J. Y. Pang, and A. Rusetsky, “Three particle quantization condition in a finite volume: 2. general formalism and the analysis of data,” JHEP10, 115 (2017), arXiv:1707.02176 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Relating the finite-volume spectrum and the two- and-three-particleSmatrix for relativistic systems of identical scalar particles,

    Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, Maxwell T. Hansen, and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Relating the finite-volume spectrum and the two- and-three-particleSmatrix for relativistic systems of identical scalar particles,” Phys. Rev. D95, 074510 (2017), arXiv:1701.07465 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Testing the threshold expansion for three-particle energies at fourth order inϕ 4 theory,

    Stephen R. Sharpe, “Testing the threshold expansion for three-particle energies at fourth order inϕ 4 theory,” Phys. Rev. D96, 054515 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 98, 099901 (2018)], arXiv:1707.04279 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    Numerical approach for finite volume three-body interaction,

    Peng Guo and Vladimir Gasparian, “Numerical approach for finite volume three-body interaction,” Phys. Rev. D97, 014504 (2018), arXiv:1709.08255 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    A solvable three-body model in finite volume,

    Peng Guo and Vladimir Gasparian, “A solvable three-body model in finite volume,” Phys. Lett. B774, 441–445 (2017), arXiv:1701.00438 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Three-particle bound states in a finite volume: unequal masses and higher partial waves,

    Yu Meng, Chuan Liu, Ulf-G Meißner, and A. Rusetsky, “Three-particle bound states in a finite volume: unequal masses and higher partial waves,” Phys. Rev. D98, 014508 (2018), arXiv:1712.08464 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    Variational approach toN-body interactions in finite volume,

    Peng Guo, Michael D¨ oring, and Adam P. Szczepaniak, “Variational approach toN-body interactions in finite volume,” Phys. Rev. D98, 094502 (2018), arXiv:1810.01261 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    Multiple-particle interaction in (1+1)-dimensional lattice model,

    Peng Guo and Tyler Morris, “Multiple-particle interaction in (1+1)-dimensional lattice model,” Phys. Rev. D99, 014501 (2019), arXiv:1808.07397 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Signatures of few-body resonances in finite volume,

    P. Klos, S. K¨ onig, H. W. Hammer, J. E. Lynn, and A. Schwenk, “Signatures of few-body resonances in finite volume,” Phys. Rev. C98, 034004 (2018), arXiv:1805.02029 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    Numerical study of the relativistic three-body quantization 27 condition in the isotropic approximation,

    Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, Maxwell T. Hansen, and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Numerical study of the relativistic three-body quantization 27 condition in the isotropic approximation,” Phys. Rev. D98, 014506 (2018), arXiv:1803.04169 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    Three-particle systems with resonant subprocesses in a finite volume,

    Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, Maxwell T. Hansen, and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Three-particle systems with resonant subprocesses in a finite volume,” Phys. Rev. D99, 014516 (2019), arXiv:1810.01429 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    Finite-Volume Spectrum ofπ +π+ andπ +π+π+ Systems,

    Maxim Mai and Michael Doring, “Finite-Volume Spectrum ofπ +π+ andπ +π+π+ Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 062503 (2019), arXiv:1807.04746 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Three-body spectrum in a finite volume: the role of cubic symmetry,

    M. D¨ oring, H. W. Hammer, M. Mai, J. Y. Pang,§A. Rusetsky, and J. Wu, “Three-body spectrum in a finite volume: the role of cubic symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D97, 114508 (2018), arXiv:1802.03362 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Equivalence of three-particle scattering formalisms,

    A. W. Jackura, S. M. Dawid, C. Fern´ andez-Ram ´ ırez, V. Mathieu, M. Mikhasenko, A. Pilloni, S. R. Sharpe, and A. P. Szczepaniak, “Equivalence of three-particle scattering formalisms,” Phys. Rev. D100, 034508 (2019), arXiv:1905.12007 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Three-body unitarity versus finite-volumeπ +π+π+ spectrum from lattice QCD,

    M. Mai, M. D¨ oring, C. Culver, and A. Alexandru, “Three-body unitarity versus finite-volumeπ +π+π+ spectrum from lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D101, 054510 (2020), arXiv:1909.05749 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Propagation of particles on a torus,

    Peng Guo, “Propagation of particles on a torus,” Phys. Lett. B804, 135370 (2020), arXiv:1908.08081 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  53. [53]

    Implementing the three-particle quantization condition including higher partial waves,

    Tyler D. Blanton, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Implementing the three-particle quantization condition including higher partial waves,” JHEP03, 106 (2019), arXiv:1901.07095 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Unitarity of the infinite- volume three-particle scattering amplitude arising from a finite-volume formalism,

    Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, Maxwell T. Hansen, Stephen R. Sharpe, and Adam P. Szczepaniak, “Unitarity of the infinite- volume three-particle scattering amplitude arising from a finite-volume formalism,” Phys. Rev. D100, 054508 (2019), arXiv:1905.11188 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    Numerical exploration of three relativistic particles in a finite volume including two-particle resonances and bound states,

    Fernando Romero-L´ opez, Stephen R. Sharpe, Tyler D. Blanton, Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, and Maxwell T. Hansen, “Numerical exploration of three relativistic particles in a finite volume including two-particle resonances and bound states,” JHEP 10, 007 (2019), arXiv:1908.02411 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Energy shift of the three-particle system in a finite volume,

    Jin-Yi Pang, Jia-Jun Wu, H. W. Hammer, Ulf-G. Meißner, and Akaki Rusetsky, “Energy shift of the three-particle system in a finite volume,” Phys. Rev. D99, 074513 (2019), arXiv:1902.01111 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    Lattice model of heavy-light three-body system,

    Peng Guo and Michael D¨ oring, “Lattice model of heavy-light three-body system,” Phys. Rev. D101, 034501 (2020), arXiv:1910.08624 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    d-dimensional L¨ uscher’s formula and the near-threshold three-body states in a finite volume,

    Shangguo Zhu and Shina Tan, “d-dimensional L¨ uscher’s formula and the near-threshold three-body states in a finite volume,” (2019), arXiv:1905.05117 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    DDKsystem in finite volume,

    Jin-Yi Pang, Jia-Jun Wu, and Li-Sheng Geng, “DDKsystem in finite volume,” Phys. Rev. D102, 114515 (2020), arXiv:2008.13014 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Generalizing the relativistic quantization condi- tion to include all three-pion isospin channels,

    Maxwell T. Hansen, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Generalizing the relativistic quantization condi- tion to include all three-pion isospin channels,” JHEP07, 047 (2020), [Erratum: JHEP 02, 014 (2021)], arXiv:2003.10974 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    Modeling few-body resonances in finite volume,

    Peng Guo, “Modeling few-body resonances in finite volume,” Phys. Rev. D102, 054514 (2020), arXiv:2007.12790 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Threshold expansion formula ofNbosons in a finite volume from a variational approach,

    Peng Guo, “Threshold expansion formula ofNbosons in a finite volume from a variational approach,” Phys. Rev. D101, 054512 (2020), arXiv:2002.04111 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    Visualizing resonances in finite volume,

    Peng Guo and Bingwei Long, “Visualizing resonances in finite volume,” Phys. Rev. D102, 074508 (2020), arXiv:2007.10895 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    Multi-π + systems in a finite volume,

    Peng Guo and Bingwei Long, “Multi-π + systems in a finite volume,” Phys. Rev. D101, 094510 (2020), arXiv:2002.09266 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Alternative derivation of the relativistic three-particle quantization condition,

    Tyler D. Blanton and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Alternative derivation of the relativistic three-particle quantization condition,” Phys. Rev. D102, 054520 (2020), arXiv:2007.16188 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  66. [66]

    Relativistic three-particle quantization condition for nondegenerate scalars,

    Tyler D. Blanton and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Relativistic three-particle quantization condition for nondegenerate scalars,” Phys. Rev. D103, 054503 (2021), arXiv:2011.05520 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Finite-volume energy shift of the three-pion ground state,

    Fabian M¨ uller, Tiansu Yu, and Akaki Rusetsky, “Finite-volume energy shift of the three-pion ground state,” Phys. Rev. D103, 054506 (2021), arXiv:2011.14178 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    On the three-particle analog of the Lellouch-L¨ uscher formula,

    Fabian M¨ uller and Akaki Rusetsky, “On the three-particle analog of the Lellouch-L¨ uscher formula,” JHEP03, 152 (2021), arXiv:2012.13957 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Solving relativistic three-body integral equations in the presence of bound states,

    Andrew W. Jackura, Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, Sebastian M. Dawid, Md Habib E. Islam, and Connor McCarty, “Solving relativistic three-body integral equations in the presence of bound states,” Phys. Rev. D104, 014507 (2021), arXiv:2010.09820 [hep- lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    Three-body interactions from the finite-volume QCD spectrum,

    Ruair ´ ı Brett, Chris Culver, Maxim Mai, Andrei Alexandru, Michael D¨ oring, and Frank X. Lee, “Three-body interactions from the finite-volume QCD spectrum,” Phys. Rev. D104, 014501 (2021), arXiv:2101.06144 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Relativistic-invariant formulation of the NREFT three- 28 particle quantization condition,

    Fabian M¨ uller, Jin-Yi Pang, Akaki Rusetsky, and Jia-Jun Wu, “Relativistic-invariant formulation of the NREFT three- 28 particle quantization condition,” JHEP02, 158 (2022), arXiv:2110.09351 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    Decay amplitudes to three hadrons from finite- volume matrix elements,

    Maxwell T. Hansen, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Decay amplitudes to three hadrons from finite- volume matrix elements,” JHEP04, 113 (2021), arXiv:2101.10246 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    Three-particle finite-volume formalism forπ+π+K+ and related systems,

    Tyler D. Blanton and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Three-particle finite-volume formalism forπ+π+K+ and related systems,” Phys. Rev. D104, 034509 (2021), arXiv:2105.12094 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  74. [74]

    Implementing the three-particle quantization condition forπ +π+K+ and related systems,

    Tyler D. Blanton, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Implementing the three-particle quantization condition forπ +π+K+ and related systems,” JHEP02, 098 (2022), arXiv:2111.12734 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Three-particle Lellouch-L¨ uscher formalism in moving frames,

    Fabian M¨ uller, Jin-Yi Pang, Akaki Rusetsky, and Jia-Jun Wu, “Three-particle Lellouch-L¨ uscher formalism in moving frames,” JHEP02, 214 (2023), arXiv:2211.10126 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    Spurious poles in a finite volume,

    Jin-Yi Pang, Martin Ebert, Hans-Werner Hammer, Fabian M¨ uller, Akaki Rusetsky, and Jia-Jun Wu, “Spurious poles in a finite volume,” JHEP07, 019 (2022), arXiv:2204.04807 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Partial-wave projection of the one-particle exchange in three-body scattering amplitudes,

    Andrew W. Jackura and Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, “Partial-wave projection of the one-particle exchange in three-body scattering amplitudes,” (2023), arXiv:2312.00625 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    Lellouch-L¨ uscher factor for theK→3π decays,

    Jin-Yi Pang, Rishabh Bubna, Fabian M¨ uller, Akaki Rusetsky, and Jia-Jun Wu, “Lellouch-L¨ uscher factor for theK→3π decays,” (2023), arXiv:2312.04391 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    Finite-volume energy shift of the three-nucleon ground state,

    Rishabh Bubna, Fabian M¨ uller, and Akaki Rusetsky, “Finite-volume energy shift of the three-nucleon ground state,” Phys. Rev. D108, 014518 (2023), arXiv:2304.13635 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    Three relativistic neutrons in a finite volume,

    Zachary T. Draper, Maxwell T. Hansen, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Three relativistic neutrons in a finite volume,” JHEP07, 226 (2023), arXiv:2303.10219 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.