Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Probing Latent Subspaces in LLM for AI Security: Identifying and Manipulating Adversarial States

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.09066 v2 pith:WK6UOGMU submitted 2025-03-12 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CR
keywords activationsmodelstatesadversariallatentresponsessafestate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various tasks, yet they remain vulnerable to adversarial manipulations such as jailbreaking via prompt injection attacks. These attacks bypass safety mechanisms to generate restricted or harmful content. In this study, we investigated the underlying latent subspaces of safe and jailbroken states by extracting hidden activations from a LLM. Inspired by attractor dynamics in neuroscience, we hypothesized that LLM activations settle into semi stable states that can be identified and perturbed to induce state transitions. Using dimensionality reduction techniques, we projected activations from safe and jailbroken responses to reveal latent subspaces in lower dimensional spaces. We then derived a perturbation vector that when applied to safe representations, shifted the model towards a jailbreak state. Our results demonstrate that this causal intervention results in statistically significant jailbreak responses in a subset of prompts. Next, we probed how these perturbations propagate through the model's layers, testing whether the induced state change remains localized or cascades throughout the network. Our findings indicate that targeted perturbations induced distinct shifts in activations and model responses. Our approach paves the way for potential proactive defenses, shifting from traditional guardrail based methods to preemptive, model agnostic techniques that neutralize adversarial states at the representation level.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Probing the Robustness of Large Language Models Safety to Latent Perturbations

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Randomized noise injected into hidden layers bypasses safety refusals in 12 open LLMs, and layer-wise adversarial training on the resulting benchmark reduces the attack's success.

  2. Zero-Direction Probing: A Linear-Algebraic Framework for Deep Analysis of Large-Language-Model Drift

    cs.LG 2025-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A claim that null-space leakage yields provable LLM drift detection is undermined by an inverted eigenvalue inference and a sketched regret proof, with no empirical validation.

Pith tools