Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 104 references

Fast, accurate, and error-resilient variational quantum noise spectroscopy

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Variational quantum noise spectroscopy (VQNS) reconstructs a quantum sensor's noise spectrum by fitting a sum of symmetrized Lorentzians to coherence decays measured under standard dynamical-decoupling pulse sequences, with closed-form…

desk verdict The core VQNS pipeline is fast and genuinely useful, but the headline low-frequency experimental claim outruns what the CPMG data can actually support. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17064 v4 pith:WLTD6QNR submitted 2024-11-26 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.chem-ph

Nanako Shitara , Andrés Montoya-Castillo This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hallphysics.chem-ph
keywords quantumnoisespectroscopyvariationaloptimizationdynamicaldecouplingLorentzianbasisnitrogen-vacancycentersdecoherencefilterfunctionsconfidenceintervals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a post-processing method, variational quantum noise spectroscopy (VQNS), that reconstructs a quantum sensor's environmental noise spectrum from coherence decays measured under ordinary dynamical-decoupling sequences. Instead of inverting the coherence-to-spectrum relation point-by-point, VQNS represents the trial spectrum as a sum of symmetrized Lorentzians and optimizes its parameters so that the predicted coherence curves match all input measurements simultaneously and self-consistently. Because the coherence response to each Lorentzian is known analytically, the optimization is fast and needs no numerical quadrature, making it practical for routine experimental data. On experimental nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center data, VQNS claims to reveal that previous dynamical-decoupling noise spectroscopy overestimated low-frequency noise by an order of magnitude, and to resolve a hydrogen Larmor peak that earlier analysis missed. The method also provides confidence intervals and a sensitivity measure that identifies which additional pulse sequences would tighten the reconstruction at selected frequencies.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the symmetrized Lorentzian basis expansion, $S_{\text{trial}}(\omega) = \sum_i B_i(\omega_{c,i}^2/(\omega_{c,i}^2 + (\omega-d_i)^2) + \omega_{c,i}^2/(\omega_{c,i}^2 + (\omega+d_i)^2))$, together with the closed-form attenuation functions $\chi(t)$ for CPMG pulse sequences. Because each Lorentzian's contribution to the coherence can be written analytically, the trial coherence $C^{\text{trial}}(t;\theta)$ is evaluated without expensive oscillatory quadrature, and a gradient-based optimizer minimizes the mean-squared error between measured and trial coherences subject to the positivity constraint $\theta \ge 0$. Stochastic initialization of the parameters yields slightly different optimized spectra across independent runs, and their pointwise spread defines confidence intervals. A time-integrated filter-function sensitivity $G_x(\omega) = \int_0^\infty dt\, F_x(\omega t) e^{-\chi_x(t)}$ identifies which additional pulse sequences tighten the reconstruction at selected frequencies, enabling an iterative experiment-theory loop.

What would settle it

Generate synthetic coherence curves from a sharply peaked non-Lorentzian spectrum, for example a narrow Gaussian line or a two-level-fluctuator spectrum whose width is much smaller than the narrowest Lorentzian in the basis, and run VQNS on those curves: if the reconstructed peak position, height, or width is visibly biased despite excellent coherence fits, the Lorentzian basis is the limiting assumption. Alternatively, on the same NV sample studied here, perform a direct Ramsey free-induction measurement to probe the zero-frequency spectral weight and compare its initial decay slope with the VQNS spectrum; a slope implying several times more low-frequency power than VQNS reports would contradict the order-of-magnitude suppression claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a single variational algorithm applied to standard FID, spin-echo, and CPMG coherence measurements can recover the full noise power spectrum $S(\omega)$ with accuracy and precision that exceed pointwise DDNS and Fourier-transform noise spectroscopy, while remaining robust to measurement noise and sparse temporal sampling. Central to the claim is the empirical demonstration on shallow NV centers in diamond: VQNS, using the same CPMG coherence data that DDNS had analyzed, produces a spectrum whose low-frequency weight is roughly ten times smaller than the double-Lorentzian DDNS reconstruction, and which contains a clear peak at the hydrogen Larmor frequency (≈1.93 MHz at 454 G) that DDNS only revealed under a separate XY8 sequence. The paper treats this as evidence that VQNS extracts greater physical insight from the same experiment, setting up precision noise-spectroscopy-based quantum metrology.

Load-bearing premise

The reconstruction is valid only if the true noise spectrum can be well approximated by a finite sum of positive, frequency-symmetric Lorentzian bumps whose centers, widths, and heights are optimized; if the real spectrum contains sharper resonances or longer non-Lorentzian tails, the reported confidence intervals may be too narrow and the low-frequency estimate could be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Existing CPMG, spin-echo, and FID coherence datasets can be reanalyzed with VQNS without any new experiments, so previously published DDNS reconstructions may be worth revisiting for systematic low-frequency bias.
  • Spectral features such as nuclear Larmor peaks can be extracted directly from ordinary CPMG decays, without requiring dedicated pulse sequences or supplementary measurements.
  • The sensitivity measure provides a quantitative criterion for choosing the next pulse sequence to add, making noise-spectrum refinement a systematic iterative process rather than a heuristic one.
  • Because VQNS tolerates underconverged, noisy, and poorly time-resolved coherence data, it extends noise spectroscopy to systems where high-statistics measurements are difficult to obtain.
  • The method's computational cost is small enough (roughly minutes per run on a laptop, and trivially parallelizable) that confidence intervals and repeated analyses can be performed routinely in the experimental workflow.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's specific NV demonstration, VQNS implies that the accuracy of any noise-spectrum reconstruction is limited by the match between the true spectrum and the chosen Lorentzian basis; for spectra with sharp resonances or long non-Lorentzian tails, the confidence intervals from random restarts may substantially understate the true reconstruction error.
  • The paper's claim that prior DDNS overestimated low-frequency noise is a strong physical conclusion that would be independently testable with a direct Ramsey free-induction measurement at the same NV center, which is sensitive to the zero-frequency spectral weight that VQNS could not directly probe from CPMG data alone.
  • The sensitivity measure suggests a closed-loop experiment-design protocol in which preliminary FID/SE measurements seed a trial spectrum, the measure identifies complementary pulses, and new data recursively tighten the confidence intervals; this protocol could be automated for future quantum-sensor calibration.
  • If the Lorentzian basis were replaced by another overcomplete set with closed-form coherence responses, such as Gaussian or algebraic-decay kernels, VQNS's basis sensitivity could be quantified directly; such a comparison would clarify how much of the reported low-frequency suppression is intrinsic to the data versus imposed by the basis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces VQNS, a post-processing variational method to reconstruct Gaussian pure-dephasing noise spectra S(ω) from coherence decays under FID, Hahn echo, and CPMG pulse sequences. The trial spectrum is written as a sum of Nbasis symmetrized Lorentzians, for which the attenuation integral in Eq. (1) has closed-form expressions for CPMG-type filter functions (SI Sec. I). Parameters are optimized with Adam/AdamW to minimize the mean-squared error between measured and trial coherences, with non-negativity constraints and a convergence threshold ξ; independent stochastic restarts yield pointwise means and standard deviations used as confidence intervals. The method is tested on synthetic three-Lorentzian, Ohmic, and 1/f spectra, compared favorably with FTNS under measurement noise and low temporal resolution (SI Sec. VI), and a sensitivity measure Gx(ω) is proposed to guide pulse-sequence selection. The paper applies VQNS to published NV-center CPMG data, reporting a peak at the hydrogen Larmor frequency and a low-frequency plateau about an order of magnitude below the DDNS reconstruction of Ref. 53.

Significance. The core algorithmic idea is attractive and, if the experimental claims are properly supported, would be a useful addition to the noise-spectroscopy toolbox. The analytical Lorentzian filter responses make the optimization fast and portable, and the stochastic-restart confidence intervals plus the sensitivity heuristic are practical tools. The synthetic benchmarks in Figs. 2–3 and the SI demonstrate real robustness to additive coherence noise, low temporal resolution, and non-Lorentzian target spectra, and the SI provides enough hyperparameter detail to reproduce the method. The hydrogen-peak recovery from CPMG data alone, once confirmed by the robustness tests requested below, would be a valuable demonstration. However, the abstract's flagship quantitative claim—that previous measurements overestimated low-frequency noise by an order of magnitude—is not currently established by the evidence in the manuscript, because the low-frequency inversion is weakly constrained by the available data and is entangled with regularization choices.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 4 and surrounding text; abstract] The order-of-magnitude low-frequency statement is not supported by the CPMG data set used. Because no FID measurement is included and the lowest-order sequence is spin echo, the filter functions have very weak sensitivity near ω → 0; the paper itself notes (p. 10) that "a more accurate assessment of the zero-frequency spectral weight would require Ramsey measurements." The VQNS result in Fig. 4(e) is obtained with AdamW weight decay 0.4 (SI Sec. II), which systematically pulls poorly constrained amplitudes toward zero. The observed factor-of-ten reduction relative to the DDNS reconstruction is therefore expected even in the absence of new spectral information. To retain the abstract claim, the authors must show that the low-frequency plateau is stable under the subsampling and regularization-strength tests of SI Sec. V, as was done for the hydrogen peak.
  2. [Fig. 4(e) and 'confidence intervals', p. 11] The reported confidence intervals are standard deviations over Nruns = 30 random initializations with a fixed basis size, fixed optimizer, and fixed regularization. They therefore quantify only initialization variance within the chosen Lorentzian ansatz; they do not include model error from basis incompleteness, uncertainty in the regularization strength, or the null space of the S → C map arising from the lossy filtering in Eq. (1). The claim that "narrow confidence intervals ... suggest a high level of accuracy" (p. 11) is not justified. The authors should either provide a synthetic inversion study demonstrating that these intervals have reasonable coverage for the experimental sequence set, or temper the language to "precision" rather than "accuracy."
  3. [SI Sec. V, Fig. S1] SI Sec. V applies two consistency tests to the experimental data—subsampling the available CPMG sequences and varying the weight decay—and concludes that high-frequency features and the feature near the 13C Larmor frequency are not robust, while the hydrogen peak persists. The low-frequency plateau, which is the basis of the abstract's central quantitative claim, is not subjected to the same tests. Without this control, the possibility remains that the plateau height is a regularization artifact rather than a property of the data. The authors should extend Fig. S1 to display the low-frequency region under the same variations and report the resulting range of plateau values.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase "previously undetected nuclear species at the diamond surface" overstates the novelty: Ref. 53 already reported the hydrogen signal, although it required a separate XY8 measurement; the new achievement is recovering it from CPMG data alone.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption contains a doubled period: "set ω0 = 105/(2π) Hz. ." should read "set ω0 = 105/(2π) Hz."
  3. [p. 5, algorithmic step 4] The constraint "θ ≥ 0" is ambiguous because θ is a vector containing Bi, di, and ωc,i; the authors should state explicitly which parameter classes are constrained to be non-negative (the SI initialization suggests di is drawn from positive intervals, but the body text should say so).
  4. [Eq. (3) and Fig. 3(d)] For the 1/f test, the input spectrum S(ω) = ζ/|ω| diverges at ω = 0, and the text explains that the zero-pulse sequence is omitted for this reason; it would be helpful to state in the main text that the finite plateau shown near ω → 0 is a regularized low-frequency representation rather than a faithful reconstruction of the divergent model.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: VQNS is an inverse fit with independent checks; only the coherence-match 'confirmation' is a local self-consistency step.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Main text, experimental application paragraph beginning 'To assess the accuracy of VQNS relative to DDNS...' (around Fig. 4a-d).]
    "Indeed, the good agreement between VQNS coherence curves and experiment—which is markedly better than that of the DDNS curves—across all CPMG pulse sequences shown in Fig. 4 (a-d) confirms the accuracy of the VQNS reconstruction."

    The VQNS spectrum is obtained by minimizing exactly this coherence error: the loss is L = N_t^{-1} sum_{j,k} |C_j(t_k) - C_j^{trial}(t_k; theta)|^2 (SI Sec. II), and convergence requires L < xi. Thus the 'predicted' coherence curves from the fitted spectrum are the objective function of the fit, so their agreement with the input measurements is enforced by construction up to the threshold xi. Using that agreement to 'confirm the accuracy' of the reconstruction is a self-consistency check, not an independent test. The main spectral outputs (hydrogen Larmor peak, absence of 13C, low-frequency plateau) are not themselves defined by this step, and the hydrogen feature is cross-checked against a known Larmor frequency and against subsampling/regularization stability in SI Sec.

full rationale

The central VQNS derivation is a genuine inverse fit, not a tautology. Equations (2)-(3) parametrize S(omega) as a positive sum of symmetrized Lorentzians with free coefficients, Eq. (1) maps S to coherence analytically, and the loss in SI Sec. II minimizes the mean-squared deviation between measured and trial coherences. Reconstructing S by fitting C is not circular because S is not defined from C by identity; the Lorentzian parameters are optimized, the hydrogen peak is not pre-assigned, and the paper validates it against the known 1H Larmor frequency and checks stability under subsampling and regularization (SI Sec. V, Fig. S1). The low-frequency order-of-magnitude claim is regularization- and ansatz-dependent, and the paper itself concedes that 'a more accurate assessment of the zero-frequency spectral weight would require Ramsey measurements'; this is an uncertainty/correctness caveat, not a circularity. The one locally circular element is the use of the fitted coherence curves as 'confirmation' of accuracy: the trial coherences are the minimization objective, so agreement with experiment is enforced up to threshold xi. This is a self-consistency check, not independent evidence, but it is not load-bearing for the main spectral claims. The FTNS comparison cites the authors' own Ref. 61/S11, but only as a benchmarking baseline, not as justification of the VQNS method; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from self-citations. Finally, the abstract's phrase 'previously undetected nuclear species' overstates the main text's statement that the hydrogen feature was 'also reported in' Ref. 53 under XY8; that is a presentation inconsistency, not a circularity. Overall, the central derivation is self-contained and the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central reconstruction is a data fit with a user-chosen basis and regularization; the only new mathematical object introduced is the sensitivity measure Gx(ω) (Eq. 4), which is a heuristic defined from the filter functions and a preliminary fitted spectrum, not a new physical entity.

free parameters (6)
  • Lorentzian amplitudes B_i (i=1..Nbasis) = not reported numerically; shown as spectra
    Optimized to match coherence data (Eq. 3); these are the primary degrees of freedom of the fit.
  • Lorentzian center frequencies d_i = not reported; appear in final spectra
    Optimized; the hydrogen peak at 1.93 MHz emerges from these parameters.
  • Lorentzian widths ω_{c,i} = not reported
    Optimized; control peak sharpness and are limited by coherence data duration.
  • Number of basis functions Nbasis = 3, 10, 20, 40 in different figures
    Hand-chosen; affects which spectra can be represented (SI Fig. S3).
  • Convergence threshold ξ = 1e-5 to 1e-2 depending on figure
    User-selected; sets the stopping condition and influences the spread of accepted spectra.
  • Optimizer hyperparameters (lr, weight decay, betas, eps) = e.g., lr=0.02, weight decay=0.4 for Fig. 4
    Hand-tuned; the weight decay (regularization) significantly changes the high-frequency part of the experimental reconstruction (SI Sec V).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Noise is a stationary Gaussian process with zero mean and vanishing higher-order cumulants
    Needed to derive Eq. 1; standard in DDNS but not universally true (e.g., telegraph noise).
  • domain assumption Pure dephasing limit T2* << T1, Hamiltonian H = (1/2)[Ω + β(t)]σ_z
    Justifies the scalar noise model; appropriate for NV centers at moderate fields.
  • domain assumption Filter functions for FID, SE, and CPMG are exact for ideal instantaneous π pulses
    Analytical filter functions (SI Sec I) neglect pulse width and error effects; real experiments deviate.
  • ad hoc to paper The true spectrum can be represented as a finite sum of positive symmetrized Lorentzians
    Eq. 2; this method choice is not guaranteed for arbitrary noise and is the main source of potential bias.
  • domain assumption Adam/AdamW optimization with random restarts finds a spectrum consistent with the data within threshold ξ
    The algorithm relies on local optimization; multiple runs sample the landscape but do not guarantee the global minimum.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fast, accurate, and error-resilient variational quantum noise spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WLTD6QNR

@misc{pith2026241117064,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fast, accurate, and error-resilient variational quantum noise spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WLTD6QNR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17064}
}
read the original abstract

Detecting and characterizing decoherence-inducing noise sources is critical for developing robust quantum technologies and deploying quantum sensors operating at molecular scales. However, current noise spectroscopies rely on severe approximations that sacrifice accuracy and precision. We propose a novel approach to overcome these limitations. It self-consistently extracts noise spectra that characterize the interactions between a quantum sensor and its environment from commonly performed dynamical decoupling-based coherence measurements. Our approach adopts minimal assumptions and is resilient to measurement errors. We quantify confidence intervals and sensitivity measures to identify experiments that improve spectral reconstruction. We employ our method to reconstruct the noise spectrum of a nitrogen-vacancy sensor in diamond, resolving previously undetected nuclear species at the diamond surface and revealing that previous measurements had overestimated the strength of low-frequency noise by an order of magnitude. Our method uncovers previously hidden structure with unprecedented accuracy, setting the stage for precision noise spectroscopy-based quantum metrology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17064 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic for the variational quantum noise spectr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. VQNS reconstruction of a sample power spectrum from 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Numerically generated coherence dynamics with s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a-d) Comparison of experimentally measured coher [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a-c) Sensitivity measures Gx(ω) of pulse sequences used in the measurement set and their sum. (d-f) VQNS noise spectra reconstructed using the corresponding sets of measurements indicated in the above panels. For the spectrum reconstructions, we used Nbasis = 20, Nrun…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hahn, E. L. Spin Echoes. Phys. Rev. 1950, 80, 580--594

    1950

  2. [2]

    Y.; Purcell, E

    Carr, H. Y.; Purcell, E. M. Effects of Diffusion on Free Precession in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments. Phys. Rev. 1954, 94, 630--638

    1954

  3. [3]

    Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times

    Meiboom, S.; Gill, D. Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times. Review of Scientific Instruments 1958, 29, 688--691

    1958

  4. [4]

    Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems

    Viola, L.; Lloyd, S. Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems. Physical Review A 1998, 58, 2733--2744

    1998

  5. [5]

    Dynamical Decoupling of Open Quantum Systems

    Viola, L.; Knill, E.; Lloyd, S. Dynamical Decoupling of Open Quantum Systems. Physical Review Letters 1999, 82, 2417--2421

    1999

  6. [6]

    Using parity kicks for decoherence control

    Vitali, D.; Tombesi, P. Using parity kicks for decoherence control. Physical Review A 1999, 59, 4178--4186

    1999

  7. [7]

    H.; Ristè, D.; Dobrovitski, V

    de Lange, G.; Wang, Z. H.; Ristè, D.; Dobrovitski, V. V.; Hanson, R. Universal Dynamical Decoupling of a Single Solid-State Spin from a Spin Bath. Science 2010, 330, 60--63

    2010

  8. [8]

    Du, J.; Rong, X.; Zhao, N.; Wang, Y.; Yang, J.; Liu, R. B. Preserving electron spin coherence in solids by optimal dynamical decoupling. Nature 2009, 461, 1265--1268

    2009

Show all 104 references
  1. [9]

    M.; Eckvahl, H

    Moisanu, C. M.; Eckvahl, H. J.; Stern, C. L.; Wasielewski, M. R.; Dichtel, W. R. A Paired-Ion Framework Composed of Vanadyl Porphyrin Molecular Qubits Extends Spin Coherence Times. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146, 27975--28598

    2024

  2. [10]

    Quantum sensing of radio-frequency signal with NV centers in SiC

    Jiang, Z.; Cai, H.; Cernansky, R.; Liu, X.; Gao, W. Quantum sensing of radio-frequency signal with NV centers in SiC. Science advances 2023, 9, eadg2080

    2023

  3. [11]

    C.; Wang, Y.-X.; Onizhuk, M.; Soloway, B

    Jerger, P. C.; Wang, Y.-X.; Onizhuk, M.; Soloway, B. S.; Solomon, M. T.; Egerstrom, C.; Heremans, F. J.; Galli, G.; Clerk, A. A.; Awschalom, D. D. Detecting Spin-Bath Polarization with Quantum Quench Phase Shifts of Single Spins in Diamond. PRX Quantum 2023, 4, 040315

    2023

  4. [12]

    A.; Yao, N

    Machado, F.; Demler, E. A.; Yao, N. Y.; Chatterjee, S. Quantum Noise Spectroscopy of Dynamical Critical Phenomena. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 131, 070801

    2023

  5. [13]

    M.; Melentijevi \'c , K.; Stacey, A.; Markham, M.; Twitchen, D.; Isoya, J.; Pezzagna, S.; Meijer, J.; Du, J

    M \"u ller, C.; Kong, X.; Cai, J. M.; Melentijevi \'c , K.; Stacey, A.; Markham, M.; Twitchen, D.; Isoya, J.; Pezzagna, S.; Meijer, J.; Du, J. F.; Plenio, M. B.; Naydenov, B.; McGuinness, L. P.; Jelezko, F. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with single spin sensitivity. ...

    2014

  6. [14]

    D.; Walsworth, R

    Ajoy, A.; Bissbort, U.; Lukin, M. D.; Walsworth, R. L.; Cappellaro, P. Atomic-Scale Nuclear Spin Imaging Using Quantum-Assisted Sensors in Diamond. Phys. Rev. X 2015, 5, 011001

    2015

  7. [15]

    Single-molecule scale magnetic resonance spectroscopy using quantum diamond sensors

    Du, J.; Shi, F.; Kong, X.; Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J. Single-molecule scale magnetic resonance spectroscopy using quantum diamond sensors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2024, 96, 025001

    2024

  8. [16]

    L.; Reinhard, F.; Cappellaro, P

    Degen, C. L.; Reinhard, F.; Cappellaro, P. Quantum sensing. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2017, 89, 035002

    2017

  9. [17]

    B.; Fedder, H.; Wrachtrup, J

    Zhao, N.; Honert, J.; Schmid, B.; Klas, M.; Isoya, J.; Markham, M.; Twitchen, D.; Jelezko, F.; Liu, R. B.; Fedder, H.; Wrachtrup, J. Sensing single remote nuclear spins. Nature Nanotechnology 2012, 7, 657--662

    2012

  10. [18]

    W.; Nöbauer, T.; Rempp, F.; Balasubramanian, G.; Wolf, T.; Reinhard, F.; Hollenberg, L

    Dolde, F.; Fedder, H.; Doherty, M. W.; Nöbauer, T.; Rempp, F.; Balasubramanian, G.; Wolf, T.; Reinhard, F.; Hollenberg, L. C.; Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J. Electric-field sensing using single diamond spins. Nature Physics 2011, 7, 459--463

    2011

  11. [19]

    W.; Myers, B

    Ovartchaiyapong, P.; Lee, K. W.; Myers, B. A.; Jayich, A. C. B. Dynamic strain-mediated coupling of a single diamond spin to a mechanical resonator. Nature communications 2014, 5, 4429

    2014

  12. [20]

    Single-protein spin resonance spectroscopy under ambient conditions

    Shi, F.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, P.; Sun, H.; Wang, J.; Rong, X.; Chen, M.; Ju, C.; Reinhard, F.; Chen, H.; Wrachtrup, J.; Wang, J.; Du, J. Single-protein spin resonance spectroscopy under ambient conditions. Science 2015, 347, 1135--1138

    2015

  13. [21]

    O.; Urbach, E.; de Leon, N

    Lovchinsky, I.; Sushkov, A. O.; Urbach, E.; de Leon, N. P.; Choi, S.; Greve, K. D.; Evans, R.; Gertner, R.; Bersin, E.; Müller, C.; McGuinness, L.; Jelezko, F.; Walsworth, R. L.; Park, H.; Lukin, M. D. Nuclear magnetic resonance detection and spectroscopy of single proteins us...

    2016

  14. [22]

    Shi, F. et al. Single-DNA electron spin resonance spectroscopy in aqueous solutions. Nature Methods 2018, 15, 697--699

    2018

  15. [23]

    L.; Jayich, A

    Jenkins, A.; Pelliccione, M.; Yu, G.; Ma, X.; Li, X.; Wang, K. L.; Jayich, A. C. B. Single-spin sensing of domain-wall structure and dynamics in a thin-film skyrmion host. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2019, 3, 083801

    2019

  16. [24]

    X.; B \"u ttner, F.; Walsworth, R

    Dovzhenko, Y.; Casola, F.; Schlotter, S.; Zhou, T. X.; B \"u ttner, F.; Walsworth, R. L.; Beach, G. S.; Yacoby, A. Magnetostatic twists in room-temperature skyrmions explored by nitrogen-vacancy center spin texture reconstruction. Nature communications 2018, 9, 2712

    2018

  17. [25]

    T.; Kehayias, P.; McDowell, A

    Smits, J.; Damron, J. T.; Kehayias, P.; McDowell, A. F.; Mosavian, N.; Fescenko, I.; Ristoff, N.; Laraoui, A.; Jarmola, A.; Acosta, V. M. Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with a microfluidic diamond quantum sensor. Science Advances 2019, 5, eaaw7895

    2019

  18. [26]

    H.; Randall, J.; Bradley, C

    Abobeih, M. H.; Randall, J.; Bradley, C. E.; Bartling, H. P.; Bakker, M. A.; Degen, M. J.; Markham, M.; Twitchen, D. J.; Taminiau, T. H. Atomic-scale imaging of a 27-nuclear-spin cluster using a quantum sensor. Nature 2019, 576, 411--415

    2019

  19. [27]

    Dynamical decoupling sequence construction as a filter-design problem

    Biercuk, M.; Doherty, A.; Uys, H. Dynamical decoupling sequence construction as a filter-design problem. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 2011, 44, 154002

    2011

  20. [28]

    A.; Suter, D

    \'Alvarez, G. A.; Suter, D. Measuring the Spectrum of Colored Noise by Dynamical Decoupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 230501

    2011

  21. [29]

    G.; Nakamura, Y.; Tsai, J

    Bylander, J.; Gustavsson, S.; Yan, F.; Yoshihara, F.; Harrabi, K.; Fitch, G.; Cory, D. G.; Nakamura, Y.; Tsai, J. S.; Oliver, W. D. Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit. Nature Physics 2011, 7, 565--570

    2011

  22. [30]

    F.; Berkson, Z.; Polyhach, Y.; Jeschke, G

    Soetbeer, J.; Ibáñez, L. F.; Berkson, Z.; Polyhach, Y.; Jeschke, G. Regularized dynamical decoupling noise spectroscopy-a decoherence descriptor for radicals in glassy matrices. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2021, 23, 21664--21676

    2021

  23. [31]

    M.; Viola, L.; Paz-Silva, G

    Chalermpusitarak, T.; Tonekaboni, B.; Wang, Y.; Norris, L. M.; Viola, L.; Paz-Silva, G. A. Frame-Based Filter-Function Formalism for Quantum Characterization and Control. PRX Quantum 2021, 2, 030315

    2021

  24. [32]

    M.; Paz-Silva, G

    Norris, L. M.; Paz-Silva, G. A.; Viola, L. Qubit Noise Spectroscopy for Non-Gaussian Dephasing Environments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 150503

    2016

  25. [33]

    Sun, W. K. C.; Cappellaro, P. Self-consistent noise characterization of quantum devices. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 106, 155413

    2022

  26. [34]

    M.; Sung, Y.; Winik, R.; Qiu, J

    von L\"upke, U.; Beaudoin, F.; Norris, L. M.; Sung, Y.; Winik, R.; Qiu, J. Y.; Kjaergaard, M.; Kim, D.; Yoder, J.; Gustavsson, S.; Viola, L.; Oliver, W. D. Two-Qubit Spectroscopy of Spatiotemporally Correlated Quantum Noise in Superconducting Qubits. PRX Quantum 2020, 1, 010305

    2020

  27. [35]

    Tripathi, V.; Chen, H.; Levenson-Falk, E.; Lidar, D. A. Modeling Low- and High-Frequency Noise in Transmon Qubits with Resource-Efficient Measurement. PRX Quantum 2024, 5, 010320

    2024

  28. [36]

    Digital noise spectroscopy with a quantum sensor

    Wang, G.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Li, C.; Viola, L.; Cooper, A.; Cappellaro, P. Digital noise spectroscopy with a quantum sensor. Quantum Science and Technology 2024, 9, 035006

    2024

  29. [37]

    Sung, Y. et al. Multi-level quantum noise spectroscopy. Nature communications 2021, 12, 967

    2021

  30. [38]

    N.; Petukhov, A.; Dykman, M

    Wudarski, F.; Zhang, Y.; Korotkov, A. N.; Petukhov, A.; Dykman, M. Characterizing low-frequency qubit noise. Physical Review Applied 2023, 19, 064066

    2023

  31. [39]

    I.; Futamura, L.; Fox, C.; Cambria, M

    Rovny, J.; Yuan, Z.; Fitzpatrick, M.; Abdalla, A. I.; Futamura, L.; Fox, C.; Cambria, M. C.; Kolkowitz, S.; de Leon, N. P. Nanoscale covariance magnetometry with diamond quantum sensors. Science 2022, 378, 1301--1305

    2022

  32. [40]

    A.; Norris, L

    Paz-Silva, G. A.; Norris, L. M.; Beaudoin, F.; Viola, L. Extending comb-based spectral estimation to multiaxis quantum noise. Phys. Rev. A 2019, 100, 042334

    2019

  33. [41]

    Q.; Dong, W.; Norris, L

    Khan, M. Q.; Dong, W.; Norris, L. M.; Viola, L. Multiaxis quantum noise spectroscopy robust to errors in state preparation and measurement. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2024, 22, 024074

    2024

  34. [42]

    Sangtawesin, S. et al. Origins of Diamond Surface Noise Probed by Correlating Single-Spin Measurements with Surface Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. X 2019, 9, 031052

    2019

  35. [43]

    V.; Shotan, Z.; Jayakumar, H.; Henshaw, J.; Zangara, P

    Monge, R.; Delord, T.; Proscia, N. V.; Shotan, Z.; Jayakumar, H.; Henshaw, J.; Zangara, P. R.; Lozovoi, A.; Pagliero, D.; Esquinazi, P. D.; An, T.; Sodemann, I.; Menon, V. M.; Meriles, C. A. Spin Dynamics of a Solid-State Qubit in Proximity to a Superconductor. Nano Letters 20...

    2023

  36. [44]

    Chrostoski, P.; Kehayias, P.; Santamore, D. H. Surface roughness noise analysis and comprehensive noise effects on depth-dependent coherence time of NV centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 106, 235311

    2022

  37. [45]

    A.; Das, A.; Dartiailh, M

    Myers, B. A.; Das, A.; Dartiailh, M. C.; Ohno, K.; Awschalom, D. D.; Bleszynski Jayich, A. C. Probing Surface Noise with Depth-Calibrated Spins in Diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 027602

    2014

  38. [46]

    E.; Shulman, M

    Dial, O. E.; Shulman, M. D.; Harvey, S. P.; Bluhm, H.; Umansky, V.; Yacoby, A. Charge Noise Spectroscopy Using Coherent Exchange Oscillations in a Singlet-Triplet Qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 146804

    2013

  39. [47]

    Spectral density classification for environment spectroscopy

    Barr, J.; Zicari, G.; Ferraro, A.; Paternostro, M. Spectral density classification for environment spectroscopy. Machine Learning: Science and Technology 2024, 5, 015043

    2024

  40. [48]

    K.; Martins, F.; Cywi \' n ski, .; Rudner, M

    Malinowski, F. K.; Martins, F.; Cywi \' n ski, .; Rudner, M. S.; Nissen, P. D.; Fallahi, S.; Gardner, G. C.; Manfra, M. J.; Marcus, C. M.; Kuemmeth, F. Spectrum of the Nuclear Environment for GaAs Spin Qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 177702

    2017

  41. [49]

    Ferrie, C.; Granade, C.; Paz-Silva, G.; Wiseman, H. M. Bayesian quantum noise spectroscopy. New Journal of Physics 2018, 20, 123005

    2018

  42. [50]

    Application of optimal band-limited control protocols to quantum noise sensing

    Frey, V.; Mavadia, S.; Norris, L.; De Ferranti, W.; Lucarelli, D.; Viola, L.; Biercuk, M. Application of optimal band-limited control protocols to quantum noise sensing. Nature communications 2017, 8, 2189

    2017

  43. [51]

    F.; Morton, J

    Wise, D. F.; Morton, J. J.; Dhomkar, S. Using deep learning to understand and mitigate the qubit noise environment. PRX Quantum 2021, 2, 010316

    2021

  44. [52]

    M.; Belthangady, C.; Le Sage, D.; Cappellaro, P.; Maze, J.; Lukin, M

    Bar-Gill, N.; Pham, L. M.; Belthangady, C.; Le Sage, D.; Cappellaro, P.; Maze, J.; Lukin, M. D.; Yacoby, A.; Walsworth, R. Suppression of spin-bath dynamics for improved coherence of multi-spin-qubit systems. Nature communications 2012, 3, 858

    2012

  45. [53]

    J.; Isoda, T.; Itoh, K

    Romach, Y.; M\"uller, C.; Unden, T.; Rogers, L. J.; Isoda, T.; Itoh, K. M.; Markham, M.; Stacey, A.; Meijer, J.; Pezzagna, S.; Naydenov, B.; McGuinness, L. P.; Bar-Gill, N.; Jelezko, F. Spectroscopy of Surface-Induced Noise Using Shallow Spins in Diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015...

    2015

  46. [54]

    J.; Uys, H.; VanDevender, A

    Biercuk, M. J.; Uys, H.; VanDevender, A. P.; Shiga, N.; Itano, W. M.; Bollinger, J. J. Experimental Uhrig dynamical decoupling using trapped ions. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 79, 062324

    2009

  47. [55]

    J.; Nelson, J.; Edge, L

    Connors, E. J.; Nelson, J.; Edge, L. F.; Nichol, J. M. Charge-noise spectroscopy of Si/SiGe quantum dots via dynamically-decoupled exchange oscillations. Nature communications 2022, 13, 940

    2022

  48. [56]

    T.; Dehollain, J

    Muhonen, J. T.; Dehollain, J. P.; Laucht, A.; Hudson, F. E.; Kalra, R.; Sekiguchi, T.; Itoh, K. M.; Jamieson, D. N.; McCallum, J. C.; Dzurak, A. S.; Morello, A. Storing quantum information for 30 seconds in a nanoelectronic device. Nature Nanotechnology 2014, 9, 986--991

    2014

  49. [57]

    M.; Hanson, M

    Medford, J.; Cywi\' n ski, .; Barthel, C.; Marcus, C. M.; Hanson, M. P.; Gossard, A. C. Scaling of Dynamical Decoupling for Spin Qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 086802

    2012

  50. [58]

    A.; H \"a u ermann, T.; Pasquarelli, A.; Denisenko, A.; Wrachtrup, J

    F \'a varo de Oliveira, F.; Antonov, D.; Wang, Y.; Neumann, P.; Momenzadeh, S. A.; H \"a u ermann, T.; Pasquarelli, A.; Denisenko, A.; Wrachtrup, J. Tailoring spin defects in diamond by lattice charging. Nature communications 2017, 8, 15409

    2017

  51. [59]

    J.; Sherwood, M

    Kim, M.; Mamin, H. J.; Sherwood, M. H.; Ohno, K.; Awschalom, D. D.; Rugar, D. Decoherence of Near-Surface Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers Due to Electric Field Noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 115, 087602

    2015

  52. [60]

    M.; Abe, E

    Ishizu, S.; Sasaki, K.; Misonou, D.; Teraji, T.; Itoh, K. M.; Abe, E. Spin coherence and depths of single nitrogen-vacancy centers created by ion implantation into diamond via screening masks. Journal of Applied Physics 2020, 127, 244502

    2020

  53. [61]

    Fourier transform noise spectroscopy

    Vezvaee, A.; Shitara, N.; Sun, S.; Montoya-Castillo, A. Fourier transform noise spectroscopy. npj Quantum Information 2024, 10, 52

    2024

  54. [62]

    Quantum computer based on color centers in diamond

    Pezzagna, S.; Meijer, J. Quantum computer based on color centers in diamond. Applied Physics Reviews 2021, 8, 011308

    2021

  55. [63]

    Decoherence and dynamical decoupling control of nitrogen vacancy center electron spins in nuclear spin baths

    Zhao, N.; Ho, S.-W.; Liu, R.-B. Decoherence and dynamical decoupling control of nitrogen vacancy center electron spins in nuclear spin baths. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 115303

    2012

  56. [64]

    Wang, Z.-H.; de Lange, G.; Rist\`e, D.; Hanson, R.; Dobrovitski, V. V. Comparison of dynamical decoupling protocols for a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 155204

    2012

  57. [65]

    A.; Ouellet, M.; Huang, T.-Y.; Taminiau, T

    Breitweiser, S. A.; Ouellet, M.; Huang, T.-Y.; Taminiau, T. H.; Bassett, L. C. Quadrupolar resonance spectroscopy of individual nuclei using a room-temperature quantum sensor. Nano Letters 2024, 24, 16253--16260

    2024

  58. [66]

    R.; Weiss, A

    Zvi, U.; Candido, D. R.; Weiss, A. M.; Jones, A. R.; Chen, L.; Golovina, I.; Yu, X.; Wang, S.; Talapin, D. V.; Flatté, M. E.; Esser-Kahn, A. P.; Maurer, P. C. Engineering spin coherence in core-shell diamond nanocrystals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2025, 1...

    2025

  59. [67]

    Kawai, S. et al. Nitrogen-terminated diamond surface for nanoscale NMR by shallow nitrogen-vacancy centers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2019, 123, 3594--3604

    2019

  60. [68]

    Wong, J. et al. Coherent Erbium Spin Defects in Colloidal Nanocrystal Hosts. ACS nano 2024, 18, 19110--19123

    2024

  61. [69]

    V.; Shotan, Z.; Jayakumar, H.; Henshaw, J.; Zangara, P

    Monge, R.; Delord, T.; Proscia, N. V.; Shotan, Z.; Jayakumar, H.; Henshaw, J.; Zangara, P. R.; Lozovoi, A.; Pagliero, D.; Esquinazi, P. D.; An, T.; Sodemann, I.; Menon, V. M.; Meriles, C. A. Spin dynamics of a solid-state qubit in proximity to a superconductor. Nano letters 20...

    2023

  62. [70]

    M.; Algara-Siller, G.; Kaiser, U.; Weil, T.; Tzeng, Y

    Ermakova, A.; Pramanik, G.; Cai, J. M.; Algara-Siller, G.; Kaiser, U.; Weil, T.; Tzeng, Y. K.; Chang, H. C.; McGuinness, L. P.; Plenio, M. B.; Naydenov, B.; Jelezko, F. Detection of a few metallo-protein molecules using color centers in nanodiamonds. Nano letters 2013, 13, 3305--3309

    2013

  63. [71]

    ohr, R.; Denisenko, A.; H\

    Kumar, J.; Yudilevich, D.; Smooha, A.; Zohar, I.; Pariari, A. K.; St\"ohr, R.; Denisenko, A.; H\"ucker, M.; Finkler, A. Room Temperature Relaxometry of Single Nitrogen Vacancy Centers in Proximity to -RuCl3 Nanoflakes. Nano Letters 2024, 24, 4793--4800

    2024

  64. [72]

    S.; Carter, S

    Farfurnik, D.; Singh, H.; Luo, Z.; Bracker, A. S.; Carter, S. G.; Pettit, R. M.; Waks, E. All-optical noise spectroscopy of a solid-state spin. Nano Letters 2023, 23, 1781--1786

    2023

  65. [73]

    P.; Allcock, D

    Harty, T. P.; Allcock, D. T. C.; Ballance, C. J.; Guidoni, L.; Janacek, H. A.; Linke, N. M.; Stacey, D. N.; Lucas, D. M. High-Fidelity Preparation, Gates, Memory, and Readout of a Trapped-Ion Quantum Bit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 220501

    2014

  66. [74]

    Graham, T. M. et al. Multi-qubit entanglement and algorithms on a neutral-atom quantum computer. Nature 2022, 604, 457--462

    2022

  67. [75]

    Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective

    Wintersperger, K.; Dommert, F.; Ehmer, T.; Hoursanov, A.; Klepsch, J.; Mauerer, W.; Reuber, G.; Strohm, T.; Yin, M.; Luber, S. Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective. EPJ Quantum Technology 2023, 10, 32

    2023

  68. [76]

    M.; Niklas, J.; Poluektov, O

    Zadrozny, J. M.; Niklas, J.; Poluektov, O. G.; Freedman, D. E. Millisecond coherence time in a tunable molecular electronic spin qubit. ACS central science 2015, 1, 488--492

    2015

  69. [77]

    Spin dynamics in single-molecule magnets and molecular qubits

    Aravena, D.; Ruiz, E. Spin dynamics in single-molecule magnets and molecular qubits. Dalton Transactions 2020, 49, 9916--9928

    2020

  70. [78]

    P.; Ba, J

    Kingma, D. P.; Ba, J. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. 2014; http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980

    2014 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Environmental noise spectroscopy with qubits subjected to dynamical decoupling

    Sza \'n kowski, P.; Ramon, G.; Krzywda, J.; Kwiatkowski, D.; Cywi\' n ski, . Environmental noise spectroscopy with qubits subjected to dynamical decoupling. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2017, 29, 333001

    2017

  72. [80]

    Uhrig, G. S. Keeping a quantum bit alive by optimized -pulse sequences. Physical Review Letters 2007, 98, 100504

    2007

  73. [81]

    Uhrig, G. S. Exact results on dynamical decoupling by pulses in quantum information processes. New Journal of Physics 2008, 10, 083024

    2008

  74. [82]

    M.; Nave, C

    Cywi\' n ski, .; Lutchyn, R. M.; Nave, C. P.; Sarma, S. D. How to enhance dephasing time in superconducting qubits. Physical Review B 2008, 77, 174509

    2008

  75. [83]

    Karniadakis, G.; Sherwin, S. J. Spectral/hp element methods for computational fluid dynamics; Oxford University Press, USA, 2005

    2005

  76. [84]

    Boyd, J. P. Chebyshev and Fourier spectral methods; Courier Corporation, 2001

    2001

  77. [85]

    R.; Anderson, P

    Klauder, J. R.; Anderson, P. W. Spectral Diffusion Decay in Spin Resonance Experiments. Physical Review 1962, 125, 912--932

    1962

  78. [86]

    Meier, C.; Tannor, D. J. Non-Markovian evolution of the density operator in the presence of strong laser fields. Journal of Chemical Physics 1999, 111, 3365--3376

    1999

  79. [87]

    Reduced quantum dynamics with arbitrary bath spectral densities: Hierarchical equations of motion based on several different bath decomposition schemes

    Liu, H.; Zhu, L.; Bai, S.; Shi, Q. Reduced quantum dynamics with arbitrary bath spectral densities: Hierarchical equations of motion based on several different bath decomposition schemes. The Journal of chemical physics 2014, 140, 134106

    2014

  80. [88]

    A.; Skaar, J

    Dirdal, C. A.; Skaar, J. Superpositions of Lorentzians as the class of causal functions. Phys. Rev. A 2013, 88, 033834

    2013

  81. [89]

    Accuracy of dynamical-decoupling-based spectroscopy of Gaussian noise

    Sza\' n kowski, P.; Cywi\' n ski, . Accuracy of dynamical-decoupling-based spectroscopy of Gaussian noise. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 97, 032101

    2018

  82. [90]

    Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symmetry, and correlation functions; CRC Press, 2018

    Forster, D. Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symmetry, and correlation functions; CRC Press, 2018

    2018

  83. [91]

    P.; Patterson, G

    Lindsey, C. P.; Patterson, G. D. Detailed comparison of the Williams-Watts and Cole-Davidson functions. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1980, 73, 3348--3357

    1980

  84. [92]

    S.; Pham, L

    Hong, S.; Grinolds, M. S.; Pham, L. M.; Sage, D. L.; Luan, L.; Walsworth, R. L.; Yacoby, A. Nanoscale magnetometry with NV centers in diamond. MRS Bulletin 2013, 38, 155--161

    2013

  85. [93]

    M.; Falci, G.; Altshuler, B

    Paladino, E.; Galperin, Y. M.; Falci, G.; Altshuler, B. L. 1/f noise: Implications for solid-state quantum information. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2014, 86, 361--418 mcitethebibliography main.tex0000664000000000000000000010147215033121272011225 0ustar rootroot [journal=nalefd, manuscript...

    2014

  86. [94]

    Sza\' n kowski \ and\ author

    author author P. Sza\' n kowski \ and\ author . Cywi\' n ski ,\ title title Accuracy of dynamical-decoupling-based spectroscopy of gaussian noise ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.032101 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 97 ,\ pages 032101 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  87. [95]

    Weierstrass ,\ title title Uber die analytische darstellbarkeit sogenannter willkurlicher funktionen reeller argumente ,\ @noop journal journal SB Deutsche Akad

    author author K. Weierstrass ,\ title title Uber die analytische darstellbarkeit sogenannter willkurlicher funktionen reeller argumente ,\ @noop journal journal SB Deutsche Akad. Wiss. Berlin KL. Math. Phys. Tech. \ ( year 1885 ) NoStop

  88. [96]

    Forster ,\ @noop title Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symmetry, and correlation functions \ ( publisher CRC Press ,\ year 2018 ) NoStop

    author author D. Forster ,\ @noop title Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symmetry, and correlation functions \ ( publisher CRC Press ,\ year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  89. [97]

    author author C. P. \ Lindsey \ and\ author G. D. \ Patterson ,\ title title Detailed comparison of the williams-watts and cole-davidson functions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.440530 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 73 ,\ pages 3348 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    doi

  90. [98]

    @noop title Pytorch ,\ howpublished https://pytorch.org/ NoStop

  91. [99]

    @noop title Tensorflow ,\ howpublished https://www.tensorflow.org NoStop

  92. [100]

    Romach , author C

    author author Y. Romach , author C. M\"uller , author T. Unden , author L. J. \ Rogers , author T. Isoda , author K. M. \ Itoh , author M. Markham , author A. Stacey , author J. Meijer , author S. Pezzagna , author B. Naydenov , author L. P. \ McGuinness , author N. Bar-Gill ,...

    doi

  93. [101]

    Loshchilov \ and\ author F

    author author I. Loshchilov \ and\ author F. Hutter ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05101 title Decoupled weight decay regularization ( year 2017 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05101 arXiv:1711.05101 [cs.LG] NoStop

    2017 arXiv

  94. [102]

    author author W. K. C. \ Sun \ and\ author P. Cappellaro ,\ title title Self-consistent noise characterization of quantum devices ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.155413 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 106 ,\ pages 155413 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi

  95. [103]

    Soetbeer , author L

    author author J. Soetbeer , author L. F. \ Ibáñez , author Z. Berkson , author Y. Polyhach ,\ and\ author G. Jeschke ,\ title title Regularized dynamical decoupling noise spectroscopy-a decoherence descriptor for radicals in glassy matrices ,\ https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cp03103...

    doi

  96. [104]

    Vezvaee , author N

    author author A. Vezvaee , author N. Shitara , author S. Sun ,\ and\ author A. Montoya-Castillo ,\ title title Fourier transform noise spectroscopy ,\ @noop journal journal npj Quantum Information \ volume 10 ,\ pages 52 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.