Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervision

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.11377 v2 pith:WOJCZCFE submitted 2021-09-23 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLstat.ML
keywords supervisionevaluationweakwrenchapproachesbenchmarkdatasetsoften
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent Weak Supervision (WS) approaches have had widespread success in easing the bottleneck of labeling training data for machine learning by synthesizing labels from multiple potentially noisy supervision sources. However, proper measurement and analysis of these approaches remain a challenge. First, datasets used in existing works are often private and/or custom, limiting standardization. Second, WS datasets with the same name and base data often vary in terms of the labels and weak supervision sources used, a significant "hidden" source of evaluation variance. Finally, WS studies often diverge in terms of the evaluation protocol and ablations used. To address these problems, we introduce a benchmark platform, WRENCH, for thorough and standardized evaluation of WS approaches. It consists of 22 varied real-world datasets for classification and sequence tagging; a range of real, synthetic, and procedurally-generated weak supervision sources; and a modular, extensible framework for WS evaluation, including implementations for popular WS methods. We use WRENCH to conduct extensive comparisons over more than 120 method variants to demonstrate its efficacy as a benchmark platform. The code is available at https://github.com/JieyuZ2/wrench.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. HackerSignal: A Large-Scale Multi-Source Dataset Linking Hacker Community Discourse to the CVE Vulnerability Lifecycle

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    HackerSignal aggregates 7.45M documents from hacker communities, exploit databases, vulnerability reports, and fixes into a public benchmark for temporal OOD CVE linkage and exploit classification.

  2. Scoring, Reasoning, and Selecting the Best! Ensembling Large Language Models via a Peer-Review Process

    cs.CL 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM-PeerReview ensembles LLMs by scoring responses with LLM-as-Judge and selecting the best via averaging or truth inference, beating Smoothie-Global by 6.9-7.3 points on four datasets.

  3. Harnessing Multiple Large Language Models: A Survey on LLM Ensemble

    cs.CL 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A systematic survey of LLM ensemble methods organized into a taxonomy of ensemble-before-inference, ensemble-during-inference, and ensemble-after-inference stages, with review of benchmarks, applications, and future d...

Pith tools