Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.11297 v1 pith:WP2SRH6J submitted 2020-10-21 cs.CV cs.LG

Performance Prediction for Convolutional Neural Networks in Edge Devices

classification cs.CV cs.LG
keywords edgepredictiontimedevicesmethodsplatformsaccuracybest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Running Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based applications on edge devices near the source of data can meet the latency and privacy challenges. However due to their reduced computing resources and their energy constraints, these edge devices can hardly satisfy CNN needs in processing and data storage. For these platforms, choosing the CNN with the best trade-off between accuracy and execution time while respecting Hardware constraints is crucial. In this paper, we present and compare five (5) of the widely used Machine Learning based methods for execution time prediction of CNNs on two (2) edge GPU platforms. For these 5 methods, we also explore the time needed for their training and tuning their corresponding hyperparameters. Finally, we compare times to run the prediction models on different platforms. The utilization of these methods will highly facilitate design space exploration by providing quickly the best CNN on a target edge GPU. Experimental results show that eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) provides a less than 14.73% average prediction error even for unexplored and unseen CNN models' architectures. Random Forest (RF) depicts comparable accuracy but needs more effort and time to be trained. The other 3 approaches (OLS, MLP and SVR) are less accurate for CNN performances estimation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Spiking Neural Network Architecture Search: A Survey

    cs.NE 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A survey of Spiking Neural Network architecture search techniques viewed through a hardware/software co-design lens.