REVIEW 6 cited by
Computer-Vision Benchmark Segment-Anything Model (SAM) in Medical Images: Accuracy in 12 Datasets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Computer-Vision Benchmark Segment-Anything Model (SAM) in Medical Images: Accuracy in 12 Datasets
read the original abstract
Background: The segment-anything model (SAM), introduced in April 2023, shows promise as a benchmark model and a universal solution to segment various natural images. It comes without previously-required re-training or fine-tuning specific to each new dataset. Purpose: To test SAM's accuracy in various medical image segmentation tasks and investigate potential factors that may affect its accuracy in medical images. Methods: SAM was tested on 12 public medical image segmentation datasets involving 7,451 subjects. The accuracy was measured by the Dice overlap between the algorithm-segmented and ground-truth masks. SAM was compared with five state-of-the-art algorithms specifically designed for medical image segmentation tasks. Associations of SAM's accuracy with six factors were computed, independently and jointly, including segmentation difficulties as measured by segmentation ability score and by Dice overlap in U-Net, image dimension, size of the target region, image modality, and contrast. Results: The Dice overlaps from SAM were significantly lower than the five medical-image-based algorithms in all 12 medical image segmentation datasets, by a margin of 0.1-0.5 and even 0.6-0.7 Dice. SAM-Semantic was significantly associated with medical image segmentation difficulty and the image modality, and SAM-Point and SAM-Box were significantly associated with image segmentation difficulty, image dimension, target region size, and target-vs-background contrast. All these 3 variations of SAM were more accurate in 2D medical images, larger target region sizes, easier cases with a higher Segmentation Ability score and higher U-Net Dice, and higher foreground-background contrast.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Seeing Through the Tool: A Controlled Benchmark for Occlusion Robustness in Foundation Segmentation Models
SAM-family models split into occluder-aware types that avoid predicting into occluded regions and occluder-agnostic types that confidently segment hidden areas, shown via a new benchmark on polyp datasets.
-
MorVess: Morphology-Aware Pulmonary Vessel Segmentation Network
MorVess improves pulmonary vessel segmentation by jointly predicting vessel masks, distance maps, and thickness maps using a 2.5D SAM adapter and global-local fusion for better small-vessel recovery and connectivity.
-
CardioSAM: Topology-Aware Decoder Design for High-Precision Cardiac MRI Segmentation
CardioSAM introduces a topology-aware decoder and boundary refinement module to elevate SAM's performance on cardiac MRI, achieving a 93.39% Dice score.
-
Clinical utility of foundation models in musculoskeletal MRI for biomarker fidelity and predictive outcomes
Fine-tuned foundation models produce reliable MSK MRI biomarkers that support workload-reducing triage and calibrated 48-month prediction of knee replacement and incident OA.
-
CellNet -- Localizing Cells using Sparse and Noisy Point Annotations
CellNet applies regression-based deep learning to count cells from sparse point annotations in microscopy images and claims better performance than zero-shot methods in low-data regimes.
-
Data-Centric Foundation Models in Computational Healthcare: A Survey
The paper surveys data-centric strategies for foundation models in computational healthcare and supplies a curated list of related models and datasets.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.