Characterising Decision Theories with Mechanised Causal Graphs
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved pith:WQIISNQZrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
How should my own decisions affect my beliefs about the outcomes I expect to achieve? If taking a certain action makes me view myself as a certain type of person, it might affect how I think others view me, and how I view others who are similar to me. This can influence my expected utility calculations and change which action I perceive to be best. Whether and how it should is subject to debate, with contenders for how to think about it including evidential decision theory, causal decision theory, and functional decision theory. In this paper, we show that mechanised causal models can be used to characterise and differentiate the most important decision theories, and generate a taxonomy of different decision theories.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A causal modeling perspective on decision theory
Using NPSEMs the paper defines personal decision theory and claims it is optimal under a performance metric of hypothetical interventions enforcing the theory across a population, illustrated on smoking-lesion and New...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.