Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.17617 v3 pith:WTJFCLMZ submitted 2023-12-29 cs.CL

Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Survey

classification cs.CL
keywords generativelanguagellmstasksworksexplorationextractiongithub
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Information extraction (IE) aims to extract structural knowledge from plain natural language texts. Recently, generative Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in text understanding and generation. As a result, numerous works have been proposed to integrate LLMs for IE tasks based on a generative paradigm. To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and exploration of LLM efforts for IE tasks, in this study, we survey the most recent advancements in this field. We first present an extensive overview by categorizing these works in terms of various IE subtasks and techniques, and then we empirically analyze the most advanced methods and discover the emerging trend of IE tasks with LLMs. Based on a thorough review conducted, we identify several insights in technique and promising research directions that deserve further exploration in future studies. We maintain a public repository and consistently update related works and resources on GitHub (\href{https://github.com/quqxui/Awesome-LLM4IE-Papers}{LLM4IE repository})

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. IE as Cache: Information Extraction Enhanced Agentic Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    IE-as-Cache framework repurposes information extraction as a dynamic cognitive cache to improve agentic reasoning accuracy in LLMs on challenging benchmarks.

  2. LA-RL: Label-Aware Self-Reflection for Reinforcement Learning in Information Extraction

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Label-aware diagnostic reflection plus two-stage outcome GRPO improves same-backbone IE F1 over SFT, with larger gains under relation-extraction domain shift.

  3. LC-ICL: Label-Guided Contrastive In-Context Learning for Robust Information Extraction

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LC-ICL improves few-shot NER and RE by using label-guided contrastive demonstrations that pair positive samples with error-annotated negative samples.

  4. From Unstructured Recall to Schema-Grounded Memory: Reliable AI Memory via Iterative, Schema-Aware Extraction

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Schema-aware iterative extraction turns AI memory into a verified system of record, reaching 90-97% accuracy on extraction and end-to-end memory benchmarks where retrieval baselines score 80-87%.

  5. Make Any Collection Navigable: Methods for Constructing and Evaluating Hypergraph of Text

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Methods for constructing Hypergraphs of Text are proposed with a new effort ratio metric where TF-IDF baselines match LLM methods in experiments.

  6. CASE: An Agentic AI Framework for Enhancing Scam Intelligence in Digital Payments

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CASE is a novel agentic AI system that proactively interviews scam victims using LLMs to collect detailed intelligence, which is then structured for use in scam prevention, resulting in a 21% increase in enforcements ...

  7. (Towards) Scalable Reliable Automated Evaluation with Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    Multi-LLM pairwise Elo ranking with adjustable consensus thresholds produces rankings of competency profiles that average Spearman ρ≈0.83 with expert judgments.

  8. A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents

    cs.AI 2024-04 accept novelty 3.0

    A systematic review of memory designs, evaluation methods, applications, limitations, and future directions for LLM-based agents.