Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0809.1413 v2 pith:WUOV46AA submitted 2008-09-08 hep-th astro-phhep-lathep-ph

Cosmology of Bifundamental Fields

classification hep-th astro-phhep-lathep-ph
keywords fieldsmodelsnon-abelianfluxgaugephasetubesbaryons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

If a field theory contains gauged, non-Abelian, bi-fundamental fields i.e. fields that are charged under two separate non-Abelian gauge groups, the transition from a deconfined phase to a hadronic phase may be frustrated. Similar frustration may occur in non-Abelian gauge models containing matter only in higher dimensional representations e.g. models with pure glue, or if ordinary quarks are confined by two flux tubes, as implied in the triangular configuration of baryons within QCD. In a cosmological setting, such models can lead to the formation of a web of confining electric flux tubes that can potentially have observational signatures.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dark Horse, Dark Matter: Revisiting the SO(16)x SO(16)' Nonsupersymmetric Model in the LHC and Dark Energy Era

    hep-th 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Reexamination of the SO(16)xSO(16)' nonsupersymmetric model for implications on dark energy, vacuum stabilization, dark matter candidates, and gauge-Higgs unification in light of LHC and dark energy data.