Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 41 references

Effective field theory of quasi-hydrodynamics from kinetic theory

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that in any linearized causal kinetic-type theory with a spectral gap, the exact slow-variable dynamics expands in powers of the fast relaxation time, with transient hydrodynamics as the universal leading order.

desk verdict Rigorous and likely important: it derives transient hydrodynamics as the controlled leading-order EFT of a broad class of kinetic-like theories, but the abstract overstates the domain by omitting the PT-even self-adjointness assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13542 v1 pith:WVPHU3RI submitted 2026-08-13 nucl-th hep-thmath-phmath.MP

Lorenzo Gavassino This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thhep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords quasi-hydrodynamicseffectivefieldtheorykinetictransienthydrodynamicsIsrael-StewartsymmetrichyperbolicityOnsagerreciprocityspectralseparation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quasi-hydrodynamics describes systems in which a few observables—chemical abundances, shear stresses, or similar—relax far more slowly than the remaining microscopic modes. This paper claims to derive an effective field theory for that regime from any linearized, causal kinetic-type theory: the exact equations for the slow variables are shown to expand in powers of the fast relaxation timescale, with a convergent expansion below a well-defined ultraviolet cutoff. At zeroth order the expansion always produces a causal, symmetric-hyperbolic system belonging to the transient-hydrodynamic universality class selected by the number and tensorial character of the slow degrees of freedom: Israel-Stewart theory for a shear channel with a conserved momentum and a quasi-conserved traceless tensor, Cattaneo theory for a conserved scalar with a quasi-conserved vector. Higher-order corrections are systematic gradient terms that inherit positivity, Onsager reciprocity, and causality constraints from the microscopic theory. If the central claim is right, transient hydrodynamics is not a phenomenological option but the universal leading description of slow relaxation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the operator pair $(\sigma,E^j)$ in the self-adjoint kinetic form $\partial_t\Psi=-(\sigma+E^j\partial_j)\Psi$, together with the spectral projectors $S$ and $F$ that split the Hilbert space into slow and fast sectors. The argument runs through the compressed operators $\sigma_{H_S}$, $E^j_{H_S}$, $E^j_{H_F}$, and the resolvent $(\sigma_{H_F}+ik_l E^l_{H_F}-i\omega)^{-1}$; expanding that resolvent in a Neumann series produces the EFT derivative expansion (5). The same projected operators carry all the structural constraints: self-adjointness and non-negativity of $\sigma_{H_S}$ give dissipation, the causality bound on $E^j_{H_S}$ and on the higher coefficients gives subluminal propagation, and rotational covariance restricts the leading-order theory to a transient-hydrodynamic universality class.

What would settle it

One concrete test: take a linearized kinetic-type theory with parity-violating transport, for instance a chiral or optically active medium, and check whether its evolution operator can be brought to the self-adjoint form (1) with non-negative $\sigma$; if it cannot, the spectral projection, equation (5), and the universality theorem do not apply. A second, computational test: in the radiative shear example, compute the exact dispersion relation (S14) and compare it with the first-order EFT; if the difference fails to scale as $O(\tau_F^2)$ while $|k|\tau_F\ll1$ and $|\omega|\tau_F\ll1$, the power counting and convergence claim would be wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the dynamics of the slow sector of any linearized kinetic-type theory can be projected out and re-expanded exactly. The paper starts from the universal self-adjoint evolution law $\partial_t\Psi=-(\sigma+E^j\partial_j)\Psi$, with $\sigma\ge 0$ and $\|n_jE^j\|\le 1$, and separates the spectrum of $\sigma$ into a finite slow cluster and a fast continuum separated by a circle of radius $(2\tau_F)^{-1}$. Kato perturbation theory guarantees the separation persists for wavenumbers $|k|<(2\tau_F)^{-1}-\tau_S^{-1}$. Projecting the eigenvalue equation onto the slow and fast Hilbert subspaces and inverting the fast block yields an exact equation for the slow variables, Eq. (4), whose resolvent expands in powers of the fast relaxation time $\tau_F$ to give Eq. (5). At zeroth order the effective operators are still self-adjoint, non-negative, causal, and rotationally covariant; Schur's lemma forces the slow Hilbert space to decompose into irreducible rotational tensors, which fixes the leading-order theory to be one of the transient-hydrodynamic universality classes. This is what makes Israel-Stewart-like dynamics the universal leading-order EFT for quasi-hydrodynamics, and what makes all higher-order corrections systematically computable.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the premise that every relevant linearized kinetic-type theory can be written as $\partial_t\Psi=-(\sigma+E^j\partial_j)\Psi$ with $\sigma$ and $E^j$ self-adjoint, $\sigma\ge0$, and $\|n_jE^j\|\le1$, and that there is a clean timescale gap $\tau_F\ll\tau_S$ between slow and fast relaxation rates.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The formalism supplies an algorithm: identify the quasi-conserved modes of any linearized kinetic theory, project, and expand, so that EFT coefficients up to arbitrary order are computed rather than fit.
  • Leading-order quasi-hydrodynamics is causal and symmetric-hyperbolic, so it can be used as a PDE even when gradients are large on the macroscopic scale, provided they stay below the microscopic cutoff.
  • First-order corrections always increase dissipation: the free energy of the slow variables decreases at a rate $-\Psi_S,\sigma_{H_S}\Psi_S-\tau_F(\partial_j\Psi_S,D^{jk}\partial_k\Psi_S)+O(\tau_F^2)$, with the operator $D^{jk}$ positive and causal.
  • In the radiation-coupled viscoelastic example, the first-order EFT reproduces the standard radiative shear viscosity $\eta_{\rm rad}=\frac{4}{15}aT^4\tau_F$, giving a direct microscopic derivation of a known transport coefficient.
  • Truncations beyond zeroth order are generically parabolic and acausal, but a perturbative field redefinition restores causality and stability order by order without altering the physical content.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper does not pursue: the same operator projection should work when the spectral gap is replaced by a weaker resolvent-smallness condition, which would push the EFT below the threshold $|k|<(2\tau_F)^{-1}$ and may cover systems with marginally separated spectra.
  • Because the zeroth-order class is fixed by rotational tensors, one could construct an atlas of universality classes for anisotropic backgrounds, such as magnetic fields, crystals, or rotating fluids, by repeating the Schur-lemma argument with the appropriate invariance group.
  • The premise that every relevant UV theory admits the self-adjoint form (1) is a natural place to test boundaries: if a parity-violating kinetic theory cannot be written that way, the same projection technique might still produce an EFT with extra non-self-adjoint corrections, revealing a larger universality landscape.
  • It is not claimed in the paper, but the convergence estimate suggests a practical numerical probe: compute exact quasi-normal modes of a kinetic UV theory and compare them with EFT truncations; the difference should scale as a definite power of $\tau_F$ well below the cutoff, providing a direct test of the power counting.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a systematic effective field theory (EFT) for linear quasi-hydrodynamics starting from a class of kinetic-type theories. It assumes the abstract evolution equation (1) with self-adjoint operators sigma and E^j, sigma >= 0, and the causal bound ||n_j E^j|| <= 1, together with a spectral gap tau_F << tau_S separating finitely many slow modes from a fast sector. Using Kato's spectral projection, the fast variables are eliminated exactly in Eq. (4); a Neumann expansion of the resolvent yields the central expansion (5), with an explicit convergence radius k_UV ~ (2 tau_F)^{-1}. At zeroth order the truncated equations form a causal symmetric-hyperbolic system belonging to the transient-hydrodynamic universality classes discussed in [12], and higher-order terms appear as systematically computable derivative corrections with inherited positivity, Onsager, and causality constraints. Two analytic models, a radiative viscoelastic example, a kinetic Cattaneo completion, and a BDNK-type causal reformulation of the first-order theory are provided.

Significance. If the result holds, it provides a rigorous operator-theoretic derivation of transient hydrodynamics as the leading universal EFT of quasi-hydrodynamic slow sectors, including explicit control of the truncation error and a concrete wavenumber range. The strengths of the paper are the explicit block elimination, the convergent Neumann expansion with a stated radius obtained from Kato's perturbation theory, the worked analytic examples in which exact and EFT dispersion relations can be compared, and a proof that a first-order truncation admits a causal and stable reformulation. The main caveat is that the universality claim is conditional on the structural assumption in Eq. (1); the abstract currently states the scope more broadly than the derivation supports.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and 'Abstract kinetic-type framework', Eq. (1)] The abstract and introduction claim that the construction applies to 'any linearized, causal kinetic-like theory,' but the derivation uses the substantially more specific premise of Eq. (1): PT-evenness, an Onsager inner product, self-adjointness of sigma and E^j, non-negativity of sigma, and the causal bound ||n_j E^j|| <= 1. The text itself concedes the PT-even restriction immediately before Eq. (1), and the cited references for (1) do not cover, for example, parity-violating kinetic transport or collision operators that are not self-adjoint in an Onsager inner product. Since the universality theorem is exactly as broad as Eq. (1), the abstract's 'any' overstates the result. Please amend the abstract and the opening paragraph to state the assumption explicitly, for instance 'any linearized, causal, PT-even kinetic-like theory that admits the self-adjoint form (1).' This is a scope correction rather than a request for new results, but it is load-bearing for the headline universality claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (10) and Supplementary Material, Step 5] The notation for the first-order transport operator is inconsistent: in Eq. (10) the first-order term is written as tau_F D^{jk} partial_j partial_k, so D^{jk} is dimensionless, while in the Supplementary Material D = S E^j F sigma^{-1}_{HF} F E^k S has dimensions of time and is used without the explicit tau_F prefactor. Please align the notation, for example by defining D^{jk} = tau_F^{-1} S E^j F sigma^{-1}_{HF} F E^k S or by extracting tau_F explicitly in the supplementary calculation.
  2. [From Eq. (4) to Eq. (5)] The sentence 'Reconstructing a partial differential equation from the eigenvalue problem' is terse; for real k the operator sigma + i k E is not self-adjoint, so completeness of eigenmodes is not automatic. Please add a short remark explaining that Eq. (5) is the operator identity obtained by Schur complementation of the resolvent on the slow spectral subspace, so that the exact equation holds for all solutions and not merely for individual eigenmodes.
  3. [Eq. (2)] In the definition of k_UV, the denominator ||n_j E^j|| should be specified as being evaluated for the propagation direction n_j under consideration, or maximized over n_j if a direction-independent radius is intended. The subsequent inequality is clear, but the notation is slightly ambiguous as written.
  4. [Figure 2 caption and discussion] The caption states that the exact quasi-normal modes and the second-order EFT 'overlap perfectly'; since the plot reaches k tau_S = 4 with tau_F/tau_S = 0.1, the comparison is near the edge of the convergence region. It would be helpful to state the numerical tolerance or to include a difference plot, so the reader can judge the size of the truncation error.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central EFT expansion is new, but the universality claim is imported from the author's own Eq. (1) and atlas; partial circularity via self-citation chain.

  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract kinetic-type framework, Eq. (1)]
    "The crucial observation is that, when Ψ is even under PT symmetry (a standard feature of kinetic theory [31]), Onsager reciprocity and causality imply [11, 12, 26, 27] that the equations of motion take the universal form ∂tΨ = −(σ + E^j ∂j)Ψ, (1) ... The EFT developed below is obtained by systematically expanding the exact dynamics generated by (1)."

    The paper's headline scope is 'any linearized, causal kinetic-like theory', but the derivation starts from Eq. (1), which is not proved in this Letter; it is delegated to refs. [11, 12, 26, 27], all by the present author and collaborators. Every later step—the projectors S and F, the exact block equation (4), the Neumann expansion (5), and the universality conclusion—is a consequence of (1). Thus the claimed universality is no broader than the self-cited structural theorem. The abstract's 'any' also overstates the PT-even assumption stated in the body. This is not a fitted-parameter circularity, but the central premise is load-bearing and originates in the author's own prior work.

  2. uniqueness imported from authors [Classifying and constraining EFTs; Conclusions]
    "At zeroth order, the equations reduce to a causal symmetric-hyperbolic theory belonging to the transient-hydrodynamic universality class uniquely determined by the number and tensorial character of the slow degrees of freedom (see the atlas in [12]) ... any shear channel with a conserved vector and a quasi-conserved symmetric traceless tensor necessarily belongs to the Israel-Stewart universality class."

    The assignment of the zeroth-order EFT to a specific universality class is not re-derived in this paper; the uniqueness claim 'uniquely determined ... (see the atlas in [12])' and the word 'necessarily' import the classification from same-author prior work. Without that atlas, the paper could still show that the zeroth-order system is symmetric hyperbolic, but not that it is uniquely Israel-Stewart. The headline 'establishing Israel-Stewart-like dynamics as the universal description' therefore reduces, at that step, to an application of the authors' own classification rather than an independent derivation from the kinetic theory. The new EFT expansion itself is independent, which is why this is partial rather than total circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain from Eq. (1) to Eq. (5) is internally sound and not circular: S and F are spectral projections, Eq. (4) is an exact block elimination, and the Neumann expansion is convergent under the stated spectral gap and causal bound. The examples compare EFT coefficients with explicitly specified UV theories, and the supplementary consistency check compares EFT dispersion with the exact UV dispersion rather than with fitted values. The self-citations do not smuggle the target universality class in by definition: Eq. (1) does not mention Israel-Stewart or Cattaneo, and the expansion does not assume the conclusion. However, the paper's headline universality claim is conditional on Eq. (1), which is imported from refs. [11,12,26,27] by the same author, and the assignment to a particular universality class is imported from the same authors' atlas [12]. The abstract's 'any linearized, causal kinetic-like theory' is broader than the PT-even restriction stated around Eq. (1); that is a scope mismatch rather than a formal circularity, but it underscores that the universality result inherits the reach of the self-cited theorem. Overall, the central EFT construction has independent content, but some load-bearing self-citation remains, so the score is 4 rather than 0 or 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on four premises: the self-adjoint kinetic form (Eq. 1), the spectral gap defining quasi-hydrodynamics, Kato's perturbation theory for the persistent gap, and the invertibility of the fast compression. The first two are domain assumptions; the latter two are standard mathematics. The expansion itself introduces no fitted parameters or invented entities.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The UV theory can be written as partial_t Psi = -(sigma + E^j partial_j)Psi with sigma and E^j self-adjoint on a Hilbert space, sigma >= 0, and ||n_j E^j|| <= 1 (Eq. 1).
    This is the foundational input, asserted to hold for any linearized causal kinetic-type theory with PT-even Psi (refs [11,12,26,27]). The entire EFT derivation rests on this structure.
  • domain assumption Spectral separation: Spectrum(sigma) is contained in [0,1/tau_S] union [1/tau_F, +infinity] with a finite-dimensional slow sector and tau_F << tau_S.
    Defines the quasi-hydrodynamic regime. Gives the small parameter tau_F and the UV cutoff.
  • standard math The family sigma + i k n_j E^j is a holomorphic family of type (A) in the sense of Kato.
    Standard perturbation theory (Kato [32]). Used to prove persistence of spectral separation for |k| < k_UV.
  • standard math The compression sigma_HF + i k E_HF - i omega is invertible with bounded inverse for |k| < k_UV.
    Follows from spectral separation and ||n_j E^j|| <= 1; needed for the exact elimination of Psi_F.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective field theory of quasi-hydrodynamics from kinetic theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WVPHU3RI

@misc{pith2026260813542,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective field theory of quasi-hydrodynamics from kinetic theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WVPHU3RI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13542}
}
read the original abstract

Quasi-hydrodynamics describes systems with quasi-conserved degrees of freedom, namely observables that relax on timescales that are finite but parametrically longer than microscopic relaxation times. Examples include kinetic chemistry and linear viscoelasticity. Here, we develop a rigorous effective-field-theory framework for linear quasi-hydrodynamics from kinetic-type theories. Starting from any linearized, causal kinetic-like theory endowed with slow degrees of freedom, we show that the exact dynamics of conserved and quasi-conserved observables admits a systematic expansion in the fast relaxation timescale. At zeroth order, the resulting equations form a causal, symmetric-hyperbolic theory belonging to the appropriate transient-hydrodynamic universality class, establishing Israel-Stewart-like dynamics as the universal description of slow relaxation modes. Higher-order corrections can be computed systematically and inherit universal symmetry, Onsager, positivity, and causality constraints from the underlying microscopic theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13542 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of the quasi-hydrodynamic spectral separation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Comparison between the Fourier modes of Model 1 (blue) and Model 2 (red) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [12]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 222302 (2024), arXiv:2302.03478 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Glorioso and H

    P. Glorioso and H. Liu, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1805.09331 (2018), arXiv:1805.09331 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  3. [2]

    Struchtrup and P

    H. Struchtrup and P. Taheri, IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics76, 672 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [3]

    A. Y. Malkin and A. I. Isayev,Rheology: Concepts, Methods, and Applications, 2nd ed. (ChemTec Publishing, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [4]

    Baggioli, M

    M. Baggioli, M. Vasin, V. Brazhkin, and K. Trachenko, Physics Reports865, 1 (2020), gapped momentum states

    work page 2020

  6. [5]

    Stephanov and Y

    M. Stephanov and Y. Yin, Phys. Rev. D98, 036006 (2018), arXiv:1712.10305 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [6]

    Baggioli, M

    M. Baggioli, M. Landry, and A. Zaccone, Phys. Rev. E105, 024602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [7]

    Grozdanov, A

    S. Grozdanov, A. Lucas, and N. Poovuttikul, Phys. Rev. D99, 086012 (2019), arXiv:1810.10016 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 41 references
  1. [8]

    Andrade, M

    T. Andrade, M. Baggioli, and O. Pujol` as, Phys. Rev. D100, 106014 (2019), arXiv:1903.02859 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Y. Ahn, M. Baggioli, Y. Bu, M. Matsumoto, and X. Sun, Phys. Rev. D112, 086013 (2025), arXiv:2506.00926 [hep-th]

    2025

  3. [10]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Phys. Rev. D106, 056010 (2022), arXiv:2207.14778 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. D107, 065013 (2023), arXiv:2210.05067 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    D. Jou, J. Casas-V´ azquez, and G. Lebon, Reports on Progress in Physics51, 1105 (1999)

    1999

  6. [14]

    Muller and T

    I. Muller and T. Ruggeri,Rational Extended Thermodynamics, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag New York, 1998)

    1998

  7. [15]

    C. Cattaneo,Sur une forme de l’´ equation de la chaleur ´ eliminant le paradoxe d’une propagation instantan´ ee, Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des s´ eances de l’Acad´ emie des sciences (Gauthier-Villars, 1958)

    1958

  8. [16]

    Israel and J

    W. Israel and J. Stewart, Annals of Physics118, 341 (1979)

    1979

  9. [17]

    W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Annals of Physics151, 466 (1983)

    1983

  10. [18]

    Priou, Phys

    D. Priou, Phys. Rev. D43, 1223 (1991)

    1991

  11. [19]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Symmetry12, 1543 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Gavassino and M

    L. Gavassino and M. Antonelli, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 075012 (2023), arXiv:2209.12865 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Phys. Rev. D105, 045011 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Gavassino and J

    L. Gavassino and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D109, 096040 (2024), arXiv:2305.04119 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D109, 096041 (2024), arXiv:2302.05332 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Gavassino, Class

    L. Gavassino, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 165008 (2023), arXiv:2304.05455 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    J. L. Hernandez, C. Manuel, S. S ¨appi, and L. Tolos, (2025), arXiv:2507.00794 [hep-ph]

    2025

  18. [26]

    Soares Rocha, L

    G. Soares Rocha, L. Gavassino, and N. Mullins, Phys. Rev. D110, 016020 (2024), arXiv:2405.10878 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. Lett.137, 022301 (2026), arXiv:2601.03081 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Dudy´ nski and M

    M. Dudy´ nski and M. L. Ekiel-Jezewska, Communications in Mathematical Physics102, 17 (1985)

    1985

  21. [29]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L042043 (2024), arXiv:2404.12327 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. D110, 094012 (2024), arXiv:2408.14316 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. D113, 023035 (2026), arXiv:2511.14344 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2026

  24. [32]

    Kato,Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, 2nd ed., Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol

    T. Kato,Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, 2nd ed., Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. 132 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1980) corrected printing of the second edition

    1980

  25. [33]

    Gavassino, ´A

    L. Gavassino, ´A. D. Kov´ acs, and H. S. Reall, Phys. Rev. D113, 124022 (2026), arXiv:2602.14541 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz,Theory of elasticity, v. 7 (Pergamon Press, 1970)

    1970

  27. [35]

    Trachenko and V

    K. Trachenko and V. V. Brazhkin, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 016502 (2016), arXiv:1512.06592 [cond-mat.soft]

    2016 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Ke and Y

    W. Ke and Y. Yin, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 212303 (2023), arXiv:2208.01046 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    M. G. Alford, L. Bovard, M. Hanauske, L. Rezzolla, and K. Schwenzer, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 041101 (2018), arXiv:1707.09475 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. D111, L081306 (2025), arXiv:2411.12929 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 010606 (2022), arXiv:2105.14621 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Weinberg, ApJ168, 175 (1971)

    S. Weinberg, ApJ168, 175 (1971)

    1971

  33. [41]

    liquid+radiation

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. X12, 041001 (2022), arXiv:2111.05254 [gr-qc]. 1 Effective field theory of quasi-hydrodynamics from kinetic theory Supplementary Material L. Gavassino Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, ...

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.