Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.10635 v2 pith:WZKDJNHA submitted 2019-11-24 cs.LG cs.AIcs.MAstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.MAstat.ML
keywords marlgameslearningalgorithmstheoreticalchapteradvancesangles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent years have witnessed significant advances in reinforcement learning (RL), which has registered great success in solving various sequential decision-making problems in machine learning. Most of the successful RL applications, e.g., the games of Go and Poker, robotics, and autonomous driving, involve the participation of more than one single agent, which naturally fall into the realm of multi-agent RL (MARL), a domain with a relatively long history, and has recently re-emerged due to advances in single-agent RL techniques. Though empirically successful, theoretical foundations for MARL are relatively lacking in the literature. In this chapter, we provide a selective overview of MARL, with focus on algorithms backed by theoretical analysis. More specifically, we review the theoretical results of MARL algorithms mainly within two representative frameworks, Markov/stochastic games and extensive-form games, in accordance with the types of tasks they address, i.e., fully cooperative, fully competitive, and a mix of the two. We also introduce several significant but challenging applications of these algorithms. Orthogonal to the existing reviews on MARL, we highlight several new angles and taxonomies of MARL theory, including learning in extensive-form games, decentralized MARL with networked agents, MARL in the mean-field regime, (non-)convergence of policy-based methods for learning in games, etc. Some of the new angles extrapolate from our own research endeavors and interests. Our overall goal with this chapter is, beyond providing an assessment of the current state of the field on the mark, to identify fruitful future research directions on theoretical studies of MARL. We expect this chapter to serve as continuing stimulus for researchers interested in working on this exciting while challenging topic.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dissecting Larval Zebrafish Hunting using Deep Reinforcement Learning Trained RNN Agents

    q-bio.NC 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Minimal DRL-trained RNN agents reproduce larval zebrafish hunting motifs — vergence-linked pursuit and ~50% per-bout prey-angle reduction — without imitation learning, from binocular sensing, coupled bout kinematics, ...

  2. Society of Mind Meets Real-Time Strategy: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Strategic Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hierarchical framework of specialized imitation agents plus a strategic planner improves win rates and cuts LLM calls in text-based StarCraft II across all race matchups.

  3. InstantEdit: Text-Guided Few-Step Image Editing with Piecewise Rectified Flow

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    InstantEdit combines RectifiedFlow inversion, latent injection, disentangled prompt guidance, and Canny ControlNet to do fast few-step text-guided image editing with content preservation.

Pith tools