Pith

open record

sign in
Browse

arxiv: 2207.10289 · v1 · pith:X2WTVX4C · submitted 2022-07-21 · physics.comp-ph · cs.LG

A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networks

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved pith:X2WTVX4Crecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification physics.comp-ph cs.LG
keywords samplingadaptivepinnsmethodsuniformdistributionpointsresidual
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have shown to be an effective tool for solving forward and inverse problems of partial differential equations (PDEs). PINNs embed the PDEs into the loss of the neural network, and this PDE loss is evaluated at a set of scattered residual points. The distribution of these points are highly important to the performance of PINNs. However, in the existing studies on PINNs, only a few simple residual point sampling methods have mainly been used. Here, we present a comprehensive study of two categories of sampling: non-adaptive uniform sampling and adaptive nonuniform sampling. We consider six uniform sampling, including (1) equispaced uniform grid, (2) uniformly random sampling, (3) Latin hypercube sampling, (4) Halton sequence, (5) Hammersley sequence, and (6) Sobol sequence. We also consider a resampling strategy for uniform sampling. To improve the sampling efficiency and the accuracy of PINNs, we propose two new residual-based adaptive sampling methods: residual-based adaptive distribution (RAD) and residual-based adaptive refinement with distribution (RAR-D), which dynamically improve the distribution of residual points based on the PDE residuals during training. Hence, we have considered a total of 10 different sampling methods, including six non-adaptive uniform sampling, uniform sampling with resampling, two proposed adaptive sampling, and an existing adaptive sampling. We extensively tested the performance of these sampling methods for four forward problems and two inverse problems in many setups. Our numerical results presented in this study are summarized from more than 6000 simulations of PINNs. We show that the proposed adaptive sampling methods of RAD and RAR-D significantly improve the accuracy of PINNs with fewer residual points. The results obtained in this study can also be used as a practical guideline in choosing sampling methods.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hierarchical Framework of Runaway Electrons using Deep Learning

    physics.plasm-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Adjoint PINN surrogates are constructed to evolve runaway electron fluid moments and distributions for arbitrary initial conditions, achieving orders-of-magnitude speedup over conventional RE solvers with reported val...

  2. Mass-Conserving Physics-Informed Neural Networks For The One-Dimensional Advection-Diffusion Equation

    physics.comp-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0

    Adding a soft mass-conservation penalty to PINNs for the 1D advection-diffusion equation reduces long-term relative L2 error by 9–67× and mass error by 15–215× compared to vanilla PINNs across Peclet numbers 0.01–20.