Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Massive Graviton Dark Matter from a Gapped Continuum

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read One-loop corrections to the gapped graviton continuum create a long-lived sub-MeV massive graviton that can be produced by freeze-in as dark matter.

desk verdict The headline massive-graviton DM candidate is a one-loop fine-tuning, not a robust prediction; the paper is honest and the self-energy calculations are careful, but the central pole is unprotected against higher orders. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07295 v2 pith:X6DIFTOZ submitted 2026-07-08 hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph

Eugenio Megias , Miguel Prieto , Mariano Quiros This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thastro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
keywords lineardilatongappedcontinuummassivegravitondarkmatterfreeze-inholographicfluidbraneinflationunparticles
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the continuous tower of massive gravitons in a warped extra dimension with a linear-dilaton background is not just a gravitational curiosity: one-loop radiative corrections from brane-localized matter pull a single, very narrow resonance out of the continuum, just below its mass gap. When the heaviest brane-localized state is an inflaton with mass near the five-dimensional Planck scale, that resonance has mass tied to the mass gap, and for masses between about 20 keV and 2 MeV with a tiny coupling it behaves as a feebly interacting massive particle produced by freeze-in. The paper further claims the same gapped continuum acts as a pressureless holographic fluid, generated by graviton leakage off the brane, so dark matter can be the massive graviton, the fluid, or both. A brane-inflation model with inflaton mass around 10^11 GeV and sub-TeV reheating is shown to match current cosmological observables, giving the scenario a cosmological completion.

What carries the argument

The central object is the gapped graviton continuum from the linear-dilaton background, whose brane-to-brane propagator G_h(s) = -1/(m_g + sqrt(m_g^2 - s)) has a continuum of Kaluza-Klein modes above the mass gap m_g, with the zero mode subtracted. The mechanism that generates dark matter is the isolated resonance: one-loop self-energy insertions Σ(s) shift the inverse propagator, and the tuning Σ_R = -a m_g, a ∈ [1,2], places a pole at m_p = sqrt(a(2-a)) m_g with width Γ_p ∝ λ_χ^2 Σ_I. The width and residue are controlled by the Wilson coefficient λ_χ = sqrt(3(a-1)), so the same resonance is either a long-lived feebly interacting particle or a decaying state depending on λ_χ. The companion

What would settle it

A first-principles computation of the brane-to-brane graviton spectral function with the full Standard Model and inflaton self-energies, without imposing Σ_R = -a m_g, would settle it: if no pole appears below m_g for any inflaton mass in the range 8×10^10 to 4×10^11 GeV, the mechanism is absent. Observationally, a dark-matter mass outside 20 keV–2 MeV or a lifetime shorter than 10^27 s at the allowed λ_χ would rule out the candidate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the center of the paper is the brane-to-brane propagator of the gapped graviton continuum, G_h(s) = -1/(m_g + sqrt(m_g^2 - s)). One-loop self-energies from scalars, fermions, and gauge bosons add a complex function Σ(s) to the inverse propagator; the paper shows that if its real part satisfies Σ_R = -a m_g with a in [1,2], a pole appears on the second Riemann sheet at m_p = sqrt(a(2-a)) m_g below the gap. Parametrizing the residue by a Wilson coefficient λ_χ, the resonance couples to matter as (λ_χ/M_4) χ^{μν} T_{μν}; for λ_χ ≲ 0.01 and m_χ in the sub-MeV range its lifetime exceeds 10^27 s and the freeze-in yield (4.19) can saturate the observed dark-matter abundance. The paper identifies

Load-bearing premise

The entire dark-matter candidate depends on the tuned condition that the real part of the one-loop self-energy equals -a m_g with a ∈ [1,2], which the paper imposes by choosing the renormalization scale μ = M_5 and assuming the inflaton dominates the self-energy while the Standard Model contribution is negligible (the R ≪ 1 condition); if that tuning fails, no long-lived resonance below the gap exists.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, the observed dark matter can be composed of the gravitational sector itself rather than a new particle added to the Standard Model, with only Planck-suppressed interactions.
  • The dark-matter mass is not an independent input: it is tied to the mass gap m_g and hence to the inflaton mass m ≃ e^{5/8} M_5; a measurement of the gap would select the allowed DM window 20 keV–2 MeV.
  • The freeze-in abundance for the massive graviton is IR-dominated and insensitive to the reheating temperature, while the holographic-fluid component is UV-dominated and controlled by T_R; the two components depend on early-universe history in complementary ways.
  • For m_g ≲ 2 MeV the fluid must be subdominant (T_R ≲ 1 TeV), leaving room for the massive graviton, whereas for heavier m_g the fluid can be the dominant dark matter and the massive graviton decays on cosmological timescales.
  • The brane-inflation model yields a spectral index compatible with recent cosmological data and a very small tensor-to-scalar ratio, so the dark-matter mechanism can coexist with a viable inflationary completion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The tuning Σ_R = -a m_g is the paper's load-bearing condition but is not protected by a symmetry; in a more complete UV theory with additional heavy brane fields the pole position would shift, so the DM mass window should be read as a consistency condition rather than a parameter-free prediction.
  • The same isolated-resonance-from-a-gapped-continuum mechanism should apply to other soft-wall geometries with different mass gaps; one testable extension is to compute the spectral function for a range of gaps and check whether the sub-MeV window is robust.
  • The paper treats the freeze-in yield from an earlier study as an input; a direct Boltzmann computation within this model, including the momentum-dependent width of the resonance, would sharpen the allowed region and could reveal whether the IR-dominated approximation breaks down near m_χ ~ 2 MeV.
  • The two-component scenario suggests a discriminating signature: if future observations pin down both the dark-matter abundance and the reheating temperature, the split between the massive graviton and the holographic fluid becomes a quantitative prediction of the model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies a five-dimensional brane-world model with a linear-dilaton background, whose bulk graviton spectrum is a gapped continuum. The central claim is that one-loop radiative corrections to the gapped continuum propagator generate an isolated resonance χ below the mass gap; for m_g in the range 20 keV–2 MeV and a small Wilson coefficient λ_χ ≲ 0.01, this resonance is a long-lived, feebly interacting massive particle (FIMP) that can account for dark matter via freeze-in (Secs. 4.1–4.3). The paper also identifies the gapped continuum with a holographic fluid produced by UV freeze-in (Sec. 6), and proposes a brane inflation model with an inflaton mass m ≃ e^{5/8} M_5 to supply the heavy scalar needed for the resonance (Sec. 7). The one-loop self-energies for scalars, fermions, and gauge sectors are presented in Appendix A, and a detailed parameter scan of the allowed DM region is given in Figs. 4, 5, and 7.

Significance. The manuscript is technically detailed and gives a self-contained one-loop calculation of the graviton self-energy in the linear-dilaton background. If the isolated resonance were robust, the paper would offer an interesting, explicitly five-dimensional realization of spin-2 FIMP dark matter alongside a holographic-fluid component, and it connects the particle-physics parameters to a brane-inflationary scenario. The authors are careful to show the lifetime and overclosure constraints, and they use published freeze-in results appropriately. However, the central DM candidate rests on an extremely tuned cancellation between the one-loop self-energy and the mass gap (Eqs. 4.3, 4.14), and the paper does not assess the stability of this tuning against higher-order corrections. The freeze-in abundance is imported from Ref. [23] and, because it scales with λ_χ^2, the dark-matter abundance is fitted rather than predicted. These issues limit the force of the claim that the model 'proves' a dark-matter candidate, but the construction itself is coherent and the calculations are presented in enough detail to be checked.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Eqs. (4.3), (4.14)] The existence of the isolated pole below the mass gap requires the heavy-scalar self-energy to satisfy Σ_R^s = −a m_g with a ∈ [1,2]. With m ≃ M_5 ≃ 10^11 GeV and m_g at the MeV scale, the tuning condition (4.14) fixes M_5/m = e^{−5/8} + O(m_g/M_5). A relative deviation δ in M_5/m changes Σ_R^s by roughly δ·m/(4π²), i.e. δ×10^10 GeV for the masses at hand; keeping the pole in the DM window requires δ ≲ 10^−13. The paper provides no estimate of two-loop or higher-order corrections to the brane self-energy. In a theory with m/M_5 = O(1), such corrections are not suppressed by a small parameter and generically contribute at the scale m, overwhelming the O(m_g) residual that is being tuned. The manuscript should either demonstrate that the tuning is radiatively stable, or state plainly that the resonance is a fine-tuned consequence of the model; as it stands, the prediction m_p ≈ m_g is not
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Eq. (4.19)] The dark-matter abundance formula Ω_χ h² = 5.2×10^−6 λ_χ² (GeV/m_χ)^3 is imported from Ref. [23] without re-derivation. This formula is then used to derive the central allowed region in Fig. 5 and the bounds m_χ ≲ 2 MeV, λ_χ ≲ 0.01. The authors should at least state the conditions under which the QCD-dominated, IR-dominated freeze-in computation of Ref. [23] applies to the resonance χ in this model, particularly for sub-MeV masses. Moreover, since the abundance is proportional to λ_χ², it is being fitted to the observed value rather than predicted; the text and Fig. 5 should say so explicitly. If the numerical coefficient in (4.19) were not valid for this mass range or for this spin-2 resonance, the final parameter window would change.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.3, Fig. 5] The text should state unambiguously that λ_χ is scanned to match the observed Ω_DM h² ≃ 0.12; as written, the sentence 'the final score is ... can satisfy all the constraints and have the right dark matter abundance depending on the value of λ_χ' might be read as a prediction.
  2. [Sec. 7.1, Table 3] The inflationary results in Table 3 appear independent of the deformation parameter α, although the potential (7.7) contains α. It would help to state explicitly whether α cancels in the slow-roll observables or whether the benchmarks assume a specific α.
  3. [Figs. 3 and 5] The contour plots would be easier to read with color bars or labels giving the numerical values of log₁₀ R, Ω_χh², and τ_χ; currently the eye is left to interpolate between unlabeled contours.
  4. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.18)] The factor 9 multiplying Σ_v(0) is said to include both photons and gluons; the corresponding ghost contributions are already in Σ_v. It would be clearer to mention this explicitly in the text, as a reader may otherwise count 8 gluons plus 1 photon.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the resonance and DM abundance are conditional on explicit parameter choices (a, lambda_chi) and an external freeze-in formula, but no derived result is secretly equal to its input by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is: (i) compute the one-loop graviton self-energy from SM fields and a heavy scalar; (ii) impose the pole condition (4.5), Sigma_R = -a m_g, which is a consistency requirement for a non-tachyonic resonance; (iii) solve for M_5 in terms of the inflaton mass m, Eq. (4.14); (iv) use an externally computed freeze-in abundance, Eq. (4.19) from Ref. [23], to constrain the Wilson coefficient lambda_chi. None of these steps hides its conclusion in its premises. The pole condition is not a consequence of the self-energy computation; it is an imposed requirement that then fixes parameters. The paper does not claim to predict the observed relic density: it states that the abundance 'depends on' lambda_chi and only derives upper bounds on m_chi and lambda_chi from lifetime and overclosure. The self-citations to Refs. [17,21] supply the gapped-continuum propagator and holographic-fluid relations; these are technical background results, not a uniqueness theorem invoked to forbid alternatives, and the propagator is re-derived in outline in Sec. 2.2. The imported freeze-in formula is from an independent group (Cai, Cacciapaglia, Lee). The main scientific weakness is the extreme fine-tuning required for Eq. (4.14) to cancel the one-loop self-energy to O(m_g) from a natural scale O(m), as emphasized by the skeptic attack; this is a naturalness/correctness risk, not a circularity. The parameter scan over a, m_g, and lambda_chi is openly acknowledged by the paper and is standard model-building rather than a fitted input masquerading as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper adds a free Wilson coefficient λχ and scans over m_g and T_R to satisfy constraints; the existence of the pole is ensured by the tuned relation (4.14), and the abundance formulas are imported from prior work. No new fundamental constants are invented beyond the model's own scales, but the DM abundance is not a parameter-free prediction.

free parameters (6)
  • λχ (Wilson coefficient of χ–Tμν coupling) = λχ ∈ (0, √3); long-lived DM requires λχ ≲ 0.01
    Free parameter controlling both the abundance (Eq. 4.19) and the decay width; the paper scans it to satisfy lifetime and abundance constraints.
  • a (pole positioning parameter) = a ∈ [1,2] (a−1 ~ λχ²/3)
    Defined by Σ_R = −a m_g; together with Eq. (4.14) it fixes m_p = sqrt(a(2−a)) m_g. Chosen near 1 to put m_p just below the gap.
  • m_g (mass gap) = 20 keV ≲ m_g ≲ 2 MeV
    The mass gap determines mχ; the window is selected post hoc from lifetime and overclosure constraints.
  • T_R (reheating temperature) = T_R < 4.4×10³ GeV (m_g/GeV)^{1/3}; BP(i) uses 200 GeV
    Controls the holographic fluid abundance via UV freeze-in and affects the inflationary e-folds; bounded by fluid overclosure.
  • Inflaton potential parameter α = α < 1 (not fixed numerically)
    Free shape parameter of Eq. (7.7); μ is fixed by CMB normalization, but α itself is otherwise unconstrained.
  • m (inflaton mass) = 8×10¹⁰ GeV ≲ m ≲ 4×10¹¹ GeV
    Related to M5 via Eq. (4.14); sets the scale where the inflaton self-energy places the resonance near the gap.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The linear dilaton bulk metric (2.3)–(2.4) with potential (2.2) is a consistent solution of the 5D Einstein–dilaton equations and supports a gapped graviton continuum.
    Taken from Refs. [9,13,16]; the paper does not re-derive the background stability. Invoked in §2.
  • domain assumption Brane-world cosmology in the low-energy limit is described by Eq. (2.16), and the holographic fluid (2.15) with emissivity (2.20), c≃3.919, is correct.
    Imported from prior work [14–17]; not derived here. Used throughout §2 and §6.
  • domain assumption The freeze-in yield Ωχh² ≃ 5.2×10⁻⁶ λχ² (GeV/mχ)³ (Eq. 4.19) from Ref. [23] applies to this model, with q̄q→gχ and qg→qχ dominating.
    The paper does not recompute the Boltzmann equations or verify channel dominance for its parameter range.
  • standard math One-loop self-energies in the MS scheme and Feynman gauge lead to gauge- and scheme-independent physical pole properties at the computed order.
    Assumed in §3 and stated in §8; standard field-theory expectation, verified only perturbatively.
  • domain assumption The brane-to-brane propagator in the absence of the bulk black hole (2.38) is valid for computing the resonance in the considered parameter range; the horizon is far from the brane.
    Justified in §6 via Eq. (6.5), where r_h/r_b < 6.1×10⁻¹² in the allowed region.
  • standard math The analytic continuation to the second Riemann sheet and the Breit-Wigner interpretation of the pole are correct.
    Used in §4.1; the continuation of the loop functions is given in App. A.
  • domain assumption The slow-roll brane-inflation formulas (7.2)–(7.6), including H² ≈ V²/(36M₅⁶), describe the cosmic perturbation spectrum for potential (7.7).
    From Refs. [37,38,48–50]; the paper uses these to fix μ and compute n_s and r.
invented entities (2)
  • Massive graviton resonance χ (the isolated pole below the gap) independent evidence
    purpose: Long-lived FIMP dark matter candidate; the central new state.
    Predicts a sub-MeV mass (20 keV–2 MeV) and coupling λχ/M4; decays into e+e−, γγ, etc., constrained by 21-cm, CMB, and X-ray/gamma observations; also could appear as missing energy at colliders.
  • Holographic fluid from the bulk black-hole horizon independent evidence
    purpose: Second dark-matter component with ρ ∝ a⁻³, arising from the gapped continuum as a 5D realization of unparticles.
    Predicts a matter-like fluid with abundance tied to T_R and m_g; constrained by overclosure, SN 1987A, and deviation from Newton's law (M5 bound); testable via cosmological probes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Massive Graviton Dark Matter from a Gapped Continuum." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X6DIFTOZ

@misc{pith2026260707295,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Massive Graviton Dark Matter from a Gapped Continuum},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X6DIFTOZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07295}
}
abstract

We consider the possibility of dark matter in a warped extra-dimensional theory in presence of a linear dilaton background, with a gapped continuum spectrum, in a brane-world cosmological scenario. Firstly, triggered by self-energy radiative corrections, we study the existence of an isolated resonance of massive gravitons, and its realization as a long-lived feebly interacting dark matter candidate, produced by the freeze-in mechanism. This massive graviton is proved to satisfy all theoretical and experimental constraints, in the sub-MeV mass range. We further consider the close relationship between the existence of this component of dark matter and the presence of an inflaton localized on the brane, with a mass around $10^{11}$ GeV and a sub-TeV reheating temperature, in a brane inflationary scenario that allows to reproduce the most recent cosmological observables. Secondly, the gapped continuum of gravitons, a particular five dimensional realization of the physics of unparticles, is identified as a holographic fluid which can play the role of holographic dark matter. The production of the holographic fluid goes by an ultra-violet freeze-in mechanism, with an abundance mainly depending on the reheating temperature. Depending on the values of the mass gap and the reheating temperature, one or both components of dark matter can be present.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Primordial Correlators from a Kaluza-Klein Graviton Continuum

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In an RS2-like inflationary brane world, the continuum of Kaluza-Klein gravitons smears the logarithmic clock oscillation of the cosmological collider into a smooth seed function.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 44 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [17]

    Fichet, E

    S. Fichet, E. Meg ´ ıas, and M. Quir´ os,Holographic Dark Matter,arXiv:2602.13393

    arXiv

  2. [23]

    H. Cai, G. Cacciapaglia, and S. J. Lee,Massive Gravitons as Feebly Interacting Dark Matter Candidates,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022), no. 8 081806, [arXiv:2107.14548]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 132, 169901 (2024)]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [1]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 3370–3373, [hep-ph/9905221]

    arXiv 1999

  4. [2]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,An Alternative to compactification,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 4690–4693, [hep-th/9906064]

    arXiv 1999

  5. [3]

    Georgi,Unparticle physics,Phys

    H. Georgi,Unparticle physics,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 221601, [hep-ph/0703260]

    arXiv 2007

  6. [4]

    Shiromizu, K.-i

    T. Shiromizu, K.-i. Maeda, and M. Sasaki,The Einstein equation on the 3-brane world, Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 024012, [gr-qc/9910076]

    arXiv 2000

  7. [5]

    Binetruy, C

    P. Binetruy, C. Deffayet, U. Ellwanger, and D. Langlois,Brane cosmological evolution in a bulk with cosmological constant,Phys. Lett. B477(2000) 285–291, [hep-th/9910219]

    arXiv 2000

  8. [6]

    Hebecker and J

    A. Hebecker and J. March-Russell,Randall-Sundrum II cosmology, AdS / CFT, and the bulk black hole,Nucl. Phys.B608(2001) 375–393, [hep-ph/0103214]

    arXiv 2001

Show all 48 references
  1. [7]

    Langlois, L

    D. Langlois, L. Sorbo, and M. Rodriguez-Martinez,Cosmology of a brane radiating gravitons into the extra dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.89(2002) 171301, [hep-th/0206146]

    2002 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Langlois and L

    D. Langlois and L. Sorbo,Bulk gravitons from a cosmological brane,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 084006, [hep-th/0306281]. 40

    2003 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Antoniadis, A

    I. Antoniadis, A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, and A. Giveon,Phenomenology of TeV Little String Theory from Holography,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 081602, [arXiv:1102.4043]

    2012 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Cox and T

    P. Cox and T. Gherghetta,Radion Dynamics and Phenomenology in the Linear Dilaton Model,JHEP05(2012) 149, [arXiv:1203.5870]

    2012 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Aharony,A Brief review of ’little string theories’,Class

    O. Aharony,A Brief review of ’little string theories’,Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 929–938, [hep-th/9911147]

    2000 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Antoniadis, S

    I. Antoniadis, S. Dimopoulos, and A. Giveon,Little string theory at a TeV,JHEP05(2001) 055, [hep-th/0103033]

    2001 arXiv

  7. [13]

    J. A. Cabrer, G. von Gersdorff, and M. Quir´ os,Soft-Wall Stabilization,New J. Phys.12 (2010) 075012, [arXiv:0907.5361]

    2010 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Fichet, E

    S. Fichet, E. Meg ´ ıas, and M. Quir´ os,Cosmological dark matter from a bulk black hole,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 11 115014, [arXiv:2212.13268]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Fichet, E

    S. Fichet, E. Meg ´ ıas, and M. Quir´ os,Holographic fluids from 5D dilaton gravity,JHEP08 (2024) 077, [arXiv:2311.14233]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Fichet, E

    S. Fichet, E. Meg ´ ıas, and M. Quir´ os,Holography of linear dilaton spacetimes from the bottom up,Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 10 106011, [arXiv:2309.02489]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Delgado, J

    A. Delgado, J. R. Espinosa, J. M. No, and M. Quir´ os,A Note on Unparticle Decays,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 055011, [arXiv:0812.1170]

    2009 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Meg ´ ıas, M

    E. Meg ´ ıas, M. P´ erez-Victoria, and M. Quir´ os,Undecay,JHEP05(2024) 158, [arXiv:2310.16593]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Fichet, E

    S. Fichet, E. Meg ´ ıas, and M. Quir´ os,Continuum effective field theories, gravity, and holography,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 9 096016, [arXiv:2208.12273]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Meg ´ ıas and M

    E. Meg ´ ıas and M. Quir´ os,The Continuum Linear Dilaton,Acta Phys. Polon. B52(2021), no. 6-7 711, [arXiv:2104.10260]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [22]

    R. K. Mishra, M. Nee, and L. Randall,Inflation with a Growing Fifth Dimension, arXiv:2512.04177

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Quir´ os,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp

    M. Quir´ os,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 187–259, 1, 1999.hep-ph/9901312

    1999 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Essig, E

    R. Essig, E. Kuflik, S. D. McDermott, T. Volansky, and K. M. Zurek,Constraining Light Dark Matter with Diffuse X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Observations,JHEP11(2013) 193, [arXiv:1309.4091]

    2013 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Poulin, J

    V. Poulin, J. Lesgourgues, and P. D. Serpico,Cosmological constraints on exotic injection of electromagnetic energy,JCAP03(2017) 043, [arXiv:1610.10051]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    T. R. Slatyer and C.-L. Wu,General Constraints on Dark Matter Decay from the Cosmic Microwave Background,Phys. Rev. D95(2017), no. 2 023010, [arXiv:1610.06933]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Facchinetti, L

    G. Facchinetti, L. Lopez-Honorez, Y. Qin, and A. Mesinger,21cm signal sensitivity to dark matter decay,JCAP01(2024) 005, [arXiv:2308.16656]. 41

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Y. Sun, J. W. Foster, H. Liu, J. B. Mu˜ noz, and T. R. Slatyer,Inhomogeneous energy injection in the 21-cm power spectrum: Sensitivity to dark matter decay,Phys. Rev. D111 (2025), no. 4 043015, [arXiv:2312.11608]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    M. Viel, G. D. Becker, J. S. Bolton, and M. G. Haehnelt,Warm dark matter as a solution to the small scale crisis: New constraints from high redshift Lyman-αforest data,Phys. Rev. D 88(2013) 043502, [arXiv:1306.2314]

    2013 arXiv

  23. [31]

    M. Viel, G. D. Becker, J. S. Bolton, M. G. Haehnelt, M. Rauch, and W. L. W. Sargent,How cold is cold dark matter? Small scales constraints from the flux power spectrum of the high-redshift Lyman-alpha forest,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 041304, [arXiv:0709.0131]

    2008 arXiv

  24. [32]

    D’Eramo, A

    F. D’Eramo, A. Lenoci, and A. Dekker,Dark matter freeze-in and small-scale observables: Novel mass bounds and viable particle candidates,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 11 116008, [arXiv:2506.13864]. [33]DESCollaboration, E. O. Nadler et al.,Milky Way Satellite Census. III. Constra...

    2025

  25. [34]

    Elahi, C

    F. Elahi, C. Kolda, and J. Unwin,UltraViolet Freeze-in,JHEP03(2015) 048, [arXiv:1410.6157]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Bernal, F

    N. Bernal, F. Elahi, C. Maldonado, and J. Unwin,Ultraviolet Freeze-in and Non-Standard Cosmologies,JCAP11(2019) 026, [arXiv:1909.07992]

    2019

  27. [36]

    Hannestad, G

    S. Hannestad, G. Raffelt, and Y. Y. Y. Wong,Unparticle constraints from SN 1987A,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 121701, [arXiv:0708.1404]

    2007 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Maartens, D

    R. Maartens, D. Wands, B. A. Bassett, and I. Heard,Chaotic inflation on the brane,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 041301, [hep-ph/9912464]

    2000 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Jaman and K

    N. Jaman and K. Myrzakulov,Braneworld inflation with an effectiveα-attractor potential, Phys. Rev. D99(2019), no. 10 103523, [arXiv:1807.07443]. [39]Atacama Cosmology T elescopeCollaboration, T. Louis et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods andΛC...

    2019 arXiv

  30. [41]

    Galiautdinov,Logarithmically enhanced hyperbolic square-root deformation of Starobinsky inflation,arXiv:2603.14743

    A. Galiautdinov,Logarithmically enhanced hyperbolic square-root deformation of Starobinsky inflation,arXiv:2603.14743

  31. [42]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Superconformal generalizations of the Starobinsky model,JCAP06 (2013) 028, [arXiv:1306.3214]

    2013 arXiv

  32. [43]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Universality Class in Conformal Inflation,JCAP07(2013) 002, [arXiv:1306.5220]

    2013 arXiv

  33. [44]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest,Superconformal Inflationaryα-Attractors,JHEP11 (2013) 198, [arXiv:1311.0472]

    2013 arXiv

  34. [45]

    Garcia-Bellido, R

    J. Garcia-Bellido, R. Rabadan, and F. Zamora,Inflationary scenarios from branes at angles, JHEP01(2002) 036, [hep-th/0112147]. 42

    2002 arXiv

  35. [46]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, J. M. Maldacena, L. P. McAllister, and S. P. Trivedi, Towards inflation in string theory,JCAP10(2003) 013, [hep-th/0308055]

    2003 arXiv

  36. [47]

    D. H. Lyth,What would we learn by detecting a gravitational wave signal in the cosmic microwave background anisotropy?,Phys. Rev. Lett.78(1997) 1861–1863, [hep-ph/9606387]

    1997 arXiv

  37. [48]

    A. R. Liddle and S. M. Leach,How long before the end of inflation were observable perturbations produced?,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 103503, [astro-ph/0305263]. [49]Particle Data GroupCollaboration, S. Navas et al.,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 3 030001

    2003 arXiv

  38. [50]

    Martin and C

    J. Martin and C. Ringeval,First CMB Constraints on the Inflationary Reheating Temperature,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 023511, [arXiv:1004.5525]. [51]PlanckCollaboration, Y. Akrami et al.,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A10, [arXiv:1807.06...

    2010 arXiv

  39. [53]

    Robertson, R

    A. Robertson, R. Massey, and V. Eke,What does the Bullet Cluster tell us about self-interacting dark matter?,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.465(2017), no. 1 569–587, [arXiv:1605.04307]

    2017 arXiv

  40. [54]

    S. Y. Choi, J. S. Shim, and H. S. Song,Factorization and polarization in linearized gravity, Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 2751–2769, [hep-th/9411092]. 43

    1995 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.