Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

DriveQA: Passing the Driving Knowledge Test

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.21824 v1 pith:X6VARXWS submitted 2025-08-29 cs.CV

DriveQA: Passing the Driving Knowledge Test

classification cs.CV
keywords driveqadrivingtrafficknowledgetestacrossdatasetsdownstream
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

If a Large Language Model (LLM) were to take a driving knowledge test today, would it pass? Beyond standard spatial and visual question-answering (QA) tasks on current autonomous driving benchmarks, driving knowledge tests require a complete understanding of all traffic rules, signage, and right-of-way principles. To pass this test, human drivers must discern various edge cases that rarely appear in real-world datasets. In this work, we present DriveQA, an extensive open-source text and vision-based benchmark that exhaustively covers traffic regulations and scenarios. Through our experiments using DriveQA, we show that (1) state-of-the-art LLMs and Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) perform well on basic traffic rules but exhibit significant weaknesses in numerical reasoning and complex right-of-way scenarios, traffic sign variations, and spatial layouts, (2) fine-tuning on DriveQA improves accuracy across multiple categories, particularly in regulatory sign recognition and intersection decision-making, (3) controlled variations in DriveQA-V provide insights into model sensitivity to environmental factors such as lighting, perspective, distance, and weather conditions, and (4) pretraining on DriveQA enhances downstream driving task performance, leading to improved results on real-world datasets such as nuScenes and BDD, while also demonstrating that models can internalize text and synthetic traffic knowledge to generalize effectively across downstream QA tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CrashSight: A Phase-Aware, Infrastructure-Centric Video Benchmark for Traffic Crash Scene Understanding and Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CrashSight is a new infrastructure-focused benchmark showing that state-of-the-art vision-language models can describe crash scenes but fail at temporal and causal reasoning.

  2. Beyond Scene Priors: Fine-Grained Traffic Scene Reasoning with Benchmarking and Query-Guided Small-Object Focus

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A query-guided sparse residual module (TG-SOF) plus a new distractor-heavy traffic MCQ benchmark lifts a 4B MLLM by 2.1 points on fine-grained local-evidence questions.

  3. OpenVO: Open-World Visual Odometry with Temporal Dynamics Awareness

    cs.CV 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    OpenVO estimates ego-motion from monocular dashcam footage with varying observation rates and uncalibrated cameras by encoding temporal dynamics in a two-frame regression framework and using 3D priors from foundation ...

  4. Alpamayo-R1: Bridging Reasoning and Action Prediction for Generalizable Autonomous Driving in the Long Tail

    cs.RO 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Alpamayo-R1 introduces a VLA model with a Chain of Causation dataset and multi-stage SFT-plus-RL training that reports 12% better planning accuracy and 35% fewer close encounters versus trajectory-only baselines in dr...