REVIEW 1 cited by
SafeAPT: Safe Simulation-to-Real Robot Learning using Diverse Policies Learned in Simulation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The framework of Simulation-to-real learning, i.e, learning policies in simulation and transferring those policies to the real world is one of the most promising approaches towards data-efficient learning in robotics. However, due to the inevitable reality gap between the simulation and the real world, a policy learned in the simulation may not always generate a safe behaviour on the real robot. As a result, during adaptation of the policy in the real world, the robot may damage itself or cause harm to its surroundings. In this work, we introduce a novel learning algorithm called SafeAPT that leverages a diverse repertoire of policies evolved in the simulation and transfers the most promising safe policy to the real robot through episodic interaction. To achieve this, SafeAPT iteratively learns a probabilistic reward model as well as a safety model using real-world observations combined with simulated experiences as priors. Then, it performs Bayesian optimization on the repertoire with the reward model while maintaining the specified safety constraint using the safety model. SafeAPT allows a robot to adapt to a wide range of goals safely with the same repertoire of policies evolved in the simulation. We compare SafeAPT with several baselines, both in simulated and real robotic experiments and show that SafeAPT finds high-performance policies within a few minutes in the real world while minimizing safety violations during the interactions.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Embodied AI: Emerging Risks and Opportunities for Policy Action
A policy analysis arguing that embodied AI risks are real, under-covered by current US/EU/UK frameworks, and best handled through certification, benchmarks, clarified liability, and economic adaptation.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.