pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20195 · v1 · pith:XBE5EXSQnew · submitted 2026-04-04 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.LG

Pseudo-Siamese Network for Planning in Target-Oriented Proactive Dialogues

Xinyue Kang , Maodong Li , Yibin Zheng , Fang Kong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 09:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords dialogue path planningtarget-oriented proactive dialoguepseudo-siamese networkbidirectional planningtransformer decoderresponse generationDuRecDial
0
0 comments X

The pith

A forward-focused bidirectional network plans better paths for steering dialogues to specific targets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Target-oriented proactive dialogue systems aim to guide conversations toward fixed goals while offering suggestions along the way. The central task is planning a sensible sequence of dialogue turns that leads to the target. The paper introduces a network with two identical transformer decoders that plan forward from the current state and backward from the target. A forward-focused module merges the two plans while keeping the forward direction primary. The resulting path then directs language models to generate responses that keep the conversation on track. Experiments on two standard dialogue datasets show the approach outperforms earlier planning methods and improves the full system's ability to reach targets.

Core claim

The Forward-Focused Bidirectional Pseudo-Siamese Network (FF-BPSN) performs dialogue path planning by running two identical transformer-based decoders—one for forward planning from the starting point and one for backward planning from the predefined target—then using a forward-focused module to integrate the bidirectional outputs into a final forward path that benefits from both directions while prioritizing forward information; this planned path is subsequently used to guide pre-trained or large language models in generating responses for target-oriented proactive dialogues.

What carries the argument

The Forward-Focused Bidirectional Pseudo-Siamese Network (FF-BPSN), which employs two identical transformer-based decoders for forward and backward planning together with a forward-focused module that integrates their outputs to produce a prioritized forward dialogue path.

Load-bearing premise

Combining outputs from the forward and backward decoders through a forward-focused module will produce noticeably better paths than simpler unidirectional planning or alternative ways of merging the information.

What would settle it

If a single forward-only transformer decoder or a version without the forward-focused integration step achieves equal or higher path-planning scores than FF-BPSN on the DuRecDial and DuRecDial 2.0 test sets, the claimed benefit of the bidirectional forward-focused design would not hold.

read the original abstract

A target-oriented proactive dialogue system is designed to steer conversations toward predefined targets while actively providing suggestions. The core paradigm of such a system is to plan a reasonable dialogue path and subsequently guide language models (e.g., pre-trained or large language models) to generate responses, where dialogue path planning serves as the central component-a novel yet under-explored problem. In this work, we propose a Forward-Focused Bidirectional Pseudo-Siamese Network (FF-BPSN) for dialogue path planning toward predefined dialogue targets. FF-BPSN employs two identical transformer-based decoders for forward and backward planning, together with a forward-focused module that integrates bidirectional information to construct the final forward path. This path benefits from bidirectional planning while prioritizing forward information. We then employ the planned path to guide language models in response generation. Extensive experiments on DuRecDial and DuRecDial 2.0 demonstrate that FF-BPSN achieves state-of-the-art performance in dialogue path planning and significantly enhances the effectiveness of target-oriented proactive dialogue systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the Forward-Focused Bidirectional Pseudo-Siamese Network (FF-BPSN) for dialogue path planning in target-oriented proactive dialogue systems. FF-BPSN consists of two identical transformer-based decoders that perform forward and backward planning, respectively, together with a forward-focused module that fuses the bidirectional outputs to produce a final forward path that prioritizes forward information while incorporating backward context. The planned path is subsequently used to guide a language model for response generation. The authors report that FF-BPSN attains state-of-the-art results on the DuRecDial and DuRecDial 2.0 benchmarks and improves the effectiveness of the overall proactive dialogue system.

Significance. If the reported gains are shown to be robust and attributable to the proposed architecture rather than to unablated components, the work would offer a concrete architectural contribution to the under-explored problem of explicit path planning for target-oriented dialogues. The pseudo-Siamese design with explicit forward prioritization is a specific, testable choice that could be adopted or extended by other dialogue-planning systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 (Experiments)] §4 (Experiments): the central claim that FF-BPSN achieves SOTA performance and that the forward-focused module is responsible for the improvement is unsupported because no ablation isolates the module’s incremental contribution. The manuscript provides no comparison against (a) a unidirectional decoder baseline, (b) a plain bidirectional concatenation or attention fusion of the two decoders, or (c) an ablated version that removes the forward-focused weighting. Without these controls it is impossible to attribute any observed gains specifically to the forward-focused integration rather than to the mere use of two decoders.
  2. [§3 (Method)] §3 (Method): the description of the forward-focused module states that it “integrates bidirectional information to construct the final forward path” while “prioritizing forward information,” yet no quantitative analysis or theoretical argument is supplied showing why this selective prioritization yields measurably better forward paths than simpler fusion strategies or unidirectional planning. The absence of such justification makes the architectural choice appear ad hoc relative to the performance claims.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion of “state-of-the-art performance” is made without naming the competing baselines, the primary metrics (e.g., path accuracy, success rate, or BLEU), or any error bars or statistical tests, rendering the claim difficult to evaluate from the provided text.
  2. [§3 (Method)] Notation and figures: the precise mathematical definition of the forward-focused integration (e.g., the weighting function or attention mechanism) should be given explicitly, preferably as an equation, so that the module can be reproduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important areas for strengthening the experimental validation and architectural justification. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to incorporate additional ablations and expanded discussion.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (Experiments): the central claim that FF-BPSN achieves SOTA performance and that the forward-focused module is responsible for the improvement is unsupported because no ablation isolates the module’s incremental contribution. The manuscript provides no comparison against (a) a unidirectional decoder baseline, (b) a plain bidirectional concatenation or attention fusion of the two decoders, or (c) an ablated version that removes the forward-focused weighting. Without these controls it is impossible to attribute any observed gains specifically to the forward-focused integration rather than to the mere use of two decoders.

    Authors: We agree that isolating the incremental contribution of the forward-focused module requires explicit controls. In the revised manuscript we have added three new ablation settings to Section 4: (a) a unidirectional decoder baseline, (b) a bidirectional model that simply concatenates or attends over the two decoder outputs without forward-focused weighting, and (c) an ablated FF-BPSN that removes the forward-focused weighting entirely. The new results (now in Table 4 and §4.3) show that bidirectional planning alone yields gains over unidirectional, yet the forward-focused integration produces further statistically significant improvements on both path-planning metrics and downstream response generation. These additions directly address the attribution concern. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §3 (Method): the description of the forward-focused module states that it “integrates bidirectional information to construct the final forward path” while “prioritizing forward information,” yet no quantitative analysis or theoretical argument is supplied showing why this selective prioritization yields measurably better forward paths than simpler fusion strategies or unidirectional planning. The absence of such justification makes the architectural choice appear ad hoc relative to the performance claims.

    Authors: The forward-focused design is motivated by the forward-progress requirement inherent to target-oriented dialogues: the path must advance toward the predefined target while still benefiting from target-conditioned backward context. We have expanded §3.2 with a paragraph that articulates this rationale with reference to the DuRecDial task characteristics. In addition, the new ablation results in §4 now supply the requested quantitative comparison, demonstrating that the forward-focused weighting outperforms both plain bidirectional fusion and unidirectional planning. While we do not supply a formal theoretical optimality proof, the empirical evidence and task-specific motivation are now more explicitly documented. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical architecture evaluated on external datasets

full rationale

The paper presents FF-BPSN as an empirical neural architecture (two identical transformer decoders plus a forward-focused integration module) for dialogue path planning, then reports performance on the external DuRecDial and DuRecDial 2.0 benchmarks. No derivation chain, equations, or first-principles claims are offered that reduce to self-definition, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claims rest on experimental results rather than internal consistency or renamed inputs, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained empirical contribution.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Paper builds on standard neural network assumptions for sequence modeling in NLP; limited details available from abstract alone.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Transformer-based decoders are suitable for modeling forward and backward dialogue paths.
    Invoked by the choice of identical transformer decoders for planning.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5714 in / 1108 out tokens · 51789 ms · 2026-05-21T09:20:01.383300+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    FF-BPSN employs two identical transformer-based decoders for forward and backward planning, together with a forward-focused module that integrates bidirectional information to construct the final forward path... L4 = ∥F_f − F_b∥2

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Pseudo-Siamese Network for Planning in Target-Oriented Proactive Dialogues

    INTRODUCTION A target-oriented proactive dialogue system is designed to guide conversations toward predefined targets while proactively offering suggestions when appropriate [1, 2]. Ensuring coherence across multiple turns is crucial for effectiveness, and such systems have at- tracted increasing research interest in recent years [3, 4, 5]. Building on pr...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    [9] introduced coarse-grained keywords to steer system responses

    RELATED WORK Target-oriented dialogue systems aim to guide conversations toward predefined targets. [9] introduced coarse-grained keywords to steer system responses. [10] and [11] employed reinforcement learning (RL) to enhance performance by decomposing the task into sub- tasks. For knowledge graph (KG)-based applications, [12] integrated an external KG ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Action” and “Topic

    METHODOLOGY 3.1. Task Definition and Notation Explanation LetD={(K i, P i, Ci),(ACT i j=1:T , T OP i j=1:T ), Ri}i=1 N denote the dialogue dataset, whereNis the number of conversations andT is the number of [Action, Topic] pairs. Here,K i represents domain knowledge as subject–relation–object triples,P i denotes the user profile,C i is the dialogue histor...

    work page

  4. [4]

    EXPERIMENTS 4.1. Datasets and Evaluation Metrics We evaluate our approach on DuRecDial [6] (Chinese) and DuRec- Dial 2.0 [17] (English), both of which contain multi-turn dialogues incorporating domain knowledge and user profiles to support proac- tive target-oriented interactions. We adopt the version annotated by [2], and summarize the dataset details in...

    work page

  5. [5]

    win,” “tie,

    (Chinese versionCDial-GPT[21]), pre-trained on large-scale dialogue corpora; andLLaMA-3[22], a widely used family of large language models. We experiment with two versions: LLaMA-1B and LLaMA-3B. For dialogue path planning, our baselines include: MGCG[6], which employs convolutional networks to predict the next action and topic;KERS[14], which uses transf...

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    CONCLUSION We present FF-BPSN, a dialogue path planning framework for target-oriented proactive dialogue systems. FF-BPSN integrates two transformer-based encoders with a forward-focused module to perform bidirectional path planning, and the resulting path is used to guide language models in response generation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FF-B...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Screen: A benchmark for situated conversational recommen- dation,

    Dongding Lin, Jian Wang, Chak Tou Leong, and Wenjie Li, “Screen: A benchmark for situated conversational recommen- dation,” inProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Con- ference on Multimedia, 2024, pp. 9591–9600

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    A target-driven planning approach for goal-directed dialog systems,

    Jian Wang, Dongding Lin, and Wenjie Li, “A target-driven planning approach for goal-directed dialog systems,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 10475–10487, 2023

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    A survey on proactive dialogue systems: Problems, methods, and prospects,

    Yang Deng, Wenqiang Lei, Wai Lam, and Tat-Seng Chua, “A survey on proactive dialogue systems: Problems, methods, and prospects,” inIJCAI, 2023

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Proactive conversational ai: A com- prehensive survey of advancements and opportunities,

    Yang Deng, Lizi Liao, Wenqiang Lei, Grace Hui Yang, Wai Lam, and Tat-Seng Chua, “Proactive conversational ai: A com- prehensive survey of advancements and opportunities,”ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 1–45, 2025

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Protod: Proactive task-oriented dialogue system based on large language model,

    Wenjie Dong, Sirong Chen, and Yan Yang, “Protod: Proactive task-oriented dialogue system based on large language model,” inProceedings of the 31st International Conference on Com- putational Linguistics, 2025, pp. 9147–9164

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Towards conversational recommendation over multi-type dialogs,

    Z Liu, H Wang, ZYu Niu, Hua Wu, W Che, and T Liu, “Towards conversational recommendation over multi-type dialogs,” in58th Annual Meeting of the Association-for-Computational-Linguistics (ACL) Conference Location ELECTR NETWORK. ASSOC COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS-ACL Location STROUDSBURG, 2020, pp. 1036–1049

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Dialogue planning via brownian bridge stochastic process for goal-directed proac- tive dialogue,

    Jian Wang, Dongding Lin, and Wenjie Li, “Dialogue planning via brownian bridge stochastic process for goal-directed proac- tive dialogue,” inThe 61st Annual Meeting Of The Association For Computational Linguistics, 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Target-constrained bidirectional planning for generation of target-oriented proac- tive dialogue,

    Jian Wang, Dongding Lin, and Wenjie Li, “Target-constrained bidirectional planning for generation of target-oriented proac- tive dialogue,”ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1–27, 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Target-guided open- domain conversation,

    Jianheng Tang, Tiancheng Zhao, Chenyan Xiong, Xiaodan Liang, Eric Xing, and Zhiting Hu, “Target-guided open- domain conversation,” inProceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Anna Korhonen, David Traum, and Llu´ı s M`arquez, Eds., Flo- rence, Italy, July 2019, pp. 5624–5634, Association for Com- putational Li...

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Gochat: Goal- oriented chatbots with hierarchical reinforcement learning,

    Jianfeng Liu, Feiyang Pan, and Ling Luo, “Gochat: Goal- oriented chatbots with hierarchical reinforcement learning,” in Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2020, pp. 1793–1796

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Knowledge graph grounded goal planning for open- domain conversation generation,

    Jun Xu, Haifeng Wang, Zhengyu Niu, Hua Wu, and Wanxi- ang Che, “Knowledge graph grounded goal planning for open- domain conversation generation,” inProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 2020, vol. 34, pp. 9338– 9345

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Keyword-guided neural conversational model,

    Peixiang Zhong, Yong Liu, Hao Wang, and Chunyan Miao, “Keyword-guided neural conversational model,” inProceed- ings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021, vol. 35, pp. 14568–14576

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Topkg: Target-oriented dialog via global planning on knowl- edge graph,

    Zhitong Yang, Bo Wang, Jinfeng Zhou, Yue Tan, Dong- ming Zhao, Kun Huang, Ruifang He, and Yuexian Hou, “Topkg: Target-oriented dialog via global planning on knowl- edge graph,” inProceedings of the 29th International Confer- ence on Computational Linguistics, 2022, pp. 745–755

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Kers: A knowledge-enhanced framework for recommenda- tion dialog systems with multiple subgoals,

    Jun Zhang, Yan Yang, Chencai Chen, Liang He, and Zhou Yu, “Kers: A knowledge-enhanced framework for recommenda- tion dialog systems with multiple subgoals,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, 2021, pp. 1092–1101

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    CR- walker: Tree-structured graph reasoning and dialog acts for conversational recommendation,

    Wenchang Ma, Ryuichi Takanobu, and Minlie Huang, “CR- walker: Tree-structured graph reasoning and dialog acts for conversational recommendation,” inProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Pro- cessing, Marie-Francine Moens, Xuanjing Huang, Lucia Spe- cia, and Scott Wen-tau Yih, Eds., Online and Punta Cana, Do- minican R...

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Multi-hop question generation via dual-perspective keyword guidance,

    Maodong Li, Longyin Zhang, and Fang Kong, “Multi-hop question generation via dual-perspective keyword guidance,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025, Wanxiang Che, Joyce Nabende, Ekaterina Shutova, and Mohammad Taher Pilehvar, Eds., Vienna, Austria, July 2025, pp. 10096–10112, Association for Computational Lin- guistics

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Durecdial 2.0: A bilingual parallel corpus for conversational recommendation,

    Zeming Liu, Haifeng Wang, Zheng-Yu Niu, Hua Wu, and Wanxiang Che, “Durecdial 2.0: A bilingual parallel corpus for conversational recommendation,” inProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Pro- cessing, 2021, pp. 4335–4347

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Bart: Denoising sequence-to- sequence pre-training for natural language generation, trans- lation, and comprehension,

    Mike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvinine- jad, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Omer Levy, Veselin Stoyanov, and Luke Zettlemoyer, “Bart: Denoising sequence-to- sequence pre-training for natural language generation, trans- lation, and comprehension,” inProceedings of the 58th An- nual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020, pp. 7871–7880

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Language models are unsu- pervised multitask learners,

    Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al., “Language models are unsu- pervised multitask learners,”OpenAI blog, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 9, 2019

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Dialogpt: Large-scale generative pre- training for conversational response generation,

    Yizhe Zhang, Siqi Sun, Michel Galley, Yen-Chun Chen, Chris Brockett, Xiang Gao, Jianfeng Gao, Jingjing Liu, and William B Dolan, “Dialogpt: Large-scale generative pre- training for conversational response generation,” inProceed- ings of the 58th ACL, 2020, pp. 270–278

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    A large-scale chinese short-text conversation dataset,

    Yida Wang, Pei Ke, Yinhe Zheng, Kaili Huang, Yong Jiang, Xiaoyan Zhu, and Minlie Huang, “A large-scale chinese short-text conversation dataset,” inCCF International Con- ference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Com- puting. Springer, 2020, pp. 91–103

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    The Llama 3 Herd of Models

    Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, and et al., “The llama 3 herd of models,”CoRR, vol. abs/2407.21783, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transform- ers for language understanding,

    Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova, “Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transform- ers for language understanding,” inProceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, volume 1 (long and short papers), 2019, pp. 4171–4186

    work page 2019