Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Generalisation First, Memorisation Second? Memorisation Localisation for Natural Language Classification Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.04965 v1 pith:XCWLBONQ submitted 2024-08-09 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords memorisationclassificationlanguagelocalisationnaturalapplyfirstgeneralisation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Memorisation is a natural part of learning from real-world data: neural models pick up on atypical input-output combinations and store those training examples in their parameter space. That this happens is well-known, but how and where are questions that remain largely unanswered. Given a multi-layered neural model, where does memorisation occur in the millions of parameters? Related work reports conflicting findings: a dominant hypothesis based on image classification is that lower layers learn generalisable features and that deeper layers specialise and memorise. Work from NLP suggests this does not apply to language models, but has been mainly focused on memorisation of facts. We expand the scope of the localisation question to 12 natural language classification tasks and apply 4 memorisation localisation techniques. Our results indicate that memorisation is a gradual process rather than a localised one, establish that memorisation is task-dependent, and give nuance to the generalisation first, memorisation second hypothesis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Memorization or Interpolation ? Detecting LLM Memorization through Input Perturbation Analysis

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM outputs fall sharply under small input perturbations when the input was memorized, and this sensitivity can be used to flag memorized content in black-box models.

  2. ICL CIPHERS: Quantifying "Learning" in In-Context Learning via Substitution Ciphers

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs perform consistently better on tasks where input words are replaced with a consistent, reversible substitution cipher than when replacements are random, and the authors propose this gap as a measure of task learn...

Pith tools