REVIEW 1 cited by
Solving Partial Differential Equations with Point Source Based on Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In recent years, deep learning technology has been used to solve partial differential equations (PDEs), among which the physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) emerges to be a promising method for solving both forward and inverse PDE problems. PDEs with a point source that is expressed as a Dirac delta function in the governing equations are mathematical models of many physical processes. However, they cannot be solved directly by conventional PINNs method due to the singularity brought by the Dirac delta function. We propose a universal solution to tackle this problem with three novel techniques. Firstly the Dirac delta function is modeled as a continuous probability density function to eliminate the singularity; secondly a lower bound constrained uncertainty weighting algorithm is proposed to balance the PINNs losses between point source area and other areas; and thirdly a multi-scale deep neural network with periodic activation function is used to improve the accuracy and convergence speed of the PINNs method. We evaluate the proposed method with three representative PDEs, and the experimental results show that our method outperforms existing deep learning-based methods with respect to the accuracy, the efficiency and the versatility.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A deep-learning model for predicting daily PM2.5 concentration in response to emission reduction
CleanAir emulates CMAQ's daily PM2.5 responses to precursor emission reductions over China at 36 km resolution, matching CMAQ accuracy while running roughly 40,000 times faster.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.