REVIEW 4 cited by
A Tighter Complexity Analysis of SparseGPT
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this work, we improved the analysis of the running time of SparseGPT [Frantar, Alistarh ICML 2023] from $O(d^{3})$ to $O(d^{\omega} + d^{2+a+o(1)} + d^{1+\omega(1,1,a)-a})$ for any $a \in [0, 1]$, where $\omega$ is the exponent of matrix multiplication. In particular, for the current $\omega \approx 2.371$ [Alman, Duan, Williams, Xu, Xu, Zhou 2024], our running time boils down to $O(d^{2.53})$. This running time is due to the analysis of the lazy update behavior in iterative maintenance problems such as [Deng, Song, Weinstein 2022; Brand, Song, Zhou ICML 2024].
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Only Large Weights (And Not Skip Connections) Can Prevent the Perils of Rank Collapse
A residual self-attention network with all weight entries bounded by a small η can be approximated by one layer to error O(η)‖X‖∞, so skip connections do not prevent layer collapse.
-
Universal Approximation of Visual Autoregressive Transformers
The paper's headline claim that VAR transformers universally approximate all Lipschitz image maps is not supported, because the theorem restricts the target class and its key lemma has an invalid linearity step.
-
High-Order Matching for One-Step Shortcut Diffusion Models
HOMO extends shortcut diffusion with acceleration and jerk supervision, but the proof of superior approximation is not supported and experiments lack error bars.
-
Video Latent Flow Matching: Optimal Polynomial Projections for Video Interpolation and Extrapolation
VLFM models video latent patches as a HiPPO-LegS polynomial flow and trains a flow matching model to generate frames, claiming bounded interpolation and extrapolation error.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.