pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.04823 · v3 · pith:XF7QWORZnew · submitted 2024-10-07 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.CR

CAT: Concept-level backdoor ATtacks for Concept Bottleneck Models

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.CR
keywords attackbackdoorcbmsconceptmodelsattackssecuritybottleneck
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Despite the transformative impact of deep learning across multiple domains, the inherent opacity of these models has driven the development of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Among these efforts, Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have emerged as a key approach to improve interpretability by leveraging high-level semantic information. However, CBMs, like other machine learning models, are susceptible to security threats, particularly backdoor attacks, which can covertly manipulate model behaviors. Understanding that the community has not yet studied the concept level backdoor attack of CBM, because of "Better the devil you know than the devil you don't know.", we introduce CAT (Concept-level Backdoor ATtacks), a methodology that leverages the conceptual representations within CBMs to embed triggers during training, enabling controlled manipulation of model predictions at inference time. An enhanced attack pattern, CAT+, incorporates a correlation function to systematically select the most effective and stealthy concept triggers, thereby optimizing the attack's impact. Our comprehensive evaluation framework assesses both the attack success rate and stealthiness, demonstrating that CAT and CAT+ maintain high performance on clean data while achieving significant targeted effects on backdoored datasets. This work underscores the potential security risks associated with CBMs and provides a robust testing methodology for future security assessments.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Measuring What Matters: Synthetic Benchmarks for Concept Bottleneck Models

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces synthetic benchmarks for concept bottleneck models that control data modality, concept choice, annotation quality, and completeness to evaluate performance in decision support and automation.