REVIEW 3 cited by
Problems with Cosine as a Measure of Embedding Similarity for High Frequency Words
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Cosine similarity of contextual embeddings is used in many NLP tasks (e.g., QA, IR, MT) and metrics (e.g., BERTScore). Here, we uncover systematic ways in which word similarities estimated by cosine over BERT embeddings are understated and trace this effect to training data frequency. We find that relative to human judgements, cosine similarity underestimates the similarity of frequent words with other instances of the same word or other words across contexts, even after controlling for polysemy and other factors. We conjecture that this underestimation of similarity for high frequency words is due to differences in the representational geometry of high and low frequency words and provide a formal argument for the two-dimensional case.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
RPAM: A Principled Metric for Evaluating Associations in Language Models with High Predictive Validity in Downstream Outputs
Relative Probability Association Metric (RPAM) measures LM associations via softmax-normalized continuation probabilities and correlates strongly with human associations and downstream LM behavior across three models.
-
FlowETL: An Autonomous Example-Driven Pipeline for Data Engineering
FlowETL uses LLMs and a small target dataset to automatically infer and apply data-cleaning transformations, reporting high data-quality scores across 14 datasets.
-
Spiritual-LLM : Gita Inspired Mental Health Therapy In the Era of LLMs
A Gita-based mental-health dialogue dataset helps small LLMs score higher on spirituality-oriented metrics, but the evaluation loop is largely self-referential.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.