Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Fine Tuning LLM for Enterprise: Practical Guidelines and Recommendations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.10779 v1 pith:XLD4PB2L submitted 2024-03-23 cs.SE cs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.LG
keywords finellmstuningcodeformingdomainmodelspairs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

There is a compelling necessity from enterprises for fine tuning LLMs (Large Language Models) o get them trained on proprietary domain knowledge. The challenge is to imbibe the LLMs with domain specific knowledge using the most optimial resource and cost and in the best possible time. Many enterprises rely on RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) which does not need LLMs to be ine-tuned but they are limited by the quality of vector databases and their retrieval capabilities rather than the intrinsic capabilities of the LLMs themselves. In our current work we focus on fine tuning LLaMA, an open source LLM using proprietary documents and code from an enterprise repository and use the fine tuned models to evaluate the quality of responses. As part of this work, we aim to guide beginners on how to start with fine tuning an LLM for documentation and code by making educated guesses on size of GPU required and options that are available for formatting the data. We also propose pre processing recipes for both documentation and code to prepare dataset in different formats. The proposed methods of data preparation for document datasets are forming paragraph chunks, forming question and answer pairs and forming keyword and paragraph chunk pairs. For code dataset we propose forming summary and function pairs. Further, we qualitatively evaluate the results of the models for domain specific queries. Finally, we also propose practical guidelines and recommendations for fine tuning LLMs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HuggingGraph: Understanding the Supply Chain of LLM Ecosystem

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A directed heterogeneous graph of 402,654 Hugging Face models and datasets is constructed and analyzed to reveal supply-chain dependencies and structural patterns such as a connected core and heavy-tailed reuse.

  2. Fast and Accurate Contextual Knowledge Extraction Using Cascading Language Model Chains and Candidate Answers

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Cascading cheap and expensive language models, with answers validated against regex-extracted candidate dates, improved speed and modestly improved accuracy when extracting dates of birth from medical documents.

Pith tools