Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Improved Holographic QCD on a Curved Background: an Application of Dynamical System Theory in Holography

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For the holographic QCD model IHQCD, the quantum phase transition driven by boundary curvature occurs at zero curvature, not at finite positive curvature.

desk verdict The analytic sign-of-curvature result for IHQCD is solid and new, but the abstract's claim of a phase transition at zero curvature outruns the numerics, which only show continuity of the free energy, not a discontinuity. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.10703 v1 pith:XMWQS6GF submitted 2025-05-15 hep-th hep-ph

Elias Kiritsis , Francesco Nitti , Jean-Loup Raymond This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords ImprovedHolographicQCDEinstein-dilatongravitycurvaturephasetransitiondynamicalsystemscentermanifoldconfininggaugetheorydeSitterspace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens when Improved Holographic QCD (IHQCD), a bottom-up holographic model of large-$N_c$ Yang-Mills theory, is placed on a spacetime of constant curvature. Earlier work on confining Einstein-dilaton models with exponential infrared potentials found a quantum phase transition at finite positive curvature. The paper shows that at the critical exponent $b=b_c$, where IHQCD lives, the sign of the slice curvature for the singular type I/II solutions is negative for the physical value $\alpha=1/2$, so no such solutions exist for positive curvature. Consequently the curvature-driven phase transition in IHQCD occurs at zero curvature, not at a finite positive value; for $\alpha>1/2$ a finite positive critical curvature reappears, while for $\alpha<1/2$ only negative curvature admits type I/II solutions. A sympathetic reader would care because this distinguishes the most phenomenologically successful confining holographic model from every other model in its class.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the autonomous dynamical system in the variables $(\tilde W,\tilde S)$, and the auxiliary variable $Z=-\alpha/\varphi$ for $\alpha\neq 0$, obtained from the superpotential and scalar velocity; its non-hyperbolic fixed point represents the type I/II asymptotic solutions. Around this fixed point the paper applies center manifold theory, the nonlinear generalization of the zero-eigenvalue eigenspace, expanding the unique center manifold to second order and pulling the flow back onto it to reduce the system to a Riccati equation for $U$. The roots $1$ and $2\alpha$ collide at $\alpha=1/2$, turning the power-law correction into a logarithmic one, and the sign of the resulting slice curvature $T$ in equation (4.46) carries the physical conclusion: $T<0$ for all $C_{1/2}$, excluding positive-curvature type I/II solutions and placing the phase transition at $R=0$.

What would settle it

Integrate the full second-order equation (5.2) with the IHQCD potential (5.1) at $\alpha=1/2$, starting from the type I/II infrared asymptotics (4.44) and scanning negative $C_{1/2}$; if any solution reaches the ultraviolet fixed point with dimensionless curvature $R>0$, the central claim is false. Equivalently, compute the full nonlinear slice curvature $T(\varphi)$ along the type I/II branch and look for a sign change away from the asymptotic region.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for Einstein-dilaton theories with infrared potential $V(\varphi)\sim -V_\infty \varphi^\alpha e^{2b_c\varphi}$, where $b_c=1/\sqrt{2(d-1)}$, the curvature dependence of the ground states changes at $\alpha=1/2$. Using a center-manifold reduction of the autonomous dynamical system describing the large-$\varphi$ asymptotics, the authors compute the slice curvature $T(\varphi)$ for the type I/II solutions. For $\alpha=1/2$ the subleading correction is logarithmic and $T$ is negative for every value of the integration constant $C_{1/2}$; hence type I/II solutions exist only for $R\le 0$, and all positive-curvature regular ground states are type III solutions ending at finite field value. The numerical phase diagram then shows that the transition between type III and type I/II branches occurs at $R=0$ for $\alpha=1/2$, with continuous free energy density and entropy there, so the curvature-driven phase transition of IHQCD is at zero curvature.

Load-bearing premise

The exclusion of positive-curvature type I/II solutions in IHQCD rests on assuming that the negative sign of the slice curvature obtained from the leading large-$\varphi$ asymptotic expansion persists for the full nonlinear solutions away from the asymptotic regime, and that replacing the marginally relevant Yang-Mills operator by a relevant ultraviolet operator does not alter the qualitative phase structure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For IHQCD ($\alpha=1/2$) every regular ground state on a positively curved slice is a type III solution ending at finite field value; singular type I/II solutions are confined to $R\le 0$.
  • The curvature-driven quantum phase transition, present at finite positive $R$ for $\alpha>1/2$, is pushed to $R=0$ exactly at $\alpha=1/2$, and it remains continuous (second or higher order) there.
  • In the $R$--$\alpha$ phase diagram, type III and type I/II branches never overlap, and $\alpha=1/2$ is a double bifurcation point where both $R_{c+}$ and $R_{c-}$ approach zero.
  • IHQCD is thus the first confining holographic model studied in this framework with no finite-curvature phase transition, even though it still confines in flat space and has a finite-temperature deconfinement transition.
  • The center-manifold method applies beyond the infrared: with an auxiliary constrained variable it can handle full RG flows and multi-field theories, so the same classification can be repeated for richer holographic models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that if the zero-curvature transition is real for the model, then on a large-radius sphere IHQCD stays in the type III phase all the way to the flat limit; computing the spectrum on $S^4$ as $R\to 0^+$ would test whether observables vary smoothly there.
  • Because both the type III and type I/II phases are gapped and the paper identifies no order parameter separating them, a conservative reading is that boundary curvature is not an order parameter for IHQCD, weakening the notion of a curvature-driven deconfinement transition in this model.
  • The logarithmic correction at $\alpha=1/2$ makes numerical access to very small positive $R$ exponentially expensive, so settling the order of the $R=0$ transition will likely require an analytic small-$R$ expansion of the type III branch.
  • For $\alpha<1/2$ the phase diagram is asymmetric between positive and negative curvature, suggesting that the corresponding dual field theories on positively and negatively curved slices flow to qualitatively different infrared states; combining this with the negative-curvature classification for non-critical $b$ would give a unified picture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies Einstein-dilaton holographic models with critical IR asymptotics b = b_c and a power-law prefactor φ^α, focussing on the IHQCD value α = 1/2, for dual QFTs on constant-curvature backgrounds. The authors reformulate the large-φ asymptotic problem as an autonomous dynamical system, use center-manifold theory to classify the type I/II singular solutions and type III regular solutions, and then construct full numerical RG flows for a simplified UV potential. They derive an analytical expression for the slice curvature T in the IHQCD case, Eq. (4.46), whose sign is negative for all values of the integration constant, and use it to argue that no acceptable type I/II solutions exist for positive boundary curvature when α = 1/2. Numerically computed phase diagrams and free energies lead the authors to claim that for α > 1/2 a continuous phase transition occurs at a positive critical curvature R_{c+}, while for α < 1/2 and for α = 1/2 no finite-positive-curvature transition occurs; the abstract states that for IHQCD the phase transition occurs at zero curvature. The paper also presents the dynamical-system method as a novel tool for this class of holographic problems.

Significance. If the central non-existence claim is accepted, this is a significant result: the IHQCD-like critical asymptotics would be qualitatively different from all previously studied confining holographic models on curved backgrounds, since no curvature-driven transition occurs at positive curvature. The paper's main technical strengths are real: the center-manifold construction in Sections 3 and 4 is explicit and self-contained, the sign of T in Eq. (4.46) follows from an analytical solution of the reduced system rather than from numerical fitting, and the numerical procedure is described in enough detail in Appendix F to be reproducible. The exclusion of positive-curvature type I/II solutions for α = 1/2 is well supported. However, the abstract-level claim of a phase transition at zero curvature goes beyond what the paper actually demonstrates, because the free-energy comparison near R = 0 relies on an unresolved log-fit extrapolation and on small-R expansions whose applicability is uncertain. The paper is therefore a solid contribution with an overreaching summary statement.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section 5.2.3] The statement that for IHQCD 'the phase transition occurs at zero curvature' is not supported by the analysis presented. In Section 5.2.3 the authors explicitly state that for α = 1/2 the numerical data are 'not accurate enough' to determine whether any derivative of the free-energy density is discontinuous at R = 0, and Figures 16(c) and 17(c) show continuity of f and s only at the numerically accessible values of R. Moreover, the small-R expansions (5.25)-(5.26), taken from [19], were derived for flows that end at a regular IR fixed point in the zero-curvature limit, whereas here φ0 → ∞ and no such fixed point exists; the authors themselves flag this as unclear. The abstract and Section 6 should therefore be revised to state that the absence of a positive-curvature transition is established, while the behavior at R = 0 is a numerical extrapolation rather than a demonstrated phase transition.
  2. [Section 5.2.1 and Figure 10] The claim R_{c+} = 0 for α = 1/2 rests on a logarithmic extrapolation. The text explains that reaching smaller positive R requires exponentially larger φ0, making numerical computation exponentially slower, and the red curve in Figure 10 is a fit of the form R = 0.060/(4.8 + log φ0) with no independent analytic justification. Since the existence of type III solutions for all R > 0 is one half of the zero-curvature transition claim, this extrapolation should either be replaced by an analytic argument or be explicitly labeled as a numerical conjecture rather than part of the paper's main conclusions.
  3. [Section 5, Eq. (5.1)] The numerical phase diagram is computed with the simplified UV potential (5.1), in which the marginally relevant Yang-Mills operator is replaced by a relevant operator of dimension Δ_- = 3/2. The paper asserts that this replacement does not change the qualitative features, but no comparison or argument is provided to show that the mapping from the IR constants to R, or the free-energy comparison across R = 0, is insensitive to this UV modification. Since the conclusions are framed as statements about IHQCD rather than about the toy potential, this gap should either be addressed explicitly or the claims should be restricted to the simplified class of potentials.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 5.2.3] There is a typo in the sentence 'the numerical analysis is not accurate enough to indicates that the free energy density has some discontinuous derivative'; 'indicates' should be 'indicate', and the sentence should be rephrased for clarity.
  2. [Section 3.4.2] The word 'conicides' should be 'coincides' in the sentence describing the center manifold in d = 4.
  3. [Section 5.2.3] The sentence 'or more precisely, equation (5.24) below, which is derived from (5.24)' contains a self-reference error; the second occurrence of '(5.24)' should refer to the thermodynamic identity (5.18).
  4. [Figure 14] The global phase diagram in Figure 14 would benefit from a legend clarifying the meaning of the dashed curves and the boundary between the orange and blue regions, since the caption currently describes these features only in the main text.
  5. [Section 5.2.3] The renormalized free energy (5.21)-(5.22) depends on the finite counterterms A_ct, B_ct, C_ct, which are fixed to specific numerical values. The authors should state explicitly which reported conclusions are independent of this scheme choice, since a physical phase transition should not depend on the renormalization scheme.
  6. [Section 2.2] The phrase 'This is not crucial for the classification of the solutions and the IR dynamics' is stronger than what is demonstrated; the subsequent numerical results depend on the UV potential through the extraction of R and the free energy, so this point deserves a more qualified wording.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the sign-of-curvature exclusion is derived from the dynamical system; the R=0 transition claim is a flagged extrapolation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central technical result—the non-existence of positive-curvature type I/II solutions at b=bc, alpha=1/2—is derived endogenously. Equation (4.46) follows from solving the Riccati equation (4.30) obtained by pulling the autonomous system back to the center manifold; the asymptotic sign of T is negative for any finite C_{1/2}, and because T carries the sign of the boundary curvature along the flow (Section 2.3), the exclusion of R>0 type I/II solutions is a direct consequence of the equations, not of an input assumption or a fitted parameter. The same holds for the alpha<1/2 and alpha>1/2 branches via (4.40)/(4.43). The abstract's stronger statement that the transition happens at R=0 is not established to the same standard: Section 5.2.3 states the numerics are 'not accurate enough' to decide whether a derivative of the free energy is discontinuous, and the small-R expansions (5.25)-(5.26) are imported from [19] with the authors' own caveat 'it is not clear whether (5.25) and (5.26) are valid as phi0->infinity in type III solutions for alpha<=1/2'. These are correctness/rigor limitations, not circular reductions: the target claim is not used as an input to select the expansions, and the log-fit extrapolation in Figure 10 is a numerical inference rather than a definitional identity. Prior work by the same authors is used for the holographic dictionary, free-energy formulae and the b>bc classification, none of which contains the b=bc IHQCD result. No load-bearing step is equivalent by construction to its input.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small number of modeling assumptions: the Einstein-dilaton action, the constant-curvature ansatz, the specific IR asymptotics with b=b_c and alpha, Gubser's criterion for acceptable singularities, and the simplified UV potential. The free energy results additionally depend on renormalization counterterms chosen by hand. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • alpha (IR power-law exponent) = alpha=1/2 for IHQCD; 0<alpha<1 studied
    Exponent in the IR potential V ~ -V_inf phi^alpha e^{2 b_c phi}. It parametrizes the model class; the physical IHQCD value alpha=1/2 is the bifurcation point.
  • V_inf (IR potential normalization) = 1 (numerics)
    Overall normalization of the IR exponential potential; in the numerical study set to V_inf=1 after rescaling.
  • m^2 (scalar mass at UV fixed point) = m^2 = -15/4 in d=4
    Sets the conformal dimensions Delta_-=3/2, Delta_+=5/2 of the dual operator; chosen for the simplified UV potential.
  • Counterterms A_ct, B_ct, C_ct = A_ct=-0.3, B_ct=-0.0662, C_ct=0
    Finite counterterms in holographic renormalization of free energy/entropy; B_ct is chosen so that the entropy is regular at R=0. Scheme-dependent.
  • ell (AdS length) = ell=1
    Sets units; all dimensionful quantities measured in units of the AdS length.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The bulk action is d+1-dimensional Einstein gravity minimally coupled to a single scalar dilaton (2.1).
    Starting point of the bottom-up holographic model; assumes the dual QFT is governed by a single scalar operator.
  • domain assumption Ground states preserve maximal symmetry of the boundary: metric ansatz (2.2) with constant curvature slices.
    Restricts to solutions dual to QFT on dS/S; other Einstein manifolds are not considered.
  • domain assumption Gubser's criterion selects acceptable singularities: generic 'type 0' solutions are discarded.
    Standard holographic criterion for good singularities; used to identify physical solutions.
  • domain assumption The IR asymptotics V ~ -V_inf phi^alpha e^{2 b_c phi} with b_c = sqrt(1/(2(d-1))) is the defining feature of the IHQCD class.
    From [5]; this asymptotics is claimed to give linear/Regge glueball spectra for alpha=1/2.
  • ad hoc to paper The simplified UV potential (5.1) with a relevant operator of dimension Delta_-=3/2 faithfully represents the qualitative physics of IHQCD.
    The paper replaces the asymptotically free Yukawa coupling by a relevant deformation to simplify numerics; states this does not change qualitative features.
  • domain assumption Validity of the small-curvature expansions (5.25)-(5.26) from [19] for the free energy in the present case.
    Used to fit B(R), C(R); the paper itself notes it is unclear if these expansions are valid for alpha<=1/2 type III solutions as phi0 goes to infinity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Improved Holographic QCD on a Curved Background: an Application of Dynamical System Theory in Holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XMWQS6GF

@misc{pith2026250510703,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Improved Holographic QCD on a Curved Background: an Application of Dynamical System Theory in Holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XMWQS6GF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.10703}
}
abstract

The finite-curvature phase diagram of IHQCD, a bottom-up holographic model for large $N_c$ non-supersymmetric YM$_4$, is investigated. This holographic theory belongs to a class of Einstein-Dilaton theories that exhibit no scaling in the IR. We use advanced techniques from dynamical system theory to address this problem that is harder than other holographic setups. We classify all solutions where the dual theory is defined on a constant curvature manifold, both with positive and negative curvature. For general theories in this class a quantum phase transition occurs at finite curvature. For IHQCD in particular, we find that the phase transition occurs at zero curvature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the spectra of holographic QFTs on constant curvature manifolds

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For holographic QFTs on constant-curvature manifolds, the spectrum is always discrete for negative curvature and always has a continuous component starting at m^2 = (9/4)α^{-2} for positive curvature.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [19]

    Back-reaction in massless de Sitter QFTs: holography, gravitational DBI action and f(R) gravity,

    J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. T. Witkowski, “Back-reaction in massless de Sitter QFTs: holography, gravitational DBI action and f(R) gravity,” JCAP 07 (2020), 040 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/040 [ArXiv:2003.09435][hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  2. [1]

    Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, “Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,” Phys. Rept. 323 (2000), 183-386 doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00083-6 [ArXiv:hep-th/9905111]

    arXiv 2000

  3. [2]

    Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998), 505-532 doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n3.a3 [ArXiv:hep-th/9803131]

    arXiv 1998

  4. [3]

    Towards the large N limit of pure N=1 superYang-Mills,

    J. M. Maldacena and C. Nunez, “Towards the large N limit of pure N=1 superYang-Mills,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001), 588-591 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.588 [ArXiv:hep-th/0008001]

    arXiv 2001

  5. [4]

    Confinement and condensates without fine tuning in supergravity duals of gauge theories,

    L. Girardello, M. Petrini, M. Porrati and A. Zaffaroni, “Confinement and condensates without fine tuning in supergravity duals of gauge theories,” JHEP 05 (1999), 026 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/05/026 [ArXiv:hep-th/9903026] L. Girardello, M. Petrini, M. Porrati and A. Zaffaroni, “The Supergravity dual of N=1 superYang-Mills theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 569 (200...

    arXiv 1999

  6. [5]

    Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I,

    U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis, “Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I,” JHEP 0802 (2008) 032 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/032 [ArXiv:0707.1324][hep-th]; U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti, “Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II,” JHEP 0802 (2008) 019 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/019 [ArXiv:0707.1349][hep-th]

    arXiv 2008

  7. [6]

    Holographic Models for QCD in the Veneziano Limit,

    M. Jarvinen and E. Kiritsis, “Holographic Models for QCD in the Veneziano Limit,” , JHEP 03 (2012), 002; [ArXiv:1112.1261] [hep-ph]; T. Alho, M. J¨ arvinen, K. Kajantie, E. Kiritsis and K. Tuominen,“On finite-temperature holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit,” JHEP 01 (2013), 093; [ArXiv:1210.4516] [hep-ph]; T. Alho, M. J¨ arvinen, K. Kajantie, E. Kirits...

    arXiv 2012

  8. [7]

    Holographic confining theories on space-times with constant positive curvature,

    J. Kastikainen, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti, “Holographic confining theories on space-times with constant positive curvature,” [ArXiv:2502.04036] [hep-th]

    arXiv

Show all 41 references
  1. [8]

    Improved Holographic Yang-Mills at Finite Temperature: Comparison with Data,

    U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti and F. Nitti, “Improved Holographic Yang-Mills at Finite Temperature: Comparison with Data,” Nucl. Phys. B 820 (2009), 148-177; [ArXiv:0903.2859] [hep-th]; U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, G. Michalogiorgakis and F. Nitti, “Thermal Transport and Drag...

    2009 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Thermodynamics of the QCD plasma and the large-N limit,

    M. Panero, “Thermodynamics of the QCD plasma and the large-N limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009), 232001; [ArXiv:0907.3719] [hep-lat]; B. Lucini and M. Panero, “SU(N) gauge theories at large N,” Phys. Rept. 526 (2013), 93-163; [ArXiv:1210.4997] [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Improved Holographic QCD,

    U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti, G. Michalogiorgakis and F. Nitti, “Improved Holographic QCD,” Lect. Notes Phys. 828 (2011) 79 doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04864-7 [ArXiv:1006.5461][hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Dissecting the string theory dual of QCD,

    E. Kiritsis, “Dissecting the string theory dual of QCD,” Fortsch. Phys. 57 (2009), 396-417; [ArXiv:0901.1772] [hep-th]. – 66 –

    2009 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Gouteraux and E

    B. Gouteraux and E. Kiritsis, “Generalized Holographic Quantum Criticality at Finite Density, JHEP 12, 036 (2011) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2011)036 [ArXiv:1107.2116][hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Holography for Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theories from generalized dimensional reduction,

    B. Gouteraux, J. Smolic, M. Smolic, K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, “Holography for Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theories from generalized dimensional reduction,” JHEP 01, 089 (2012) [ArXiv:arXiv:1110.2320][hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Hidden Fermi surfaces in compressible states of gauge-gravity duality,

    L. Huijse, S. Sachdev and B. Swingle, “Hidden Fermi surfaces in compressible states of gauge-gravity duality,” Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012), 035121; [ArXiv:1112.0573] [cond-mat.str-el]

    2012 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Shedding black hole light on the emergent string conjecture,

    I. Basile, D. L¨ ust and C. Montella, “Shedding black hole light on the emergent string conjecture,” JHEP 07 (2024), 208; [ArXiv:2311.12113] [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [16]

    On holographic confining QFTs on AdS,

    A. Ghodsi, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti, “On holographic confining QFTs on AdS,” [ArXiv:2409.02879] [hep-th]

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    Holographic RG flows on curved manifolds and quantum phase transitions,

    J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. T. Witkowski, “Holographic RG flows on curved manifolds and quantum phase transitions,” JHEP 05 (2018), 034; [ArXiv:1711.08462][hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Holographic RG flows on curved manifolds and the F -theorem,

    J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. T. Witkowski, “Holographic RG flows on curved manifolds and the F -theorem,” JHEP 02 (2019), 055; [ArXiv:1810.12318][hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Holographic QFTs on S2×S2, spontaneous symmetry breaking and Efimov saddle points,

    E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and E. Pr´ eau, “Holographic QFTs on S2×S2, spontaneous symmetry breaking and Efimov saddle points,” JHEP 08 (2020), 138; [ArXiv:2005.09054] [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Flavored ABJM theory on the sphere and holographic F-functions,

    N. Jokela, J. Kastikainen, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti, “Flavored ABJM theory on the sphere and holographic F-functions,” JHEP 03 (2022), 091; [ArXiv:2112.08715] [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Curvature singularities: The good, the bad, and the naked,

    S. S. Gubser, “Curvature singularities: The good, the bad, and the naked,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4 (2000) 679 [ArXiv:hep-th/0002160]

    2000 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Applications of center Manifold Theory,

    J. Carr, “Applications of center Manifold Theory,” Applied Mathematical Sciences, volume 35, ISBN:9781461259305 (1981)

    1981

  16. [24]

    Guckenheimer and P

    J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes, ”Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields”, Applied Mathematical Sciences, volume 42, ISBN : 0-387-90819-6, (1983)

    1983

  17. [25]

    RG Flows and Bifurcations

    S. Gukov, “RG Flows and Bifurcations” Nuclear Physics B (2017) 919 [ArXiv:arXiv:1608.06638][hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Strogatz, ”Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering (2nd ed.),” CRC Press (2015)

    S.H. Strogatz, ”Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering (2nd ed.),” CRC Press (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Thermodynamics and bulk viscosity of approximate black hole duals to finite temperature quantum chromodynamics,

    S. S. Gubser, A. Nellore, S. S. Pufu and F. D. Rocha, “Thermodynamics and bulk viscosity of approximate black hole duals to finite temperature quantum chromodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008), 131601; [ArXiv:0804.1950] [hep-th]; S. S. Gubser and A. Nellore, “Mimicking the ...

    2008 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Deconfinement and Gluon Plasma Dynamics in Improved Holographic QCD,

    U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti and F. Nitti, “Deconfinement and Gluon Plasma Dynamics in Improved Holographic QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008), 181601; [ArXiv:0804.0899] [hep-th]; – 67 – U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti and F. Nitti, “Holography and Thermodynamics of ...

    2008 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Exotic RG Flows from Holography,

    E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. S. Pimenta, “Exotic RG Flows from Holography,” Fortsch. Phys. 65 (2017) no.2, 1600120; [ArXiv:1611.05493][hep-th]; F. Nitti, L. Silva Pimenta and D. A. Steer, “On multi-field flows in gravity and holography,” JHEP 07 (2018), 022; [ArXiv:1711.10969]...

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Holographic QFTs on AdS d, wormholes and holographic interfaces,

    A. Ghodsi, J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and V. Nourry, “Holographic QFTs on AdS d, wormholes and holographic interfaces,” JHEP 01 (2023), 121; [ArXiv:2209.12094] [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Oscillatory approach to a singular point in the relativistic cosmology

    V.A. Belinsky, I.M. Khalatnikov, E.M. Lifshitz, “Oscillatory approach to a singular point in the relativistic cosmology”, Adv.Phys. 19 (1970) 525-573

    1970

  24. [32]

    Scalar field cosmological models with hard potential walls,

    S. Foster, “Scalar field cosmological models with hard potential walls,” [ArXiv:gr-qc/9806113]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Gravity/Spin-model correspondence and holographic superfluids,

    U. Gursoy, “Gravity/Spin-model correspondence and holographic superfluids,” JHEP 12 (2010), 062; [ArXiv:1007.4854] [hep-th]; “Continuous Hawking-Page transitions in Einstein-scalar gravity,” JHEP 01 (2011), 086; [ArXiv:1007.0500] [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Generalized Hawking-Page transitions,

    O. Aharony, E. Y. Urbach and M. Weiss, “Generalized Hawking-Page transitions,” JHEP 08 (2019), 019 [ArXiv:1904.07502][hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Universal accelerating cosmologies from 10d supergravity,

    P. Marconnet and D. Tsimpis, “Universal accelerating cosmologies from 10d supergravity,” JHEP 01, 033 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2023)033 [ArXiv:2210.10813][hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Accelerated expansion of an open universe and string theory realizations,

    D. Andriot, D. Tsimpis and T. Wrase, “Accelerated expansion of an open universe and string theory realizations,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.12, 123515 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123515 [ArXiv:2309.03938][hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    De Clerck, S

    M. De Clerck, S. A. Hartnoll and J. E. Santos, JHEP 07, 202 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)202 [ArXiv:2312.11622][hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    On multi-field flows in gravity and holography,

    F. Nitti, L. Silva Pimenta and D. A. Steer, “On multi-field flows in gravity and holography,” JHEP 07, 022 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)022 [ArXiv:1711.10969][hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Holographic models of de Sitter QFTs,

    D. Marolf, M. Rangamani and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Holographic models of de Sitter QFTs,” Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 105015 (2011) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/10/105015 [ArXiv:1007.3996][hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Acceleration-Induced Deconfinement Transitions in de Sitter Spacetime,

    J. Blackman, M. B. McDermott and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Acceleration-Induced Deconfinement Transitions in de Sitter Spacetime,” JHEP 08, 064 (2011) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2011)064 [ArXiv:1105.0440][hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Lappicy, ”Conley’s index and connection matrices for non-experts,” [ArXiv:1901.05565][math.DS] – 68 –

    P. Lappicy, ”Conley’s index and connection matrices for non-experts,” [ArXiv:1901.05565][math.DS] – 68 –

    1901 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.