Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 2 cited by

Roto-translational optomechanics

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The three rotational degrees of freedom of a levitated nanoparticle are intrinsically coupled to its translation through the optomechanical Hamiltonian, and controlling all six together is the route to ground-state cooling, non-classical…

desk verdict A careful, current review that consolidates the roto-translational subfield; the idealizations are flagged and do not undermine the synthesis. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20905 v1 pith:XO5TQN2I submitted 2025-07-28 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall

classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hall
keywords levitatedoptomechanicsroto-translationalmotionanisotropicnanoparticlesopticaltweezerslibrationalcoolingcoherentscatteringtorquesensingquantumgroundstate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the three rotational degrees of freedom of a levitated nanoparticle are not a side feature of optical trapping but an intrinsic part of the optomechanical interaction. Starting from the Hamiltonian $H_{\mathrm{opt}}=-\tfrac12 V\epsilon_0 E_{\mathrm{tot}}^{\top}\chi_{\mathrm{lab}}E_{\mathrm{tot}}$, it shows that an anisotropic particle's orientation enters the trapping potential through the lab-frame susceptibility tensor, producing librations, spinning, and compound rotations that are nonlinearly coupled to translation. If the review is right, experiments that track only the center of mass will miss quantitative spectral features and may fail to reach full ground-state cooling, non-classical rotational states, or quantum-limited torque sensing. The review's practical claim is that all six degrees of freedom must be modeled, cooled, and controlled together.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the tensorial optomechanical Hamiltonian $H_{\mathrm{opt}}=-\tfrac12 V\epsilon_0(E_d+E_f)^{\top}\chi_{\mathrm{lab}}(E_d+E_f)$, with $\chi_{\mathrm{lab}}=R\chi R^{\top}$ rotating the body-frame susceptibility into the lab frame. Expanding in the tweezer field $E_d$ and the scattered field $E_f$ generates the gradient potential, deterministic radiation-pressure forces and torques, and stochastic recoil noise; adding gas collisions supplies damping and thermal noise. The particle is treated as a rigid rotor in Euler angles, with inertia, susceptibility, and friction tensors diagonal in one body frame, and the subsequent quantization via the Laplace-Beltrami operator fixes operator ordering and yields the quantum Langevin and stochastic master equations. This single derivation chain carries the paper's argument that rotation and translation are inseparable in levitated optomechanics.

What would settle it

Measure the power spectral density of an optically levitated asymmetric-top nanoparticle at pressures below $10^{-5}$ mbar over a range of trap ellipticities and check for the predicted sidebands at $\omega_\alpha \pm \omega_\gamma$ and $\omega_\beta \pm \omega_\gamma$ and the disappearance of low-frequency features when $\gamma$ becomes trapped; if these rotational signatures are absent while translational spectra match a rotation-free model, the claimed intrinsic roto-translational coupling would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the rotational and translational motion of an optically levitated anisotropic nanoparticle form a single coupled optomechanical system, described by one Hamiltonian whose gradient term couples particle orientation, position, and field polarization. The review develops a classical Hamiltonian framework with Euler angles and conjugate momenta, derives deterministic and stochastic radiation-pressure forces and torques plus gas-collision terms, and shows that the same structure, after quantization through the Laplace-Beltrami operator, yields quantum Langevin equations and a stochastic master equation. On this basis it argues that distinct particle shapes—prolate rods, oblate disks, and asymmetric tops—show characteristic librational, spinning, and precessing dynamics, and that recent experiments cooling librational motion to occupation $0.04$ with 92% purity demonstrate that rotational degrees of freedom are a viable route to room-temperature quantum optomechanics.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing idealization is that the particle is a Rayleigh-regime rigid ellipsoid whose inertia, susceptibility, and friction tensors share one body frame, trapped in a stigmatic Gaussian beam without aberrations; the review itself notes that concave geometries and higher-order field corrections would be needed (Secs. 3.2, 4.1, Appendix C).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quantitative comparison with experiments on non-spherical particles requires modeling all six degrees of freedom; rotation affects centre-of-mass spectra even when only translation is measured.
  • Particle shape can be identified from librational frequencies, translational linewidth ratios, and levitodynamic spectra, resolving size differences of a few nanometres.
  • Librational motion has been cooled to a mean occupation of $0.04$ (92% purity), making rotations a practical path to room-temperature quantum states of a levitated object.
  • Spinning nanoparticles offer better torque sensitivity than librating ones, with projected values below $10^{-30}\ \mathrm{N\,m}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ for optimized parameters, approaching the photon-recoil limit where Casimir torques and vacuum friction could be tested.
  • Full three-dimensional ground-state cooling and preparation of non-classical rotational states are identified as the next milestones, best approached by combining coherent scattering with feedback cooling of different degrees of freedom.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If rotation-translation coupling is as central as argued, then experiments cooling only centre-of-mass modes will eventually hit a rotational heating floor; hybrid cooling schedules that address librations first may reach lower occupations than translation-only protocols.
  • The same Hamiltonian structure suggests that structured-light traps carrying orbital angular momentum could engineer rotational potentials beyond the polarization torques reviewed here; the review notes transverse orbital-angular-momentum torques but does not fold them into the general framework.
  • A testable extension would be to include surface-modified photon recoil noise when a spinning nanoparticle is placed near a dielectric surface, since the review's stochastic scattering model assumes free-space mode density; the magnitude of vacuum-friction torque depends sensitively on that correction.
  • The classical-quantum bridge via symplectic replacement suggests that classical simulations of roto-translational power spectral densities could serve as a quantitative predictor for quantum sideband thermometry in the same parameter regime, a connection the review leaves implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This review synthesizes the experimental and theoretical state of roto-translational levitated optomechanics. It constructs a classical stochastic Hamiltonian model for a Rayleigh-regime anisotropic nanoparticle in a stigmatic Gaussian tweezer, including gradient and scattering forces, photon-recoil and gas-collision noises, and then provides a quantum Langevin/stochastic-master-equation counterpart. Simulations for spheres, prolate and oblate ellipsoids, and asymmetric tops illustrate that rotational and translational degrees of freedom are coupled and must be treated together; the second half surveys particle characterization, cooling, sensing, and proposals for quantum control of rotation. The review concludes that full 6D roto-translational control is the relevant target for the field's next milestones.

Significance. If the framework holds, this is a timely and useful reference that unifies a large body of recent work and makes a persuasive case that rotational motion is not a perturbation to levitated optomechanics but an intrinsic part of its dynamics. The derivations are transparent and cross-checked: Eq. (42) recovers the Rayleigh scattering cross-section, and Eq. (68) reproduces the known photon-recoil diffusion matrix for a sphere, which lends credibility to the more general formalism. The review also gives concrete, testable predictions for power spectral densities and trap-frequency scalings (Eq. (107)) and carefully distinguishes demonstrated results (6D cooling in Ref. [14], librational ground-state cooling in Ref. [220]) from proposals. The main quantitative reach is limited by the stated idealizations of co-diagonal tensors and an aberration-free Gaussian beam, but these limitations are acknowledged explicitly in the text.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 4.4.1 (Eq. (128) and following text)] The high- and low-temperature labels are swapped: the text calls ℏω ≫ k_B T the high-temperature regime and ℏω ≪ k_B T the low-temperature regime, but the subsequent formulas n̄ ≈ k_B T/ℏω and n̄ ≈ exp(−ℏω/k_B T) correspond to the opposite labels. Please correct this.
  2. [Sec. 4.4.2] The sideband-resolved condition is written as ω_m > κ/4; the standard resolved-sideband criterion is ω_m ≫ κ. The strong-coupling condition 4g > κ can then be stated in that context without the nonstandard κ/4 threshold.
  3. [Sec. 3.1.2 and Eq. (19)] The assumptions of co-diagonal susceptibility, inertia, and friction tensors, and of a stigmatic Gaussian beam, are stated as limitations, but the main text would benefit from a short paragraph (or an explicit pointer to Appendix C) explaining how small principal-axis misalignments or astigmatic corrections would shift the predicted librational frequencies and sideband positions relative to the measured linewidths cited in Sec. 4.2.3. This is a clarity request rather than a blocking concern, since the idealizations are already acknowledged.
  4. [Eq. (107) and Table 3] The notation 'a12' should be written as a_1^2, and it would help to state explicitly that a_1 is the transverse intensity asymmetry parameter. It would also be useful to say whether the value a_1 = 1.126 in Table 3 is measured from the tweezer or chosen for the simulations.
  5. [Sec. 3.3] When promoting the classical deterministic scattering terms to operators d̂p^(ds) and d̂π^(ds), operator-ordering ambiguities remain; a sentence specifying the ordering convention (for example, symmetric or Weyl ordering) would avoid ambiguity.
  6. [Throughout] There are numerous typos and inconsistent abbreviations ('psuedo-potential', 'an stigmatic', 'correlationa matrix', 'non-nonlinearities', 'unharnomic', and mixed 'Sect.'/'Sec.' usages) that should be corrected in a final pass.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the roto-translational framework is derived from the stated optomechanical Hamiltonian and standard rigid-body mechanics; self-citations are contextual rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central framework is self-contained in the relevant sense: it starts from the optomechanical interaction Hamiltonian H_opt = -(1/2) V ε0 E_tot^T χ_lab E_tot (Eq. 5), expands the field into trapping and scattered parts, and derives the gradient potential, radiation-pressure forces/torques, and stochastic recoil terms through explicit Hamiltonian and input-output steps (Eqs. 17, 21, 33, 38-41, 52-53). The simulations in Sec. 3.2 use physical parameters (Table 3) and geometry-dependent susceptibility/inertia tensors; the analytical trap frequencies in Eq. (107) are a Taylor expansion of the same H_gradient, so their agreement with the numerical PSDs is a consistency check, not a fitted prediction. The paper explicitly acknowledges the simplifying assumptions of co-diagonal tensors in a single body frame and an aberration-free Gaussian beam (Sec. 3.1.2, Appendix C), which are limitations of the model rather than circular inputs. Self-citations do appear, for example 'it has been extended to include rotational DoFs in Refs. [140, 141]' and the SME discussion referencing [192], but these are contextual pointers to the authors' prior work; the review itself re-derives the classical and quantum equations, and the key experimental landmarks cited (e.g., ground-state cooling of libration in Ref. [220]) are independent external results. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation, and the central claim that roto-translational motion must be included is supported by the derived Hamiltonian together with independent experiments. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review's central framework rests on standard Hamiltonian and stochastic calculus plus explicitly stated domain assumptions about particle shape, field model, and gas environment; no new particles or forces are introduced. The assumptions are conventional in the field, though the Gaussian beam and diagonal-tensor approximations limit quantitative accuracy.

free parameters (1)
  • a1, transverse trap asymmetry parameter = 1.126
    Set by hand in Table 3 for all simulations; controls the x-y asymmetry of the Gaussian mode and appears in trap-frequency expressions, including Eq. 107. It is not fitted to reproduce a specific target result.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Rayleigh-regime approximation: particle size is much smaller than the trapping wavelength, so the polarizability can be described by ellipsoidal susceptibility tensors.
    Invoked at the start of Sec. 3 and used throughout the derivation of gradient forces, scattering terms, and simulations.
  • domain assumption Diagonal tensor alignment: susceptibility, moment of inertia, and gas friction tensors are simultaneously diagonal in one body frame.
    Stated in Sec. 3.1.2, Eq. 13; the review acknowledges that more general particles would need separate body frames.
  • domain assumption Stigmatic Gaussian beam model for the tweezer field, with a first-order mode function and later refinements in Appendix C.
    Introduced in Eqs. 18 and 19; the review notes aberrations and higher-order corrections can matter.
  • domain assumption Molecular flow regime for residual gas, with mean free path much larger than the particle size.
    Assumed in Sec. 3.1.8 to justify the Langevin friction and noise model for gas collisions.
  • domain assumption Caldeira-Leggett dissipative model for gas damping and noise.
    Used in Secs. 3.1.8 and 3.3 to connect classical damping to quantum dissipators; a simplified model valid at high gas temperature.
  • domain assumption Photon-recoil noise is neglected in the numerical simulations because gas-collision noise dominates in the considered pressure range.
    Stated at the end of Sec. 3.1.7 and used in Sec. 3.2; this limits quantitative accuracy at ultrahigh vacuum.
  • standard math Canonical quantization via Poisson-bracket replacement and the Laplace-Beltrami operator fixes operator ordering for rotational coordinates.
    Used in Sec. 3.3, Eq. 108 to 110, to pass from classical Hamilton equations to quantum Langevin equations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Roto-translational optomechanics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XO5TQN2I

@misc{pith2026250720905,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Roto-translational optomechanics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XO5TQN2I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20905}
}
read the original abstract

Levitated optomechanics, the interaction between light and small levitated objects, is a new macroscopic quantum system that is being used as a testing ground for fundamental physics and for the development of sensors with exquisite sensitivity. The utility of this system, when compared to other quantum optomechanical systems, is its extreme isolation from the environment and, by the relatively few degrees of freedom that a levitated object has. While work in the field has strongly focused on the three translational degrees of freedom of this system, it has become increasingly important to understand the induced rotational motion of levitated objects, particularly in optical trapping fields, but also in magnetic and electric traps. These additional three degrees of freedom, which are intrinsic to levitated systems, offer a new set of optomechanical nonlinear interactions that lead to a rich and yet largely unexplored roto-translational motion. The control and utilization of these interactions promise to extend the utility of levitated optomechanics in both fundamental studies and applications. In this review, we provide an overview of levitated optomechanics, before focusing on the roto-translational motion of optically levitated anisotropic objects. We first present a classical treatment of this induced motion, bridging the gap between classical and quantum formalisms. We describe the different types of roto-translational motion for different particle shapes via their interaction with polarized optical trapping fields. Subsequently, we provide an overview of the theoretical and experimental approaches as well as applications that have established this new field. The review concludes with an outlook of promising experiments and applications, including the creation of non-classical states of roto-translational motion, quantum-limited torque sensing and particle characterization methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.20905 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Interactive mind map overview of the main topics covered in this review on roto-translational levitated optomechanics. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of different types of motion in levitated optomechanics. a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of typical levitation platforms used for rotational optomechanics: optical, magnetic, and electric trapping. a) Optical levitation and cavity cooling scheme adapted from Delić et al., [17]. A silica nanoparticle is trapped by a tightly focused optical tweezer (purple) and placed inside a high-finesse optical cavity (gray). The scattering of light from the particle into the cavity mode enables sideband-resol… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Layout of a 2x2 magnetic trap array showing the magnetic fields generated. The red and blue coloring represent the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Overview diagram of the theoretical framework. Arrows indicate how key equations and components flow into the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematics of the different geometries studied in an optical trap using numerical simulations in this work. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Flowchart showing how vacuum field fluctuations and input mode amplitudes ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Numerical simulations for a spherical nanoparticle of radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Numerical simulations for a prolate ellipsoidal nanoparticle. a) The geometry considered has [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Numerical simulations for an oblate ellipsoidal nanoparticle. a) The geometry considered has [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Numerical simulation for an asymmetric-top nanoparticle. a) The geometry considered is a shell of thickness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Effects of particle morphology on light scattering and rotational dynamics of optically levitated nanoparticles. (a–h) Adapted from Rademacher et al., [175]. (a, c, e, g) Normalized vertically polarized light intensity IV /Imax V as a function of λ/2 waveplate angle, …
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Experimental configurations and rotational motion spectra of optically levitated nanodumbbells. (a–b) Adapted from Bang et al., [109]. (a) Schematic of a five-dimensional cooling configuration. A silica nanodumbbell is levitated using a tightly focused 1064 nm linearl…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Coherent scattering cooling of an ellipsoidal nanoparticle Adapted from Pontin et al., [14]. (a) Pictorial view of the experiment and definition of the reference frames. The transformation of coordinates from body to laboratory frame is defined through three Euler ang…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Force and torque sensing examples using optically levitated nanoparticles. (a–c) Adapted from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Ground-state cooling of translational and rotational degrees of freedom in levitated nanoparticles. (a) Adapted from Delić et al. [17]. Mean phonon occupation n¯x of the translational mode along the cavity axis as a function of cavity detuning ∆. The lowest occupation…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Long-axis spinning of a levitated nanodumbbell, adapted from [49]. (a) A dumbbell is trapped at the focus of a linearly polarized optical tweezer (λ = 1550 nm). An auxiliary circularly polarized beam (λ = 1064 nm) is used to apply a controlled torque in the y-z plane.…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: (a). This demonstrates that the quantum state of a levitated particle can be coherently spread beyond the ground-state width – a clear signature of non-classical motion - with potential applications for quantum-enhanced force sensing [291] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/fu…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Simultaneous ground-state cooling of six mechanical modes of two levitated nanoparticles

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Tuning the polarization angle allows simultaneous ground-state cooling of six mechanical modes in a system of two cavity-coupled levitated nanoparticles.

  2. Explaining Optomechanical Libration Spectra: A Stochastic Simulation Approach

    physics.comp-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A stochastic simulation shows that thermal transitions between confined libration and free rotation around the long axis produce the shoulder features in nanodumbbell libration spectra.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 115 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [14]

    Pontin, H

    A. Pontin, H. Fu, M. Toroš, T. S. Monteiro, P. F. Barker, Simultaneous cavity cooling of all six degrees of freedom of a levitated nanoparticle, Nature Physics (Apr. 2023).doi:10.1038/ 88 s41567-023-02006-6. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02006-6

  2. [220]

    High-purity quantum optomechanics at room temperature

    L. Dania, O. S. Kremer, J. Piotrowski, D. Candoli, J. Vijayan, O. Romero-Isart, C. Gonzalez- Ballestero, L. Novotny, M. Frimmer, High-purity quantum optomechanics at room temperature (2024). doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2412.14117. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14117

  3. [1]

    Barzanjeh, A

    S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, S. Gröblacher, M. Paternostro, C. A. Regal, E. M. Weig, Optomechanics for quantum technologies, Nature Physics 18 (1) (2022) 15–24.doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01402-0. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01402-0

  4. [2]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, M

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, M. Aspelmeyer, L. Novotny, R. Quidant, O. Romero-Isart, Levitodynamics: Levitation and control of microscopic objects in vacuum, Science 374 (6564) (2021) eabg3027.doi: 10.1126/science.abg3027. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg3027

  5. [3]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics 86 (4) (2014) 1391. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.1391

  6. [4]

    Bowen, G

    W. Bowen, G. Milburn, Quantum Optomechanics, Taylor & Francis, 2015. URLhttps://books.google.co.uk/books?id=xqlcrgEACAAJ

  7. [5]

    M. Bild, M. Fadel, Y. Yang, U. von Lüpke, P. Martin, A. Bruno, Y. Chu, Schrödinger cat states of a 16- microgram mechanical oscillator, Science 380 (6642) (2023) 274–278.doi:10.1126/science.adf7553. URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.adf7553 87

  8. [6]

    Bagci, A

    T. Bagci, A. Simonsen, S. Schmid, L. G. Villanueva, E. Zeuthen, J. Appel, J. M. Taylor, A. Sørensen, K. Usami, A. Schliesser, E. S. Polzik, Optical detection of radio waves through a nanomechanical transducer, Nature 507 (7490) (2014) 81–85.doi:10.1038/nature13029. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nature13029

Show all 298 references
  1. [7]

    B.-B. Li, J. Bílek, U. B. Hoff, L. S. Madsen, S. Forstner, V. Prakash, C. Schäfermeier, T. Gehring, W. P. Bowen, U. L. Andersen, Quantum enhanced optomechanical magnetometry, Optica 5 (7) (2018) 850–856.doi:10.1364/OPTICA.5.000850. URLhttps://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm...

  2. [8]

    A. G. Krause, M. Winger, T. D. Blasius, Q. Lin, O. Painter, A high-resolution microchip optomechanical accelerometer, Nature Photonics 6 (11) (2012) 768–772.doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012. 245. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.245

  3. [9]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.97

    E.Gavartin, P.Verlot, T.J.Kippenberg, Ahybridon-chipoptomechanicaltransducerforultrasensitive force measurements, Nature Nanotechnology 7 (8) (2012) 509–514.doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.97. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.97

  4. [10]

    Jiang, C

    W. Jiang, C. J. Sarabalis, Y. D. Dahmani, R. N. Patel, F. M. Mayor, T. P. McKenna, R. V. Laer, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Efficient bidirectional piezo-optomechanical transduction between microwave and optical frequency, Nature Communications 11 (1) (Mar. 2020).doi:10.1038/s41467-02...

  5. [11]

    Nunnenkamp, K

    A. Nunnenkamp, K. Børkje, S. M. Girvin, Single-photon optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 063602.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.063602. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.063602

  6. [12]

    D. E. Chang, C. Regal, S. Papp, D. Wilson, J. Ye, O. Painter, H. J. Kimble, P. Zoller, Cavity opto- mechanics using an optically levitated nanosphere, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (3) (2010) 1005–1010.doi:10.1073/pnas.0912969107. URLhttps://doi.org/10.10...

  7. [13]

    P. F. Barker, Doppler cooling a microsphere, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 073002.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.105.073002. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.073002

  8. [15]

    Piotrowski, D

    J. Piotrowski, D. Windey, J. Vijayan, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, A. de los Ríos Sommer, N. Meyer, R. Quidant, O. Romero-Isart, R. Reimann, L. Novotny, Simultaneous ground-state cooling of two mechanical modes of a levitated nanoparticle, Nature Physics (Mar. 2023).doi:10.1038/ s4...

  9. [16]

    Magrini, P

    L. Magrini, P. Rosenzweig, C. Bach, A. Deutschmann-Olek, S. G. Hofer, S. Hong, N. Kiesel, A. Kugi, M.Aspelmeyer, Real-timeoptimalquantumcontrolofmechanicalmotionatroomtemperature, Nature 595 (7867) (2021) 373–377.doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03602-3. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s4158...

  10. [17]

    Delić, M

    U. Delić, M. Reisenbauer, K. Dare, D. Grass, V. Vuletić, N. Kiesel, M. Aspelmeyer, Cooling of a levitated nanoparticle to the motional quantum ground state, Science 367 (6480) (2020) 892.doi: 10.1126/science.aba3993. URLhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/367/6480/892.abstract

  11. [18]

    B. A. Stickler, K. Hornberger, M. S. Kim, Quantum rotations of nanoparticles, Nature Reviews Physics 3 (8) (2021) 589–597.doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00335-0. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00335-0

  12. [19]

    B. A. Stickler, B. Papendell, S. Kuhn, B. Schrinski, J. Millen, M. Arndt, K. Hornberger, Probing macroscopic quantum superpositions with nanorotors, New Journal of Physics 20 (12) (2018) 122001. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aaece4. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aaece4

  13. [20]

    J. S. Pedernales, F. Cosco, M. B. Plenio, Decoherence-free rotational degrees of freedom for quantum applications, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 090501.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.090501. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.090501

  14. [21]

    Dziedzic, Optical levitation by radiation pressure, Applied Physics Letters 19 (8) (1971) 283–285

    J. Dziedzic, Optical levitation by radiation pressure, Applied Physics Letters 19 (8) (1971) 283–285. doi:10.1063/1.1653919. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.1653919

  15. [22]

    Ashkin, J

    A. Ashkin, J. M. Dziedzic, Optical levitation of liquid drops by radiation pressure, Science 187 (4181) (1975) 1073–1075.doi:10.1126/science.187.4181.1073. URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.187.4181.1073 89

  16. [23]

    R. F. Wuerker, H. Shelton, R. V. Langmuir, Electrodynamic Containment of Charged Particles, Journal of Applied Physics 30 (3) (2004) 342–349.arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/ article-pdf/30/3/342/7926269/342\_1\_online.pdf,doi:10.1063/1.1735165. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.1735165

  17. [24]

    W. A. Prothero, J. M. Goodkind, A superconducting gravimeter, Review of Scientific Instruments 39 (9) (1968) 1257–1262.doi:10.1063/1.1683645. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.1683645

  18. [25]

    Bateman, S

    J. Bateman, S. Nimmrichter, K. Hornberger, H. Ulbricht, Near-field interferometry of a free-falling nanoparticle from a point-like source, Nature communications 5 (1) (2014) 1–5

  19. [26]

    Arndt, K

    M. Arndt, K. Hornberger, Testing the limits of quantum mechanical superpositions, Nature Physics 10 (4) (2014) 271–277.doi:10.1038/nphys2863. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2863

  20. [27]

    D. C. Moore, A. A. Geraci, Searching for new physics using optically levitated sensors, Quantum Science and Technology 6 (1) (2021) 014008.doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abcf8a. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abcf8a

  21. [28]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroš, M. Paternostro, A. A. Geraci, P. F. Barker, M. Kim, G. Milburn, Spin entanglement witness for quantum gravity, Physical Review Letters 119 (24) (2017) 240401. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.240401

  22. [29]

    Y. Jin, K. Shen, P. Ju, T. Li, Towards real-world applications of levitated optomechanics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12496 (2024)

  23. [30]

    URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.208

    O.M.Maragò, P.H.Jones, P.G.Gucciardi, G.Volpe, A.C.Ferrari, Opticaltrappingandmanipulation of nanostructures, Nature Nanotechnology 8 (11) (2013) 807–819.doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.208. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.208

  24. [31]

    Q. Ying, C. Li, C. He, T. Liang, Y. Shi, H. Hu, Single bioaerosol characterizations based on optical tweezers, APL Photonics 9 (12) (2024) 120901.doi:10.1063/5.0223105. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0223105

  25. [32]

    Millen, T

    J. Millen, T. S. Monteiro, R. Pettit, A. N. Vamivakas, Optomechanics with levitated particles, Reports on Progress in Physics 83 (2) (2020) 026401. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ab6100 90

  26. [33]

    A. D. Cronin, J. Schmiedmayer, D. E. Pritchard, Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1051–1129.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1051. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1051

  27. [34]

    Winstone, A

    G. Winstone, A. Grinin, M. Bhattacharya, A. A. Geraci, T. Li, P. J. Pauzauskie, N. Vamivakas, Optomechanics of optically-levitated particles: A tutorial and perspective (2024).arXiv:2307.11858. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2307.11858

  28. [35]

    S. Bose, I. Fuentes, A. A. Geraci, S. M. Khan, S. Qvarfort, M. Rademacher, M. Rashid, M. Toroš, H. Ulbricht, C. C. Wanjura, Massive quantum systems as interfaces of quantum mechanics and gravity, Reviews of Modern Physics 97 (1) (Feb. 2025).doi:10.1103/revmodphys.97.015003. UR...

  29. [36]

    Rademacher, J

    M. Rademacher, J. Millen, Y. L. Li, Quantum sensing with nanoparticles for gravimetry: when bigger is better, Advanced Optical Technologies 9 (5) (2020) 227–239. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1515/aot-2020-0019

  30. [37]

    Belenchia, M

    A. Belenchia, M. Carlesso, Ömer Bayraktar, D. Dequal, I. Derkach, G. Gasbarri, W. Herr, Y. L. Li, M. Rademacher, J. Sidhu, D. K. Oi, S. T. Seidel, R. Kaltenbaek, C. Marquardt, H. Ulbricht, V. C. Usenko, L. Wörner, A. Xuereb, M. Paternostro, A. Bassi, Quantum physics in space, ...

  31. [38]

    Kilian, M

    E. Kilian, M. Rademacher, J. M. H. Gosling, J. H. Iacoponi, F. Alder, M. Toroš, A. Pontin, C. Ghag, S. Bose, T. S. Monteiro, P. F. Barker, Dark matter searches with levitated sensors, AVS Quantum Science 6 (3) (2024) 030503.arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/avs/aqs/article-pdf/doi/10...

  32. [39]

    Gieseler, J

    J. Gieseler, J. Millen, Levitated nanoparticles for microscopic thermodynamics—a review, Entropy 20 (5) (2018) 326.doi:10.3390/e20050326. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3390/e20050326

  33. [40]

    Carney, G

    D. Carney, G. Krnjaic, D. C. Moore, C. A. Regal, G. Afek, S. Bhave, B. Brubaker, T. Corbitt, J. Cripe, N. Crisosto, A. Geraci, S. Ghosh, J. G. E. Harris, A. Hook, E. W. Kolb, J. Kunjummen, R. F. Lang, T. Li, T. Lin, Z. Liu, J. Lykken, L. Magrini, J. Manley, N. Matsumoto, A. Mo...

  34. [41]

    M. E. J. Friese, T. A. Nieminen, N. R. Heckenberg, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, Optical alignment and spinning of laser-trapped microscopic particles, Nature 394 (6691) (1998) 348–350.doi:10.1038/ 28566. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/28566

  35. [42]

    Lipfert, J

    J. Lipfert, J. W. J. Kerssemakers, T. Jager, N. H. Dekker, Magnetic torque tweezers: measuring torsional stiffness in dna and reca-dna filaments, Nature Methods 7 (12) (2010) 977–980.doi:10. 1038/nmeth.1520. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1520

  36. [43]

    D. Fan, F. Zhu, R. Cammarata, C. Chien, Electric tweezers, Nano Today 6 (4) (2011) 339–354. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2011.05.003. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2011.05.003

  37. [44]

    Arita, M

    Y. Arita, M. Mazilu, K. Dholakia, Laser-induced rotation and cooling of a trapped microgyroscope in vacuum, Nature communications 4 (2013) 2374.doi:10.1038/ncomms3374. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3374

  38. [45]

    Y. Jin, J. Yan, S. J. Rahman, J. Li, X. Yu, J. Zhang, 6 ghz hyperfast rotation of an optically levitated nanoparticle in vacuum, Photonics Research 9 (7) (2021) 1344–1350

  39. [46]

    Reimann, M

    R. Reimann, M. Doderer, E. Hebestreit, R. Diehl, M. Frimmer, D. Windey, F. Tebbenjohanns, L. Novotny, Ghz rotation of an optically trapped nanoparticle in vacuum, Physical review letters 121 (3) (2018) 033602

  40. [47]

    J. Ahn, Z. Xu, J. Bang, P. Ju, X. Gao, T. Li, Ultrasensitive torque detection with an optically levitated nanorotor, Nature Nanotechnology 15 (2) (2020) 89–93.doi:10.1038/s41565-019-0605-9. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0605-9

  41. [48]

    Monteiro, S

    F. Monteiro, S. Ghosh, E. C. van Assendelft, D. C. Moore, Optical rotation of levitated spheres in high vacuum, Phys. Rev. A 97 (2018) 051802.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.97.051802. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.051802

  42. [49]

    J. A. Zielińska, F. van der Laan, A. Norrman, R. Reimann, M. Frimmer, L. Novotny, Long-axis spinning of an optically levitated particle: A levitated spinning top, Physical Review Letters 132 (25) (Jun. 2024).doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.253601. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/Phys...

  43. [50]

    T. M. Hoang, Y. Ma, J. Ahn, J. Bang, F. Robicheaux, Z.-Q. Yin, T. Li, Torsional optomechanics of a levitated nonspherical nanoparticle, Physical review letters 117 (12) (2016) 123604.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.117.123604. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.123604

  44. [51]

    S. Kuhn, P. Asenbaum, A. Kosloff, M. Sclafani, B. A. Stickler, S. Nimmrichter, K. Hornberger, O. Cheshnovsky, F. Patolsky, M. Arndt, Cavity-assisted manipulation of freely rotating silicon nanorods in high vacuum, Nano letters 15 (8) (2015) 5604–5608.doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett. ...

  45. [52]

    Rashid, M

    M. Rashid, M. Toroš, A. Setter, H. Ulbricht, Precession motion in levitated optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 253601.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.253601. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.253601

  46. [53]

    X. Chen, T. de Lint, F. Alijani, P. G. Steeneken, Nonlinear dynamics of diamagnetically levitating resonators, Nonlinear Dynamics 112 (21) (2024) 18807–18816.doi:10.1007/s11071-024-10018-x. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-10018-x

  47. [54]

    Dania, D

    L. Dania, D. S. Bykov, M. Knoll, P. Mestres, T. E. Northup, Optical and electrical feedback cooling of a silica nanoparticle levitated in a paul trap, Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (2021) 013018.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.3.013018. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013018

  48. [55]

    Gieseler, B

    J. Gieseler, B. Deutsch, R. Quidant, L. Novotny, Subkelvin parametric feedback cooling of a laser- trapped nanoparticle, Physical review letters 109 (10) (2012) 103603

  49. [56]

    A. T. M. A. Rahman, P. F. Barker, Laser refrigeration, alignment and rotation of levitated yb3+:ylf nanocrystals, Nature Photonics 11 (10) (2017) 634–638.doi:10.1038/s41566-017-0005-3. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41566-017-0005-3

  50. [57]

    D. C. Moore, A. D. Rider, G. Gratta, Search for millicharged particles using optically levitated microspheres, Physical review letters 113 (25) (2014) 251801

  51. [58]

    Monteiro, G

    F. Monteiro, G. Afek, D. Carney, G. Krnjaic, J. Wang, D. C. Moore, Search for composite dark matter with optically levitated sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 181102.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125. 181102. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.181102 93

  52. [59]

    Arita, G

    Y. Arita, G. D. Bruce, E. M. Wright, S. H. Simpson, P. Zemánek, K. Dholakia, All-optical sub- kelvin sympathetic cooling of a levitated microsphere in vacuum, Optica 9 (9) (2022) 1000–1002. doi:10.1364/OPTICA.466337. URLhttps://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI=optica-9-9-1000

  53. [60]

    S. Kuhn, B. A. Stickler, A. Kosloff, F. Patolsky, K. Hornberger, M. Arndt, J. Millen, Optically driven ultra-stable nanomechanical rotor, Nature communications 8 (1) (2017) 1670.doi:10.1038/ s41467-017-01902-9. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01902-9

  54. [61]

    Winstone, Z

    G. Winstone, Z. Wang, S. Klomp, R. G. Felsted, A. Laeuger, C. Gupta, D. Grass, N. Aggarwal, J. Sprague, P. J. Pauzauskie, S. L. Larson, V. Kalogera, A. A. Geraci, Optical trapping of high- aspect-ratio nayf hexagonal prisms for khz-mhz gravitational wave detectors, Physical Re...

  55. [62]

    Y. Hu, J. J. Kingsley-Smith, M. Nikkhou, J. A. Sabin, F. J. Rodríguez-Fortuño, X. Xu, J. Millen, Structured transverse orbital angular momentum probed by a levitated optomechanical sensor, Nature Communications 14 (1) (May 2023).doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38261-7. URLhttp://dx.doi...

  56. [63]

    Ranjit, M

    G. Ranjit, M. Cunningham, K. Casey, A. A. Geraci, Zeptonewton force sensing with nanospheres in an optical lattice, Physical Review A 93 (5) (2016) 053801.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.93.053801. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.053801

  57. [64]

    Kamba, H

    M. Kamba, H. Kiuchi, T. Yotsuya, K. Aikawa, Recoil-limited feedback cooling of single nanoparticles near the ground state in an optical lattice, Physical Review A 103 (5) (2021) L051701

  58. [65]

    Vovrosh, M

    J. Vovrosh, M. Rashid, D. Hempston, J. Bateman, M. Paternostro, H. Ulbricht, Parametric feedback cooling of levitated optomechanics in a parabolic mirror trap, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 34 (7) (2017) 1421.doi:10.1364/josab.34.001421. URLhttps://doi.org/10.136...

  59. [66]

    Dawson, J

    C. Dawson, J. Bateman, Spectral analysis and parameter estimation in levitated optomechanics, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 36 (6) (2019) 1565–1573.doi:10.1364/JOSAB.36.001565. URLhttps://opg.optica.org/josab/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-36-6-1565

  60. [67]

    Laplane, P

    C. Laplane, P. Ren, R. P. Roberts, Y. Lu, T. Volz, Inert shell coating for enhanced laser refrigeration of nanoparticles: Application in levitated optomechanics, ACS Photonics 11 (3) (2024) 963–968.arXiv: 94 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.3c01065,doi:10.1021/acsphotonics...

  61. [68]

    A. T. M. A. Rahman, A. C. Frangeskou, M. S. Kim, S. Bose, G. W. Morley, P. F. Barker, Burning and graphitization of optically levitated nanodiamonds in vacuum, Scientific Reports 6 (1) (2016) 21633. doi:10.1038/srep21633. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/srep21633

  62. [69]

    Hebestreit, R

    E. Hebestreit, R. Reimann, M. Frimmer, L. Novotny, Measuring the internal temperature of a levitated nanoparticle in high vacuum, Phys. Rev. A 97 (2018) 043803.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.97.043803. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.043803

  63. [70]

    V. Jain, J. Gieseler, C. Moritz, C. Dellago, R. Quidant, L. Novotny, Direct measurement of photon recoil from a levitated nanoparticle, Physical review letters 116 (24) (2016) 243601.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.116.243601. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.243601

  64. [71]

    Romagnoli, R

    P. Romagnoli, R. Lecamwasam, S. Tian, J. E. Downes, J. Twamley, Controlling the motional quality factor of a diamagnetically levitated graphite plate, Applied Physics Letters 122 (9) (2023) 094102.arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0133242/ 16785737/0...

  65. [72]

    X. Chen, A. Keşkekler, F. Alijani, P. G. Steeneken, Rigid body dynamics of diamagnetically levitating graphite resonators, Applied Physics Letters 116 (24) (2020) 243505.arXiv:https://pubs.aip. org/aip/apl/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0009604/16713812/243505\_1\_online.pdf,doi:10...

  66. [73]

    S. Tian, K. Jadeja, D. Kim, A. Hodges, G. C. Hermosa, C. Cusicanqui, R. Lecamwasam, J. E. Downes, J. Twamley, Feedback cooling of an insulating high-Q diamagnetically levitated plate, Applied Physics Letters 124 (12) (2024) 124002.arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-pdf...

  67. [74]

    C. W. Lewandowski, T. D. Knowles, Z. B. Etienne, B. D’Urso, High-sensitivity accelerometry with a feedback-cooled magnetically levitated microsphere, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15 (2021) 014050.doi:10. 1103/PhysRevApplied.15.014050. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15....

  68. [75]

    M. C. O’Brien, S. Dunn, J. E. Downes, J. Twamley, Magneto-mechanical trapping of micro- diamonds at low pressures, Applied Physics Letters 114 (5) (2019) 053103.arXiv:https://pubs.aip. org/aip/apl/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5066065/14522530/053103\_1\_online.pdf,doi:10. 1063/1....

  69. [76]

    S. G. Elahi, M. Schut, A. Dana, A. Grinin, S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, A. Geraci, Diamagnetic micro-chip traps for levitated nanoparticle entanglement experiments (2024).arXiv:2411.02325. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02325

  70. [77]

    Hofer, R

    J. Hofer, R. Gross, G. Higgins, H. Huebl, O. F. Kieler, R. Kleiner, D. Koelle, P. Schmidt, J. A. Slater, M. Trupke, K. Uhl, T. Weimann, W. Wieczorek, M. Aspelmeyer, High-qmagnetic levitation and control of superconducting microspheres at millikelvin temperatures, Phys. Rev. Le...

  71. [78]

    Vinante, P

    A. Vinante, P. Falferi, G. Gasbarri, A. Setter, C. Timberlake, H. Ulbricht, Ultralow mechanical damping with meissner-levitated ferromagnetic microparticles, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 (2020) 064027. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.064027. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApp...

  72. [79]

    Gieseler, A

    J. Gieseler, A. Kabcenell, E. Rosenfeld, J. Schaefer, A. Safira, M. J. Schuetz, C. Gonzalez- Ballestero, C. C. Rusconi, O. Romero-Isart, M. D. Lukin, Single-spin magnetomechanics with levitated micromagnets, Physical review letters 124 (16) (2020) 163604

  73. [80]

    C.Brown, Y.Wang, M.Namazi, G.Harris, M.Uysal, J.Harris, Characterizationoflevitatedsuperfluid helium drops in high vacuum, arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.05618 (2021)

  74. [81]

    M.GutierrezLatorre, G.Higgins, A.Paradkar, T.Bauch, W.Wieczorek, Superconductingmicrosphere magnetically levitated in an anharmonic potential with integrated magnetic readout, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19 (2023) 054047.doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.054047. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/1...

  75. [82]

    Perdriat, C

    M. Perdriat, C. Pellet-Mary, T. Copie, G. Hétet, Planar magnetic paul traps for ferromagnetic particles, Phys. Rev. Res. 5 (2023) L032045.doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L032045. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L032045

  76. [83]

    Schreckenberg, Z

    H. Schreckenberg, Z. E. O. E. Alaoui, G. Gallot, Study on and off axis of levitation induced by a rotating permanent magnet (2025).arXiv:2503.22568. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22568 96

  77. [84]

    Janse, E

    M. Janse, E. van der Bent, M. Laurman, R. Smit, B. Hensen, Characterization of a levitated sub- milligram ferromagnetic cube in a planar alternating-current magnetic paul trap, Applied Physics Letters 125 (14) (2024) 144003.arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-pdf/doi/10...

  78. [85]

    Rusconi, V

    C. Rusconi, V. Pöchhacker, K. Kustura, J. Cirac, O. Romero-Isart, Quantum spin stabilized magnetic levitation, Physical Review Letters 119 (16) (Oct. 2017).doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.167202. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.119.167202

  79. [86]

    Bullier, A

    N. Bullier, A. Pontin, P. Barker, Quadratic optomechanical cooling of a cavity-levitated nanosphere, Physical Review Research 3 (3) (2021) L032022

  80. [87]

    I. Alda, J. Berthelot, R. A. Rica, R. Quidant, Trapping and manipulation of individual nanoparticles in a planar paul trap, Applied Physics Letters 109 (16) (2016) 163105

  81. [88]

    Dania, K

    L. Dania, K. Heidegger, D. S. Bykov, G. Cerchiari, G. Araneda, T. E. Northup, Position measurement of a levitated nanoparticle via interference with its mirror image, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 013601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.013601. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Ph...

  82. [89]

    Delord, P

    T. Delord, P. Huillery, L. Nicolas, G. Hétet, Spin-cooling of the motion of a trapped diamond, Nature 580 (7801) (2020) 56–59

  83. [90]

    Y. Jin, K. Shen, P. Ju, X. Gao, C. Zu, A. J. Grine, T. Li, Quantum control and berry phase of electron spins in rotating levitated diamonds in high vacuum, Nature Communications 15 (1) (2024) 5063. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49175-3

  84. [91]

    Perdriat, C

    M. Perdriat, C. C. Rusconi, T. Delord, P. Huillery, C. Pellet-Mary, A. Durand, B. A. Stickler, G. Hétet, Rotational locking of charged microparticles in quadrupole ion traps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 253602.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.253602. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10....

  85. [92]

    D. S. Bykov, L. Dania, F. Goschin, T. E. Northup, 3d sympathetic cooling and detection of levitated nanoparticles, Optica 10 (4) (2023) 438–442

  86. [93]

    Penny, A

    T. Penny, A. Pontin, P. Barker, Sympathetic cooling and squeezing of two colevitated nanoparticles, Physical Review Research 5 (1) (2023) 013070. 97

  87. [94]

    Hopper, P

    A. Hopper, P. F. Barker, A levitated atom-nanosphere hybrid quantum system, New Journal of Physics 26 (1) (2024) 013015.doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ad19f6. URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ad19f6

  88. [95]

    D. S. Bykov, L. Dania, F. Goschin, T. E. Northup, A nanoparticle stored with an atomic ion in a linear paul trap (2024).arXiv:2403.02034

  89. [96]

    G. P. Conangla, A. W. Schell, R. A. Rica, R. Quidant, Motion control and optical interrogation of a levitating single nitrogen vacancy in vacuum, Nano Letters 18 (6) (2018) 3956–3961, pMID: 29772171. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01414,doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8...

  90. [97]

    Bonvin, L

    E. Bonvin, L. Devaud, M. Rossi, A. Militaru, L. Dania, D. S. Bykov, M. Teller, T. E. Northup, L. Novotny, M. Frimmer, Hybrid paul-optical trap with large optical access for levitated optomechanics (2023).doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2312.10131. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10131

  91. [98]

    Bonvin, L

    E. Bonvin, L. Devaud, M. Rossi, A. Militaru, L. Dania, D. S. Bykov, O. Romero-Isart, T. E. Northup, L. Novotny, M. Frimmer, State expansion of a levitated nanoparticle in a dark harmonic potential (2023).arXiv:2312.13111

  92. [99]

    G. F. M. Tomassi, D. Veldhuizen, B. Melo, D. Candoli, A. Riera-Campeny, O. Romero-Isart, N. Meyer, R. Quidant, Accelerated state expansion of a nanoparticle in a dark inverted potential (2025).arXiv: 2503.20707. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20707

  93. [101]

    Pontin, N

    A. Pontin, N. Bullier, M. Toroš, P. Barker, Ultranarrow-linewidth levitated nano-oscillator for testing dissipative wave-function collapse, Physical Review Research 2 (2) (2020) 023349. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023349

  94. [102]

    P. S. Epstein, On the resistance experienced by spheres in their motion through gases, Phys. Rev. 23 (1924) 710–733.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.23.710. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.23.710 98

  95. [103]

    Cavalleri, G

    A. Cavalleri, G. Ciani, R. Dolesi, M. Hueller, D. Nicolodi, D. Tombolato, S. Vitale, P. Wass, W. Weber, Gas damping force noise on a macroscopic test body in an infinite gas reservoir, Physics Letters A 374 (34) (2010) 3365–3369.doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2010.06.041. URLhttps://d...

  96. [104]

    Gittes, C

    F. Gittes, C. F. Schmidt, Interference model for back-focal-plane displacement detection in optical tweezers, Opt. Lett. 23 (1) (1998) 7–9.doi:10.1364/OL.23.000007. URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-23-1-7

  97. [105]

    Tebbenjohanns, M

    F. Tebbenjohanns, M. Frimmer, L. Novotny, Optimal position detection of a dipolar scatterer in a focused field, Phys. Rev. A 100 (2019) 043821.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.100.043821. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.043821

  98. [106]

    Tebbenjohanns, M

    F. Tebbenjohanns, M. Frimmer, A. Militaru, V. Jain, L. Novotny, Cold damping of an optically levitated nanoparticle to microkelvin temperatures, Physical review letters 122 (22) (2019) 223601

  99. [107]

    Deplano, A

    Q. Deplano, A. Pontin, A. Ranfagni, F. Marino, F. Marin, High purity two-dimensional levitated mechanical oscillator, Nature Communications 16 (1) (May 2025).doi:10.1038/ s41467-025-59213-3. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59213-3

  100. [108]

    Seberson, F

    T. Seberson, F. Robicheaux, Parametric feedback cooling of rigid body nanodumbbells in levitated optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 99 (2019) 013821.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.013821. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.013821

  101. [109]

    J. Bang, T. Seberson, P. Ju, J. Ahn, Z. Xu, X. Gao, F. Robicheaux, T. Li, Five-dimensional cooling and nonlinear dynamics of an optically levitated nanodumbbell, Phys. Rev. Research 2 (2020) 043054. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043054. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Phys...

  102. [110]

    Ashkin, J

    A. Ashkin, J. M. Dziedzic, Feedback stabilization of optically levitated particles, Applied Physics Letters 30 (4) (1977) 202–204.doi:10.1063/1.89335. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.89335

  103. [111]

    Poggio, C

    M. Poggio, C. L. Degen, H. J. Mamin, D. Rugar, Feedback cooling of a cantilever’s fundamental mode below 5 mk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 017201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.017201. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.017201

  104. [112]

    T. Li, S. Kheifets, M. G. Raizen, Millikelvin cooling of an optically trapped microsphere in vacuum, Nature Physics 7 (7) (2011) 527–530.doi:10.1038/nphys1952. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1952 99

  105. [113]

    B. R. Slezak, C. W. Lewandowski, J.-F. Hsu, B. D’Urso, Cooling the motion of a silica microsphere in a magneto-gravitational trap in ultra-high vacuum, New Journal of Physics 20 (6) (2018) 063028. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aacac1. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aacac1

  106. [114]

    Ranjit, D

    G. Ranjit, D. P. Atherton, J. H. Stutz, M. Cunningham, A. A. Geraci, Attonewton force detection using microspheres in a dual-beam optical trap in high vacuum, Phys. Rev. A 91 (2015) 051805. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.91.051805. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.051805

  107. [115]

    Kamba, R

    M. Kamba, R. Shimizu, K. Aikawa, Optical cold damping of neutral nanoparticles near the ground state in an optical lattice, Optics Express 30 (15) (2022) 26716.doi:10.1364/oe.462921. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1364/oe.462921

  108. [116]

    Tebbenjohanns, M

    F. Tebbenjohanns, M. Frimmer, V. Jain, D. Windey, L. Novotny, Motional sideband asymmetry of a nanoparticle optically levitated in free space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 013603.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.124.013603. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.013603

  109. [117]

    Tebbenjohanns, M

    F. Tebbenjohanns, M. L. Mattana, M. Rossi, M. Frimmer, L. Novotny, Quantum control of a nanoparticle optically levitated in cryogenic free space, Nature 595 (7867) (2021) 378–382

  110. [118]

    Kamba, R

    M. Kamba, R. Shimizu, K. Aikawa, Nanoscale feedback control of six degrees of freedom of a near- sphere, Nature Communications 14 (1) (Dec. 2023).doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43745-7. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43745-7

  111. [119]

    J. M. H. Gosling, A. Pontin, F. Alder, M. Rademacher, T. S. Monteiro, P. F. Barker, Feedback cooling scheme for an optically levitated oscillator with controlled cross-talk (2025).arXiv:2506.17172. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2506.17172

  112. [120]

    Ferialdi, A

    L. Ferialdi, A. Setter, M. Toroš, C. Timberlake, H. Ulbricht, Optimal control for feedback cooling in cavityless levitated optomechanics, New Journal of Physics 21 (7) (2019) 073019.doi:10.1088/ 1367-2630/ab2b69. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab2b69

  113. [121]

    Setter, M

    A. Setter, M. Toroš, J. F. Ralph, H. Ulbricht, Real-time kalman filter: Cooling of an optically levitated nanoparticle, Physical Review A 97 (3) (2018) 033822

  114. [122]

    G. P. Conangla, F. Ricci, M. T. Cuairan, A. W. Schell, N. Meyer, R. Quidant, Optimal feedback cooling of a charged levitated nanoparticle with adaptive control, Physical review letters 122 (22) (2019) 223602. 100

  115. [123]

    Braginsky, F

    V. Braginsky, F. Khalili, K. Thorne, Quantum Measurement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511622748. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511622748

  116. [124]

    Gieseler, J

    J. Gieseler, J. R. Gomez-Solano, A. Magazzù, I. Pérez Castillo, L. Pérez García, M. Gironella-Torrent, X. Viader-Godoy, F. Ritort, G. Pesce, A. V. Arzola, K. Volke-Sepúlveda, G. Volpe, Optical tweezers — from calibration to applications: a tutorial, Advances in Optics and Phot...

  117. [125]

    van der Laan, F

    F. van der Laan, F. Tebbenjohanns, R. Reimann, J. Vijayan, L. Novotny, M. Frimmer, Sub-kelvin feedback cooling and heating dynamics of an optically levitated librator, Physical Review Letters 127 (12) (Sep. 2021).doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.123605. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103...

  118. [126]

    Gieseler, R

    J. Gieseler, R. Quidant, C. Dellago, L. Novotny, Dynamic relaxation of a levitated nanoparticle from a non-equilibrium steady state, Nature Nanotechnology 9 (5) (2014) 358–364.doi:10.1038/nnano. 2014.40. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NNANO.2014.40

  119. [127]

    T. W. Penny, A. Pontin, P. F. Barker, Performance and limits of feedback cooling methods for levitated oscillators: A direct comparison, Phys. Rev. A 104 (2021) 023502.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.104. 023502. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.023502

  120. [128]

    Marquardt, J

    F. Marquardt, J. P. Chen, A. A. Clerk, S. M. Girvin, Quantum theory of cavity-assisted sideband cooling of mechanical motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 093902.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99. 093902. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.093902

  121. [129]

    Schliesser, R

    A. Schliesser, R. Rivière, G. Anetsberger, O. Arcizet, T. J. Kippenberg, Resolved-sideband cooling of a micromechanical oscillator, Nature Physics 4 (5) (2008) 415–419.doi:10.1038/nphys939. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys939

  122. [130]

    J. Chan, T. M. Alegre, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. T. Hill, A. Krause, S. Gröblacher, M. Aspelmeyer, O. Painter, Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state, Nature 478 (7367) (2011) 89–92. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nature10461 101

  123. [131]

    Kiesel, F

    N. Kiesel, F. Blaser, U. Delić, D. Grass, R. Kaltenbaek, M. Aspelmeyer, Cavity cooling of an optically levitated submicron particle, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (35) (2013) 14180– 14185.doi:10.1073/pnas.1309167110. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309167110

  124. [132]

    P. Z. G. Fonseca, E. B. Aranas, J. Millen, T. S. Monteiro, P. F. Barker, Nonlinear dynamics and strong cavity cooling of levitated nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 173602.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.117.173602. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.173602

  125. [133]

    Meyer, A

    N. Meyer, A. d. l. R. Sommer, P. Mestres, J. Gieseler, V. Jain, L. Novotny, R. Quidant, Resolved- sideband cooling of a levitated nanoparticle in the presence of laser phase noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 153601.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.153601. URLhttps://link.aps.org/d...

  126. [134]

    Vuletić, S

    V. Vuletić, S. Chu, Laser cooling of atoms, ions, or molecules by coherent scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 3787–3790.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3787. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3787

  127. [135]

    A. Kuhn, D. Ljunggren†, Cavity-based single-photon sources, Contemporary Physics 51 (4) (2010) 289–313.doi:10.1080/00107511003602990. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00107511003602990

  128. [136]

    Delić, D

    U. Delić, D. Grass, M. Reisenbauer, T. Damm, M. Weitz, N. Kiesel, M. Aspelmeyer, Levitated cavity optomechanics in high vacuum, Quantum Science and Technology 5 (2) (2020) 025006

  129. [137]

    Toroš, T

    M. Toroš, T. S. Monteiro, Quantum sensing and cooling in three-dimensional levitated cavity optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 023228.doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023228. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023228

  130. [139]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, P

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, P. Maurer, D. Windey, L. Novotny, R. Reimann, O. Romero-Isart, Theory for cavity cooling of levitated nanoparticles via coherent scattering: Master equation approach, Physical Review A 100 (1) (Jul. 2019).doi:10.1103/physreva.100.013805. URLhttps://doi....

  131. [140]

    Schäfer, H

    J. Schäfer, H. Rudolph, K. Hornberger, B. A. Stickler, Cooling nanorotors by elliptic coherent scattering, Physical Review Letters 126 (16) (2021) 163603. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.163603

  132. [141]

    Rudolph, J

    H. Rudolph, J. Schäfer, B. A. Stickler, K. Hornberger, Theory of nanoparticle cooling by elliptic coherent scattering, Phys. Rev. A 103 (2021) 043514.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.103.043514. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.043514

  133. [142]

    U. c. v. Delić, M. Reisenbauer, D. Grass, N. Kiesel, V. Vuletić, M. Aspelmeyer, Cavity cooling of a levitated nanosphere by coherent scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 123602.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.122.123602. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.123602

  134. [143]

    Windey, C

    D. Windey, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, P. Maurer, L. Novotny, O. Romero-Isart, R. Reimann, Cavity- based3dcoolingofalevitatednanoparticleviacoherentscattering, Phys.Rev.Lett.122(2019)123601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.123601. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.123601

  135. [144]

    Japha, R

    Y. Japha, R. Folman, Quantum uncertainty limit for stern-gerlach interferometry with massive objects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 113602.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.113602. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.113602

  136. [145]

    C. Wan, M. Scala, G. W. Morley, A. A. Rahman, H. Ulbricht, J. Bateman, P. F. Barker, S. Bose, M. S. Kim, Free Nano-Object Ramsey Interferometry for Large Quantum Superpositions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (14) (2016) 143003, publisher: American Physical Society.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLe...

  137. [146]

    Wachter, S

    V. Wachter, S. V. Kusminskiy, G. Hétet, B. A. Stickler, Gyroscopically stabilized quantum spin rotors (2025).arXiv:2504.10339. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10339

  138. [147]

    B. D. Wood, S. Bose, G. W. Morley, Spin dynamical decoupling for generating macroscopic superpositions of a free-falling nanodiamond, Phys. Rev. A 105 (2022) 012824.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.105.012824. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.012824

  139. [148]

    Perdriat, C

    M. Perdriat, C. Pellet-Mary, P. Huillery, L. Rondin, G. Hétet, Spin-mechanics with nitrogen-vacancy centers and trapped particles, Micromachines 12 (6) (2021).doi:10.3390/mi12060651. URLhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/12/6/651 103

  140. [149]

    Delord, L

    T. Delord, L. Nicolas, L. Schwab, G. Hétet, Electron spin resonance from nv centers in diamonds levitating in an ion trap, New Journal of Physics 19 (3) (2017) 033031.doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ aa659c. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa659c

  141. [150]

    Delord, P

    T. Delord, P. Huillery, L. Schwab, L. Nicolas, L. Lecordier, G. Hétet, Ramsey interferences and spin echoes from electron spins inside a levitating macroscopic particle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 053602. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.053602. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103...

  142. [151]

    T. M. Hoang, J. Ahn, J. Bang, T. Li, Electron spin control of optically levitated nanodiamonds in vacuum, Nature Communications 7 (1) (2016) 12250.doi:10.1038/ncomms12250. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12250

  143. [152]

    Voisin, A

    J. Voisin, A. Durand, T. Copie, M. Perdriat, G. Hétet, Nuclear magnetic resonance with a levitating microparticle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 213602.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.213602. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.213602

  144. [153]

    Z.-q. Yin, T. Li, M. Feng, Three-dimensional cooling and detection of a nanosphere with a single cavity, Phys. Rev. A 83 (2011) 013816.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.83.013816. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.013816

  145. [154]

    D. S. Bykov, L. Dania, F. Goschin, T. E. Northup, A nanoparticle stored with an atomic ion in a linear paul trap (2024).doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2403.02034. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02034

  146. [155]

    Toroš, S

    M. Toroš, S. Bose, P. F. Barker, Creating atom-nanoparticle quantum superpositions, Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (2021) 033218.doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033218. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033218

  147. [156]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, J

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, J. Zielińska, M. Rossi, A. Militaru, M. Frimmer, L. Novotny, P. Maurer, O. Romero-Isart, Suppressing recoil heating in levitated optomechanics using squeezed light, PRX Quantum 4 (3) (Sep. 2023).doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.030331. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1...

  148. [157]

    Xu, Y.-H

    Y. Xu, Y.-H. Liu, C. Liu, J.-Q. Liao, Simultaneous ground-state cooling of two levitated nanoparticles by coherent scattering, Physical Review A 109 (5) (May 2024).doi:10.1103/physreva.109.053521. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.053521 104

  149. [158]

    Pontin, H

    A. Pontin, H. Fu, J. H. Iacoponi, P. F. Barker, T. S. Monteiro, Controlling mode orientations and frequencies in levitated cavity optomechanics, Physical Review Research 5 (1) (Jan. 2023).doi: 10.1103/physrevresearch.5.013013. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013013

  150. [159]

    M. Hu, N. Li, Z. Fu, J. Yang, Y. Zhang, W. Li, H. Cai, H. Hu, Understanding thermal induced escape mechanism of optically levitated sphere in low vacuum, Optics Communications 546 (2023) 129784. doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2023.129784. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2023.129784

  151. [160]

    Y. Jin, K. Shen, P. Ju, T. Li, Towards real-world applications of levitated optomechanics (2024). doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2407.12496. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12496

  152. [161]

    J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Nashville, TN, 1998

  153. [162]

    Novotny, B

    L. Novotny, B. Hecht, Principles of nano-optics, Cambridge university press, 2012

  154. [163]

    L. C. Evans, An introduction to stochastic differential equations, Vol. 82, American Mathematical Soc., 2012

  155. [164]

    Goldstein, Classical mechanics, Pearson Education India, 2011

    H. Goldstein, Classical mechanics, Pearson Education India, 2011

  156. [165]

    V. I. Arnol’d, Mathematical methods of classical mechanics, Vol. 60, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

  157. [166]

    Loudon, The quantum theory of light, OUP Oxford, 2000

    R. Loudon, The quantum theory of light, OUP Oxford, 2000

  158. [167]

    Gardiner, P

    C. Gardiner, P. Zoller, P. Zoller, Quantum noise: a handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quantum stochastic methods with applications to quantum optics, Springer Science & Business Media, 2004

  159. [168]

    Seberson, F

    T. Seberson, F. Robicheaux, Distribution of laser shot-noise energy delivered to a levitated nanoparticle, Phys. Rev. A 102 (2020) 033505.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.102.033505. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.033505

  160. [169]

    L. N. Trefethen, D. Bau, Numerical linear algebra, Vol. 181, Siam, 2022

  161. [170]

    Cercignani, C

    C. Cercignani, C. Cercignani, The boltzmann equation, Springer, 1988

  162. [171]

    J. Ahn, Z. Xu, J. Bang, Y.-H. Deng, T. M. Hoang, Q. Han, R.-M. Ma, T. Li, Optically levitated nanodumbbell torsion balance and ghz nanomechanical rotor, Physical review letters 121 (3) (2018) 105 033603.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.033603. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Ph...

  163. [172]

    G. Ford, J. Lewis, J. McConnell, Rotational brownian motion of an asymmetric top, Physical Review A 19 (2) (1979) 907.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.19.907. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.19.907

  164. [173]

    Caldeira, A

    A. Caldeira, A. Leggett, Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 121 (3) (1983) 587–616.doi:10.1016/0378-4371(83)90013-4. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378437183900134

  165. [174]

    C. F. Bohren, D. R. Huffman, Absorption and scattering of light by small particles, John Wiley & Sons, 2008

  166. [175]

    Rademacher, J

    M. Rademacher, J. Gosling, A. Pontin, M. Toroš, J. T. Mulder, A. J. Houtepen, P. F. Barker, Measurement of single nanoparticle anisotropy by laser induced optical alignment and Rayleigh scattering for determining particle morphology, Applied Physics Letters 121 (22) (2022) 221...

  167. [176]

    Gieseler, L

    J. Gieseler, L. Novotny, R. Quidant, Thermal nonlinearities in a nanomechanical oscillator, Nature Physics 9 (12) (2013) 806–810.doi:10.1038/nphys2798. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038

  168. [177]

    Zheng, L.-M

    Y. Zheng, L.-M. Zhou, Y. Dong, C.-W. Qiu, X.-D. Chen, G.-C. Guo, F.-W. Sun, Robust optical- levitation-based metrology of nanoparticle’s position and mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 223603. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.223603. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.1...

  169. [178]

    Flajšmanová, M

    J. Flajšmanová, M. Šiler, P. Jedlička, F. Hrubý, O. Brzobohatý, R. Filip, P. Zemánek, Using the transient trajectories of an optically levitated nanoparticle to characterize a stochastic duffing oscillator, Scientific Reports 10 (1) (Sep. 2020).doi:10.1038/s41598-020-70908-z. ...

  170. [179]

    Platen, N

    E. Platen, N. Bruti-Liberati, Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations with jumps in finance, Vol. 64, Springer Science & Business Media, 2010

  171. [180]

    T. Li, S. Kheifets, D. Medellin, M. G. Raizen, Measurement of the instantaneous velocity of a brownian particle, Science 328 (5986) (2010) 1673–1675.doi:10.1126/science.1189403. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189403 106

  172. [181]

    Trojek, L

    J. Trojek, L. Chvátal, P. Zemánek, Optical alignment and confinement of an ellipsoidal nanorod in optical tweezers: a theoretical study, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29 (7) (2012) 1224–1236, publisher: OSA. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.29.001224. URLhttp://josaa.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-29-7-1224

  173. [182]

    van der Laan, R

    F. van der Laan, R. Reimann, A. Militaru, F. Tebbenjohanns, D. Windey, M. Frimmer, L. Novotny, Optically levitated rotor at its thermal limit of frequency stability, Phys. Rev. A 102 (2020) 013505. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.102.013505. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.1...

  174. [183]

    Seberson, F

    T. Seberson, F. Robicheaux, Stability and dynamics of optically levitated dielectric disks in a gaussian standing wave beyond the harmonic approximation, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 033437.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.2.033437. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033437

  175. [184]

    Podolsky, Quantum-mechanically correct form of hamiltonian function for conservative systems, Physical Review 32 (5) (1928) 812

    B. Podolsky, Quantum-mechanically correct form of hamiltonian function for conservative systems, Physical Review 32 (5) (1928) 812

  176. [185]

    Jost, Riemannian geometry and geometric analysis, Springer, 2005

    J. Jost, Riemannian geometry and geometric analysis, Springer, 2005

  177. [186]

    H. M. Wiseman, G. J. Milburn, Quantum measurement and control, Cambridge university press, 2009

  178. [187]

    Belavkin, Measurement, filtering and control in quantum open dynamical systems, Reports on Mathematical Physics 43 (3) (1999) A405–A425

    V. Belavkin, Measurement, filtering and control in quantum open dynamical systems, Reports on Mathematical Physics 43 (3) (1999) A405–A425

  179. [188]

    Jacobs, Quantum measurement theory and its applications, Cambridge University Press, 2014

    K. Jacobs, Quantum measurement theory and its applications, Cambridge University Press, 2014

  180. [189]

    B. A. Stickler, S. Nimmrichter, L. Martinetz, S. Kuhn, M. Arndt, K. Hornberger, Rotranslational cavity cooling of dielectric rods and disks, Phys. Rev. A 94 (2016) 033818.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA. 94.033818. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.033818

  181. [190]

    B. A. Stickler, B. Papendell, K. Hornberger, Spatio-orientational decoherence of nanoparticles, Physical Review A 94 (3) (2016) 033828.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.94.033828. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.033828

  182. [191]

    Papendell, B

    B. Papendell, B. A. Stickler, K. Hornberger, Quantum angular momentum diffusion of rigid bodies, New Journal of Physics 19 (12) (2017) 122001.doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa99d1. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa99d1 107

  183. [192]

    Toroš, M

    M. Toroš, M. Rashid, H. Ulbricht, Detection of anisotropic particles in levitated optomechanics, Physical Review A 98 (5) (2018) 053803.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.98.053803. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.053803

  184. [193]

    B. A. Stickler, B. Schrinski, K. Hornberger, Rotational friction and diffusion of quantum rotors, arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05163 (2017).doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.040401. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.040401

  185. [194]

    H. M. Wiseman, G. J. Milburn, Interpretation of quantum jump and diffusion processes illustrated on the bloch sphere, Phys. Rev. A 47 (1993) 1652–1666.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.47.1652. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.1652

  186. [195]

    M. Pan, J. A. Lednicky, C.-Y. Wu, Collection, particle sizing and detection of airborne viruses, Journal of applied microbiology 127 (6) (2019) 1596–1611

  187. [196]

    Mitra, B

    A. Mitra, B. Deutsch, F. Ignatovich, C. Dykes, L. Novotny, Nano-optofluidic detection of single viruses and nanoparticles, ACS nano 4 (3) (2010) 1305–1312

  188. [197]

    S. Wang, K. Zhou, X. Lu, H. Chen, F. Yang, Q. Li, J. Chen, K. A. Prather, X. Yang, X. Wang, Online shape and density measurement of single aerosol particles, Journal of Aerosol Science 159 (2022) 105880.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105880. URLhttps://www.science...

  189. [198]

    Zhu, Şahin Kaya Özdemir, L

    J. Zhu, Şahin Kaya Özdemir, L. He, D.-R. Chen, L. Yang, Single virus and nanoparticle size spectrometry by whispering-gallery-mode microcavities, Opt. Express 19 (17) (2011) 16195–16206. doi:10.1364/OE.19.016195. URLhttp://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-19-17-16195

  190. [199]

    Asghari, C

    A. Asghari, C. Wang, K. M. Yoo, A. Rostamian, X. Xu, J.-D. Shin, H. Dalir, R. T. Chen, Fast, accurate, point-of-care COVID-19 pandemic diagnosis enabled through advanced lab-on-chip optical biosensors: Opportunities and challenges, Applied Physics Reviews 8 (3) (2021) 031313.a...

  191. [200]

    Priyadarshi, U

    N. Priyadarshi, U. Abbasi, V. Kumaran, P. Chowdhury, A new approach for accurate determination of particle sizes in microfluidic impedance cytometry, Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering (NPE) 5 (4) (2022) 043002.arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/tu/npe/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/10...

  192. [201]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08857

    K.Nyandey, G.Derkachov, D.Jakubczyk, Aconvolutionalneuralnetworktechniqueforonlinetracking of the radius evolution of levitating evaporating microdroplets of pure liquids, liquid mixtures and suspensions (2024).arXiv:2410.08857. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08857

  193. [202]

    P. H. Kaye, J. E. Barton, E. Hirst, J. M. Clark, Simultaneous light scattering and intrinsic fluorescence measurement for the classification of airborne particles, Appl. Opt. 39 (21) (2000) 3738–3745.doi: 10.1364/AO.39.003738. URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-3...

  194. [203]

    A. Chen, S. Wang, Y. Liu, S. Yan, J. Zeng, T. Deng, Light scattering intensity field imaging sensor for in situ aerosol analysis, ACS Sensors 5 (7) (2020) 2061–2066, pMID: 32608223.arXiv:https: //doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c00574,doi:10.1021/acssensors.0c00574. URLhttps://doi...

  195. [204]

    P. J. Z. William D. Dick, P. H. McMurry, Multiangle light-scattering measurements of refractive index of submicron atmospheric particles, Aerosol Science and Technology 41 (5) (2007) 549–569. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701272012,doi:10.1080/02786820701272012. URLhtt...

  196. [205]

    Wu, D.-x

    M.-y. Wu, D.-x. Ling, L. Ling, W. Li, Y.-q. Li, Stable optical trapping and sensitive characterization of nanostructures using standing-wave raman tweezers, Scientific Reports 7 (1) (2017) 42930.doi: 10.1038/srep42930. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/srep42930

  197. [206]

    Kohler, M

    L. Kohler, M. Mader, C. Kern, M. Wegener, D. Hunger, Tracking Brownian motion in three dimensions and characterization of individual nanoparticles using a fiber-based high-finesse microcavity, Nature Communications 12 (1) (2021) 6385.doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26719-5. URLhttps://...

  198. [207]

    C.-H. Li, J. Jing, L.-M. Zhou, Z.-H. Fu, X.-W. Gao, N. Li, X.-F. Chen, H.-Z. Hu, Fast size estimation of single-levitated nanoparticles in a vacuum optomechanical system, Optics Letters 46 (18) (2021) 4614.doi:10.1364/ol.436041. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1364/ol.436041

  199. [208]

    Rybin, D

    V. Rybin, D. Shcherbinin, M. Semynin, A. Gavenchuk, V. Zakharov, A. Ivanov, Y. Rozhdestvensky, S. Rudyi, Novel nonlinear damping identification method: Simultaneous size, mass, charge and density measurements of a microparticle in quadrupole trap, Powder Technology 427 (2023) ...

  200. [209]

    R. K. Kohli, J. F. Davies, Measuring the chemical evolution of levitated particles: A study on the evaporation of multicomponent organic aerosol, Analytical Chemistry 93 (36) (2021) 12472–12479, pMID: 34455787.arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02890,doi:10.1021/acs....

  201. [210]

    P. Chen, N. Li, P. He, X. Chen, D. Wang, J. Liu, H. Hu, Shape measurement and rapid identification of levitated nanoparticles based on scattering, Optics and Lasers in Engineering 187 (2025) 108868. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2025.108868. URLhttps://www.sciencedir...

  202. [211]

    C. Li, Y. Ma, J. Wang, Q. Ying, S. Zhu, Z. Fu, X. Jiang, H. Yang, T. Liang, X. Gao, H. Hu, Morphological tracking and tuning of silica nanoparticles in optomechanical systems for enhanced stable levitation in vacuum, ACS Applied Nano Materials 7 (22) (2024) 25493–25499.arXiv:h...

  203. [212]

    Zheng, Y

    D. Zheng, Y. Leng, X. Kong, R. Li, Z. Wang, X. Luo, J. Zhao, C.-K. Duan, P. Huang, J. Du, M. Carlesso, A. Bassi, Room temperature test of the continuous spontaneous localization model using a levitated micro-oscillator, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 013057.doi:10.1103/PhysRevResear...

  204. [213]

    A. K. Amer, F. Robicheaux, Simulations and theory of power spectral density functions for time- dependent and anharmonic langevin oscillators, Phys. Rev. E 108 (2023) 034122.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevE.108.034122. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.108.034122

  205. [214]

    J. Gao, F. van der Laan, J. A. Zielińska, A. Militaru, L. Novotny, M. Frimmer, Feedback cooling a levitated nanoparticle’s libration to below 100 phonons, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (2024) 033009.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033009. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch...

  206. [215]

    Schellenberg, M

    B. Schellenberg, M. M. Behbahani, N. Balasubramanian, T. H. Fikkers, S. Hoekstra, Mass and shape determination of optically levitated nanoparticles, Applied Physics Letters 123 (11) (2023) 114102.arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0166136/ 110 1811948...

  207. [216]

    Li, C.-X

    C.-H. Li, C.-X. He, Y.-Y. Ma, J.-C. Wang, Y. Dong, S.-C. Zhu, X.-W. Gao, H.-Z. Hu, Structure characterization of nanoparticles with optical tweezers using scattering light, Optics & Laser Technology 171 (2024) 110347.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.110347. URLhttp...

  208. [217]

    J. M. H. Gosling, M. Rademacher, J. T. Mulder, A. J. Houtepen, M. Toroš, A. T. M. A. Rahman, A. Pontin, P. F. Barker, Levitodynamic spectroscopy for single nanoparticle characterisation (2024). arXiv:2401.11551

  209. [218]

    Timberlake, E

    C. Timberlake, E. Simcox, H. Ulbricht, Linear cooling of a levitated micromagnetic cylinder by vibration, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (2024) 033345.doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033345. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033345

  210. [219]

    C.P.Blakemore, D.Martin, A.Fieguth, N.Priel, G.Venugopalan, A.Kawasaki, G.Gratta, Librational feedback cooling, Phys. Rev. A 106 (2022) 023503.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.106.023503. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.023503

  211. [221]

    Timberlake, G

    C. Timberlake, G. Gasbarri, A. Vinante, A. Setter, H. Ulbricht, Acceleration sensing with magnetically levitated oscillators above a superconductor, Applied Physics Letters 115 (22) (Nov. 2019).doi: 10.1063/1.5129145. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5129145

  212. [222]

    Vinante, C

    A. Vinante, C. Timberlake, H. Ulbricht, Levitated micromagnets in superconducting traps: A new platform for tabletop fundamental physics experiments, Entropy 24 (11) (2022) 1642.doi:10.3390/ e24111642. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24111642

  213. [223]

    E. R. Post, G. A. Popescu, N. Gershenfeld, Inertial measurement with trapped particles: A microdynamical system, Applied Physics Letters 96 (14) (Apr. 2010).doi:10.1063/1.3360808. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3360808 111

  214. [224]

    Monteiro, W

    F. Monteiro, W. Li, G. Afek, C.-l. Li, M. Mossman, D. C. Moore, Force and acceleration sensing with optically levitated nanogram masses at microkelvin temperatures, Phys. Rev. A 101 (2020) 053835. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.101.053835. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.053835

  215. [225]

    J. M. H. Gosling, A. Pontin, J. H. Iacoponi, P. F. Barker, T. S. Monteiro, Sensing directional noise baths in levitated optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (2024) 013129.doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch. 6.013129. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.013129

  216. [226]

    Liang, S

    T. Liang, S. Zhu, P. He, Z. Chen, Y. Wang, C. Li, Z. Fu, X. Gao, X. Chen, N. Li, Q. Zhu, H. Hu, Yoctonewton force detection based on optically levitated oscillator, Fundamental Research 3 (1) (2023) 57–62.doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2022.09.021. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2022.09.021

  217. [227]

    Millen, T

    J. Millen, T. Deesuwan, P. Barker, J. Anders, Nanoscale temperature measurements using non- equilibrium brownian dynamics of a levitated nanosphere, Nature Nanotechnology 9 (6) (2014) 425–429.doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.82. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.82

  218. [228]

    Carlesso, S

    M. Carlesso, S. Donadi, L. Ferialdi, M. Paternostro, H. Ulbricht, A. Bassi, Present status and future challenges of non-interferometric tests of collapse models, Nature Physics (2022) 1–8. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01489-5

  219. [229]

    J. Wang, T. W. Penny, J. Recoaro, B. Siegel, Y.-H. Tseng, D. C. Moore, Mechanical detection of nuclear decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 023602.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.023602. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.023602

  220. [230]

    J. A. Zielińska, F. van der Laan, A. Norrman, M. Rimlinger, R. Reimann, L. Novotny, M. Frimmer, Controlling optomechanical libration with the degree of polarization, Physical Review Letters 130 (20) (May 2023).doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.203603. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/Ph...

  221. [231]

    V. A. Parsegian, G. H. Weiss, Dielectric anisotropy and the van der waals interaction between bulk media, The Journal of Adhesion 3 (4) (1972) 259–267.doi:10.1080/00218467208072197. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00218467208072197

  222. [232]

    D. A. T. Somers, J. L. Garrett, K. J. Palm, J. N. Munday, Measurement of the casimir torque, Nature 564 (7736) (2018) 386–389.doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0777-8. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0777-8 112

  223. [233]

    J. B. Pendry, Shearing the vacuum - quantum friction, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 9 (47) (1997) 10301–10320.doi:10.1088/0953-8984/9/47/001. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/9/47/001

  224. [234]

    Z. Xu, Z. Jacob, T. Li, Enhancement of rotational vacuum friction by surface photon tunneling, Nanophotonics 10 (1) (2020) 537–543.doi:10.1515/nanoph-2020-0391. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2020-0391

  225. [235]

    H. B. G. Casimir, On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates, Indag. Math. 10 (4) (1948) 261–263

  226. [236]

    J. N. Munday, D. Iannuzzi, Y. Barash, F. Capasso, Torque on birefringent plates induced by quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. A 71 (2005) 042102.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.042102. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.71.042102

  227. [237]

    Joulain, R

    K. Joulain, R. Carminati, J.-P. Mulet, J.-J. Greffet, Definition and measurement of the local density of electromagnetic states close to an interface, Phys. Rev. B 68 (2003) 245405.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB. 68.245405. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.245405

  228. [238]

    P. Ju, Y. Jin, K. Shen, Y. Duan, Z. Xu, X. Gao, X. Ni, T. Li, Near-field ghz rotation and sensing with an optically levitated nanodumbbell, Nano Letters 23 (22) (2023) 10157–10163.doi:10.1021/acs. nanolett.3c02442. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02442

  229. [239]

    Z. Xu, T. Li, Detecting casimir torque with an optically levitated nanorod, Phys. Rev. A 96 (2017) 033843.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.96.033843. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.033843

  230. [240]

    Khosravi, W

    F. Khosravi, W. Sun, C. Khandekar, T. Li, Z. Jacob, Giant enhancement of vacuum friction in spinning yig nanospheres, New Journal of Physics 26 (5) (2024) 053006.doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ad3fe1. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ad3fe1

  231. [241]

    A. Raj, W. L. Schaich, B. Dragnea, Orbital dynamics at atmospheric pressure in a lensed dual-beam optical trap, Journal of the Optical Society of America A 39 (8) (2022) 1468.doi:10.1364/josaa. 459301. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.459301

  232. [242]

    X. Chen, G. Xiao, K. Yang, W. Xiong, H. Luo, Characteristics of the orbital rotation in dual-beam fiber-optic trap with transverse offset, Optics Express 24 (15) (2016) 16952.doi:10.1364/oe.24. 113 016952. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.016952

  233. [243]

    Mazilu, Y

    M. Mazilu, Y. Arita, T. Vettenburg, J. M. Auñón, E. M. Wright, K. Dholakia, Orbital-angular- momentum transfer to optically levitated microparticles in vacuum, Phys. Rev. A 94 (2016) 053821. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.94.053821. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.053821

  234. [244]

    Dania, D

    L. Dania, D. S. Bykov, F. Goschin, M. Teller, A. Kassid, T. E. Northup, Ultrahigh quality factor of a levitated nanomechanical oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 133602.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 132.133602. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.133602

  235. [245]

    C. P. Blakemore, D. Martin, A. Fieguth, A. Kawasaki, N. Priel, A. D. Rider, G. Gratta, Absolute pressure and gas species identification with an optically levitated rotor, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Meas...

  236. [246]

    D. S. Barker, D. Carney, T. W. LeBrun, D. C. Moore, J. M. Taylor, Collision-resolved pressure sensing, Phys. Rev. A 109 (2024) 042616.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.109.042616. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.042616

  237. [247]

    T. M. Fuchs, D. G. Uitenbroek, J. Plugge, N. van Halteren, J.-P. van Soest, A. Vinante, H. Ulbricht, T. H. Oosterkamp, Measuring gravity with milligram levitated masses, Science Advances 10 (8) (Feb. 2024).doi:10.1126/sciadv.adk2949. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk2949

  238. [248]

    Xiong, K

    P. Xiong, K. K. K. Ho, J. M. H. Gosling, M. Rademacher, P. F. Barker, Optical centrifuge for nanoparticles (2025).arXiv:2506.16134. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16134

  239. [249]

    K. Zeng, X. Xu, Y. Wu, X. Wu, D. Xiao, Optically levitated micro gyroscopes with an mhz rotational vaterite rotor, Microsystems & Nanoengineering 10 (1) (Jun. 2024).doi:10.1038/ s41378-024-00726-0. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41378-024-00726-0

  240. [250]

    Fadeev, C

    P. Fadeev, C. Timberlake, T. Wang, A. Vinante, Y. B. Band, D. Budker, A. O. Sushkov, H. Ulbricht, D. F. J. Kimball, Ferromagnetic gyroscopes for tests of fundamental physics, Quantum Science and 114 Technology 6 (2) (2021) 024006.doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abd892. URLhttps://dx.doi...

  241. [251]

    X. Ni, Z. Zou, R. Lecamwasam, A. Vinante, D. Budker, P. K. Lam, T. Wang, J. Gong, Microscopic theory of a precessing ferromagnet for ultrasensitive magnetometry (2025).arXiv:2503.00728. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2503.00728

  242. [252]

    Ahrens, W

    F. Ahrens, W. Ji, D. Budker, C. Timberlake, H. Ulbricht, A. Vinante, Levitated ferromagnetic magnetometer with energy resolution well belowℏ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025) 110801.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.110801. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.110801

  243. [253]

    S. Zhu, Z. Fu, X. Gao, C. Li, Z. Chen, Y. Wang, X. Chen, H. Hu, Nanoscale electric field sensing using a levitated nano-resonator with net charge, Photon. Res. 11 (2) (2023) 279–289.doi:10.1364/PRJ. 475793. URLhttps://opg.optica.org/prj/abstract.cfm?URI=prj-11-2-279

  244. [254]

    Z. Fu, J. Xu, S. Zhu, C. He, X. Zhu, X. Gao, H. Cai, P. He, Z. Chen, Y. Zhang, N. Li, X. Chen, Y. Dong, S. Zhu, C. Liu, H. Hu, Optically levitated nanoparticles as receiving antennas for low frequency wireless communication, PhotoniX 6 (1) (Jan. 2025).doi:10.1186/s43074-025-00...

  245. [255]

    J. D. Teufel, T. Donner, D. Li, J. W. Harlow, M. Allman, K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, K. W. Lehnert, R. W. Simmonds, Sideband cooling of micromechanical motion to the quantum ground state, Nature 475 (7356) (2011) 359–363. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nature10261

  246. [256]

    M. G. Paris, F. Illuminati, A. Serafini, S. De Siena, Purity of gaussian states: Measurement schemes and time evolution in noisy channels, Physical Review A 68 (1) (2003) 012314

  247. [257]

    Børkje, F

    K. Børkje, F. Marin, Quantum state purity versus average phonon number for characterization of mechanical oscillators in cavity optomechanics, Physical Review A 107 (1) (2023) 013502

  248. [258]

    Leibfried, R

    D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, D. Wineland, Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions, Reviews of Modern Physics 75 (1) (2003) 281

  249. [259]

    Wilson-Rae, N

    I. Wilson-Rae, N. Nooshi, W. Zwerger, T. J. Kippenberg, Theory of ground state cooling of a mechanical oscillator using dynamical backaction, Physical review letters 99 (9) (2007) 093901. 115

  250. [260]

    Genes, D

    C. Genes, D. Vitali, P. Tombesi, S. Gigan, M. Aspelmeyer, Ground-state cooling of a micromechanical oscillator: Comparing cold damping and cavity-assisted cooling schemes, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 77 (3) (2008) 033804

  251. [261]

    Mancini, D

    S. Mancini, D. Vitali, P. Tombesi, Optomechanical cooling of a macroscopic oscillator by homodyne feedback, Physical Review Letters 80 (4) (1998) 688

  252. [262]

    Frimmer, K

    M. Frimmer, K. Luszcz, S. Ferreiro, V. Jain, E. Hebestreit, L. Novotny, Controlling the net charge on a nanoparticle optically levitated in vacuum, Physical Review A 95 (6) (2017) 061801

  253. [263]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 1155–1208.doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1155. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1155

  254. [264]

    A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. Chan, J. T. Hill, T. P. M. Alegre, A. Krause, O. Painter, Observation of quantum motion of a nanomechanical resonator, Physical Review Letters 108 (3) (2012) 033602

  255. [265]

    R. E. Kalman, A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems, J. Basic Eng. (82) (1960) 35–45

  256. [266]

    J. Liao, M. Jost, M. Schaffner, M. Magno, M. Korb, L. Benini, F. Tebbenjohanns, R. Reimann, V. Jain, M. Gross, et al., Fpga implementation of a kalman-based motion estimator for levitated nanoparticles, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 68 (7) (2018) 2374–2386

  257. [267]

    R. E. Kalman, et al., Contributions to the theory of optimal control, Bol. soc. mat. mexicana 5 (2) (1960) 102–119

  258. [268]

    Kamba, K

    M. Kamba, K. Aikawa, Revealing the velocity uncertainties of a levitated particle in the quantum ground state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 183602.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.183602. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.183602

  259. [269]

    Vijayan, Z

    J. Vijayan, Z. Zhang, J. Piotrowski, D. Windey, F. van der Laan, M. Frimmer, L. Novotny, Scalable all-optical cold damping of levitated nanoparticles, Nature nanotechnology 18 (1) (2023) 49–54

  260. [270]

    G. Afek, F. Monteiro, B. Siegel, J. Wang, S. Dickson, J. Recoaro, M. Watts, D. C. Moore, Control and measurement of electric dipole moments in levitated optomechanics, Physical Review A 104 (5) (Nov. 2021).doi:10.1103/physreva.104.053512. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA....

  261. [271]

    Parniak, I

    M. Parniak, I. Galinskiy, T. Zwettler, E. S. Polzik, High-frequency broadband laser phase noise cancellation using a delay line, Optics Express 29 (5) (2021) 6935–6946

  262. [272]

    L. Qiu, I. Shomroni, P. Seidler, T. J. Kippenberg, Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator to its zero-point energy, Physical review letters 124 (17) (2020) 173601

  263. [273]

    Youssefi, S

    A. Youssefi, S. Kono, M. Chegnizadeh, T. J. Kippenberg, A squeezed mechanical oscillator with millisecond quantum decoherence, Nature Physics 19 (11) (2023) 1697–1702

  264. [274]

    Shkarin, N

    A. Shkarin, N. Flowers-Jacobs, S. Hoch, A. Kashkanova, C. Deutsch, J. Reichel, J. Harris, Optically mediated hybridization between two mechanical modes, Physical review letters 112 (1) (2014) 013602

  265. [275]

    E. T. Jaynes, F. W. Cummings, Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser, Proceedings of the IEEE 51 (1) (2005) 89–109

  266. [276]

    Forn-Díaz, L

    P. Forn-Díaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, E. Solano, Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction, Reviews of Modern Physics 91 (2) (2019) 025005

  267. [277]

    N. S. Mueller, Y. Okamura, B. G. Vieira, S. Juergensen, H. Lange, E. B. Barros, F. Schulz, S. Reich, Deep strong light–matter coupling in plasmonic nanoparticle crystals, Nature 583 (7818) (2020) 780– 784

  268. [278]

    2021).doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20419-2

    A.delosRíosSommer, N.Meyer, R.Quidant, Strongoptomechanicalcouplingatroomtemperatureby coherent scattering, Nature Communications 12 (1) (Jan. 2021).doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20419-2. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20419-2

  269. [279]

    K. Dare, J. J. Hansen, I. Coroli, A. Johnson, M. Aspelmeyer, U. Delić, Ultrastrong linear optomechanical interaction, Physical Review Research 6 (4) (2024) L042025

  270. [280]

    Ranfagni, P

    A. Ranfagni, P. Vezio, M. Calamai, A. Chowdhury, F. Marino, F. Marin, Vectorial polaritons in the quantum motion of a levitated nanosphere, Nature Physics 17 (10) (2021) 1120–1124.doi: 10.1038/s41567-021-01307-y. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01307-y

  271. [281]

    Kustura, C

    K. Kustura, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, A. d. l. R. Sommer, N. Meyer, R. Quidant, O. Romero-Isart, Mechanical squeezing via unstable dynamics in a microcavity, Physical Review Letters 128 (14) (2022) 143601

  272. [282]

    Weiss, M

    T. Weiss, M. Roda-Llordes, E. Torrontegui, M. Aspelmeyer, O. Romero-Isart, Large quantum delocalization of a levitated nanoparticle using optimal control: Applications for force sensing and entangling via weak forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 023601.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett....

  273. [283]

    Cosco, J

    F. Cosco, J. S. Pedernales, M. B. Plenio, Enhanced force sensitivity and entanglement in periodically driven optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 103 (2021) L061501.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.103.L061501. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.L061501

  274. [284]

    Calamai, A

    M. Calamai, A. Ranfagni, F. Marin, Transfer of a levitating nanoparticle between optical tweezers, AIP Advances 11 (2) (2021)

  275. [285]

    Frisk Kockum, A

    A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nature Reviews Physics 1 (1) (2019) 19–40

  276. [286]

    J. Koch, G. R. Hunanyan, T. Ockenfels, E. Rico, E. Solano, M. Weitz, Quantum rabi dynamics of trapped atoms far in the deep strong coupling regime, Nature Communications 14 (1) (2023) 954

  277. [287]

    Rossi, A

    M. Rossi, A. Militaru, N. C. Zambon, A. Riera-Campeny, O. Romero-Isart, M. Frimmer, L. Novotny, Quantum delocalization of a levitated nanoparticle (2024).doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2408.01264. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01264

  278. [288]

    Janszky, P

    J. Janszky, P. Adam, Strong squeezing by repeated frequency jumps, Physical Review A 46 (9) (1992) 6091

  279. [289]

    Rossi, D

    M. Rossi, D. Mason, J. Chen, A. Schliesser, Observing and verifying the quantum trajectory of a mechanical resonator, Physical review letters 123 (16) (2019) 163601

  280. [290]

    Lammers, K

    J. Lammers, K. Hammerer, Quantum retrodiction in gaussian systems and applications in optomechanics, Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology 2 (2024) 1294905

  281. [291]

    S. Burd, R. Srinivas, J. Bollinger, A. Wilson, D. Wineland, D. Leibfried, D. Slichter, D. Allcock, Quantum amplification of mechanical oscillator motion, Science 364 (6446) (2019) 1163–1165

  282. [292]

    Rashid, T

    M. Rashid, T. Tufarelli, J. Bateman, J. Vovrosh, D. Hempston, M. S. Kim, H. Ulbricht, Experimental realization of a thermal squeezed state of levitated optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 273601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.273601. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Ph...

  283. [293]

    Ranfagni, K

    A. Ranfagni, K. Børkje, F. Marino, F. Marin, Two-dimensional quantum motion of a levitated nanosphere, Phys. Rev. Res. 4 (2022) 033051.doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033051. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033051 118

  284. [294]

    Ranfagni, F

    A. Ranfagni, F. Marino, F. Marin, Spectral analysis of quantum field fluctuations in a strongly coupled optomechanical system, Physical Review Letters 130 (19) (2023) 193601

  285. [295]

    Ollivier, W

    H. Ollivier, W. H. Zurek, Quantum discord: a measure of the quantumness of correlations, Physical review letters 88 (1) (2001) 017901

  286. [296]

    Vitali, S

    D. Vitali, S. Mancini, P. Tombesi, Stationary entanglement between two movable mirrors in a classically driven fabry–perot cavity, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40 (28) (2007) 8055

  287. [297]

    Genes, D

    C. Genes, D. Vitali, P. Tombesi, Simultaneous cooling and entanglement of mechanical modes of a micromirror in an optical cavity, New Journal of Physics 10 (9) (2008) 095009

  288. [298]

    M. J. Hartmann, M. B. Plenio, Steady state entanglement in the mechanical vibrations of two dielectric membranes, Physical Review Letters 101 (20) (2008) 200503

  289. [299]

    J. Li, I. M. Haghighi, N. Malossi, S. Zippilli, D. Vitali, Generation and detection of large and robust entanglement between two different mechanical resonators in cavity optomechanics, New Journal of Physics 17 (10) (2015) 103037

  290. [300]

    Mazzola, M

    L. Mazzola, M. Paternostro, Activating optomechanical entanglement, Scientific reports 1 (1) (2011) 199

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.