REVIEW 1 cited by
Irony in Emojis: A Comparative Study of Human and LLM Interpretation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Irony in Emojis: A Comparative Study of Human and LLM Interpretation
read the original abstract
Emojis have become a universal language in online communication, often carrying nuanced and context-dependent meanings. Among these, irony poses a significant challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs) due to its inherent incongruity between appearance and intent. This study examines the ability of GPT-4o to interpret irony in emojis. By prompting GPT-4o to evaluate the likelihood of specific emojis being used to express irony on social media and comparing its interpretations with human perceptions, we aim to bridge the gap between machine and human understanding. Our findings reveal nuanced insights into GPT-4o's interpretive capabilities, highlighting areas of alignment with and divergence from human behavior. Additionally, this research underscores the importance of demographic factors, such as age and gender, in shaping emoji interpretation and evaluates how these factors influence GPT-4o's performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Cognitive Mismatch in Multimodal Large Language Models for Discrete Symbol Understanding
MLLMs exhibit a consistent recognition-reasoning inversion on discrete visual symbols across domains, underperforming on elementary perception while appearing competent on higher-level reasoning via linguistic compensation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.