Quantum simulation of out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories

Jad C. Halimeh; Johannes Knolle; Niklas Mueller; Zlatko Papi\'c; Zohreh Davoudi

arxiv: 2509.03586 · v1 · pith:XX3TKXKRnew · submitted 2025-09-03 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el· hep-lat

Quantum simulation of out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories

Jad C. Halimeh , Niklas Mueller , Johannes Knolle , Zlatko Papi\'c , Zohreh Davoudi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 19:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elhep-lat

keywords quantum simulationgauge theoriesout-of-equilibrium dynamicsstring breakingparticle productionthermalizationlattice gauge theory

0 comments

The pith

Quantum simulators using neutral atoms and trapped ions can access out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories beyond classical reach.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review surveys advances in quantum technologies that enable simulation of gauge theories far from equilibrium on platforms such as neutral atoms, trapped ions, and superconducting circuits. These regimes feature phenomena like particle production, string breaking, collision dynamics, thermalization, and dynamical quantum phase transitions where classical methods are limited by exponential complexity growth. A reader would care because the approach promises first-principles access to matter evolution in settings from the early universe to high-energy collisions. The paper maps both experimental realizations and theoretical developments that are converging concepts across nuclear, high-energy, and condensed-matter physics.

Core claim

The central claim is that quantum simulation has matured to the point of addressing out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories on current and near-term hardware, with direct experimental access to processes such as string breaking and particle production that classical computation cannot reach efficiently.

What carries the argument

Lattice gauge theory implementations on quantum hardware that evolve in real time and capture non-equilibrium effects such as confinement and pair production.

If this is right

Particle production becomes directly observable in simulated gauge theories.
String breaking can be tracked in real time on lattice models.
Collision dynamics between particles in gauge theories can be studied experimentally.
Thermalization and ergodicity breaking can be investigated in controlled settings.
Dynamical quantum phase transitions become accessible for measurement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

These simulations could eventually provide quantitative input on confinement dynamics in quantum chromodynamics.
Links may appear between gauge-theory thermalization and entanglement growth in quantum information.
Near-term hardware scaling could allow extension to two- and three-dimensional models relevant to realistic particle physics.

Load-bearing premise

Current quantum hardware can reach and maintain the relevant dynamical regimes of gauge theories without being stopped by noise, decoherence, or scalability limits.

What would settle it

An experiment on a neutral-atom or trapped-ion simulator that clearly demonstrates string breaking or particle production dynamics matching theoretical predictions for a gauge theory model would support the claim; failure to observe these signatures due to rapid decoherence would challenge the practical reach.

read the original abstract

Recent advances in quantum technologies have enabled quantum simulation of gauge theories -- some of the most fundamental frameworks of nature -- in regimes far from equilibrium, where classical computation is severely limited. These simulators, primarily based on neutral atoms, trapped ions, and superconducting circuits, hold the potential to address long-standing questions in nuclear, high-energy, and condensed-matter physics, and may ultimately allow first-principles studies of matter evolution in settings ranging from the early universe to high-energy collisions. Research in this rapidly growing field is also driving the convergence of concepts across disciplines and uncovering new phenomena. In this Review, we highlight recent experimental and theoretical developments, focusing on phenomena accessible in current and near-term quantum simulators, including particle production and string breaking, collision dynamics, thermalization, ergodicity breaking, and dynamical quantum phase transitions. We conclude by outlining promising directions for future research and opportunities enabled by available quantum hardware.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This review organizes recent quantum simulation work on gauge theories effectively but rests its bigger claims on unexamined scaling steps from current small experiments to the regimes that would matter for nuclear or high-energy questions.

read the letter

This paper is a review that collects and organizes experimental and theoretical progress on using neutral atoms, ions, and superconducting circuits to simulate out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories. The authors focus on phenomena that are already reachable or close, such as particle production, string breaking, collisions, thermalization, and dynamical phase transitions. That mapping is the main contribution and it is done clearly enough to serve as a useful entry point for someone new to the area. The citations are broad and the selection of examples looks representative of the main platforms and results so far. No new derivations or data appear, which is expected for a review, but the synthesis itself is straightforward and free of obvious gaps in coverage of the cited literature. The forward-looking sections are where the text is thinner. The abstract and conclusion suggest these simulators could eventually enable first-principles access to early-universe or high-energy collision dynamics, yet the paper does not supply concrete estimates of qubit counts, coherence requirements, or lattice-size extrapolations needed to reach volumes where classical methods fail. The stress-test note on scaling assumptions is on target; the step from existing 1D or small 2D demonstrations to 3+1D continuum-relevant regimes is asserted rather than quantified. Minor issues include occasional reliance on qualitative descriptions of hardware capabilities without cross-checking against published error budgets. Overall the work is competent and timely. It is aimed at researchers already working in quantum simulation or adjacent fields who want a compact overview rather than a deep technical dive. A serious editor should send it to peer review; the topic is active and a well-organized review can save time for the community even if the optimistic framing needs tightening in revision.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. This review summarizes recent experimental and theoretical advances in quantum simulation of out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories using neutral-atom, trapped-ion, and superconducting-circuit platforms. It focuses on phenomena accessible with current and near-term hardware, including particle production and string breaking, collision dynamics, thermalization, ergodicity breaking, and dynamical quantum phase transitions, while discussing their relevance to nuclear, high-energy, and condensed-matter physics and the potential for first-principles studies of matter evolution from the early universe to high-energy collisions. The manuscript concludes with an outline of promising future research directions.

Significance. If the summaries of cited developments are accurate and representative, the review provides a timely synthesis of an interdisciplinary area at the intersection of quantum information science and fundamental physics. It usefully highlights concrete, near-term accessible phenomena and the convergence of concepts across fields, offering a roadmap that could guide experimental priorities and foster collaborations between quantum technologists and high-energy theorists.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and conclusion] Abstract and concluding section: the forward-looking statement that these simulators 'may ultimately allow first-principles studies of matter evolution in settings ranging from the early universe to high-energy collisions' rests on an unquantified extrapolation. The manuscript does not provide estimates of qubit overhead, error thresholds, lattice-size extrapolations, or coherence requirements needed to reach 3+1D volumes or continuum limits where classical methods fail while preserving gauge invariance, leaving the step from existing 1D/2D demonstrations to the claimed regimes unsecured by the cited results.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract's phrasing 'some of the most fundamental frameworks of nature' is overly general; it would be clearer to name the specific gauge groups (e.g., U(1), SU(2)) and models emphasized in the main text.
[Platform overview sections] A brief table or summary paragraph comparing resource requirements and current system sizes across the three hardware platforms would improve readability and allow readers to assess scalability claims more directly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of forward-looking statements.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and conclusion] Abstract and concluding section: the forward-looking statement that these simulators 'may ultimately allow first-principles studies of matter evolution in settings ranging from the early universe to high-energy collisions' rests on an unquantified extrapolation. The manuscript does not provide estimates of qubit overhead, error thresholds, lattice-size extrapolations, or coherence requirements needed to reach 3+1D volumes or continuum limits where classical methods fail while preserving gauge invariance, leaving the step from existing 1D/2D demonstrations to the claimed regimes unsecured by the cited results.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript, as a review focused on recent and near-term accessible developments, does not contain quantitative resource estimates (qubit overhead, error thresholds, lattice extrapolations, or coherence requirements) for reaching 3+1D volumes or continuum limits. The phrasing in the abstract and conclusion is deliberately prospective and aspirational, reflecting the long-term relevance of gauge-theory dynamics to nuclear, high-energy, and early-universe physics rather than a claim that current 1D/2D results already secure those regimes. In the revised version we will (i) qualify the statement to make explicit that substantial further advances in hardware, algorithms, and error control will be required, and (ii) add a short paragraph in the outlook section that enumerates the principal open challenges (dimensionality scaling, gauge invariance preservation, and fault-tolerant thresholds) without introducing new technical calculations outside the scope of the review. These changes will remove any impression of an unsecured extrapolation while preserving the motivational context of the work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: review paper relies on external citations without internal self-referential derivations

full rationale

This is a review article summarizing experimental and theoretical developments in quantum simulation of gauge theories from external literature. No new derivations, equations, or predictions are introduced that reduce by construction to inputs defined within the paper itself. Claims about potential applications (early universe, high-energy collisions) are forward-looking extrapolations based on cited prior works, not self-defined or fitted quantities renamed as predictions. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for any central derivation. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits no patterns of self-definitional, fitted-input, or ansatz-smuggling circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review of existing literature the paper introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it relies on the standard background of quantum simulation and gauge theory as established in the cited references.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5480 in / 1048 out tokens · 87839 ms · 2026-05-17T19:44:34.860935+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Foundation.GaugeFromCube; Foundation.DimensionForcing; Papers.GCIC.ReducedPhasePotential gauge_rank_match; alexander_duality_circle_linking; phase_rigidity echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

focusing on phenomena accessible in current and near-term quantum simulators, including particle production and string breaking, collision dynamics, thermalization, ergodicity breaking, and dynamical quantum phase transitions.
Foundation.HierarchyEmergence; Foundation.LedgerCanonicality hierarchy_emergence_forces_phi; uniform_scaling_forced echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

These simulators, primarily based on neutral atoms, trapped ions, and superconducting circuits, hold the potential to address long-standing questions in nuclear, high-energy, and condensed-matter physics, and may ultimately allow first-principles studies of matter evolution in settings ranging from the early universe to high-energy collisions.
Foundation.GaugeFromCube; Foundation.IntegrationGap three_layer_factorization; integrationGap_at_D3 echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

Confinement is a hallmark of QCD... string breaking... false-vacuum decay

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 20 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Hadronic scattering in (1+1)D SU(2) lattice gauge theory from tensor networks
hep-lat 2025-10 conditional novelty 8.0

First tensor-network simulation of real-time hadronic scattering in (1+1)D SU(2) lattice gauge theory reveals entanglement and spatial delocalization in the baryon-number-one sector at strong coupling.
Tightening energy-based boson truncation bound using Monte Carlo-assisted methods
hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Monte Carlo-assisted tightening of the energy-based boson truncation bound substantially reduces volume dependence in (1+1)D scalar field theory and (2+1)D U(1) gauge theory.
Tightening energy-based boson truncation bound using Monte Carlo-assisted methods
hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A Monte Carlo-assisted analytic method tightens energy-based bounds on boson truncation errors, substantially reducing the volume dependence of the required cutoff in scalar and gauge theories.
Dynamical preparation of U(1) quantum spin liquids in an analogue quantum simulator
cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Experimental realization of large-scale U(1) quantum spin liquid regions in a 2D analog quantum simulator using ultracold atoms, with evidence from Gauss-law compliance, pinch-point correlations, and many-body coheren...
Hilbert Space Fragmentation from Generalized Symmetries
hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Generalized symmetries generate exponentially many Krylov sectors in quantum many-body systems, showing that Hilbert space fragmentation does not by itself imply ergodicity breaking.
Observation of glueball excitations and string breaking in a $2+1$D $\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theory on a trapped-ion quantum computer
hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A trapped-ion quantum computer simulates 2+1D Z2 lattice gauge theory dynamics, revealing glueball excitations and multi-order string breaking.
Observation of genuine $2+1$D string dynamics in a U$(1)$ lattice gauge theory with a tunable plaquette term on a trapped-ion quantum computer
quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Quantum simulation on trapped ions shows that a plaquette term in a 2+1D U(1) gauge theory enables string propagation in the plane and extended matter creation, realizing genuine two-dimensional dynamics.
Non-reciprocal Ising gauge theory
cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Non-reciprocal coupling of two Ising gauge theories yields linear asymptotic Wilson loop scaling with tunable confinement length, self-avoiding quasiparticle trails on critical percolation clusters, and non-reciprocit...
Thermalization of SU(2) Lattice Gauge Fields on Quantum Computers
hep-lat 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Quantum hardware simulation of SU(2) lattice gauge thermalization matches classical extrapolations up to 101 plaquettes after error mitigation, establishing feasibility for chaotic quantum field systems.
The nonlocal magic of a holographic Schwinger pair
hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Holographic Schwinger pair creation generates nonlocal magic for spacetime dimensions d>2, as shown by a non-flat entanglement spectrum that can be read from the probe brane free energy.
Ground state preparation in $(2+1)$-dimensional pure $\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theory via deterministic quantum imaginary time evolution
hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Deterministic QITE made gauge-invariant via commuting Pauli operators achieves relative error below 0.1 percent for ground-state preparation in 2+1D Z2 LGT on systems up to twelve plaquettes, as shown by tensor-networ...
Preparation and detection of quasiparticles for quantum simulations of scattering
quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A method using dressed creation operators from MLWFs enables selective preparation and detection of quasiparticles in lattice theories, tested via MPS on hardcore QCD ladders to separate known excitations from resonances.
Hilbert Space Fragmentation and Gauge Symmetry
hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

An emergent gauge symmetry valid only in a subset of sectors of the fragmented S=1 dipole-conserving spin chain enables exact quantum simulation of gauge theories using a non-gauge-invariant Hamiltonian.
A minimal implementation of Yang-Mills theory on a digital quantum computer
hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A minimal implementation of SU(N) pure Yang-Mills theory on digital quantum computers is presented with simplified Hamiltonians, improved infinite-mass convergence, and SU(2) embedding into R^4, benchmarked by Monte C...
Toward Quantum Simulation of SU(2) Gauge Theory using Non-Compact Variables
hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

New simplified Hamiltonians, compact qubit encoding for SU(2), and an added Hamiltonian term reduce quantum resources while still reaching the Kogut-Susskind limit in (2+1)D SU(2) lattice gauge theory.
Large Nc Truncations for SU(Nc) Lattice Yang-Mills Theory with Fermions
hep-lat 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A multi-part truncation for lattice QCD with fermions enables explicit Hamiltonians in 1+1D and 2+1D and string-breaking simulations by capping basis states, electric energy, fermions per site, and using large-Nc matr...
The Quantum Complexity of String Breaking in the Schwinger Model
hep-ph 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Quantum complexity measures applied to the Schwinger model reveal nonlocal correlations along the string and show that entanglement and magic give complementary views of string formation and breaking.
Tightening energy-based boson truncation bound using Monte Carlo-assisted methods
hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

New analytic and Monte Carlo-assisted method tightens energy-based boson truncation bounds, reducing volume dependence in (1+1)D scalar and (2+1)D U(1) gauge theories.
Lattice field theories with a sign problem
hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

A review of holomorphic extensions, dual variables, tensor renormalization group, and machine learning approaches for controlling the sign problem in lattice field theories.
Lattice field theories with a sign problem
hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 1.0

Reviews approaches such as Lefschetz thimbles, complex Langevin dynamics, dual variables, tensor renormalization group, and machine learning to control the sign problem in lattice field theories.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 111 canonical work pages · cited by 17 Pith papers · 12 internal anchors

[1]

Acharya, L

(1979), “U(1) without instantons, author=Veneziano, Gabriele,” Nuclear Physics B 159 (1-2), 213–224. Aamodt, Kenneth, A Abrahantes Quintana, R Achenbach, S Acounis, D Adamov´ a, C Adler, M Aggarwal, F Agnese, G Aglieri Rinella, Z Ahammed, et al. (2008), “The alice experiment at the cern lhc,” Journal of Instrumentation 3 (08), S08002. Abanin, DA, J.H. Bar...

work page arXiv 1979
[2]

The International Linear Collider. A Global Project

Aidelsburger, Monika (2015), Artificial gauge fields with ul- tracold atoms in optical lattices , Dissertation (Ludwig- Maximilians-Universit¨ at M¨ unchen, Faculty of Physics). Aidelsburger, Monika, Luca Barbiero, Alejandro Bermudez, Titas Chanda, Alexandre Dauphin, Daniel Gonz´ alez- Cuadra, Przemys law R. Grzybowski, Simon Hands, Fred Jendrzejewski, Jo...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[3]

Snowmass Energy Frontier Simulations

Altman, Ehud, Kenneth R Brown, Giuseppe Carleo, Lin- coln D Carr, Eugene Demler, Cheng Chin, Brian DeMarco, Sophia E Economou, Mark A Eriksson, Kai-Mei C Fu,et al. (2021), “Quantum simulators: Architectures and opportu- nities,” PRX quantum 2 (1), 017003. Alvarez-Ruso, L, M Sajjad Athar, MB Barbaro, D Cher- dack, ME Christy, P Coloma, TW Donnelly, S Dytma...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[4]

Simple fermionic model of deconfined phases and phase transitions,

Assaad, FF, and Tarun Grover (2016), “Simple fermionic model of deconfined phases and phase transitions,” Physi- cal Review X 6 (4), 041049. Atas, Yasar Y, Eugene Bogomolny, Olivier Giraud, and Guil- lame Roux (2013), “Distribution of the ratio of consecutive level spacings in random matrix ensembles,” Physical re- view letters 110 (8), 084101. Atas, Yasa...

work page 2016
[5]

Nearly op- timal quantum algorithm for generating the ground state of a free quantum field theory,

Bagherimehrab, Mohsen, Yuval R Sanders, Dominic W Berry, Gavin K Brennen, and Barry C Sanders (2022), “Nearly op- timal quantum algorithm for generating the ground state of a free quantum field theory,” PRX Quantum 3 (2), 020364. B¨ ahr, Manuel, Stefan Gieseke, Martyn A Gigg, David Grellscheid, Keith Hamilton, Oluseyi Latunde-Dada, Si- mon Pl¨ atzer, Pete...

work page arXiv 2022
[6]

Quantum Scars from Zero Modes in an Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory on Ladders,

Banerjee, Debasish, and Arnab Sen (2021), “Quantum Scars from Zero Modes in an Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory on Ladders,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 220601. Ba˜ nuls, Mari Carmen (2023), “Tensor network algorithms: A route map,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 14 (1), 173–191. Banuls, Mari Carmen, and Krzysztof Cichy (2020), “Review on novel methods f...

work page 2021
[7]

Metal– insulator transition in a weakly interacting many-electron system with localized single-particle states,

Basko, DM, I.L. Aleiner, and B.L. Altshuler (2006), “Metal– insulator transition in a weakly interacting many-electron system with localized single-particle states,” Annals of Physics 321 (5), 1126 –

work page 2006
[8]

Quantum algorithms for quantum chem- istry and quantum materials science,

Bauer, Bela, Sergey Bravyi, Mario Motta, and Garnet Kin- Lic Chan (2020), “Quantum algorithms for quantum chem- istry and quantum materials science,” Chemical reviews 120 (22), 12685–12717. Bauer, Christian W, Zohreh Davoudi, A Baha Balantekin, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Marcela Carena, Wibe A De Jong, Patrick Draper, Aida El-Khadra, Nate Gemelke, Masanori Hana...

work page arXiv 2020
[9]

Asymptotic sum rules at infinite momentum,

Bjorken, James D (1969), “Asymptotic sum rules at infinite momentum,” Physical Review 179 (5),

work page 1969
[10]

Gauge theories of gravitation,

Blagojevi´ c, Milutin, and Friedrich W Hehl (2012), “Gauge theories of gravitation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1210.3775. Blais, Alexandre, Arne L Grimsmo, Steven M Girvin, and An- dreas Wallraff (2021), “Circuit quantum electrodynamics,” Reviews of Modern Physics 93 (2), 025005. Bloch, Felix (1929), “ ¨Uber die quantenmechanik der elektro- nen in kristallgitt...

work page arXiv 2012
[11]

Transverse-field ising dynamics in a rydberg-dressed atomic gas,

Borish, V, O. Markovi´ c, J. A. Hines, S. V. Rajagopal, and M. Schleier-Smith (2020), “Transverse-field ising dynamics in a rydberg-dressed atomic gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 063601. Borla, Umberto, Jesse J. Osborne, Sergej Moroz, and Jad C. Halimeh (2025), “String breaking in a 2 + 1d Z2 lattice gauge theory,” arXiv:2501.17929 [quant-ph]. Bozzi, Giuseppe...

work page arXiv 2020
[12]

Observed be- havior of highly inelastic electron-proton scattering,

Breidenbach, Martin, Jerome I Friedman, Henry W Kendall, Elliott D Bloom, DH Coward, H DeStaebler, J Drees, Luke W Mo, and Richard E Taylor (1969), “Observed be- havior of highly inelastic electron-proton scattering,” Phys- ical Review Letters 23 (16),

work page 1969
[13]

Many-body localization dy- namics from gauge invariance,

Brenes, Marlon, Marcello Dalmonte, Markus Heyl, and An- tonello Scardicchio (2018), “Many-body localization dy- namics from gauge invariance,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 030601. 73 Brennen, Gavin K, Peter Rohde, Barry C Sanders, and Sukhwinder Singh (2015), “Multiscale quantum simulation of quantum field theory using wavelets,” Physical Review A 92 (3), 032315...

work page arXiv 2018
[14]

Disorder-Free Localization and Fragmentation in a Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory

First Quantum Corrections,” Phys. Rev. D 16, 1762–1768. Callan Jr, Curtis G, RF Dashen, and David J Gross (1976), “The structure of the gauge theory vacuum,” Physics Let- ters B 63 (3), 334–340. Campbell, Earl (2024), “A series of fast-paced advances in quantum error correction,” Nature Reviews Physics 6 (3), 160–161. Cao, Yudong, Jonathan Romero, Jonatha...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1976
[15]

Variational quantum algorithms,

Cerezo, Marco, Andrew Arrasmith, Ryan Babbush, Simon C Benjamin, Suguru Endo, Keisuke Fujii, Jarrod R Mc- 74 Clean, Kosuke Mitarai, Xiao Yuan, Lukasz Cincio, et al. (2021), “Variational quantum algorithms,” Nature Reviews Physics 3 (9), 625–644. Chabaud, Ulysse, and Mattia Walschaers (2023), “Resources for bosonic quantum computational advantage,” Physica...

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

Equivalence between fermion-to-qubit mappings in two spatial dimensions,

Chen, Yu-An, and Yijia Xu (2023), “Equivalence between fermion-to-qubit mappings in two spatial dimensions,” PRX Quantum 4 (1), 010326. Cheng, Lang-Xing, and Dan-Bo Zhang (2025), “Variational quantum simulation of ground states and thermal states for lattice gauge theory with multi-objective optimization,” Physics Letters A 546, 130516. Cheng, Yanting, Sh...

work page arXiv 2023
[17]

Quantum compu- tations with cold trapped ions,

Cirac, Juan I, and Peter Zoller (1995), “Quantum compu- tations with cold trapped ions,” Physical review letters 74 (20),

work page 1995
[18]

Efficient Quantum Algorithms for Simulating Lindblad Evolution

Cleve, Richard, and Chunhao Wang (2016), “Efficient quan- tum algorithms for simulating lindblad evolution,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.09512. Clo¨ et, Ian C, Matthew R Dietrich, John Arrington, Alexei Bazavov, Michael Bishof, Adam Freese, Alexey V Gor- shkov, Anna Grassellino, Kawtar Hafidi, Zubin Jacob,et al. (2019), “Opportunities for nuclear physics & ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[19]

More about the massive schwinger model,

Coleman, Sidney (1976), “More about the massive schwinger model,” Annals of Physics 101 (1), 239–267. Coleman, Sidney (1977), “Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclas- sical theory,” Phys. Rev. D 15, 2929–2936. Coleman, Sidney, R Jackiw, and Leonard Susskind (1975), “Charge shielding and quark confinement in the massive schwinger model,” Annals of Physics 93 (...

work page arXiv 1976
[20]

From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynam- ics,

D’Alessio, Luca, Yariv Kafri, Anatoli Polkovnikov, and Mar- cos Rigol (2016), “From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynam- ics,” Adv. Phys. 65 (3),

work page 2016
[21]

Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation,

Daley, Andrew J, Immanuel Bloch, Christian Kokail, Stuart Flannigan, Natalie Pearson, Matthias Troyer, and Peter Zoller (2022), “Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation,” Nature 607 (7920), 667–676. Dalmonte, Marcello, Viktor Eisler, Marco Falconi, and Benoˆ ıt Vermersch (2022), “Entanglement hamiltonians: from field theory to lattice models and...

work page arXiv 2022
[22]

Weak ergodicity breaking in the Schwinger model,

Desaules, Jean-Yves, Debasish Banerjee, Ana Hudomal, Zlatko Papi´ c, Arnab Sen, and Jad C. Halimeh (2023a), “Weak ergodicity breaking in the Schwinger model,” Phys. Rev. B 107, L201105. Desaules, Jean-Yves, Ana Hudomal, Debasish Banerjee, Arnab Sen, Zlatko Papi´ c, and Jad C. Halimeh (2023b), “Prominent quantum many-body scars in a truncated Schwinger mod...

work page 2022
[23]

Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system,

Deutsch, J M (1991), “Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system,” Phys. Rev. A 43,

work page 1991
[24]

Quantum error correction for beginners,

Devitt, Simon J, William J Munro, and Kae Nemoto (2013), “Quantum error correction for beginners,” Reports on Progress in Physics 76 (7), 076001. Devoret, Michel H, and John M Martinis (2004), “Imple- menting qubits with superconducting integrated circuits,” Quantum Information Processing 3 (1), 163–203. Devoret, Michel H, and Robert J Schoelkopf (2013), ...

work page 2013
[25]

Entanglement enhanced metrology with quantum many- body scars,

Dooley, Shane, Silvia Pappalardi, and John Goold (2023), “Entanglement enhanced metrology with quantum many- body scars,” Phys. Rev. B 107, 035123. Duan, L-M, Z-X Gong, et al. (2021), “Programmable quan- tum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions,” Re- views of Modern Physics 93 (2), 025001. Dulat, Sayipjamal, Tie-Jiun Hou, Jun Gao, Marco Guzzi, Jo...

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

Overlap-adapt-vqe: practical quantum chem- istry on quantum computers via overlap-guided compact ans¨ atze,

Feniou, C´ esar, Muhammad Hassan, Diata Traor´ e, Em- manuel Giner, Yvon Maday, and Jean-Philip Piquemal (2023), “Overlap-adapt-vqe: practical quantum chem- istry on quantum computers via overlap-guided compact ans¨ atze,” Communications Physics6 (1),

work page 2023
[27]

Simulating physics with com- puters,

Feynman, Richard P (1982), “Simulating physics with com- puters,” in Feynman and computation (cRc Press) pp. 133–

work page 1982
[28]

Observation of dynamical vortices after quenches in a system with topology,

Fl¨ aschner, N, D Vogel, M Tarnowski, BS Rem, D-S L¨ uhmann, Markus Heyl, JC Budich, L Mathey, Klaus Sengstock, and C Weitenberg (2018), “Observation of dynamical vortices after quenches in a system with topology,” Nature Physics 14 (3), 265–268. Florkowski, Wojciech (2010), Phenomenology of ultra- relativistic heavy-ion collisions (World Scientific Publi...

work page 2018
[29]

W physics at the LHC with FEWZ 2.1

Gao, Jun, Lucian Harland-Lang, and Juan Rojo (2018), “The structure of the proton in the lhc precision era,” Physics Reports 742, 1–121. Garc´ ıa-´Alvarez, L, J Casanova, A Mezzacapo, IL Egusquiza, L Lamata, G Romero, and E Solano (2015), “Fermion- fermion scattering in quantum field theory with supercon- ducting circuits,” Physical review letters 114 (7)...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[30]

Quantum simulation,

Georgescu, Iulia M, Sahel Ashhab, and Franco Nori (2014), “Quantum simulation,” Reviews of Modern Physics 86 (1), 153–185. Geraedts, Scott D, Rahul Nandkishore, and Nicolas Regnault (2016), “Many-body localization and thermalization: In- sights from the entanglement spectrum,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 174202. Gerbier, Fabrice, and Jean Dalibard (2010), “Gauge fie...

work page 2014
[31]

Breakdown of ergodicity in disor- dered U(1) lattice gauge theories,

Giudici, G, F. M. Surace, J. E. Ebot, A. Scardicchio, and M. Dalmonte (2020), “Breakdown of ergodicity in disor- dered U(1) lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 032034. Glaetzle, Alexander W, Marcello Dalmonte, Rejish Nath, Christian Gross, Immanuel Bloch, and Peter Zoller (2015), “Designing frustrated quantum magnets with laser-dressed rydberg ato...

work page 2020
[32]

Event generation with sherpa 1.1,

Gleisberg, Tanju, Stefan H¨ oche, Frank Krauss, M Sch¨ onherr, Steffen Schumann, Frank Siegert, and Jan Winter (2009), “Event generation with sherpa 1.1,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2009 (02),

work page 2009
[33]

Loschmidt Echo

G´ omez, JMG, K Kar, VKB Kota, Rafael A Molina, Armando Rela˜ no, and Joaqu´ ın Retamosa (2011), “Many-body quan- tum chaos: Recent developments and applications to nu- clei,” Physics Reports 499 (4-5), 103–226. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, Daniel, Dolev Bluvstein, Marcin Kali- nowski, Raphael Kaubruegger, Nishad Maskara, Piero Naldesi, Torsten V Zache, Adam M Kauf...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[34]

Quantum computing with rotation-symmetric bosonic codes,

Grimsmo, Arne L, Joshua Combes, and Ben Q Baragi- ola (2020), “Quantum computing with rotation-symmetric bosonic codes,” Physical Review X 10 (1), 011058. Gross, David J, and Frank Wilczek (1973), “Ultraviolet be- havior of non-Abelian gauge theories,” Physical Review Letters 30 (26),

work page 2020
[35]

50 years of quantum chromodynamics: Introduction and review,

Gross, Franz, Eberhard Klempt, Stanley J Brodsky, An- drzej J Buras, Volker D Burkert, Gudrun Heinrich, Karl Jakobs, Curtis A Meyer, Kostas Orginos, Michael Strick- land, et al. (2023), “50 years of quantum chromodynamics: Introduction and review,” The European Physical Journal C 83 (12),

work page 2023
[36]

Quan- tum disentangled liquids,

Grover, Tarun, and Matthew PA Fisher (2014), “Quan- tum disentangled liquids,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2014 (10), P10010. Guangyou, QIN (2020), “Soft and hard probes of relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Nuclear Physics Review 37 (3), 317–

work page 2014
[37]

Quantum chaos: An introduction via chains of interacting spins 1/2,

Gubin, Aviva, and Lea F Santos (2012), “Quantum chaos: An introduction via chains of interacting spins 1/2,” American Journal of Physics 80 (3), 246–251. Gustafson, Erik, Patrick Dreher, Zheyue Hang, and Yannick Meurice (2019), “Benchmarking quantum computers for real-time evolution of a (1 + 1)d field theory with error mitigation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1...

work page arXiv 2012
[38]

Observation of disorder-free local- ization using a (2+1)d lattice gauge theory on a quantum processor,

Gyawali, Gaurav, Shashwat Kumar, Yuri D. Lensky, Eliott Rosenberg, Aaron Szasz, Tyler Cochran, Renyi Chen, Amir H. Karamlou, Kostyantyn Kechedzhi, Julia Berndts- son, Tom Westerhout, Abraham Asfaw, Dmitry Abanin, Rajeev Acharya, Laleh Aghababaie Beni, Trond I. Ander- sen, Markus Ansmann, Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Nikita Astrakhantsev, Juan Atalaya, Ryan Ba...

work page arXiv 2025
[39]

On the asymptotic con- dition in quantum field theory,

Haag, Rudolf, and D Ruelle (1958), “On the asymptotic con- dition in quantum field theory,” Phys. Review, II. Ser 112, 669–673. Haah, Jeongwan, Matthew B Hastings, Robin Kothari, and Guang Hao Low (2021), “Quantum algorithm for simu- lating real time evolution of lattice hamiltonians,” SIAM Journal on Computing 52 (6), FOCS18–250. Haase, Jan F, Luca Della...

work page 1958
[40]

Elementary excitations in gapped quantum spin systems,

Haegeman, Jutho, Spyridon Michalakis, Bruno Nachtergaele, Tobias J Osborne, Norbert Schuch, and Frank Verstraete (2013), “Elementary excitations in gapped quantum spin systems,” Physical review letters 111 (8), 080401. Haegeman, Jutho, Bogdan Pirvu, David J Weir, J Ignacio Cirac, Tobias J Osborne, Henri Verschelde, and Frank Ver- straete (2012), “Variatio...

work page arXiv 2013
[41]

Dynamical quantum phase transitions in many-body localized systems

Halimeh, Jad C, Maarten Van Damme, Valentin Zauner- Stauber, and Laurens Vanderstraeten (2020b), “Quasipar- ticle origin of dynamical quantum phase transitions,” Phys- ical Review Research 2 (3), 033111. Halimeh, Jad C, Nikolay Yegovtsev, and Victor Gurarie (2019), “Dynamical quantum phase transitions in many- body localized systems,” arXiv:1903.03109 [co...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[42]

Exponential improvement in quantum simulations of bosons,

Hanada, Masanori, Shunji Matsuura, Emanuele Mendicelli, and Enrico Rinaldi (2025), “Exponential improvement in quantum simulations of bosons,” arXiv:2505.02553 [quant- ph]. Hansen, Maxwell T, and Stephen R Sharpe (2019), “Lattice QCD and three-particle decays of resonances,” Annual Re- view of Nuclear and Particle Science 69 (1), 65–107. Harris, John W, a...

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Floquet prethermalization of Z2 lattice gauge theory on superconducting qubits,

Hayata, Tomoya, Kazuhiro Seki, and Arata Yamamoto (2024), “Floquet prethermalization of Z2 lattice gauge theory on superconducting qubits,” Physical Review D 110 (11), 114503. van Hees, Hendrik, Vincenzo Greco, and Ralf Rapp (2006), “Heavy-quark probes of the quark-gluon plasma and inter- pretation of recent data taken at the bnl relativistic heavy ion co...

work page 2024
[44]

Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review,

Heyl, Markus (2018), “Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review,” Reports on Progress in Physics 81 (5), 054001. Heyl, Markus, Anatoli Polkovnikov, and Stefan Kehrein (2013), “Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the transverse-field ising model,” Physical review letters 110 (13), 135704. Ho, Wen Wei, Soonwon Choi, Hannes Pichler, and Mikhail D. Luk...

work page 2018
[45]

The- ory of dynamic critical phenomena,

Hohenberg, Pierre C, and Bertrand I Halperin (1977), “The- ory of dynamic critical phenomena,” Reviews of Modern Physics 49 (3),

work page 1977
[46]

Re- alistic scheme for quantum simulation of Z2 lattice gauge theories with dynamical matter in (2+1)D,

Homeier, Lukas, Annabelle Bohrdt, Simon Linsel, Eugene Demler, Jad C. Halimeh, and Fabian Grusdt (2023), “Re- alistic scheme for quantum simulation of Z2 lattice gauge theories with dynamical matter in (2+1)D,” Communica- tions Physics 6 (1),

work page 2023
[47]

Supersolidity in rydberg tweezer arrays,

Homeier, Lukas, Simon Hollerith, Sebastian Geier, Neng- Chun Chiu, Antoine Browaeys, and Lode Pollet (2025), “Supersolidity in rydberg tweezer arrays,” Phys. Rev. A 111, L011305. Homrighausen, Ingo, Nils O. Abeling, Valentin Zauner- Stauber, and Jad C. Halimeh (2017), “Anomalous dynam- ical phase in quantum spin chains with long-range interac- tions,” Phy...

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adv3255 2025
[48]

On-chip quantum simulation with superconducting cir- cuits,

Houck, Andrew A, Hakan E T¨ ureci, and Jens Koch (2012), “On-chip quantum simulation with superconducting cir- cuits,” Nature Physics 8 (4), 292–299. Hu, Yu-Min, and Biao Lian (2024), “From the quantum breakdown model to the lattice gauge theory,” AAPPS Bul- letin 34 (1),

work page 2012
[49]

Superconducting quantum computing: a review,

Huang, He-Liang, Dachao Wu, Daojin Fan, and Xiaobo Zhu (2020a), “Superconducting quantum computing: a review,” Science China Information Sciences 63 (8), 180501. Huang, Hsin-Yuan, Richard Kueng, and John Preskill (2020b), “Predicting many properties of a quantum sys- tem from very few measurements,” Nature Physics16 (10), 1050–1057. Huang, Ke, Yu Wang, an...

work page 2021
[50]

Onset of a quantum phase transition with a trapped ion quantum simulator,

Islam, R, EE Edwards, K Kim, S Korenblit, C Noh, H Carmichael, G-D Lin, L-M Duan, C-C Joseph Wang, JK Freericks, et al. (2011), “Onset of a quantum phase transition with a trapped ion quantum simulator,” Nature communications 2 (1),

work page 2011
[51]

Emergence and frustration of magnetism with variable-range interac- tions in a quantum simulator,

Islam, R, S Korenblit, J Smith, A Lee, EE Edwards, C-CJ Wang, JK Freericks, and C Monroe (2013), “Emergence and frustration of magnetism with variable-range interac- tions in a quantum simulator,” science 340 (6132), 583–

work page 2013
[52]

Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system,

Islam, Rajibul, Ruichao Ma, Philipp M Preiss, M Eric Tai, Alexander Lukin, Matthew Rispoli, and Markus Greiner (2015), “Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system,” Nature 528 (7580), 77–83. Ivanov, Andrew N, and Olexei I. Motrunich (2025a), “Many exact area-law scar eigenstates in the nonintegrable pxp and related models,” arXiv:2503.16...

work page arXiv 2015
[53]

Canonical momenta in digitized SU(2) lattice gauge theory: definition and free theory,

Jakobs, Timo, Marco Garofalo, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Johann Ostmeyer, Dominik Rolfes, Simone Romiti, and Carsten Urbach (2023), “Canonical momenta in digitized SU(2) lattice gauge theory: definition and free theory,” The European Physical Journal C 83 (7),

work page 2023
[54]

Nonthermal states arising from confinement in one and two dimensions,

James, Andrew J A, Robert M. Konik, and Neil J. Robinson (2019), “Nonthermal states arising from confinement in one and two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130603. Jaynes, Edwin T, and Frederick W Cummings (1963), “Com- parison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser,” Proceedings of the IEEE 51 (1), 89–109. J...

work page 2019
[55]

Real-time scattering in ising field theory using matrix product states,

Jha, Raghav G, Ashley Milsted, Dominik Neuenfeld, John Preskill, and Pedro Vieira (2025), “Real-time scattering in ising field theory using matrix product states,” Physical Review Research 7 (2), 023266. Jha, Raghav G, Felix Ringer, George Siopsis, and Shane Thompson (2023), “Toward quantum computa- tions of the o(3) model using qumodes,” arXiv preprint a...

work page arXiv 2025
[56]

Lattice quantum chromodynamics and electrodynamics on a universal quan- tum computer,

Kan, Angus, and Yunseong Nam (2021), “Lattice quantum chromodynamics and electrodynamics on a universal quan- tum computer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.12769. Kane, Charles L, and Eugene J Mele (2005), “Quantum spin hall effect in graphene,” Physical review letters 95 (22), 226801. Kane, Christopher, Dorota M Grabowska, Benjamin Nach- man, and Christian W ...

work page arXiv 2021
[57]

Karch, S

Karch, Simon, Souvik Bandyopadhyay, Zheng-Hang Sun, Alexander Impertro, SeungJung Huh, Irene Prieto Rodr´ ıguez, Julian F. Wienand, Wolfgang Ketterle, Markus Heyl, Anatoli Polkovnikov, Immanuel Bloch, and Monika Aidelsburger (2025), “Probing quantum many-body dynamics using subsystem loschmidt echos,” arXiv:2501.16995 [cond-mat.quant-gas]. Karle, Volker, ...

work page arXiv 2025
[58]

Kebriˇ c, J

Kaufman, Adam M, M Eric Tai, Alexander Lukin, Matthew Rispoli, Robert Schittko, Philipp M Preiss, and Markus Greiner (2016b), “Quantum thermalization through en- tanglement in an isolated many-body system,” Science 353 (6301), 794–800. Kebriˇ c, Matjaˇ z, Jad C Halimeh, Ulrich Schollw¨ ock, and Fabian Grusdt (2023), “Confinement in 1+1D Z2 Lattice Gauge T...

work page arXiv 2023
[59]

Some implications of a cosmologi- cal phase transition,

Kibble, Tom WB (1980), “Some implications of a cosmologi- cal phase transition,” Physics Reports 67 (1), 183–199. Kim, Kihwan, M-S Chang, Rajibul Islam, Simcha Koren- blit, L-M Duan, and Christopher Monroe (2009), “Entan- glement and tunable spin-spin couplings between trapped ions¡? format?¿ using multiple transverse modes,” Physical review letters 103 (...

work page 1980
[60]

Wavefunction preparation and resampling using a quantum computer

Kitaev, A Yu (2003), “Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons,” Annals of physics 303 (1), 2–30. Kitaev, Alexei (2006), “Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond,” Annals of Physics 321 (1), 2–111. Kitaev, Alexei, and William A Webb (2008), “Wavefunction preparation and resampling using a quantum computer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:0801.0342. Kivlich...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[61]

Fault-Tolerant Postselected Quantum Computation: Schemes

Knill, E (2004), “Fault-tolerant postselected quantum com- putation: Schemes,” arXiv:quant-ph/0402171 [quant-ph]. Knolle, Johannes, and Roderich Moessner (2019), “A field guide to spin liquids,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10 (1), 451–472. Kn¨ orzer, Johannes, Tao Shi, Eugene Demler, and J Igna- cio Cirac (2022), “Spin-holstein models in tra...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[62]

Entanglement hamil- tonian tomography in quantum simulation,

Kokail, Christian, Rick van Bijnen, Andreas Elben, Benoˆ ıt Vermersch, and Peter Zoller (2021), “Entanglement hamil- tonian tomography in quantum simulation,” Nature Physics 17 (8), 936–942. Kokail, Christian, Christine Maier, Rick van Bijnen, Tiff Bry- dges, Manoj K Joshi, Petar Jurcevic, Christine A Muschik, Pietro Silvi, Rainer Blatt, Christian F Roos,...

work page 2021
[63]

A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits,

Krantz, Philip, Morten Kjaergaard, Fei Yan, Terry P Or- lando, Simon Gustavsson, and William D Oliver (2019), “A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits,” Applied physics reviews 6 (2). Kranzl, Florian, Stefan Birnkammer, Manoj K Joshi, Alvise Bastianello, Rainer Blatt, Michael Knap, and Christian F Roos (2023), “Observation of magnon bound sta...

work page arXiv 2019
[64]

Stabilizer r´ enyi entropy,

Leone, Lorenzo, Salvatore FE Oliviero, and Alioscia Hamma (2022), “Stabilizer r´ enyi entropy,” Physical Review Letters 128 (5), 050402. Lerose, Alessio (2024), “Simulating schwinger model dynamics with quasi-one-dimensional qubit arrays,” arXiv:2409.14544 [quant-ph]. Lerose, Alessio, Tommaso Parolini, Rosario Fazio, Dmitry A. Abanin, and Silvia Pappalard...

work page arXiv 2022
[65]

Femtoscopy in relativistic heavy ion colli- sions: two decades of progress,

Lisa, Michael Annan, Scott Pratt, Ron Soltz, and Urs Wiede- mann (2005), “Femtoscopy in relativistic heavy ion colli- sions: two decades of progress,” Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55 (1), 357–402. Liu, Fangli, Rex Lundgren, Paraj Titum, Guido Pagano, Jiehang Zhang, Christopher Monroe, and Alexey V Gor- shkov (2019), “Confined quasiparticle dynamics in long...

work page 2005
[66]

Towards a variational jordan–lee–preskill quan- tum algorithm,

Liu, Junyu, Zimu Li, Han Zheng, Xiao Yuan, and Jinzhao Sun (2022b), “Towards a variational jordan–lee–preskill quan- tum algorithm,” Machine Learning: Science and Technol- ogy 3 (4), 045030. Liu, Yuan, Shraddha Singh, Kevin C Smith, Eleanor Crane, 85 John M Martyn, Alec Eickbusch, Alexander Schuckert, Richard D Li, Jasmine Sinanan-Singh, Micheline B Soley...

work page arXiv 2024
[67]

Hamiltonian Simulation in the Interaction Picture

Low, Guang Hao, and Nathan Wiebe (2018), “Hamilto- nian simulation in the interaction picture,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.00675. Lu, Sirui, Mari Carmen Ba˜ nuls, and J Ignacio Cirac (2021), “Algorithms for quantum simulation at finite energies,” PRX quantum 2 (2), 020321. Lukin, Alexander, Matthew Rispoli, Robert Schittko, M Eric Tai, Adam M Kaufman, Soon...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[68]

Hybrid quantum- classical hierarchy for mitigation of decoherence and de- termination of excited states,

McClean, Jarrod R, Mollie E Kimchi-Schwartz, Jonathan Carter, and Wibe A De Jong (2017), “Hybrid quantum- classical hierarchy for mitigation of decoherence and de- termination of excited states,” Physical Review A 95 (4), 042308. McClean, Jarrod R, Jonathan Romero, Ryan Babbush, and Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik (2016), “The theory of variational hy- brid quantum-c...

work page 2017
[69]

The physics of the quark-gluon plasma,

McLerran, Larry (1986), “The physics of the quark-gluon plasma,” Reviews of Modern Physics 58 (4),

work page 1986
[70]

Lattice schwinger model: Confinement, anomalies, chiral fermions, and all that,

Melnikov, Kirill, and Marvin Weinstein (2000), “Lattice schwinger model: Confinement, anomalies, chiral fermions, and all that,” Physical Review D 62 (9), 094504. Metag, V (1993), “Near-threshold particle production: A probe for resonance matter formation in relativistic heavy ion collisions,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics30, 75–88. Meth, Micha...

work page arXiv 2000
[71]

Fate of quantum many-body scars in the presence of disorder,

Mondragon-Shem, Ian, Maxim G. Vavilov, and Ivar Martin (2021), “Fate of quantum many-body scars in the presence of disorder,” PRX Quantum 2, 030349. Montvay, Istv´ an, and Gernot M¨ unster (1994),Quantum fields on a lattice (Cambridge University Press). Mori, Takashi, Tatsuhiko N Ikeda, Eriko Kaminishi, and Masahito Ueda (2018), “Thermalization and prethe...

work page arXiv 2021
[72]

Thermalization of gauge theories from their entanglement spectrum,

Mueller, Niklas, Torsten V Zache, and Robert Ott (2022), “Thermalization of gauge theories from their entanglement spectrum,” Physical Review Letters 129 (1), 011601. Mukherjee, Bhaskar, Debasish Banerjee, K. Sengupta, and Arnab Sen (2021), “Minimal model for hilbert space frag- mentation with local constraints,” Phys. Rev. B 104, 155117. M¨ uller, Berndt...

work page arXiv 2022
[73]

Naturally weak cp violation,

Nelson, Ann (1984), “Naturally weak cp violation,” Physics Letters B 136 (5-6), 387–391. Nevado, Pedro, Samuel Fern´ andez-Lorenzo, and Diego Por- ras (2017), “Topological edge states in periodically driven trapped-ion chains,” Physical Review Letters 119 (21), 210401. Nevado, Pedro, and Diego Porras (2016), “Hidden frustrated interactions and quantum ann...

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1819316116 1984
[74]

Error-corrected fermionic quantum processors with neu- tral atoms,

Ott, Robert, Daniel Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, Torsten V Zache, Pe- ter Zoller, Adam M Kaufman, and Hannes Pichler (2025), “Error-corrected fermionic quantum processors with neu- tral atoms,” Physical Review Letters 135 (9), 090601. Ott, Robert, Torsten V Zache, Fred Jendrzejewski, and J¨ urgen Berges (2021), “Scalable cold-atom quantum sim- ulator for two-dimens...

work page arXiv 2025
[75]

String breaking in zero-temperature lattice QCD

Pedersen, Simon Panyella, and Nikolaj Thomas Zinner (2021), “Lattice gauge theory and dynamical quantum phase transitions using noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices,” Physical Review B 103 (23), 235103. Pennanen, P, Christopher Michael, UKQCD Collaboration, et al. (2000), “String breaking in zero-temperature lattice QCD,” arXiv preprint hep-lat/000101...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[76]

Finding periodic orbits in pro- jected quantum many-body dynamics,

Petrova, Elena, Marko Ljubotina, G¨ okhan Yalnız, and Maksym Serbyn (2025), “Finding periodic orbits in pro- jected quantum many-body dynamics,” arXiv:2504.12472 [quant-ph]. Pichler, Hannes, Guanyu Zhu, Alireza Seif, Peter Zoller, and Mohammad Hafezi (2016), “Measurement protocol for the entanglement spectrum of cold atoms,” Physical Review X 6 (4), 04103...

work page arXiv 2025
[77]

Shear viscosity of strongly coupled n= 4 supersym- metric yang-mills plasma,

Policastro, Giuseppe, Dan T Son, and Andrei O Starinets (2001), “Shear viscosity of strongly coupled n= 4 supersym- metric yang-mills plasma,” Physical Review Letters 87 (8), 081601. Polkovnikov, Anatoli, and Dries Sels (2016), “Thermalization in small quantum systems,” Science 353 (6301), 752–753. Pomarico, Domenico, Leonardo Cosmai, Paolo Facchi, Cosmo ...

work page arXiv 2001
[78]

Simple z2 lattice gauge theories at finite fermion density,

Prosko, Christian, Shu-Ping Lee, and Joseph Maciejko (2017), “Simple z2 lattice gauge theories at finite fermion density,” Physical Review B 96 (20), 205104. Puertas Mart´ ınez, Javier, S´ ebastien L´ eger, Nicolas Gheeraert, R´ emy Dassonneville, Luca Planat, Farshad Foroughi, Yuriy Krupko, Olivier Buisson, C´ ecile Naud, Wiebke Hasch- Guichard, et al. (...

work page 2017
[79]

Observing frustrated quantum magnetism in two-dimensional ion crystals,

Qiao, Mu, Zhengyang Cai, Ye Wang, Botao Du, Naijun Jin, Wentao Chen, Pengfei Wang, Chunyang Luan, Erfu Gao, Ximo Sun, et al. (2022), “Observing frustrated quantum magnetism in two-dimensional ion crystals,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.07283. Qiu, L-Y, H-Y Liang, Y-B Yang, H-X Yang, T Tian, Y Xu, and L-M Duan (2020), “Observation of generalized kibble- zurek...

work page arXiv 2022
[80]

Self-mitigating Trotter circuits for SU(2) lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer,

Rahman, Sarmed, Randy Lewis, Emanuele Mendicelli, and Sarah Powell (2022), “Self-mitigating Trotter circuits for SU(2) lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer,” Phys- ical Review D 106 (7), 074502. Rajput, Abhishek, Alessandro Roggero, and Nathan Wiebe (2022), “Hybridized methods for quantum simulation in the interaction picture,” Quantum 6,

work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.

[1] [1]

Acharya, L

(1979), “U(1) without instantons, author=Veneziano, Gabriele,” Nuclear Physics B 159 (1-2), 213–224. Aamodt, Kenneth, A Abrahantes Quintana, R Achenbach, S Acounis, D Adamov´ a, C Adler, M Aggarwal, F Agnese, G Aglieri Rinella, Z Ahammed, et al. (2008), “The alice experiment at the cern lhc,” Journal of Instrumentation 3 (08), S08002. Abanin, DA, J.H. Bar...

work page arXiv 1979

[2] [2]

The International Linear Collider. A Global Project

Aidelsburger, Monika (2015), Artificial gauge fields with ul- tracold atoms in optical lattices , Dissertation (Ludwig- Maximilians-Universit¨ at M¨ unchen, Faculty of Physics). Aidelsburger, Monika, Luca Barbiero, Alejandro Bermudez, Titas Chanda, Alexandre Dauphin, Daniel Gonz´ alez- Cuadra, Przemys law R. Grzybowski, Simon Hands, Fred Jendrzejewski, Jo...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[3] [3]

Snowmass Energy Frontier Simulations

Altman, Ehud, Kenneth R Brown, Giuseppe Carleo, Lin- coln D Carr, Eugene Demler, Cheng Chin, Brian DeMarco, Sophia E Economou, Mark A Eriksson, Kai-Mei C Fu,et al. (2021), “Quantum simulators: Architectures and opportu- nities,” PRX quantum 2 (1), 017003. Alvarez-Ruso, L, M Sajjad Athar, MB Barbaro, D Cher- dack, ME Christy, P Coloma, TW Donnelly, S Dytma...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

[4] [4]

Simple fermionic model of deconfined phases and phase transitions,

Assaad, FF, and Tarun Grover (2016), “Simple fermionic model of deconfined phases and phase transitions,” Physi- cal Review X 6 (4), 041049. Atas, Yasar Y, Eugene Bogomolny, Olivier Giraud, and Guil- lame Roux (2013), “Distribution of the ratio of consecutive level spacings in random matrix ensembles,” Physical re- view letters 110 (8), 084101. Atas, Yasa...

work page 2016

[5] [5]

Nearly op- timal quantum algorithm for generating the ground state of a free quantum field theory,

Bagherimehrab, Mohsen, Yuval R Sanders, Dominic W Berry, Gavin K Brennen, and Barry C Sanders (2022), “Nearly op- timal quantum algorithm for generating the ground state of a free quantum field theory,” PRX Quantum 3 (2), 020364. B¨ ahr, Manuel, Stefan Gieseke, Martyn A Gigg, David Grellscheid, Keith Hamilton, Oluseyi Latunde-Dada, Si- mon Pl¨ atzer, Pete...

work page arXiv 2022

[6] [6]

Quantum Scars from Zero Modes in an Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory on Ladders,

Banerjee, Debasish, and Arnab Sen (2021), “Quantum Scars from Zero Modes in an Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory on Ladders,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 220601. Ba˜ nuls, Mari Carmen (2023), “Tensor network algorithms: A route map,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 14 (1), 173–191. Banuls, Mari Carmen, and Krzysztof Cichy (2020), “Review on novel methods f...

work page 2021

[7] [7]

Metal– insulator transition in a weakly interacting many-electron system with localized single-particle states,

Basko, DM, I.L. Aleiner, and B.L. Altshuler (2006), “Metal– insulator transition in a weakly interacting many-electron system with localized single-particle states,” Annals of Physics 321 (5), 1126 –

work page 2006

[8] [8]

Quantum algorithms for quantum chem- istry and quantum materials science,

Bauer, Bela, Sergey Bravyi, Mario Motta, and Garnet Kin- Lic Chan (2020), “Quantum algorithms for quantum chem- istry and quantum materials science,” Chemical reviews 120 (22), 12685–12717. Bauer, Christian W, Zohreh Davoudi, A Baha Balantekin, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Marcela Carena, Wibe A De Jong, Patrick Draper, Aida El-Khadra, Nate Gemelke, Masanori Hana...

work page arXiv 2020

[9] [9]

Asymptotic sum rules at infinite momentum,

Bjorken, James D (1969), “Asymptotic sum rules at infinite momentum,” Physical Review 179 (5),

work page 1969

[10] [10]

Gauge theories of gravitation,

Blagojevi´ c, Milutin, and Friedrich W Hehl (2012), “Gauge theories of gravitation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1210.3775. Blais, Alexandre, Arne L Grimsmo, Steven M Girvin, and An- dreas Wallraff (2021), “Circuit quantum electrodynamics,” Reviews of Modern Physics 93 (2), 025005. Bloch, Felix (1929), “ ¨Uber die quantenmechanik der elektro- nen in kristallgitt...

work page arXiv 2012

[11] [11]

Transverse-field ising dynamics in a rydberg-dressed atomic gas,

Borish, V, O. Markovi´ c, J. A. Hines, S. V. Rajagopal, and M. Schleier-Smith (2020), “Transverse-field ising dynamics in a rydberg-dressed atomic gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 063601. Borla, Umberto, Jesse J. Osborne, Sergej Moroz, and Jad C. Halimeh (2025), “String breaking in a 2 + 1d Z2 lattice gauge theory,” arXiv:2501.17929 [quant-ph]. Bozzi, Giuseppe...

work page arXiv 2020

[12] [12]

Observed be- havior of highly inelastic electron-proton scattering,

Breidenbach, Martin, Jerome I Friedman, Henry W Kendall, Elliott D Bloom, DH Coward, H DeStaebler, J Drees, Luke W Mo, and Richard E Taylor (1969), “Observed be- havior of highly inelastic electron-proton scattering,” Phys- ical Review Letters 23 (16),

work page 1969

[13] [13]

Many-body localization dy- namics from gauge invariance,

Brenes, Marlon, Marcello Dalmonte, Markus Heyl, and An- tonello Scardicchio (2018), “Many-body localization dy- namics from gauge invariance,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 030601. 73 Brennen, Gavin K, Peter Rohde, Barry C Sanders, and Sukhwinder Singh (2015), “Multiscale quantum simulation of quantum field theory using wavelets,” Physical Review A 92 (3), 032315...

work page arXiv 2018

[14] [14]

Disorder-Free Localization and Fragmentation in a Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory

First Quantum Corrections,” Phys. Rev. D 16, 1762–1768. Callan Jr, Curtis G, RF Dashen, and David J Gross (1976), “The structure of the gauge theory vacuum,” Physics Let- ters B 63 (3), 334–340. Campbell, Earl (2024), “A series of fast-paced advances in quantum error correction,” Nature Reviews Physics 6 (3), 160–161. Cao, Yudong, Jonathan Romero, Jonatha...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1976

[15] [15]

Variational quantum algorithms,

Cerezo, Marco, Andrew Arrasmith, Ryan Babbush, Simon C Benjamin, Suguru Endo, Keisuke Fujii, Jarrod R Mc- 74 Clean, Kosuke Mitarai, Xiao Yuan, Lukasz Cincio, et al. (2021), “Variational quantum algorithms,” Nature Reviews Physics 3 (9), 625–644. Chabaud, Ulysse, and Mattia Walschaers (2023), “Resources for bosonic quantum computational advantage,” Physica...

work page arXiv 2021

[16] [16]

Equivalence between fermion-to-qubit mappings in two spatial dimensions,

Chen, Yu-An, and Yijia Xu (2023), “Equivalence between fermion-to-qubit mappings in two spatial dimensions,” PRX Quantum 4 (1), 010326. Cheng, Lang-Xing, and Dan-Bo Zhang (2025), “Variational quantum simulation of ground states and thermal states for lattice gauge theory with multi-objective optimization,” Physics Letters A 546, 130516. Cheng, Yanting, Sh...

work page arXiv 2023

[17] [17]

Quantum compu- tations with cold trapped ions,

Cirac, Juan I, and Peter Zoller (1995), “Quantum compu- tations with cold trapped ions,” Physical review letters 74 (20),

work page 1995

[18] [18]

Efficient Quantum Algorithms for Simulating Lindblad Evolution

Cleve, Richard, and Chunhao Wang (2016), “Efficient quan- tum algorithms for simulating lindblad evolution,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.09512. Clo¨ et, Ian C, Matthew R Dietrich, John Arrington, Alexei Bazavov, Michael Bishof, Adam Freese, Alexey V Gor- shkov, Anna Grassellino, Kawtar Hafidi, Zubin Jacob,et al. (2019), “Opportunities for nuclear physics & ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[19] [19]

More about the massive schwinger model,

Coleman, Sidney (1976), “More about the massive schwinger model,” Annals of Physics 101 (1), 239–267. Coleman, Sidney (1977), “Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclas- sical theory,” Phys. Rev. D 15, 2929–2936. Coleman, Sidney, R Jackiw, and Leonard Susskind (1975), “Charge shielding and quark confinement in the massive schwinger model,” Annals of Physics 93 (...

work page arXiv 1976

[20] [20]

From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynam- ics,

D’Alessio, Luca, Yariv Kafri, Anatoli Polkovnikov, and Mar- cos Rigol (2016), “From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynam- ics,” Adv. Phys. 65 (3),

work page 2016

[21] [21]

Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation,

Daley, Andrew J, Immanuel Bloch, Christian Kokail, Stuart Flannigan, Natalie Pearson, Matthias Troyer, and Peter Zoller (2022), “Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation,” Nature 607 (7920), 667–676. Dalmonte, Marcello, Viktor Eisler, Marco Falconi, and Benoˆ ıt Vermersch (2022), “Entanglement hamiltonians: from field theory to lattice models and...

work page arXiv 2022

[22] [22]

Weak ergodicity breaking in the Schwinger model,

Desaules, Jean-Yves, Debasish Banerjee, Ana Hudomal, Zlatko Papi´ c, Arnab Sen, and Jad C. Halimeh (2023a), “Weak ergodicity breaking in the Schwinger model,” Phys. Rev. B 107, L201105. Desaules, Jean-Yves, Ana Hudomal, Debasish Banerjee, Arnab Sen, Zlatko Papi´ c, and Jad C. Halimeh (2023b), “Prominent quantum many-body scars in a truncated Schwinger mod...

work page 2022

[23] [23]

Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system,

Deutsch, J M (1991), “Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system,” Phys. Rev. A 43,

work page 1991

[24] [24]

Quantum error correction for beginners,

Devitt, Simon J, William J Munro, and Kae Nemoto (2013), “Quantum error correction for beginners,” Reports on Progress in Physics 76 (7), 076001. Devoret, Michel H, and John M Martinis (2004), “Imple- menting qubits with superconducting integrated circuits,” Quantum Information Processing 3 (1), 163–203. Devoret, Michel H, and Robert J Schoelkopf (2013), ...

work page 2013

[25] [25]

Entanglement enhanced metrology with quantum many- body scars,

Dooley, Shane, Silvia Pappalardi, and John Goold (2023), “Entanglement enhanced metrology with quantum many- body scars,” Phys. Rev. B 107, 035123. Duan, L-M, Z-X Gong, et al. (2021), “Programmable quan- tum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions,” Re- views of Modern Physics 93 (2), 025001. Dulat, Sayipjamal, Tie-Jiun Hou, Jun Gao, Marco Guzzi, Jo...

work page arXiv 2023

[26] [26]

Overlap-adapt-vqe: practical quantum chem- istry on quantum computers via overlap-guided compact ans¨ atze,

Feniou, C´ esar, Muhammad Hassan, Diata Traor´ e, Em- manuel Giner, Yvon Maday, and Jean-Philip Piquemal (2023), “Overlap-adapt-vqe: practical quantum chem- istry on quantum computers via overlap-guided compact ans¨ atze,” Communications Physics6 (1),

work page 2023

[27] [27]

Simulating physics with com- puters,

Feynman, Richard P (1982), “Simulating physics with com- puters,” in Feynman and computation (cRc Press) pp. 133–

work page 1982

[28] [28]

Observation of dynamical vortices after quenches in a system with topology,

Fl¨ aschner, N, D Vogel, M Tarnowski, BS Rem, D-S L¨ uhmann, Markus Heyl, JC Budich, L Mathey, Klaus Sengstock, and C Weitenberg (2018), “Observation of dynamical vortices after quenches in a system with topology,” Nature Physics 14 (3), 265–268. Florkowski, Wojciech (2010), Phenomenology of ultra- relativistic heavy-ion collisions (World Scientific Publi...

work page 2018

[29] [29]

W physics at the LHC with FEWZ 2.1

Gao, Jun, Lucian Harland-Lang, and Juan Rojo (2018), “The structure of the proton in the lhc precision era,” Physics Reports 742, 1–121. Garc´ ıa-´Alvarez, L, J Casanova, A Mezzacapo, IL Egusquiza, L Lamata, G Romero, and E Solano (2015), “Fermion- fermion scattering in quantum field theory with supercon- ducting circuits,” Physical review letters 114 (7)...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[30] [30]

Quantum simulation,

Georgescu, Iulia M, Sahel Ashhab, and Franco Nori (2014), “Quantum simulation,” Reviews of Modern Physics 86 (1), 153–185. Geraedts, Scott D, Rahul Nandkishore, and Nicolas Regnault (2016), “Many-body localization and thermalization: In- sights from the entanglement spectrum,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 174202. Gerbier, Fabrice, and Jean Dalibard (2010), “Gauge fie...

work page 2014

[31] [31]

Breakdown of ergodicity in disor- dered U(1) lattice gauge theories,

Giudici, G, F. M. Surace, J. E. Ebot, A. Scardicchio, and M. Dalmonte (2020), “Breakdown of ergodicity in disor- dered U(1) lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 032034. Glaetzle, Alexander W, Marcello Dalmonte, Rejish Nath, Christian Gross, Immanuel Bloch, and Peter Zoller (2015), “Designing frustrated quantum magnets with laser-dressed rydberg ato...

work page 2020

[32] [32]

Event generation with sherpa 1.1,

Gleisberg, Tanju, Stefan H¨ oche, Frank Krauss, M Sch¨ onherr, Steffen Schumann, Frank Siegert, and Jan Winter (2009), “Event generation with sherpa 1.1,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2009 (02),

work page 2009

[33] [33]

Loschmidt Echo

G´ omez, JMG, K Kar, VKB Kota, Rafael A Molina, Armando Rela˜ no, and Joaqu´ ın Retamosa (2011), “Many-body quan- tum chaos: Recent developments and applications to nu- clei,” Physics Reports 499 (4-5), 103–226. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, Daniel, Dolev Bluvstein, Marcin Kali- nowski, Raphael Kaubruegger, Nishad Maskara, Piero Naldesi, Torsten V Zache, Adam M Kauf...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[34] [34]

Quantum computing with rotation-symmetric bosonic codes,

Grimsmo, Arne L, Joshua Combes, and Ben Q Baragi- ola (2020), “Quantum computing with rotation-symmetric bosonic codes,” Physical Review X 10 (1), 011058. Gross, David J, and Frank Wilczek (1973), “Ultraviolet be- havior of non-Abelian gauge theories,” Physical Review Letters 30 (26),

work page 2020

[35] [35]

50 years of quantum chromodynamics: Introduction and review,

Gross, Franz, Eberhard Klempt, Stanley J Brodsky, An- drzej J Buras, Volker D Burkert, Gudrun Heinrich, Karl Jakobs, Curtis A Meyer, Kostas Orginos, Michael Strick- land, et al. (2023), “50 years of quantum chromodynamics: Introduction and review,” The European Physical Journal C 83 (12),

work page 2023

[36] [36]

Quan- tum disentangled liquids,

Grover, Tarun, and Matthew PA Fisher (2014), “Quan- tum disentangled liquids,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2014 (10), P10010. Guangyou, QIN (2020), “Soft and hard probes of relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Nuclear Physics Review 37 (3), 317–

work page 2014

[37] [37]

Quantum chaos: An introduction via chains of interacting spins 1/2,

Gubin, Aviva, and Lea F Santos (2012), “Quantum chaos: An introduction via chains of interacting spins 1/2,” American Journal of Physics 80 (3), 246–251. Gustafson, Erik, Patrick Dreher, Zheyue Hang, and Yannick Meurice (2019), “Benchmarking quantum computers for real-time evolution of a (1 + 1)d field theory with error mitigation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1...

work page arXiv 2012

[38] [38]

Observation of disorder-free local- ization using a (2+1)d lattice gauge theory on a quantum processor,

Gyawali, Gaurav, Shashwat Kumar, Yuri D. Lensky, Eliott Rosenberg, Aaron Szasz, Tyler Cochran, Renyi Chen, Amir H. Karamlou, Kostyantyn Kechedzhi, Julia Berndts- son, Tom Westerhout, Abraham Asfaw, Dmitry Abanin, Rajeev Acharya, Laleh Aghababaie Beni, Trond I. Ander- sen, Markus Ansmann, Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Nikita Astrakhantsev, Juan Atalaya, Ryan Ba...

work page arXiv 2025

[39] [39]

On the asymptotic con- dition in quantum field theory,

Haag, Rudolf, and D Ruelle (1958), “On the asymptotic con- dition in quantum field theory,” Phys. Review, II. Ser 112, 669–673. Haah, Jeongwan, Matthew B Hastings, Robin Kothari, and Guang Hao Low (2021), “Quantum algorithm for simu- lating real time evolution of lattice hamiltonians,” SIAM Journal on Computing 52 (6), FOCS18–250. Haase, Jan F, Luca Della...

work page 1958

[40] [40]

Elementary excitations in gapped quantum spin systems,

Haegeman, Jutho, Spyridon Michalakis, Bruno Nachtergaele, Tobias J Osborne, Norbert Schuch, and Frank Verstraete (2013), “Elementary excitations in gapped quantum spin systems,” Physical review letters 111 (8), 080401. Haegeman, Jutho, Bogdan Pirvu, David J Weir, J Ignacio Cirac, Tobias J Osborne, Henri Verschelde, and Frank Ver- straete (2012), “Variatio...

work page arXiv 2013

[41] [41]

Dynamical quantum phase transitions in many-body localized systems

Halimeh, Jad C, Maarten Van Damme, Valentin Zauner- Stauber, and Laurens Vanderstraeten (2020b), “Quasipar- ticle origin of dynamical quantum phase transitions,” Phys- ical Review Research 2 (3), 033111. Halimeh, Jad C, Nikolay Yegovtsev, and Victor Gurarie (2019), “Dynamical quantum phase transitions in many- body localized systems,” arXiv:1903.03109 [co...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[42] [42]

Exponential improvement in quantum simulations of bosons,

Hanada, Masanori, Shunji Matsuura, Emanuele Mendicelli, and Enrico Rinaldi (2025), “Exponential improvement in quantum simulations of bosons,” arXiv:2505.02553 [quant- ph]. Hansen, Maxwell T, and Stephen R Sharpe (2019), “Lattice QCD and three-particle decays of resonances,” Annual Re- view of Nuclear and Particle Science 69 (1), 65–107. Harris, John W, a...

work page arXiv 2025

[43] [43]

Floquet prethermalization of Z2 lattice gauge theory on superconducting qubits,

Hayata, Tomoya, Kazuhiro Seki, and Arata Yamamoto (2024), “Floquet prethermalization of Z2 lattice gauge theory on superconducting qubits,” Physical Review D 110 (11), 114503. van Hees, Hendrik, Vincenzo Greco, and Ralf Rapp (2006), “Heavy-quark probes of the quark-gluon plasma and inter- pretation of recent data taken at the bnl relativistic heavy ion co...

work page 2024

[44] [44]

Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review,

Heyl, Markus (2018), “Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review,” Reports on Progress in Physics 81 (5), 054001. Heyl, Markus, Anatoli Polkovnikov, and Stefan Kehrein (2013), “Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the transverse-field ising model,” Physical review letters 110 (13), 135704. Ho, Wen Wei, Soonwon Choi, Hannes Pichler, and Mikhail D. Luk...

work page 2018

[45] [45]

The- ory of dynamic critical phenomena,

Hohenberg, Pierre C, and Bertrand I Halperin (1977), “The- ory of dynamic critical phenomena,” Reviews of Modern Physics 49 (3),

work page 1977

[46] [46]

Re- alistic scheme for quantum simulation of Z2 lattice gauge theories with dynamical matter in (2+1)D,

Homeier, Lukas, Annabelle Bohrdt, Simon Linsel, Eugene Demler, Jad C. Halimeh, and Fabian Grusdt (2023), “Re- alistic scheme for quantum simulation of Z2 lattice gauge theories with dynamical matter in (2+1)D,” Communica- tions Physics 6 (1),

work page 2023

[47] [47]

Supersolidity in rydberg tweezer arrays,

Homeier, Lukas, Simon Hollerith, Sebastian Geier, Neng- Chun Chiu, Antoine Browaeys, and Lode Pollet (2025), “Supersolidity in rydberg tweezer arrays,” Phys. Rev. A 111, L011305. Homrighausen, Ingo, Nils O. Abeling, Valentin Zauner- Stauber, and Jad C. Halimeh (2017), “Anomalous dynam- ical phase in quantum spin chains with long-range interac- tions,” Phy...

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adv3255 2025

[48] [48]

On-chip quantum simulation with superconducting cir- cuits,

Houck, Andrew A, Hakan E T¨ ureci, and Jens Koch (2012), “On-chip quantum simulation with superconducting cir- cuits,” Nature Physics 8 (4), 292–299. Hu, Yu-Min, and Biao Lian (2024), “From the quantum breakdown model to the lattice gauge theory,” AAPPS Bul- letin 34 (1),

work page 2012

[49] [49]

Superconducting quantum computing: a review,

Huang, He-Liang, Dachao Wu, Daojin Fan, and Xiaobo Zhu (2020a), “Superconducting quantum computing: a review,” Science China Information Sciences 63 (8), 180501. Huang, Hsin-Yuan, Richard Kueng, and John Preskill (2020b), “Predicting many properties of a quantum sys- tem from very few measurements,” Nature Physics16 (10), 1050–1057. Huang, Ke, Yu Wang, an...

work page 2021

[50] [50]

Onset of a quantum phase transition with a trapped ion quantum simulator,

Islam, R, EE Edwards, K Kim, S Korenblit, C Noh, H Carmichael, G-D Lin, L-M Duan, C-C Joseph Wang, JK Freericks, et al. (2011), “Onset of a quantum phase transition with a trapped ion quantum simulator,” Nature communications 2 (1),

work page 2011

[51] [51]

Emergence and frustration of magnetism with variable-range interac- tions in a quantum simulator,

Islam, R, S Korenblit, J Smith, A Lee, EE Edwards, C-CJ Wang, JK Freericks, and C Monroe (2013), “Emergence and frustration of magnetism with variable-range interac- tions in a quantum simulator,” science 340 (6132), 583–

work page 2013

[52] [52]

Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system,

Islam, Rajibul, Ruichao Ma, Philipp M Preiss, M Eric Tai, Alexander Lukin, Matthew Rispoli, and Markus Greiner (2015), “Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system,” Nature 528 (7580), 77–83. Ivanov, Andrew N, and Olexei I. Motrunich (2025a), “Many exact area-law scar eigenstates in the nonintegrable pxp and related models,” arXiv:2503.16...

work page arXiv 2015

[53] [53]

Canonical momenta in digitized SU(2) lattice gauge theory: definition and free theory,

Jakobs, Timo, Marco Garofalo, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Johann Ostmeyer, Dominik Rolfes, Simone Romiti, and Carsten Urbach (2023), “Canonical momenta in digitized SU(2) lattice gauge theory: definition and free theory,” The European Physical Journal C 83 (7),

work page 2023

[54] [54]

Nonthermal states arising from confinement in one and two dimensions,

James, Andrew J A, Robert M. Konik, and Neil J. Robinson (2019), “Nonthermal states arising from confinement in one and two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130603. Jaynes, Edwin T, and Frederick W Cummings (1963), “Com- parison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser,” Proceedings of the IEEE 51 (1), 89–109. J...

work page 2019

[55] [55]

Real-time scattering in ising field theory using matrix product states,

Jha, Raghav G, Ashley Milsted, Dominik Neuenfeld, John Preskill, and Pedro Vieira (2025), “Real-time scattering in ising field theory using matrix product states,” Physical Review Research 7 (2), 023266. Jha, Raghav G, Felix Ringer, George Siopsis, and Shane Thompson (2023), “Toward quantum computa- tions of the o(3) model using qumodes,” arXiv preprint a...

work page arXiv 2025

[56] [56]

Lattice quantum chromodynamics and electrodynamics on a universal quan- tum computer,

Kan, Angus, and Yunseong Nam (2021), “Lattice quantum chromodynamics and electrodynamics on a universal quan- tum computer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.12769. Kane, Charles L, and Eugene J Mele (2005), “Quantum spin hall effect in graphene,” Physical review letters 95 (22), 226801. Kane, Christopher, Dorota M Grabowska, Benjamin Nach- man, and Christian W ...

work page arXiv 2021

[57] [57]

Karch, S

Karch, Simon, Souvik Bandyopadhyay, Zheng-Hang Sun, Alexander Impertro, SeungJung Huh, Irene Prieto Rodr´ ıguez, Julian F. Wienand, Wolfgang Ketterle, Markus Heyl, Anatoli Polkovnikov, Immanuel Bloch, and Monika Aidelsburger (2025), “Probing quantum many-body dynamics using subsystem loschmidt echos,” arXiv:2501.16995 [cond-mat.quant-gas]. Karle, Volker, ...

work page arXiv 2025

[58] [58]

Kebriˇ c, J

Kaufman, Adam M, M Eric Tai, Alexander Lukin, Matthew Rispoli, Robert Schittko, Philipp M Preiss, and Markus Greiner (2016b), “Quantum thermalization through en- tanglement in an isolated many-body system,” Science 353 (6301), 794–800. Kebriˇ c, Matjaˇ z, Jad C Halimeh, Ulrich Schollw¨ ock, and Fabian Grusdt (2023), “Confinement in 1+1D Z2 Lattice Gauge T...

work page arXiv 2023

[59] [59]

Some implications of a cosmologi- cal phase transition,

Kibble, Tom WB (1980), “Some implications of a cosmologi- cal phase transition,” Physics Reports 67 (1), 183–199. Kim, Kihwan, M-S Chang, Rajibul Islam, Simcha Koren- blit, L-M Duan, and Christopher Monroe (2009), “Entan- glement and tunable spin-spin couplings between trapped ions¡? format?¿ using multiple transverse modes,” Physical review letters 103 (...

work page 1980

[60] [60]

Wavefunction preparation and resampling using a quantum computer

Kitaev, A Yu (2003), “Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons,” Annals of physics 303 (1), 2–30. Kitaev, Alexei (2006), “Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond,” Annals of Physics 321 (1), 2–111. Kitaev, Alexei, and William A Webb (2008), “Wavefunction preparation and resampling using a quantum computer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:0801.0342. Kivlich...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

[61] [61]

Fault-Tolerant Postselected Quantum Computation: Schemes

Knill, E (2004), “Fault-tolerant postselected quantum com- putation: Schemes,” arXiv:quant-ph/0402171 [quant-ph]. Knolle, Johannes, and Roderich Moessner (2019), “A field guide to spin liquids,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10 (1), 451–472. Kn¨ orzer, Johannes, Tao Shi, Eugene Demler, and J Igna- cio Cirac (2022), “Spin-holstein models in tra...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

[62] [62]

Entanglement hamil- tonian tomography in quantum simulation,

Kokail, Christian, Rick van Bijnen, Andreas Elben, Benoˆ ıt Vermersch, and Peter Zoller (2021), “Entanglement hamil- tonian tomography in quantum simulation,” Nature Physics 17 (8), 936–942. Kokail, Christian, Christine Maier, Rick van Bijnen, Tiff Bry- dges, Manoj K Joshi, Petar Jurcevic, Christine A Muschik, Pietro Silvi, Rainer Blatt, Christian F Roos,...

work page 2021

[63] [63]

A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits,

Krantz, Philip, Morten Kjaergaard, Fei Yan, Terry P Or- lando, Simon Gustavsson, and William D Oliver (2019), “A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits,” Applied physics reviews 6 (2). Kranzl, Florian, Stefan Birnkammer, Manoj K Joshi, Alvise Bastianello, Rainer Blatt, Michael Knap, and Christian F Roos (2023), “Observation of magnon bound sta...

work page arXiv 2019

[64] [64]

Stabilizer r´ enyi entropy,

Leone, Lorenzo, Salvatore FE Oliviero, and Alioscia Hamma (2022), “Stabilizer r´ enyi entropy,” Physical Review Letters 128 (5), 050402. Lerose, Alessio (2024), “Simulating schwinger model dynamics with quasi-one-dimensional qubit arrays,” arXiv:2409.14544 [quant-ph]. Lerose, Alessio, Tommaso Parolini, Rosario Fazio, Dmitry A. Abanin, and Silvia Pappalard...

work page arXiv 2022

[65] [65]

Femtoscopy in relativistic heavy ion colli- sions: two decades of progress,

Lisa, Michael Annan, Scott Pratt, Ron Soltz, and Urs Wiede- mann (2005), “Femtoscopy in relativistic heavy ion colli- sions: two decades of progress,” Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55 (1), 357–402. Liu, Fangli, Rex Lundgren, Paraj Titum, Guido Pagano, Jiehang Zhang, Christopher Monroe, and Alexey V Gor- shkov (2019), “Confined quasiparticle dynamics in long...

work page 2005

[66] [66]

Towards a variational jordan–lee–preskill quan- tum algorithm,

Liu, Junyu, Zimu Li, Han Zheng, Xiao Yuan, and Jinzhao Sun (2022b), “Towards a variational jordan–lee–preskill quan- tum algorithm,” Machine Learning: Science and Technol- ogy 3 (4), 045030. Liu, Yuan, Shraddha Singh, Kevin C Smith, Eleanor Crane, 85 John M Martyn, Alec Eickbusch, Alexander Schuckert, Richard D Li, Jasmine Sinanan-Singh, Micheline B Soley...

work page arXiv 2024

[67] [67]

Hamiltonian Simulation in the Interaction Picture

Low, Guang Hao, and Nathan Wiebe (2018), “Hamilto- nian simulation in the interaction picture,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.00675. Lu, Sirui, Mari Carmen Ba˜ nuls, and J Ignacio Cirac (2021), “Algorithms for quantum simulation at finite energies,” PRX quantum 2 (2), 020321. Lukin, Alexander, Matthew Rispoli, Robert Schittko, M Eric Tai, Adam M Kaufman, Soon...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[68] [68]

Hybrid quantum- classical hierarchy for mitigation of decoherence and de- termination of excited states,

McClean, Jarrod R, Mollie E Kimchi-Schwartz, Jonathan Carter, and Wibe A De Jong (2017), “Hybrid quantum- classical hierarchy for mitigation of decoherence and de- termination of excited states,” Physical Review A 95 (4), 042308. McClean, Jarrod R, Jonathan Romero, Ryan Babbush, and Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik (2016), “The theory of variational hy- brid quantum-c...

work page 2017

[69] [69]

The physics of the quark-gluon plasma,

McLerran, Larry (1986), “The physics of the quark-gluon plasma,” Reviews of Modern Physics 58 (4),

work page 1986

[70] [70]

Lattice schwinger model: Confinement, anomalies, chiral fermions, and all that,

Melnikov, Kirill, and Marvin Weinstein (2000), “Lattice schwinger model: Confinement, anomalies, chiral fermions, and all that,” Physical Review D 62 (9), 094504. Metag, V (1993), “Near-threshold particle production: A probe for resonance matter formation in relativistic heavy ion collisions,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics30, 75–88. Meth, Micha...

work page arXiv 2000

[71] [71]

Fate of quantum many-body scars in the presence of disorder,

Mondragon-Shem, Ian, Maxim G. Vavilov, and Ivar Martin (2021), “Fate of quantum many-body scars in the presence of disorder,” PRX Quantum 2, 030349. Montvay, Istv´ an, and Gernot M¨ unster (1994),Quantum fields on a lattice (Cambridge University Press). Mori, Takashi, Tatsuhiko N Ikeda, Eriko Kaminishi, and Masahito Ueda (2018), “Thermalization and prethe...

work page arXiv 2021

[72] [72]

Thermalization of gauge theories from their entanglement spectrum,

Mueller, Niklas, Torsten V Zache, and Robert Ott (2022), “Thermalization of gauge theories from their entanglement spectrum,” Physical Review Letters 129 (1), 011601. Mukherjee, Bhaskar, Debasish Banerjee, K. Sengupta, and Arnab Sen (2021), “Minimal model for hilbert space frag- mentation with local constraints,” Phys. Rev. B 104, 155117. M¨ uller, Berndt...

work page arXiv 2022

[73] [73]

Naturally weak cp violation,

Nelson, Ann (1984), “Naturally weak cp violation,” Physics Letters B 136 (5-6), 387–391. Nevado, Pedro, Samuel Fern´ andez-Lorenzo, and Diego Por- ras (2017), “Topological edge states in periodically driven trapped-ion chains,” Physical Review Letters 119 (21), 210401. Nevado, Pedro, and Diego Porras (2016), “Hidden frustrated interactions and quantum ann...

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1819316116 1984

[74] [74]

Error-corrected fermionic quantum processors with neu- tral atoms,

Ott, Robert, Daniel Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, Torsten V Zache, Pe- ter Zoller, Adam M Kaufman, and Hannes Pichler (2025), “Error-corrected fermionic quantum processors with neu- tral atoms,” Physical Review Letters 135 (9), 090601. Ott, Robert, Torsten V Zache, Fred Jendrzejewski, and J¨ urgen Berges (2021), “Scalable cold-atom quantum sim- ulator for two-dimens...

work page arXiv 2025

[75] [75]

String breaking in zero-temperature lattice QCD

Pedersen, Simon Panyella, and Nikolaj Thomas Zinner (2021), “Lattice gauge theory and dynamical quantum phase transitions using noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices,” Physical Review B 103 (23), 235103. Pennanen, P, Christopher Michael, UKQCD Collaboration, et al. (2000), “String breaking in zero-temperature lattice QCD,” arXiv preprint hep-lat/000101...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

[76] [76]

Finding periodic orbits in pro- jected quantum many-body dynamics,

Petrova, Elena, Marko Ljubotina, G¨ okhan Yalnız, and Maksym Serbyn (2025), “Finding periodic orbits in pro- jected quantum many-body dynamics,” arXiv:2504.12472 [quant-ph]. Pichler, Hannes, Guanyu Zhu, Alireza Seif, Peter Zoller, and Mohammad Hafezi (2016), “Measurement protocol for the entanglement spectrum of cold atoms,” Physical Review X 6 (4), 04103...

work page arXiv 2025

[77] [77]

Shear viscosity of strongly coupled n= 4 supersym- metric yang-mills plasma,

Policastro, Giuseppe, Dan T Son, and Andrei O Starinets (2001), “Shear viscosity of strongly coupled n= 4 supersym- metric yang-mills plasma,” Physical Review Letters 87 (8), 081601. Polkovnikov, Anatoli, and Dries Sels (2016), “Thermalization in small quantum systems,” Science 353 (6301), 752–753. Pomarico, Domenico, Leonardo Cosmai, Paolo Facchi, Cosmo ...

work page arXiv 2001

[78] [78]

Simple z2 lattice gauge theories at finite fermion density,

Prosko, Christian, Shu-Ping Lee, and Joseph Maciejko (2017), “Simple z2 lattice gauge theories at finite fermion density,” Physical Review B 96 (20), 205104. Puertas Mart´ ınez, Javier, S´ ebastien L´ eger, Nicolas Gheeraert, R´ emy Dassonneville, Luca Planat, Farshad Foroughi, Yuriy Krupko, Olivier Buisson, C´ ecile Naud, Wiebke Hasch- Guichard, et al. (...

work page 2017

[79] [79]

Observing frustrated quantum magnetism in two-dimensional ion crystals,

Qiao, Mu, Zhengyang Cai, Ye Wang, Botao Du, Naijun Jin, Wentao Chen, Pengfei Wang, Chunyang Luan, Erfu Gao, Ximo Sun, et al. (2022), “Observing frustrated quantum magnetism in two-dimensional ion crystals,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.07283. Qiu, L-Y, H-Y Liang, Y-B Yang, H-X Yang, T Tian, Y Xu, and L-M Duan (2020), “Observation of generalized kibble- zurek...

work page arXiv 2022

[80] [80]

Self-mitigating Trotter circuits for SU(2) lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer,

Rahman, Sarmed, Randy Lewis, Emanuele Mendicelli, and Sarah Powell (2022), “Self-mitigating Trotter circuits for SU(2) lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer,” Phys- ical Review D 106 (7), 074502. Rajput, Abhishek, Alessandro Roggero, and Nathan Wiebe (2022), “Hybridized methods for quantum simulation in the interaction picture,” Quantum 6,

work page 2022