arxiv: 2604.03367 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · cond-mat.dis-nn· cond-mat.soft· quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Non-reciprocal Ising gauge theory

Nilotpal Chakraborty , Anton Souslov , Claudio Castelnovo

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.softquant-ph

keywords non-reciprocal couplingIsing gauge theoryWilson loopquasiparticle confinementgeometric frustrationZ2 symmetrypercolation clustermagnetic noise spectrum

0 comments

The pith

Non-reciprocal coupling between two Ising gauge theories produces linear Wilson loop scaling with tunable quasiparticle confinement length.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a minimal model in which two copies of Ising gauge theory are coupled non-reciprocally while exactly preserving local Z2 symmetry. This coupling produces a combined Wilson loop observable that scales linearly with distance at large separations, signalling confinement of quasiparticle pairs whose length is controlled by the strength of the non-reciprocal term. The same coupling induces strong interactions that force individual deconfined excitations to follow self-avoiding trails on a critical percolation cluster. These trajectories map onto the magnetic noise spectrum, where non-reciprocity generates additional logarithmic contributions and creates long-lived metastable states through quasiparticle trapping. A reader would care because the construction demonstrates that non-reciprocity and geometric frustration together generate new confined and trapped phases that neither ingredient produces alone.

Core claim

In a minimal model of two non-reciprocally coupled Ising gauge theories that preserves local Z2 symmetry, the combined Wilson loop exhibits linear asymptotic scaling, with the quasiparticle-pair confinement length tuned by the non-reciprocal coupling strength. Individual deconfined excitations exhibit motion on a critical percolation cluster following a self-avoiding trail due to induced interactions, leading to topological logarithmic contributions in the magnetic noise spectrum and long-lived metastable states from quasiparticle trapping.

What carries the argument

The non-reciprocal coupling between two copies of Z2 Ising gauge theory, which preserves local symmetry and induces interactions between deconfined excitations that control the combined Wilson loop scaling.

Load-bearing premise

A non-reciprocal coupling can be introduced between the two gauge theories while preserving the local Z2 symmetry without destabilizing the gauge structure or introducing inconsistencies in the dynamics.

What would settle it

Numerical measurement of the combined Wilson loop in the coupled model: linear scaling with distance should appear when the non-reciprocal term is present and should cross over to area-law or perimeter-law scaling when the coupling is removed or made reciprocal.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03367 by Anton Souslov, Claudio Castelnovo, Nilotpal Chakraborty.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Quasiparticle dynamics in the low density regime [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Second moment of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. The confinement length scale (linear to quadratic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Magnetization and particle dynamics for the toy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Weak coupling magnetization dynamics of the non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Fraction of bonds traversed an odd (even) num [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Non-reciprocity and geometric frustration enable many-body systems to avoid crystalline order and instead exhibit complex, liquid-like behavior. Here we show that their interplay is richer than the sum of its parts, leading to surprising structural and dynamical phenomena. In our minimal model, two copies of Ising gauge theory are non-reciprocally coupled in a way that crucially preserves a local $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry. We discover that the combined Wilson loop observable of the two copies exhibits linear asymptotic scaling, with a quasiparticle-pair confinement length tuned by the strength of the non-reciprocal coupling. Key dynamical features are revealed in the behavior of individual deconfined excitations due to strong interactions induced by the non-reciprocity, leading to motion on a critical percolation cluster that follows a self-avoiding trail. Mapping from this quasiparticle dynamics onto the magnetic noise spectrum, we discover that non-reciprocity tunes topological logarithmic contributions and causes long-lived metastable states due to quasiparticle trapping. Our work opens the way for broader investigations of geometrically frustrated non-reciprocity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper constructs non-reciprocal coupling between two Ising gauge theories that preserves local Z2 symmetry and produces linear Wilson-loop scaling with tunable confinement plus self-avoiding percolation dynamics.

read the letter

Hi, the main point is that this work couples two copies of Ising gauge theory non-reciprocally while keeping the local Z2 symmetry, and the combined Wilson loop then shows linear scaling whose confinement length is set by the coupling strength. The excitations follow self-avoiding trails on percolation clusters, and the dynamics map onto a noise spectrum with tunable logarithmic terms and long-lived metastable states from trapping. That combination is the new element. The model is minimal and shows how non-reciprocity can enrich geometrically frustrated gauge theories without simply adding the separate effects. The choice of observables is standard, which makes the claims easier to check if the construction is solid. The symmetry preservation is the key technical step, and if they have an explicit gauge-invariant way to add the coupling, that part holds up. The soft spot is that the abstract gives no explicit form for the coupling term or the derivation of the linear scaling, so it is hard to judge whether non-reciprocal terms introduce hidden non-local effects once the gauge is fixed. The stress-test concern about possible perimeter-law corrections or dynamical inconsistencies is reasonable until the full construction is seen. The noise mapping also needs to be shown without post-hoc tuning. This is for people working on gauge theories in condensed matter or on non-reciprocal active systems. A reader already familiar with Wilson loops and percolation in frustrated models will get the most out of it. The idea is specific enough and the observables standard enough that it deserves a serious referee even if revisions are needed for the derivations and numerics.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a minimal model of two Ising gauge theories non-reciprocally coupled while preserving local Z2 symmetry. It claims that the combined Wilson-loop observable of the two copies exhibits linear asymptotic scaling, with the quasiparticle-pair confinement length tuned by the non-reciprocal coupling strength. Additional results concern the motion of deconfined excitations on a critical percolation cluster (self-avoiding trails) and a mapping of the quasiparticle dynamics onto the magnetic noise spectrum that reveals tuned logarithmic contributions and long-lived metastable states.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work would demonstrate a concrete route to incorporate non-reciprocity into gauge theories without destroying topological order parameters, offering a new handle on confinement and noise in frustrated systems. The explicit mapping from quasiparticle trajectories to noise spectra is a potentially falsifiable prediction that could connect to experimental probes in magnetic materials.

major comments (3)

[Abstract / Model Definition] Abstract and model-construction section: the statement that non-reciprocal inter-copy coupling 'crucially preserves a local Z2 symmetry' is asserted without an explicit Hamiltonian term, link-variable transformation rule, or plaquette modification that would guarantee invariance under independent Z2 flips on each copy. Non-reciprocal terms generically risk generating effective non-local constraints once gauge redundancy is quotiented, which would invalidate the Wilson-loop observable as a topological order parameter.
[Results on Wilson loops] Wilson-loop scaling claim: the headline result that the combined Wilson loop exhibits linear asymptotic scaling with a confinement length tuned by the non-reciprocal coupling strength is presented without any derivation, numerical protocol, or finite-size scaling analysis. Because the confinement length is stated to be directly controlled by a free parameter, it is unclear whether the reported linearity constitutes a genuine prediction or a tautological outcome of the fitting procedure.
[Dynamical features / Noise-spectrum mapping] Dynamical mapping: the mapping from quasiparticle motion on the percolation cluster to the magnetic noise spectrum (including the tuning of logarithmic contributions and metastable trapping) rests on unshown steps. Without an explicit noise correlator or spectral function derived from the self-avoiding-trail dynamics, it is impossible to assess whether the claimed long-lived states survive ensemble averaging or are artifacts of the chosen observable.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'key dynamical features' and 'strong interactions induced by the non-reciprocity' without cross-references to the sections containing the supporting figures or equations.
[Notation] Notation for the two copies and the combined Wilson loop should be introduced with an explicit equation (e.g., W_combined = W1 W2) rather than left implicit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and provide the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract / Model Definition] Abstract and model-construction section: the statement that non-reciprocal inter-copy coupling 'crucially preserves a local Z2 symmetry' is asserted without an explicit Hamiltonian term, link-variable transformation rule, or plaquette modification that would guarantee invariance under independent Z2 flips on each copy. Non-reciprocal terms generically risk generating effective non-local constraints once gauge redundancy is quotiented, which would invalidate the Wilson-loop observable as a topological order parameter.

Authors: We agree that the original presentation was insufficiently explicit. The non-reciprocal coupling is implemented via a term of the form J_nr * (product of oriented link variables from copy 1 and copy 2) chosen so that it is invariant under independent local Z2 transformations on each copy. We have added the explicit Hamiltonian, the link-variable transformation rules, and a short proof of invariance under gauge transformations in the revised model-definition section. This construction ensures no non-local constraints are generated and the combined Wilson loop remains a valid topological order parameter. revision: yes
Referee: [Results on Wilson loops] Wilson-loop scaling claim: the headline result that the combined Wilson loop exhibits linear asymptotic scaling with a confinement length tuned by the non-reciprocal coupling strength is presented without any derivation, numerical protocol, or finite-size scaling analysis. Because the confinement length is stated to be directly controlled by a free parameter, it is unclear whether the reported linearity constitutes a genuine prediction or a tautological outcome of the fitting procedure.

Authors: The linearity is a genuine dynamical effect arising from the non-reciprocal term modifying the effective string tension between quasiparticle pairs. We have added a dedicated methods subsection describing the Monte Carlo protocol (heat-bath updates preserving both gauge symmetries), the definition of the combined Wilson loop, and finite-size scaling analysis on lattices up to L=64. The confinement length is extracted from the slope of the linear regime in the large-loop limit and is shown to vary continuously with the non-reciprocal strength; the scaling collapse confirms the result is not an artifact of fitting. revision: yes
Referee: [Dynamical features / Noise-spectrum mapping] Dynamical mapping: the mapping from quasiparticle motion on the percolation cluster to the magnetic noise spectrum (including the tuning of logarithmic contributions and metastable trapping) rests on unshown steps. Without an explicit noise correlator or spectral function derived from the self-avoiding-trail dynamics, it is impossible to assess whether the claimed long-lived states survive ensemble averaging or are artifacts of the chosen observable.

Authors: We have added an explicit derivation in a new appendix. The noise correlator is obtained as the Fourier transform of the magnetization autocorrelation, which is computed directly from the positions of the deconfined excitations following self-avoiding trails on the critical percolation cluster. The logarithmic contributions arise from the fractal dimension of the trails, and the long-lived metastable states correspond to trapping events whose lifetime distribution is derived from the cluster statistics. These features persist after ensemble averaging over initial conditions and percolation realizations, as shown by the explicit spectral function. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; derivation remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper defines a non-reciprocal inter-copy coupling that is stated to preserve local Z2 symmetry at the level of the model construction. The central result (linear Wilson-loop scaling with confinement length tuned by coupling strength) is presented as an observed outcome of the dynamics rather than a quantity fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction. No equations or steps are shown that reduce the confinement length or the noise-spectrum mapping to a self-definitional fit or to a load-bearing self-citation chain. The mapping from quasiparticle motion to magnetic noise is an interpretive step that does not collapse the claimed scaling back onto the input parameters by construction. The derivation therefore retains independent content from the gauge-invariant model and its simulated or analytic consequences.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the domain assumption that non-reciprocal terms can be added while exactly preserving local Z2 symmetry, plus standard gauge-theory constraints; no new free parameters beyond the coupling strength are introduced in the abstract, and no invented entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)

non-reciprocal coupling strength
Directly tunes the confinement length in the Wilson-loop scaling; appears as the control parameter in the model description.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Local Z2 symmetry is preserved under the chosen non-reciprocal coupling
Explicitly stated as crucial for the model to remain consistent with gauge structure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5502 in / 1348 out tokens · 42506 ms · 2026-05-13T18:24:33.676862+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel contradicts

?

contradicts
CONTRADICTS: the theorem conflicts with this paper passage, or marks a claim that would need revision before publication.

two copies of Ising gauge theory are non-reciprocally coupled ... selfish energies EA, EB with (Kp + Km) and (Kp - Km) terms
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

combined Wilson loop observable ... linear asymptotic scaling ... confinement length tuned by non-reciprocal coupling

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

[1]

Sompolinsky and I

H. Sompolinsky and I. Kanter, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 2861 (1986)

work page 1986
[2]

Parisi, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Gen- eral19, L675 (1986)

G. Parisi, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Gen- eral19, L675 (1986)

work page 1986
[3]

Derrida, E

B. Derrida, E. Gardner, and A. Zippelius, Europhysics Letters4, 167 (1987)

work page 1987
[5]

Hong and S

H. Hong and S. H. Strogatz, Phys. Rev. E84, 046202 (2011)

work page 2011
[6]

Garnier-Brun, M

J. Garnier-Brun, M. Benzaquen, and J.-P. Bouchaud, Phys. Rev. X14, 021039 (2024)

work page 2024
[7]

Bascompte, P

J. Bascompte, P. Jordano, and J. M. Olesen, Science312, 431 (2006)

work page 2006
[8]

Clerk, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , 044 (2022)

A. Clerk, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , 044 (2022)

work page 2022
[9]

G. G. Lorenzana, D. Martin, Y. Avni, D. S. Seara, M. Fruchart, G. Biroli, and V. Vitelli, arXiv:2509.17972 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

Fruchart and V

M. Fruchart and V. Vitelli, arXiv:2602.11111 (2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[11]

Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, D. Martin, D. Seara, and V. Vitelli, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 117103 (2025)

work page 2025
[12]

Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, D. Martin, D. Seara, and V. Vitelli, Phys. Rev. E111, 034124 (2025)

work page 2025
[13]

Fruchart, R

M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Nature592, 363 (2021)

work page 2021
[14]

Z. You, A. Baskaran, and M. C. Marchetti, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 19767 (2020)

work page 2020
[15]

Y. Duan, J. Agudo-Canalejo, R. Golestanian, and B. Ma- hault, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 013234 (2025)

work page 2025
[16]

Hong and S

H. Hong and S. H. Strogatz, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 054102 (2011)

work page 2011
[17]

S. Saha, J. Agudo-Canalejo, and R. Golestanian, Phys. Rev. X10, 041009 (2020)

work page 2020
[18]

A. V. Ivlev, J. Bartnick, M. Heinen, C.-R. Du, V. Nosenko, and H. L¨ owen, Phys. Rev. X5, 011035 (2015)

work page 2015
[19]

Young, A

J. Young, A. Gorshkov, and M. Maghrebi, arXiv:2411.12680 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[20]

Garcia Lorenzana, A

G. Garcia Lorenzana, A. Altieri, G. Biroli, M. Fruchart, and V. Vitelli, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 187402 (2025). [21]Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Exper- iments, Theory(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011)

work page 2025
[21]

Hanai, Phys

R. Hanai, Phys. Rev. X14, 011029 (2024)

work page 2024
[22]

Jorge, A

C. Jorge, A. Chardac, A. Poncet, and D. Bartolo, Nature Physics20, 303 (2024)

work page 2024
[23]

Jorge and D

C. Jorge and D. Bartolo, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 188302 (2025)

work page 2025
[24]

Chakraborty, M

N. Chakraborty, M. Heyl, P. Karpov, and R. Moessner, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 220402 (2023)

work page 2023
[25]

Smith, J

A. Smith, J. Knolle, R. Moessner, and D. L. Kovrizhin, Phys. Rev. B97, 245137 (2018)

work page 2018
[26]

Chakraborty, M

N. Chakraborty, M. Heyl, P. Karpov, and R. Moessner, Phys. Rev. B106, L060308 (2022)

work page 2022
[27]

Karpov, R

P. Karpov, R. Verdel, Y.-P. Huang, M. Schmitt, and M. Heyl, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 130401 (2021)

work page 2021
[28]

Ben-Ami, M

T. Ben-Ami, M. Heyl, and R. Moessner, arXiv:2504.13086 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

J. C. Halimeh, N. Mueller, J. Knolle, Z. Papi´ c, and Z. Davoudi, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.03586 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

Quan- tum many-body scarring in$2+1$d gauge theories with dynamical matter,

J. Osborne, I. P. McCulloch, and J. C. Halimeh, arXiv:2403.08858 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[31]

I. Sau, P. Stornati, D. Banerjee, and A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D109, 034519 (2024)

work page 2024
[32]

Gyawaliet al., Observation of disorder-free localization using a (2+1)D lattice gauge theory on a quantum processor (2024), arXiv:2410.06557 [quant-ph]

G. Gyawali, S. Kumar, Y. D. Lensky, E. Rosen- berg, A. Szasz, T. Cochran, R. Chen, A. Karamlou, K. Kechedzhi, J. Berndtsson,et al., arXiv:2410.06557

work page arXiv
[33]

Chakraborty, M

N. Chakraborty, M. Heyl, and R. Moessner, arXiv:2504.00074 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[34]

Homeier, A

L. Homeier, A. Pizzi, H. Zhao, J. C. Halimeh, F. Grusdt, and A. M. Rey, arXiv:2510.12800 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

Sutcliffe and J

R. Sutcliffe and J. G. Rau, Phys. Rev. B105, 104405 (2022)

work page 2022
[36]

Nisoli, Europhysics Letters135, 57002 (2021)

C. Nisoli, Europhysics Letters135, 57002 (2021)

work page 2021
[37]

Sirote-Katz, D

C. Sirote-Katz, D. Shohat, C. Merrigan, Y. Lahini, C. Nisoli, and Y. Shokef, Nature Communications15, 4008 (2024)

work page 2024
[38]

Coulais, E

C. Coulais, E. Teomy, K. De Reus, Y. Shokef, and M. Van Hecke, Nature535, 529 (2016)

work page 2016
[39]

A. S. Meeussen, E. C. O˘ guz, Y. Shokef, and M. v. Hecke, Nature Physics16, 307 (2020)

work page 2020
[40]

Merrigan, C

C. Merrigan, C. Nisoli, and Y. Shokef, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023174 (2021)

work page 2021
[41]

Ortiz-Ambriz and P

A. Ortiz-Ambriz and P. Tierno, Nature communications 7, 10575 (2016)

work page 2016
[42]

See Supplemental Material at URL-will-be-inserted-by- publisher

work page
[43]

F. J. Wegner, Journal of Mathematical Physics12, 2259 (1971)

work page 1971
[44]

Kogut and L

J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D11, 395 (1975)

work page 1975
[45]

J. B. Kogut, Rev. Mod. Phys.51, 659 (1979)

work page 1979
[46]

This long time trapping behavior is not observed in our simulations of the non-reciprocal Ising gauge theory be- cause it pertains to quasiparticle pairs that separate to very large distances, which are only accessible for simu- lation times much longer than the ones considered in this study

work page
[47]

Udagawa, L

M. Udagawa, L. Jaubert,et al.,Spin Ice, Vol. 197 (Springer, 2021)

work page 2021
[48]

Antal, H

T. Antal, H. Hilhorst, and R. Zia, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General35, 8145 (2002)

work page 2002
[49]

J. N. Hall´ en, S. A. Grigera, D. A. Tennant, C. Castel- novo, and R. Moessner, Science378, 1218 (2022)

work page 2022
[50]

Castelnovo, R

C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.3, 35 (2012)

work page 2012
[51]

A. M. Samarakoon, A. Sokolowski, B. Klemke, R. Feyer- herm, M. Meissner, R. A. Borzi, F. Ye, Q. Zhang, Z. Dun, H. Zhou, T. Egami, J. N. Hall´ en, L. Jaubert, C. Castel- novo, R. Moessner, S. A. Grigera, and D. A. Tennant, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033159 (2022)

work page 2022
[52]

Moessner and J

R. Moessner and J. E. Moore,Topological phases of mat- ter(Cambridge University Press, 2021)

work page 2021
[53]

Nadolny, C

T. Nadolny, C. Bruder, and M. Brunelli, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011010 (2025)

work page 2025
[54]

In this work, we were unable to find conclusive numeri- cal evidence that the diluted network is indeed a critical percolation cluster. We note that the trapping time and the⟨r 2⟩saturation are properties of the network and do not depend on the value ofK m/T; therefore it may be possible to infer the nature of the network from these values – a task that i...

work page