REVIEW 6 cited by
Experience with GitHub Copilot for Developer Productivity at Zoominfo
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Experience with GitHub Copilot for Developer Productivity at Zoominfo
read the original abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of GitHub Copilot's deployment and impact on developer productivity at Zoominfo, a leading Go-To-Market (GTM) Intelligence Platform. We describe our systematic four-phase approach to evaluating and deploying GitHub Copilot across our engineering organization, involving over 400 developers. Our analysis combines both quantitative metrics, focusing on acceptance rates of suggestions given by GitHub Copilot and qualitative feedback given by developers through developer satisfaction surveys. The results show an average acceptance rate of 33% for suggestions and 20% for lines of code, with high developer satisfaction scores of 72%. We also discuss language-specific performance variations, limitations, and lessons learned from this medium-scale enterprise deployment. Our findings contribute to the growing body of knowledge about AI-assisted software development in enterprise settings.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Developers' Experience with Generative AI Beyond Productivity Assessment -- Insights from an Empirical Mixed-Methods Field Study
Mixed-methods study shows developers prefer GenAI for repetitive tasks, benefit from single interaction modes but not combined ones, and gain awareness from study participation.
-
Developers' Experience with Generative AI Beyond Productivity Assessment -- Insights from an Empirical Mixed-Methods Field Study
In a four-day mixed-methods field study of 22 SAP developers, single Copilot interaction modes (in-code or chat) improve efficiency and lower workload while combining them does not, and AI use raises cognitive load on...
-
Analyzing the Presentation, Content, and Utilization of References in LLM-powered Conversational AI Systems
LLM chat systems show large differences in reference quantity and quality, but users rarely click or engage with them.
-
What Motivates Whom? A Survey of Newcomers to OSS and Experienced OSS Practitioners
Demographics and motivations correlate with OSS project-selection preferences, with distinct patterns for newcomers versus experienced practitioners in a 208-person survey.
-
Echo: Learning from Experience Data via User-Driven Refinement
Echo is a framework that harvests user-driven refinements of agent proposals as training signals to align models with real-world needs, demonstrated by raising code completion acceptance from 25.7% to 35.7% in production.
-
EcoAssist: Embedding Sustainability into AI-Assisted Frontend Development
EcoAssist embeds energy estimation and optimization into AI-assisted frontend coding, reducing website energy use by 13-16% in benchmarks while preserving developer productivity.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.