REVIEW 3 cited by
GPTBIAS: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Bias in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Warning: This paper contains content that may be offensive or upsetting. There has been a significant increase in the usage of large language models (LLMs) in various applications, both in their original form and through fine-tuned adaptations. As a result, LLMs have gained popularity and are being widely adopted by a large user community. However, one of the concerns with LLMs is the potential generation of socially biased content. The existing evaluation methods have many constraints, and their results exhibit a limited degree of interpretability. In this work, we propose a bias evaluation framework named GPTBIAS that leverages the high performance of LLMs (e.g., GPT-4 \cite{openai2023gpt4}) to assess bias in models. We also introduce prompts called Bias Attack Instructions, which are specifically designed for evaluating model bias. To enhance the credibility and interpretability of bias evaluation, our framework not only provides a bias score but also offers detailed information, including bias types, affected demographics, keywords, reasons behind the biases, and suggestions for improvement. We conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness and usability of our bias evaluation framework.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
BharatBBQ: A Multilingual Bias Benchmark for Question Answering in the Indian Context
BharatBBQ measures social bias in question-answering models across eight languages and finds that Indian-language examples often elicit more stereotyped answers than English ones.
-
Dutch CrowS-Pairs: Adapting a Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Language Models for Dutch
The paper presents a Dutch adaptation of the CrowS-Pairs bias benchmark and reports bias scores for seven masked and two autoregressive language models across nine demographic categories.
-
B-score: Detecting biases in large language models using response history
LLMs self-correct toward uniform answers in multi-turn repetition, and the gap between single-turn and multi-turn answer rates (B-score) flags biased answers better than verbalized confidence.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.