Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Unveiling the nonrelativistic spin current polarization in an altermagnet

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read RuO2's magnetic spin current is polarized along the Néel vector, once the ordinary spin Hall contribution is subtracted.

desk verdict Clever SMR-based split of magnetic and conventional spin Hall effects in RuO2, but the central claim leans on temperature scalings that are fitted, not proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.18937 v1 pith:XZHAO32O submitted 2024-12-25 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Chang Pan , Shuai Hu , Fanli Yang , Dongchao Yang , Weijia Fan , Zhong Shi , Liqing Pan , Shiming Zhou
show 1 more author
Xuepeng Qiu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismspinHallmagnetoresistancenonrelativisticcurrentNéelvectorrutheniumdioxidetime-reversal-oddeffectpolarization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the nonrelativistic (time-reversal-odd) spin current in altermagnetic RuO$_2$ is polarized essentially along the Néel vector, and that a large conventional time-reversal-even spin Hall effect had masked this in earlier experiments. Using spin Hall magnetoresistance in RuO$_2$/CoFeB from 5 to 360 K, the authors separate the two contributions by their temperature dependence and find the odd component's polarization angle stays near $\theta_N = \arctan(c/a) \approx 35^\circ$. This would establish the magnetic origin of the nonrelativistic spin current and explain why earlier measurements saw a tilted polarization.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spin Hall magnetoresistance (SMR) measurement with an added phase-shift analysis. In a RuO$_2$/CoFeB bilayer, a charge current along RuO$_2$[010] generates a spin current whose polarization makes an angle $\Delta\beta$ with the $y$ axis, shifting the SMR angular dependence to $\Delta R\cos(2(\beta-\Delta\beta))$; calibrating with a Pt/CoFeB reference fixes $\Delta\beta$, giving the $y$ and $z$ components of the spin Hall conductivity $\sigma_{zx}$. The decomposition then uses the disparate temperature dependence: the odd, magnetic component scales with the electron lifetime $\tau \propto 1/T$ (fitted between 150 and 300 K as $A/T + B$), while the even, spin-orbit component is assumed temperature independent, so the constant $B$ is subtracted to isolate the odd part over the full range.

What would settle it

Measure the spin Hall magnetoresistance phase shift in RuO$_2$/CoFeB down to 5 K while independently determining the electron scattering time, and also measure the ordinary spin Hall contribution in a nonmagnetic structural analogue; if the extracted time-reversal-even conductivity at low temperature departs from the constant $B$ fitted at 150–300 K, or if $\theta_s^{\mathrm{odd}}$ at 5 K changes with film growth conditions beyond the fit uncertainty, the Néel-vector-locking conclusion would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's terms, the central discovery is that after subtracting the temperature-independent, spin-orbit-coupled even component, the remaining odd spin Hall conductivity in (101)-oriented RuO$_2$ has a polarization angle $\theta_s^{\mathrm{odd}} = \arctan(\sigma_{zx}^{y,\mathrm{odd}}/\sigma_{zx}^{z,\mathrm{odd}})$ close to $\theta_N \approx 35^\circ$ across 5–360 K, pointing along the lattice-derived Néel vector. The measured total polarization is tilted because the even component is not negligible; it even dominates at high temperature. The authors take this as evidence that the nonrelativistic spin current has a magnetic origin and that magnetic order survives in their films despite reports questioning bulk RuO$_2$'s ground state.

Load-bearing premise

The decomposition assumes the ordinary, spin-orbit-driven spin Hall conductivity does not change as the sample cools from 150 K to 5 K, and that the magnetic part grows exactly as $1/T$; both are fixed by a fit only between 150 and 300 K, so if the ordinary part varies at low temperature, the deduced magnetic polarization angle could shift away from the Néel vector.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The previously reported tilted spin polarization in RuO$_2$ is explained as a superposition of a large conventional $y$-polarized spin Hall current and the Néel-vector-polarized odd current, without invoking exotic physics.
  • If the odd spin current is locked to the Néel vector, spin-orbit-torque switching experiments on (101)-oriented RuO$_2$ can use the polarization direction to infer the Néel orientation, making current-driven switching deterministic with respect to it.
  • The temperature dependence offers a practical fingerprint: magnetic spin Hall signals weaken on heating while ordinary spin Hall signals persist, so the SMR phase-shift method can identify magnetic-origin spin currents in other altermagnets and noncollinear antiferromagnets.
  • Film-growth effects such as strain and oxygen vacancies appear to stabilize magnetism in RuO$_2$ films even if bulk RuO$_2$ is nonmagnetic, making the magnetic state a film-dependent property.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the odd polarization is exactly locked to the Néel vector, one could use the SMR phase shift itself as a magnetometer for the antiferromagnetic order parameter, reading the Néel orientation from transport alone.
  • A sharper test would be to repeat the decomposition on (110)-oriented RuO$_2$, where theory permits a different set of polarization components, and check whether $\theta_s^{\mathrm{odd}}$ follows the corresponding Néel projection.
  • The two-parameter $A/T + B$ fit could be validated by measuring the ordinary spin Hall contribution separately in a nonmagnetic structural analogue and comparing its low-temperature magnitude with the assumed constant $B$.
  • Below 150 K, where the fit is extrapolated, the paper's conclusion rests on the unverified stability of the even component; a direct low-temperature measurement of that component would settle whether the Néel-vector locking persists to 5 K.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports SMR measurements on (101)-oriented RuO2/CoFeB bilayers and uses the temperature dependence of the measured spin Hall conductivity to separate a time-reversal-odd (T-odd) component, assumed to scale as 1/T, from a time-reversal-even (T-even) component, assumed to be temperature independent. The authors find that the T-odd spin current polarization angle is approximately arctan(c/a) = 35 degrees over 5 to 360 K, which they identify as the Néel vector direction, and conclude that the nonrelativistic spin current in RuO2 has a magnetic origin. They also find that the T-even component becomes dominant at high temperature, which they use to explain the tilted spin polarization observed in earlier RuO2 experiments.

Significance. If the decomposition were independently validated, the result would resolve an important puzzle: the apparent mismatch between theoretically predicted and experimentally observed spin current polarization in RuO2 would be explained by a large conventional T-even spin Hall component, while the T-odd component would be shown to align with the Néel vector. The SMR-based technique, with the Pt/CoFeB calibration and the use of two crystallographic current directions, is a useful experimental contribution, and the paper explicitly ships a falsifiable prediction: the T-odd polarization angle should track the Néel vector orientation. However, the central decomposition rests on an assumed 1/T and constant functional form that is fitted only over 150-300 K and then extrapolated, and no independent verification or error analysis is provided. For this reason the significance is conditional on the validity of that temperature-dependence assumption.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 4(b,c) and text after Eq. (1)] The load-bearing step is the decomposition σ_zx^z(T) = A_z/T + B_z and σ_zx^y(T) = A_y/T + B_y, with A_z, B_z, A_y, B_y fixed by two-parameter fits restricted to 150-300 K and then used to define the T-even background at all temperatures down to 5 K. This assumes, without independent support, that the T-even spin Hall conductivity is strictly temperature independent below 150 K and that the T-odd part follows exactly 1/T. Both assumptions are questionable: extrinsic T-even mechanisms such as phonon-assisted side jump and skew scattering can be temperature dependent, and the T-odd conductivity can contain an intrinsic relaxation-time-independent contribution. No error bars, goodness-of-fit values, or residuals are reported, so it is not possible to assess whether the data actually discriminate between this model and alternatives. If, for example, the true T-even z-component grows at low temperature, B_z is overestimated and θ_s^odd would move away from 35 degrees. This extrapolation is the basis of the central claim, so it needs to be verified, e.g., by fits with additional functional forms, by showing the decomposition is stable below 150 K, or by an independent measurement of one of the components.
  2. [Discussion after Fig. 4(d)] The conclusion that the T-odd spin current is 'polarized along the Néel vector' requires knowledge of the Néel vector orientation in the measured films, but no magnetic characterization is presented. The angle θ_N = arctan(c/a) = 35 degrees is computed from the lattice parameters and assumes a particular antiferromagnetic domain state. This assumption is especially delicate because the authors themselves cite recent reports (Refs. [56-58]) suggesting a nonmagnetic ground state in RuO2, and they attribute the possible magnetism in their films to strain, oxygen vacancies, interface charge transfer, or anti-site defects, which is speculative. The claim of 'unambiguous evidence of the magnetic origin' therefore needs direct evidence that the films are antiferromagnetic and that the Néel vector has the assumed orientation, for example from magnetometry, neutron or muon measurements, or a control experiment that reverses the Néel vector.
  3. [Eq. (1) and derivation of σ_zx] The conversion from the SMR magnitude to the spin Hall conductivity uses Eq. (1), which assumes zero longitudinal spin absorption and a transparent RuO2/CoFeB interface, and then uses a spin diffusion length λ_sf = 12.2 nm taken from Ref. [62] for a different RuO2 film. These assumptions can affect both the magnitude and the phase of the extracted spin current polarization, and no uncertainty propagation is given. The paper should state how sensitive the final θ_s^odd values are to these modeling choices, or at least provide error bars that include them.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] There are several grammatical errors: 'spin degree of freedoms' should be 'spin degrees of freedom'; 'the T-odd spin current is indeed have a magnetic origin' should be 'the T-odd spin current indeed has a magnetic origin'; and 'the 1/T form is itself an assumption' is repeated in different wording. The writing should be polished throughout.
  2. [Fig. 3(c,d) caption and text] The figure captions refer to current along '[1_01]' and '[010]' but the text uses the overline notation inconsistently and the subscripted digits are not rendered correctly in several places, which may confuse readers about the crystallographic directions.
  3. [Fig. 4(d)] The plot in Fig. 4(d) would benefit from error bars and a horizontal line at θ_N = 35 degrees, so that the reader can directly judge how close the extracted θ_s^odd is to the Néel vector direction over the full temperature range.
  4. [References] Reference [41] is cited as evidence of tilted spin current in RuO2, but the paper does not explicitly quantify the discrepancy between its own θ_s^odd and the earlier reported tilt angle; adding a direct quantitative comparison would strengthen the claim that the decomposition resolves the earlier puzzle.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the claimed Néel-vector-aligned T-odd polarization is an output of an empirical temperature decomposition, not an input to the fit.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: SMR angular scans give the total spin Hall conductivity vector (sigma_zx^y, sigma_zx^z) at each temperature; each component is fitted to A/T + B over 150–300 K; B is identified as the T-even part; the residual sigma - B is treated as the T-odd part; and theta_s^odd is computed as arctan(sigma_zx^y,odd / sigma_zx^z,odd). Nothing in this chain defines the T-odd polarization angle in terms of the Néel vector, nor does the fit constrain A_y/A_z to equal tan(35°). The Néel angle theta_N = arctan(c/a) is introduced only as an external lattice-geometry comparison after the decomposition, so the near-agreement of theta_s^odd with theta_N is a genuine output rather than a self-fulfilling input. The decomposition does rely on physical assumptions—that the T-even component is temperature independent and the T-odd component scales as 1/T in the fit window—and the extrapolation from 150–300 K to 5–360 K is not independently validated. That is a legitimate concern about robustness and about the strength of the 'unambiguous evidence' claim, but it is model underdetermination, not circularity. Self-citations (e.g., refs [36,37]) appear only in contextual statements about prior observations and do not carry the load of the SMR extraction, which is based on eq. (1) and cited external parameters. No step was found that reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The central claim rests on a two-component decomposition with four fitted amplitudes and strong domain assumptions about the temperature scaling of odd and even spin Hall conductivities and about the Néel vector orientation.

free parameters (4)
  • A (z-polarized T-odd amplitude) = not stated
    Fitted coefficient of 1/T in σ_zx^z(T) = A/T + B over 150-300 K; scales the T-odd z-polarized SHC.
  • B (z-polarized T-even constant) = not stated
    Fitted constant offset, assumed to be the temperature-independent T-even SHC at all temperatures.
  • A_y (y-polarized T-odd amplitude) = not stated
    Fitted coefficient of 1/T in the y-polarized SHC temperature fit.
  • B_y (y-polarized T-even constant) = not stated
    Fitted constant offset for the y-polarized SHC, treated as the T-even component.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The T-odd spin Hall conductivity is proportional to electron lifetime τ, with τ = τ0/T between 150 and 300 K.
    Stated before Fig. 4(b); provides the 1/T functional form used in the fit.
  • domain assumption The T-even spin Hall conductivity is temperature independent from 5 to 360 K.
    Used to extrapolate the fitted constant B to low temperatures; based on the statement that intrinsic SHC is 'weakly dependent on temperature'.
  • domain assumption The SMR of the RuO2/CoFeB junction is described by Eq. (1), with zero longitudinal spin absorption, a transparent interface, and λ_sf = 12.2 nm from Ref. [62].
    Used to convert measured SMR amplitude into spin Hall angle and SHC; assumptions stated in text before Eq. (1).
  • domain assumption The Néel vector in the (101) RuO2 film is oriented at θ_N = arctan(c/a) = 35° from z.
    Used as the reference direction; the magnetic ground state and orientation of RuO2 are disputed by Refs. [56-58], and the film may have strain or defects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unveiling the nonrelativistic spin current polarization in an altermagnet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XZHAO32O

@misc{pith2026241218937,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unveiling the nonrelativistic spin current polarization in an altermagnet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XZHAO32O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.18937}
}
read the original abstract

Spin current plays a central role in spintronics for driving exotic spin-dependent phenomena and high-performance device applications. Recently, a magnetic spin Hall effect has been discovered in spin-split antiferromagnets including noncollinear antiferromagnets and altermagnets, allowing the efficient generation of unconventional spin currents even in the absence of spin-orbit coupling. However, although such nonrelativistic spin currents are proposed to have a magnetic origin, the direct connection between the Neel vector and the spin current polarization is still missing. Here, using the altermagnetic RuO2 as a representative example, we unveil the spin current polarization by disentangling the conventional and magnetic spin Hall effects using a technique we developed based on the spin Hall magnetoresistance measurement. The results suggest that the nonrelativistic spin current hosts a polarization very close to the Neel vector. Our work offers unambiguous evidence of the magnetic origin of the nonrelativistic spin current in altermagnetic RuO2, and paves a straightforward route to understand the unconventional spin currents that are crucial in spintronics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.18937 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a,b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Shift spin photocurrents in two-dimensional systems

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In 2D spin-orbit coupled systems, circularly polarized light can drive pure spin photocurrents, which vanish in all k-linear models unless a Zeeman field splits the bands.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [10]

    Chernyshov, M

    A. Chernyshov, M. Overby, X. Y. Liu, J. K. Furdyna, Y. Lyanda-Geller, and L. P. Rokhinson, Evidence for reversible control of magnetization in a ferromagnetic material by means of spin-orbit magnetic field, Nature Physics 5, 656 (2009)

    work page 2009

  2. [62]

    Nakayama, M

    H. Nakayama, M. Althammer, Y. T. Chen, K. Uchida, Y. Kajiwara, D. Kikuchi, T. Ohtani, S. Geprägs, M. Opel, S. Takahashi et al. , Spin Hall magnetoresistance induced by a nonequilibrium proximity effect, Physical Review Letters 110, 206601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [1]

    E. Y. Tsymbal and I. Žuti ć, Spintronics handbook: spin transport and magnetism: Volume One: Metallic spintronics (CRC Press, 2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [2]

    Here, current is along the [010] crystallographic direction, and the current direction was defined as x, and the normal direction as z

    substrates (details in Supplementary Note 1). Here, current is along the [010] crystallographic direction, and the current direction was defined as x, and the normal direction as z. During the measurement, a 4 T external magnetic field was rotated in the y-z plane, as illustrated in Fig. 2(a), while a 100 µA DC current along the x direction and measured t...

    work page

  5. [3]

    J. C. Slonczewski, Current-driven ex citation of magnetic mu ltilayers, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 159, L1 (1996)

    work page 1996

  6. [4]

    Berger, Emission of spin waves by a magnetic multilayer traversed by a current, Physical Review B 54, 9353 (1996)

    L. Berger, Emission of spin waves by a magnetic multilayer traversed by a current, Physical Review B 54, 9353 (1996)

    work page 1996

  7. [5]

    J. Z. Sun, Current-driven magnetic switchi ng in manganite trilayer junctions, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 202, 157 (1999)

    work page 1999

  8. [6]

    E. B. Myers, D. C. Ralph, J. A. Katine, R. N. Louie, and R. A. Buhrman, Current-induced switching of domains in magnetic multilayer devices, Science 285, 867 (1999)

    work page 1999

Show all 71 references
  1. [7]

    Manchon and S

    A. Manchon and S. Zhang, Theory of nonequilibrium intrinsic spin torque in a single nanomagnet, Physical Review B 78, 212405 (2008)

    2008

  2. [8]

    K. Ando, S. Takahashi, K. Harii, K. Sasage, J. Ieda, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Electric manipulation of spin relaxation using the sp in Hall effect, Physical Review Letters 101, 036601 (2008)

    2008

  3. [9]

    I. M. Miron, K. Garello, G. Gaudin, P. J. Zermatten, M. V. Costache, S. Auffret, S. Bandiera, B. Rodmacq, A. Schuhl, and P. Gambardella, Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection, Nature 476, 189 (2011)

    2011

  4. [11]

    Kubota, A

    H. Kubota, A. Fukushima, K. Yakushiji, T. Nagahama, S. Yuasa, K. Ando, H. Maehara, Y. Nagamine, K. Tsunekawa, D. D. Djayaprawira et al. , Quantitative measurement of voltage dependence of spin-transfer torque in MgO-based magnetic tunnel junctions, Nature Physics 4, 37 (2008)

    2008

  5. [12]

    L. Q. Liu, C. F. Pai, Y. Li, H. W. Tseng, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Spin-torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum, Science 336, 555 (2012)

    2012

  6. [13]

    Ikeda, K

    S. Ikeda, K. Miura, H. Yamamoto, K. Mizunuma, H. D. Gan, M. Endo, S. Kanai, J. Hayakawa, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno, A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB-MgO magnetic tunnel junction, Nature Materials 9, 721 (2010)

    2010

  7. [14]

    J. C. Sankey, Y. T. Cui, J. Z. Sun, J. C. Slonczewski, R. A. Buhrman, and D. C. Ralph, Measurement of the spin-transfer-torque v ector in magnetic tunnel junctions, Nature Physics 4, 67 (2008)

    2008

  8. [15]

    Grimaldi, V

    E. Grimaldi, V. Krizakova, G. Sala, F. Yasi n, S. Couet, G. S. Kar, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Single-shot dynamics of spin-orbit torque and spin transfer torque switching in three-terminal magnetic tunnel junctions, Nature Nanotechnology 15, 111 (2020)

    2020

  9. [16]

    A. D. Kent and D. C. Worledge, A new spin on magnetic memories, Nature Nanotechnology 10, 187 (2015)

    2015

  10. [17]

    M. I. Dyakonov and V. I. Perel, Current-induced spin orientation of electrons in semiconductors, Physics Letters A 35, 459 (1971)

    1971

  11. [18]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Spin Hall effects, Reviews of Modern Physics 87, 1213 (2015)

    2015

  12. [19]

    G. Yu, P. Upadhyaya, Y. Fan, J. G. Alzate, W. Jiang, K. L. Wong, S. Takei, S. A. Bender, L. T. Chang, Y. Jiang et al. , Switching of perpendicular magnetization by spin-orbit torques in the absence of external magnetic fields, Nature Nanotechnology 9, 548 (2014)

    2014

  13. [20]

    V. M. Edelstein, Spin polarization of conduction electrons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asymmetric electron systems, Solid State Communications 73, 233 (1990)

    1990

  14. [21]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

  15. [22]

    Zelezny, Y

    J. Zelezny, Y. Zhang, C. Felser, and B. H. Yan, Spin-polarized current in noncollinear antiferromagnets, Physical Review Letters 119, 187204 (2017)

    2017

  16. [23]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Bottom-up design of spin-split and reshaped electronic band structures in antiferromagnets without spin-orbit coupling: Procedure on the basis of augmented multipoles, Physical Review B 102, 144441 (2020)

    2020

  17. [24]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Ya nagi, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets, Nature Communications 10, 4305 (2019)

    2019

  18. [25]

    Gurung, D.-F

    G. Gurung, D.-F. Shao, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Transport spin polarization of noncollinear antiferromagnetic antiperovskites, Physical Review Materials 5, 124411 (2021)

    2021

  19. [26]

    L. D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J. W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antiferromagnets, Physical Review B 102, 014422 (2020)

    2020

  20. [27]

    L. D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J. W. Luo, an d A. Zunger, Prediction of low-Z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review Materials 5, 014409 (2021)

    2021

  21. [28]

    H. Y. Ma, M. L. Hu, N. N. Li, J. P. Liu, W. Yao, J. F. Jia, and J. W. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant pi ezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nature Communications 12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  22. [29]

    Smejkal, J

    L. Smejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A Phase with nonrelativ istic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Physical Review X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  23. [30]

    P. F. Liu, J. Y. Li, J. Z. Han, X. G. Wan, and Q. H. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review X 12, 021016 (2022)

    2022

  24. [31]

    L. D. Yuan and A. Zunger, Degene racy removal of spin bands in collinear antiferromagnets with non-interconvertible spin-structure motif pair, Advanced Materials 35, 2211966 (2023)

    2023

  25. [32]

    Smejkal, J

    L. Smejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Physical Review X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  26. [33]

    Kimata, H

    M. Kimata, H. Chen, K. Kondou, S. Sugimoto, P. K. Muduli, M. Ikhlas, Y. Omori, T. Tomita, A. H. MacDonald, S. Nakatsuji et al., Magnetic and magnetic inverse spin Hall effects in a non-collinear antiferromagnet, Nature 565, 627 (2019)

    2019

  27. [34]

    Gonzalez-Hernandez, L

    R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, L. Smejkal, K. Vyborny, Y. Yahagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. Zelezny, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnetism, Physical Review Letters 126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  28. [35]

    Kondou, H

    K. Kondou, H. Chen, T. Tomita, M. Ikhlas, T. Higo, A. H. MacDonald, S. Nakatsuji, and Y. Otani, Giant field-like torque by the out-of-plane magnetic spin Hall effect in a topological antiferromagnet, Nature Communications 12, 6491 (2021)

    2021

  29. [36]

    T. Nan, C. X. Quintela, J. Irwin, G. Gurung, D.-F. Shao, J. Gibbons, N. Campbell, K. Song, S. Y. Choi, L. Guo et al. , Controlling spin current polar ization through non-collinear antiferromagnetism, Nature Communications 11, 4671 (2020)

    2020

  30. [37]

    C. M. Cao, S. W. Chen, R. C. Xiao, Z. T. Zhu, G. Q. Yu, Y. P. Wang, X. P. Qiu, L. Liu, T. Y. Zhao, D.-F. Shao et al. , Anomalous spin current anisotropy in a noncollinear antiferromagnet, Nature Communications 14, 5873 (2023)

    2023

  31. [38]

    Hu, D.-F

    S. Hu, D.-F. Shao, H. L. Yang, C. Pan, Z. X. Fu, M. Tang, Y. M. Yang, W. J. Fan, S. M. Zhou, E. Y. Tsymbal et al., Efficient perpendicular magnetization switching by a magnetic spin Hall effect in a noncollinear antiferromagnet, Nature Communications 13, 4447 (2022)

    2022

  32. [39]

    B. H. Rimmler, B. H. Hazra, B. Pal, K. Mohseni, J. M. Taylor, A. Bedoya-Pinto, H. Deniz, M. Tangi, I. Kostanovskiy, C. Luo et al., Atomic displacements enabling the observation of the anomalous Hall effect in a non-co llinear antiferromagnet, Advanced Materials 35, 2209616 (2023)

    2023

  33. [40]

    R. K. Han, X. P. Zhao, H. R. Qin, H. L. Sun, H. L. Wang, D. H. Wei, and J. H. Zhao, Field-free magnetization switching in CoPt induced by noncollinear antiferromagnetic Mn3Ga, Physical Review B 107, 134422 (2023)

    2023

  34. [41]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. X. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom et al., Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Nature Electronics 5, 267 (2022)

    2022

  35. [42]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan et al. , Observation of spin splitting tor que in a collinear antiferromagnet RuO2, Physical Review Letters 128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  36. [43]

    Y. F. You, H. Bai, X. Y. Feng, X. L. Fan, L. Han, X. F. Zhou, Y. J. Zhou, R. Q. Zhang, T. J. Chen, F. Pan et al., Cluster magnetic octupole induced out-of-plane spin polarization in antiperovskite antiferromagnet, Nature Communications 12, 6524 (2021)

    2021

  37. [44]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, an d J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic RuO2, Physical Review Letters 129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  38. [45]

    Y. Q. Guo, J. Zhang, Z. T. Zhu, Y. Y. Jiang, L. X. Jiang, C. W. Wu, J. Dong, X. Xu, W. Q. He, B. He et al. , Direct and inverse spin splitting effects in altermagnetic RuO 2, Advanced Science 11, 2400967 (2024)

    2024

  39. [46]

    L. J. Yu, S. Karube, M. Liu, M. Ts unoda, M. Oogane, and Y. Ando, Observation of unconventional spin-polarization induced spin-orbit torque in L1 2-ordered antiferromagnetic Mn3Pt thin films, Applied Physics Express 15, 033002 (2022)

    2022

  40. [47]

    Z. Q. Wang, Z. Q. Li, L. Sun, Z. Y. Zhang, K. He, H. Niu, J. Cheng, M. Yang, X. Yang, G. Chen et al. , Inverse spin Hall effect dominated spin-charge conversion in (101) and (110)-oriented RuO2 films, Physical Review Letters 133, 046701 (2024)

    2024

  41. [48]

    Liao, Y.-C

    C.-T. Liao, Y.-C. Wang, Y.-C. Tien, S.-Y . Huang, and D. Qu, Separation of inverse altermagnetic spin-splitting effect from inverse spin Hall effect in RuO2, Physical Review Letters 133, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  42. [49]

    D.-F. Shao, S. H. Zhang, R. C. Xiao, Z. A. Wang, W. J. Lu, Y. P. Sun, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Spin-neutral tunneling anomalous Hall effect, Physical Review B 106, L180404 (2022)

    2022

  43. [50]

    Z. X. Feng, X. R. Zhou, L. Smejkal, L. Wu, Z. W. Zhu, H. X. Guo, R. González-Hernández, X. N. Wang, H. Yan, P. X. Qin et al., An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nature Electronics 5, 735 (2022)

    2022

  44. [51]

    D.-F. Shao, S. H. Zhang, M. Li, C. B. Eom, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Spin-neutral currents for spintronics, Nature Communications 12, 7061 (2021)

    2021

  45. [52]

    Smejkal, R

    L. Smejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall eff ect in collinear antiferromagnets, Science Advances 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  46. [53]

    Smejkal, A

    L. Smejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonzál ez-Hernández, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling magnetoresistance in unconve ntional collinear antiferromagnets with nonrelativistic-momentum, Physical Review X 12, 011028 (2022)

    2022

  47. [54]

    D.-F. Shao, Y. Y. Jiang, J. Ding, S. H. Zh ang, Z. A. Wang, R. C. Xiao, G. Gurung, W. J. Lu, Y. P. Sun, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Néel spin currents in antiferromagnets, Physical Review Letters 130, 216702 (2023)

    2023

  48. [55]

    Shao and E

    D.-F. Shao and E. Y. Tsymbal, Antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions for spintronics, npj Spintronics 2, 13 (2024)

    2024

  49. [56]

    Samanta, Y.-Y

    K. Samanta, Y.-Y. Jiang, T. R. Paudel, D.-F. Shao, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Tunneling magnetoresistance in magnetic tunnel juncti ons with a single ferromagnetic electrode, Physical Review B 109, 174407 (2024)

    2024

  50. [57]

    Hiraishi, H

    M. Hiraishi, H. Okabe, A. Koda, R. Kadono, T. Muroi, D. Hirai, and Z. Hiroi, Nonmagnetic ground state in RuO 2 revealed by muon spin rotation, Physical Review Letters 132, 166702 (2024)

    2024

  51. [58]

    Smolyanyuk, Mazin, II, L

    A. Smolyanyuk, Mazin, II, L. Garcia-Gassu ll, and R. Valentí, Fragility of the magnetic order in the prototypical altermagnet RuO 2, Physical Review B 109, 134424 (2024)

    2024

  52. [59]

    J. Kim, P. Sheng, S. Takahashi, S. M itani, and M. Hayashi, Spin Hall magnetoresistance in metallic bilayers, Physical Review Letters 116, 097201 (2016)

    2016

  53. [60]

    Keßler, L

    P. Keßler, L. Garcia-Gassull, A. Suter, T. Prokscha, Z. Salman, D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, F. Orlandi, I. I. Mazin, R. Valentí et al., Absence of magnetic order in RuO2: insights from μSR spectroscopy and neutron diffraction, npj Spintronics 2, 50 (2024)

    2024

  54. [61]

    S1 of Supplementary Note 3), λsf is the spin diffusion length of 12.2 nm [62] , tAF is the thickness of RuO2, and ε = tAF/2λsf

    : ∆𝑅 𝑅 ൌ െ𝜃ୗୌ ଶ tanhሺ𝜀ሻ 𝜆ୱ୤ 𝑡୅୊ ሾ1 െ 1 coshሺ2𝜀ሻሿ, ሺ1ሻ where θSH is the spin Hall angle (Fig. S1 of Supplementary Note 3), λsf is the spin diffusion length of 12.2 nm [62] , tAF is the thickness of RuO2, and ε = tAF/2λsf. The spin Hall conductivity zx = θSHxxℏ/2e, where xx =...

  55. [63]

    Thompson, J

    R. Thompson, J. Ryu, G. Choi, S. Karube, M. Kohda, J. Nitta, and B. G. Park, Anisotropic spin-orbit torque through crystal-orientation engineering in epitaxial Pt, Physical Review Applied 15, 014055 (2021)

    2021

  56. [64]

    Y. C. Zhang, H. Bai, L. Han, C. Chen, Y. J. Zhou, C. H. Back, F. Pan, Y. Y. Wang, and C. Song, Simultaneous high charge-spin conve rsion efficiency and large spin diffusion length in altermagnetic RuO2, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2313332 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    H. Wu, J. Nance, S. A. Razavi, D. Lujan, B. Q. Dai, Y. X. Liu, H. R. He, B. S. Cui, D. Wu, K. Wong et al. , Chiral symmetry breaking for deterministic switching of perpendicular magnetization by spin-orbit torque, Nano Letters 21, 515 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    J. Q. Liu, X. Zha, Q. Lu, L. W. Liang, W. L. Wang, Z. Q. Hu, Z. X. Guo, Z. G. Wang, and M. Liu, Field-free spin-orbit torque perpendicular magnetization switching induced by metallic multilayers, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 16, 49966 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Z. Y. Zheng, Y. Zhang, V. Lopez, L. Sánchez-Tejerina, J. C. Shi, X. Q. Feng, L. Chen, Z. L. Wang, Z. Z. Zhang, K. Zhang et al., Field-free spin-orbit torque-induced switching of perpendicular magnetization in a ferrimagnetic layer with a vertical composition gradient, Nature C...

    2021

  60. [68]

    X. H. Huang, Y. R. Zhao, X. R. Wang, F. Wang, L. Liu, H. Yang, W. S. Zhao, and S. Y. Shi, Implementing versatile programmable logic functions using two magnetization switching types in a single device, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2308219 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Patton, G

    M. Patton, G. Gurung, D.-F. Shao, G. Noh, J. A. Mittelstaedt, M. Mazur, J. W. Kim, P. J. Ryan, E. Y. Tsymbal, S. Y. Choi et al. , Symmetry control of unconventional spin-orbit torques in IrO 2, Advanced Materials 35, 2301608 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    L. Liu, C. H. Zhou, X. Y. Shu, C. J. Li, T. Y. Zhao, W. N. Lin, J. Y. Deng, Q. D. Xie, S. H. Chen, J. Zhou et al. , Symmetry-dependent field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization, Nature Nanotechnology 16, 277 (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    M. X. Wang, J. Zhou, X. G. Xu, T. Z. Zhang, Z. Q. Zhu, Z. X. Guo, Y. B. Deng, M. Yang, K. K. Meng, B. He et al. , Field-free spin-orbit torque switching via out-of-plane spin- polarization induced by an antiferromagnetic insulator/heavy metal interface, Nature Communications 1...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.