Confidence-Aware Document OCR Error Detection
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:Y74JXN5Grecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) continues to face accuracy challenges that impact subsequent applications. To address these errors, we explore the utility of OCR confidence scores for enhancing post-OCR error detection. Our study involves analyzing the correlation between confidence scores and error rates across different OCR systems. We develop ConfBERT, a BERT-based model that incorporates OCR confidence scores into token embeddings and offers an optional pre-training phase for noise adjustment. Our experimental results demonstrate that integrating OCR confidence scores can enhance error detection capabilities. This work underscores the importance of OCR confidence scores in improving detection accuracy and reveals substantial disparities in performance between commercial and open-source OCR technologies.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Beyond Logprobs: A Multi-Signal Confidence Engine for LLM-Based Document Field Extraction
ExtractConf fuses Hunter-Mapper disagreement with LLM uncertainty, OCR, image quality and layout into a classifier that reaches 0.928 ROC AUC on DocILE invoices and 0.858 on CORD receipts, cutting selective prediction...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.