Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Anchored Answers: Unravelling Positional Bias in GPT-2's Multiple-Choice Questions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.03205 v3 pith:Y7ABMYYQ submitted 2024-05-06 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords biasanchoredgpt-2mcqsmodelsfirstaccuracyacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs), such as the GPT-4 and LLaMA families, have demonstrated considerable success across diverse tasks, including multiple-choice questions (MCQs). However, these models exhibit a positional bias, particularly an even worse anchored bias in the GPT-2 family, where they consistently favour the first choice 'A' in MCQs during inference. This anchored bias challenges the integrity of GPT-2's decision-making process, as it skews performance based on the position rather than the content of the choices in MCQs. In this study, we utilise the mechanistic interpretability approach to identify the internal modules within GPT-2 models responsible for this bias. We focus on the Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) layers and attention heads, using the "logit lens" method to trace and modify the specific value vectors that contribute to the bias. By updating these vectors within MLP and recalibrating attention patterns to neutralise the preference for the first choice 'A', we effectively mitigate the anchored bias. Our interventions not only mitigate the bias but also improve the overall MCQ prediction accuracy for the GPT-2 family across various datasets. This work represents the first comprehensive mechanistic analysis of anchored bias from the failing cases in MCQs within the GPT-2 models, introducing targeted, minimal-intervention strategies that significantly enhance GPT2 model robustness and accuracy in MCQs. Our code is available at https://github.com/ruizheliUOA/Anchored_Bias_GPT2.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Movie Facts and Fibs (MF$^2$): A Benchmark for Long Movie Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    MF2 evaluates long-movie understanding by asking models to classify fact/fib claim pairs; the best model trails humans by 23.5 points in pairwise accuracy.

  2. SCOPE: Stochastic and Counterbiased Option Placement for Evaluating Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SCOPE estimates a model's position bias with nonsense prompts, puts correct answers in disliked slots, and spreads similar distractors apart to cap lucky guessing.

  3. Positional Bias in Binary Question Answering: How Uncertainty Shapes Model Preferences

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Positional bias in LLM binary QA is small for easy questions but grows sharply as uncertainty rises, especially in subjective persuasion tasks.

Pith tools