REVIEW 2 cited by
Quantum principal component analysis only achieves an exponential speedup because of its state preparation assumptions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Quantum principal component analysis only achieves an exponential speedup because of its state preparation assumptions
read the original abstract
A central roadblock to analyzing quantum algorithms on quantum states is the lack of a comparable input model for classical algorithms. Inspired by recent work of the author [E. Tang, STOC'19], we introduce such a model, where we assume we can efficiently perform $\ell^2$-norm samples of input data, a natural analogue to quantum algorithms that assume efficient state preparation of classical data. Though this model produces less practical algorithms than the (stronger) standard model of classical computation, it captures versions of many of the features and nuances of quantum linear algebra algorithms. With this model, we describe classical analogues to Lloyd, Mohseni, and Rebentrost's quantum algorithms for principal component analysis [Nat. Phys. 10, 631 (2014)] and nearest-centroid clustering [arXiv:1307.0411]. Since they are only polynomially slower, these algorithms suggest that the exponential speedups of their quantum counterparts are simply an artifact of state preparation assumptions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
High-rate qLDPC processors
Non-abelian "mitten" qLDPC codes achieve 20% encoding rate with distances 10-24 on 150-975 qubits, and simulations indicate fault-tolerant processors sustaining ~10^10 logical operations at 0.1% physical error rate.
-
Scalable Quantum Machine Learning: Trainability, Expressivity and Efficiency
A k-particle fermionic circuit with Rz-lifted RBS gates is claimed to be trainable (gradient variance Θ(k²/n⁵)), classically hard (2^{Ω(k)} under best-known algorithms), and trainable via a parallel parameter-shift ru...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.