REVIEW 4 cited by
Is ChatGPT a Good Personality Recognizer? A Preliminary Study
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Is ChatGPT a Good Personality Recognizer? A Preliminary Study
read the original abstract
In recent years, personality has been regarded as a valuable personal factor being incorporated into numerous tasks such as sentiment analysis and product recommendation. This has led to widespread attention to text-based personality recognition task, which aims to identify an individual's personality based on given text. Considering that ChatGPT has recently exhibited remarkable abilities on various natural language processing tasks, we provide a preliminary evaluation of ChatGPT on text-based personality recognition task for generating effective personality data. Concretely, we employ a variety of prompting strategies to explore ChatGPT's ability in recognizing personality from given text, especially the level-oriented prompting strategy we designed for guiding ChatGPT in analyzing given text at a specified level. The experimental results on two representative real-world datasets reveal that ChatGPT with zero-shot chain-of-thought prompting exhibits impressive personality recognition ability and is capable to provide natural language explanations through text-based logical reasoning. Furthermore, by employing the level-oriented prompting strategy to optimize zero-shot chain-of-thought prompting, the performance gap between ChatGPT and corresponding state-of-the-art model has been narrowed even more. However, we observe that ChatGPT shows unfairness towards certain sensitive demographic attributes such as gender and age. Additionally, we discover that eliciting the personality recognition ability of ChatGPT helps improve its performance on personality-related downstream tasks such as sentiment classification and stress prediction.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Large-Language-Models-as-a-Judge in Theory-Agnostic Adaptive Metric-Alignment for Prototypical Networks in Personality Recognition
JAM discovers theory-invariant pseudo-facets via attention-pooled graph prototypical networks, Cross-Theory Harmonization, and LLM-as-a-Judge, improving cross-framework balanced accuracy on Essays and Kaggle datasets.
-
A Survey of Large Language Models for Perception and Measurement of Human Psychology
A survey proposing a three-pillar framework to evaluate LLMs as tools for measuring latent psychological constructs and reviewing applications in personality and mental health.
-
Cross-Lingual Attention Distillation with Personality-Informed Generative Augmentation for Multilingual Personality Recognition
ADAM uses personality-guided LLM augmentation and cross-lingual attention distillation to raise balanced accuracy on multilingual personality recognition to 0.6332 on Essays and 0.7448 on Kaggle, outperforming standar...
-
LLM-based Multimodal Personality Recognition via Facial Action Unit-Text Semantic Fusion
LLM framework converts facial action unit sequences to text, fuses with responses, and regresses to personality scores, reporting lower errors and higher correlations than baselines on AVI-6.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.