Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Is ChatGPT a Good Personality Recognizer? A Preliminary Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.03952 v3 pith:YDHBZ5CC submitted 2023-07-08 cs.CL

Is ChatGPT a Good Personality Recognizer? A Preliminary Study

classification cs.CL
keywords chatgptpersonalitypromptingrecognitionabilitygiventaskstext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, personality has been regarded as a valuable personal factor being incorporated into numerous tasks such as sentiment analysis and product recommendation. This has led to widespread attention to text-based personality recognition task, which aims to identify an individual's personality based on given text. Considering that ChatGPT has recently exhibited remarkable abilities on various natural language processing tasks, we provide a preliminary evaluation of ChatGPT on text-based personality recognition task for generating effective personality data. Concretely, we employ a variety of prompting strategies to explore ChatGPT's ability in recognizing personality from given text, especially the level-oriented prompting strategy we designed for guiding ChatGPT in analyzing given text at a specified level. The experimental results on two representative real-world datasets reveal that ChatGPT with zero-shot chain-of-thought prompting exhibits impressive personality recognition ability and is capable to provide natural language explanations through text-based logical reasoning. Furthermore, by employing the level-oriented prompting strategy to optimize zero-shot chain-of-thought prompting, the performance gap between ChatGPT and corresponding state-of-the-art model has been narrowed even more. However, we observe that ChatGPT shows unfairness towards certain sensitive demographic attributes such as gender and age. Additionally, we discover that eliciting the personality recognition ability of ChatGPT helps improve its performance on personality-related downstream tasks such as sentiment classification and stress prediction.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Large-Language-Models-as-a-Judge in Theory-Agnostic Adaptive Metric-Alignment for Prototypical Networks in Personality Recognition

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    JAM discovers theory-invariant pseudo-facets via attention-pooled graph prototypical networks, Cross-Theory Harmonization, and LLM-as-a-Judge, improving cross-framework balanced accuracy on Essays and Kaggle datasets.

  2. A Survey of Large Language Models for Perception and Measurement of Human Psychology

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A survey proposing a three-pillar framework to evaluate LLMs as tools for measuring latent psychological constructs and reviewing applications in personality and mental health.

  3. Cross-Lingual Attention Distillation with Personality-Informed Generative Augmentation for Multilingual Personality Recognition

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ADAM uses personality-guided LLM augmentation and cross-lingual attention distillation to raise balanced accuracy on multilingual personality recognition to 0.6332 on Essays and 0.7448 on Kaggle, outperforming standar...

  4. LLM-based Multimodal Personality Recognition via Facial Action Unit-Text Semantic Fusion

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    LLM framework converts facial action unit sequences to text, fuses with responses, and regresses to personality scores, reporting lower errors and higher correlations than baselines on AVI-6.