Predictable Scale: Part II, Farseer: A Refined Scaling Law in Large Language Models
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved pith:YEM6NZCPrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Training Large Language Models (LLMs) is prohibitively expensive, creating a critical scaling gap where insights from small-scale experiments often fail to transfer to resource-intensive production systems, thereby hindering efficient innovation. To bridge this, we introduce Farseer, a novel and refined scaling law offering enhanced predictive accuracy across scales. By systematically constructing a model loss surface $L(N,D)$, Farseer achieves a significantly better fit to empirical data than prior laws (e.g., Chinchilla's law). Our methodology yields accurate, robust, and highly generalizable predictions, demonstrating excellent extrapolation capabilities, improving upon Chinchilla's law by reducing extrapolation error by 433\%. This allows for the reliable evaluation of competing training strategies across all $(N,D)$ settings, enabling conclusions from small-scale ablation studies to be confidently extrapolated to predict large-scale performance. Furthermore, Farseer provides new insights into optimal compute allocation, better reflecting the nuanced demands of modern LLM training. To validate our approach, we trained an extensive suite of approximately 1,000 LLMs across diverse scales and configurations, consuming roughly 3 million NVIDIA H100 GPU hours. We are comprehensively open-sourcing all models, data, results, and logs at https://github.com/Farseer-Scaling-Law/Farseer to foster further research.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Scaling Laws for Neural-Network Quantum States
Transformer wave functions for the J1-J2 Heisenberg model exhibit size-independent power-law decay of V-score with compute, with the exponent decreasing as frustration increases.
-
Neural Scaling Universality: If Exponents Are Fixed, Time to Understand Coefficients
Position paper claims fixed exponents in scaling laws arise from generic mechanisms while coefficients vary with data and architecture, making the latter the focus for improvements.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.