REVIEW 2 cited by
Discrete Leptonic Flavor Symmetries: UV Mediators and Phenomenology
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Given the absence of a definitive top-down indication for understanding the peculiar structure of the lepton sector, discrete flavor symmetries offer a profound perspective for examining the intricate patterns of lepton masses and mixings. In this work, drawing upon previous studies on the interplay of flavor symmetries with the potential UV completions from a purely bottom-up perspective, three well-motivated discrete flavor groups, suitable for portraying the leptonic sector as well as the neutrino masses, specifically $A_4$, $A_5$ and $S_4$, are explored within this framework, leading to the comprehensive classification of the NP mediators, along with the tree-level matching relations onto dimension-6 SMEFT operators. Particular emphasis is placed on the discrete leptonic directions, for which a phenomenological analysis is carried out in order to constrain various NP mediators, where significant focus is directed towards the examination of the cLFV operators, which, for the wide range of applicable cases, offer the leading constraint.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Flavor and CP Symmetries in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory
A CP classification of dimension-six and dimension-eight SMEFT operators is combined with minimal flavor violation to reduce independent CP-violating Wilson coefficient phases to 26 and 655 respectively.
-
Towards the Swampland of Flavour Symmetries
A thesis claiming flavour theories with explicitly broken (or absent) symmetries can be as predictive and TeV-testable as symmetry-protected ones, demonstrated via type-II seesaw textures, minimal SO(10) with leptoqua...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.