Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

vTune: Verifiable Fine-Tuning for LLMs Through Backdooring

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.06611 v2 pith:YLLMPMNI submitted 2024-11-10 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY
keywords fine-tuningmodelvtunellmstestacrossattacksdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

As fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) becomes increasingly prevalent, users often rely on third-party services with limited visibility into their fine-tuning processes. This lack of transparency raises the question: how do consumers verify that fine-tuning services are performed correctly? For instance, a service provider could claim to fine-tune a model for each user, yet simply send all users back the same base model. To address this issue, we propose vTune, a simple method that uses a small number of backdoor data points added to the training data to provide a statistical test for verifying that a provider fine-tuned a custom model on a particular user's dataset. Unlike existing works, vTune is able to scale to verification of fine-tuning on state-of-the-art LLMs, and can be used both with open-source and closed-source models. We test our approach across several model families and sizes as well as across multiple instruction-tuning datasets, and find that the statistical test is satisfied with p-values on the order of $\sim 10^{-40}$, with no negative impact on downstream task performance. Further, we explore several attacks that attempt to subvert vTune and demonstrate the method's robustness to these attacks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Trusting What You Cannot See: Auditable Fine-Tuning and Inference for Proprietary AI

    cs.CR 2026-03 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    AFTUNE spot-checks cloud fine-tuning and inference by hashing boundary states and recomputing sampled blocks inside a TEE, but its detection-probability formula assumes tampered blocks are detectable when sampled; int...

Pith tools