Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 49 references

DoppDrive: Doppler-Driven Temporal Aggregation for Improved Radar Object Detection

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read DoppDrive claims that shifting prior-frame radar points by their Doppler velocity before detection improves object detection on any detector.

desk verdict Plausible Doppler-based temporal aggregation idea, but the readable portion leaves the tangential-scatter mechanism underdetermined and the empirical claim unverifiable. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.12330 v1 pith:YPTGLX2Q submitted 2025-08-17 cs.CV

Yuval Haitman , Oded Bialer This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords radarobjectdetectiontemporalaggregationDopplerpointclouddensityautonomousdrivingdynamicobjectspreprocessing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Radar gives autonomous vehicles long range but returns sparse point clouds, so detectors often combine several radar frames to thicken the cloud. Standard temporal aggregation compensates for the vehicle's own motion, but moving objects still smear across the accumulated cloud. This paper proposes DoppDrive, a preprocessing step that shifts points from earlier frames radially by the measured dynamic Doppler component, placing each point where the object actually was, and gives every point its own aggregation duration based on Doppler and angle to limit tangential spread. Because it only rewrites the input point cloud, it can sit in front of any radar detector. The paper claims this denser, less scattered cloud improves detection performance across several detectors and datasets.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a per-point Doppler radial shift combined with a per-point aggregation duration. The dynamic Doppler component gives the radial velocity of the reflecting surface relative to the radar, so multiplying it by the time back to a previous frame gives the radial shift needed to move that earlier point into the object's current location; the aggregation duration is then set independently for each point from its Doppler and angle so that fast-moving or tangentially moving points do not smear over many frames. In one phrase, DoppDrive converts the radar's velocity measurement into a spatial alignment operation.

What would settle it

On a dataset with labeled radar scenes, compute detection average precision for DoppDrive against single-frame and naive temporal aggregation, then repeat with Doppler values artificially corrupted by noise; if detection performance is not consistently higher and the point-cloud scatter around moving objects is not measurably reduced, the central claim fails. A second check is a crossing-pedestrian case where radial velocity is near zero but tangential motion is high, where the radial shift alone should not be enough and the per-point duration must do all the work.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that radar's Doppler measurement, usually used only as an extra feature, can be used to align time-aggregated point clouds in space. Each point from a previous frame is shifted along the radar's line of sight by the distance implied by that point's dynamic Doppler component, which cancels the radial smear that ego-motion-compensated aggregation leaves on moving objects. The remaining tangential smear is then controlled per point by choosing how many previous frames to include, with shorter aggregation for points whose Doppler and angle indicate strong tangential motion. The result is a denser point cloud whose moving-object points stay compact, and the paper asserts that detectors fed these clouds detect better than detectors fed either single frames or naive temporal aggregations.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes the measured dynamic Doppler component accurately tells how far each radar point moved along the line of sight between frames, and that the remaining tangential motion can be controlled by shortening the aggregation window; if Doppler noise or unmeasured tangential motion dominates, the scatter reduction may not materialize.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any radar detector can use the DoppDrive cloud directly, since the method is only a preprocessing stage, so gains should transfer to new detectors without retraining the aggregation step.
  • Long-range detection should benefit most, because sparsity is worst there and denser aligned clouds give detectors more echoes to find objects.
  • Accumulating fewer frames for fast tangential targets keeps moving objects compact without losing the density benefit of longer aggregation for static or radially moving objects.
  • The paper's claimed improvement is detector-agnostic, meaning DoppDrive can be combined with future detectors rather than tied to one architecture.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the method only rewrites cloud geometry, it should also help radar-based tracking and moving-object segmentation, which suffer from the same scatter problem.
  • Editorial inference: a testable extension is to make the aggregation duration a learned function of Doppler and angle, or to replace the radial shift with a full two-dimensional motion estimate when micro-Doppler resolves tangential velocity.
  • Editorial inference: if Doppler noise is high, such as at low signal-to-noise ratio or under multipath, the radial shift could inject bias, so an uncertainty-aware shift magnitude would be a natural safeguard.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes DoppDrive, a preprocessing step for radar-based object detection that aggregates radar points over time. Unlike standard ego-motion-compensated aggregation, it shifts previous-frame points radially by the measured dynamic Doppler component and assigns each point a unique aggregation duration based on its Doppler and angle, with the goal of increasing point density while reducing scatter from dynamic objects. The paper claims that DoppDrive is detector-agnostic and significantly improves detection performance across various detectors and datasets. The supplied full text is a mis-encoded ASCII rendering and cannot be read, so I could not inspect the method details, experiments, or ablations; the assessment below is based on the abstract and the physical plausibility of the stated mechanism.

Significance. If the claimed result holds, DoppDrive would be a practically useful contribution: radar point clouds are sparse, temporal aggregation is a standard technique, and a Doppler-informed scatter-reduction step that works before detection would be detector-agnostic and easy to integrate into existing pipelines. The abstract's central claim is falsifiable with standard radar benchmarks, and the method is an external preprocessing heuristic, so the risk of circularity appears low. However, the paper as submitted provides no quantitative support, and the core mechanism is under-specified, so I cannot currently assess the magnitude or robustness of the claimed improvement.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / supplied full text] The load-bearing claim that DoppDrive 'significantly improves object detection performance across various detectors and datasets' is unsupported in the submitted manuscript. The full text is a mis-encoded ASCII stream with repeated unreadable paragraphs, so there is no inspectable experimental section: no datasets, detectors, baselines, metrics, or tables are visible. At minimum, the authors must provide a readable manuscript with quantitative comparisons to ego-motion-compensated aggregation on standard radar detection benchmarks.
  2. [Abstract, aggregation-duration rule] The abstract says each point is assigned 'a unique aggregation duration based on its Doppler and angle to minimize tangential scatter,' but a single radar detection provides range, azimuth, elevation, and radial velocity only; tangential velocity is not measured. Doppler and angle alone therefore do not determine a duration that eliminates tangential scatter. The method must either estimate tangential motion from multi-frame association or use a conservative worst-case bound; the paper must specify which alternative is used, and if a bound is used, show that the resulting durations still give meaningful density gains over plain ego-motion compensation.
  3. [Abstract, radial shift model] Shifting previous-frame points radially by the dynamic Doppler component assumes that the radial velocity is constant over the aggregation interval and that the 'dynamic' component is precisely defined, for example after ego-motion subtraction. No equation in the abstract specifies how the dynamic component is extracted or how ego-motion is compensated. Accelerating or rotating targets will leave residual radial scatter, so the paper should state the kinematic model and define the coordinate frame and ego-motion source.
  4. [Abstract, compatibility claim] The claim that DoppDrive is 'compatible with any detector' needs experimental support beyond a single architecture. I recommend comparing at least two detectors with different architectures on at least two datasets, keeping training protocols identical for the with- and without-DoppDrive conditions; the abstract reports none of these details.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract uses 'minimize tangential scatter' without defining a scatter metric; please specify the measure, such as spatial variance of aggregated points, used in any ablation study.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'dynamic Doppler component' is undefined; clarify whether it is the radial velocity after ego-motion compensation and how it is computed for stationary clutter and for points on moving objects.
  3. [Abstract] Please state the aggregation duration in physical units, such as milliseconds or number of frames, and describe how per-point durations are clipped, quantized, or bounded.
  4. [Submission quality] The garbled full text indicates a PDF-to-text conversion failure; the authors should upload a correctly encoded PDF with readable paragraphs, figures, and tables.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found in the readable abstract; the method is an external preprocessing heuristic with no visible fitted-input or self-citation loop.

full rationale

The only readable portion of the manuscript is the abstract, which describes DoppDrive as a preprocessing step: points from previous frames are shifted radially according to their measured dynamic Doppler component, and each point is assigned an aggregation duration based on Doppler and angle. No parameter is fitted to the detection output, no derived quantity is defined in terms of the target result, and no load-bearing self-citation is invoked. The central claim that DoppDrive improves object detection across detectors and datasets is an external empirical claim; the supplied full text is mis-encoded and unreadable, so the experimental section cannot be inspected. That is a verifiability limitation, not evidence of circularity. Without quotable equations or experimental details showing that a prediction reduces by construction to its inputs, no circular step can be identified. Accordingly, the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented physical entities can be identified from the abstract alone. The method relies on the standard radar Doppler measurement as an input and on the assumption that its accuracy is sufficient for the proposed shifts.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Radar Doppler measurements provide a sufficiently accurate dynamic radial velocity component for each point in the aggregated cloud.
    The entire radial compensation mechanism relies on this premise, as described in the abstract's claim that points are 'shifted radially according to their dynamic Doppler component'.
  • domain assumption Denser and less scattered point clouds improve detector performance after the transformation.
    The method's value depends on the hypothesis that density increases and scatter reduction benefit downstream detectors; this is the paper's central heuristic claim, not an established fact in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DoppDrive: Doppler-Driven Temporal Aggregation for Improved Radar Object Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YPTGLX2Q

@misc{pith2026250812330,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DoppDrive: Doppler-Driven Temporal Aggregation for Improved Radar Object Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YPTGLX2Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.12330}
}
read the original abstract

Radar-based object detection is essential for autonomous driving due to radar's long detection range. However, the sparsity of radar point clouds, especially at long range, poses challenges for accurate detection. Existing methods increase point density through temporal aggregation with ego-motion compensation, but this approach introduces scatter from dynamic objects, degrading detection performance. We propose DoppDrive, a novel Doppler-Driven temporal aggregation method that enhances radar point cloud density while minimizing scatter. Points from previous frames are shifted radially according to their dynamic Doppler component to eliminate radial scatter, with each point assigned a unique aggregation duration based on its Doppler and angle to minimize tangential scatter. DoppDrive is a point cloud density enhancement step applied before detection, compatible with any detector, and we demonstrate that it significantly improves object detection performance across various detectors and datasets.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION format.date year duplicate empty "emp...

  2. [2]

    Advanced radar sensor ars540

    Continental AG. Advanced radar sensor ars540. https://www.continental-automotive.com/en/components/radars/long-range-radars/advanced-radar-sensor-ars540.html. Accessed: Nov. 10, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Automated driving functions: Zf captures contract for 4d full-range radar with chinese oem, 2021

    ZF Friedrichshafen AG. Automated driving functions: Zf captures contract for 4d full-range radar with chinese oem, 2021. Accessed: Nov. 11, 2024

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Gps-imu sensor fusion for reliable autonomous vehicle position estimation

    Simegnew Yihunie Alaba. Gps-imu sensor fusion for reliable autonomous vehicle position estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.08119, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Milli-rio: Ego-motion estimation with low-cost millimetre-wave radar

    Yasin Almalioglu, Mehmet Turan, Chris Xiaoxuan Lu, Niki Trigoni, and Andrew Markham. Milli-rio: Ego-motion estimation with low-cost millimetre-wave radar. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21 0 (3): 0 3314--3323, 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Radars | advanced safety

    Aptiv. Radars | advanced safety. https://www.aptiv.com/en/solutions/advanced-safety/adas/radars. Accessed: Nov. 11, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Radar transformer: An object classification network based on 4d mmw imaging radar

    Jie Bai, Lianqing Zheng, Sen Li, Bin Tan, Sihan Chen, and Libo Huang. Radar transformer: An object classification network based on 4d mmw imaging radar. Sensors, 21 0 (11): 0 3854, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Radsimreal: Bridging the gap between synthetic and real data in radar object detection with simulation

    Oded Bialer and Yuval Haitman. Radsimreal: Bridging the gap between synthetic and real data in radar object detection with simulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 15407--15416, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving

    Holger Caesar, Varun Bankiti, Alex H Lang, Sourabh Vora, Venice Erin Liong, Qiang Xu, Anush Krishnan, Yu Pan, Giancarlo Baldan, and Oscar Beijbom. nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern re...

    2020

  2. [10]

    Fundamentals of high accuracy inertial navigation

    Averil B Chatfield. Fundamentals of high accuracy inertial navigation. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1997

    1997

  3. [11]

    Pixset: An opportunity for 3d computer vision to go beyond point clouds with a full-waveform lidar dataset

    Jean-Luc D \'e ziel, Pierre Merriaux, Francis Tremblay, Dave Lessard, Dominique Plourde, Julien Stanguennec, Pierre Goulet, and Pierre Olivier. Pixset: An opportunity for 3d computer vision to go beyond point clouds with a full-waveform lidar dataset. In 2021 ieee internationa...

    2021

  4. [12]

    Probabilistic oriented object detection in automotive radar

    Xu Dong, Pengluo Wang, Pengyue Zhang, and Langechuan Liu. Probabilistic oriented object detection in automotive radar. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 102--103, 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    Carla: An open urban driving simulator

    Alexey Dosovitskiy, German Ros, Felipe Codevilla, Antonio Lopez, and Vladlen Koltun. Carla: An open urban driving simulator. In Conference on robot learning, pages 1--16. PMLR, 2017

    2017

  6. [14]

    The global positioning system and inertial navigation

    Jay Farrell and Matthew Barth. The global positioning system and inertial navigation. (No Title), 1999

    1999

  7. [15]

    Radargnn: Transformation invariant graph neural network for radar-based perception

    Felix Fent, Philipp Bauerschmidt, and Markus Lienkamp. Radargnn: Transformation invariant graph neural network for radar-based perception. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 182--191, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    A survey of automotive radar and lidar signal processing and architectures

    Luigi Giuffrida, Guido Masera, and Maurizio Martina. A survey of automotive radar and lidar signal processing and architectures. Chips, 2 0 (4): 0 243--261, 2023

    2023

  9. [17]

    Boostrad: Enhancing object detection by boosting radar reflections

    Yuval Haitman and Oded Bialer. Boostrad: Enhancing object detection by boosting radar reflections. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 1638--1647, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    An overview of sensors in autonomous vehicles

    Henry Alexander Ignatious, Manzoor Khan, et al. An overview of sensors in autonomous vehicles. Procedia Computer Science, 198: 0 736--741, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Instantaneous ego-motion estimation using doppler radar

    Dominik Kellner, Michael Barjenbruch, Jens Klappstein, J \"u rgen Dickmann, and Klaus Dietmayer. Instantaneous ego-motion estimation using doppler radar. In 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013), pages 869--874. IEEE, 2013

    2013

  12. [20]

    Yolo-based simultaneous target detection and classification in automotive fmcw radar systems

    Woosuk Kim, Hyunwoong Cho, Jongseok Kim, Byungkwan Kim, and Seongwook Lee. Yolo-based simultaneous target detection and classification in automotive fmcw radar systems. Sensors, 20 0 (10): 0 2897, 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    Pointpillars: Fast encoders for object detection from point clouds

    Alex H Lang, Sourabh Vora, Holger Caesar, Lubing Zhou, Jiong Yang, and Oscar Beijbom. Pointpillars: Fast encoders for object detection from point clouds. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 12697--12705, 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    Feature pyramid networks for object detection

    Tsung-Yi Lin, Piotr Doll \'a r, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, Bharath Hariharan, and Serge Belongie. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2117--2125, 2017

    2017

  15. [23]

    Spatial multi-representation fusion for 3d object detection with 4d imaging radar., 2023

    J Liu, Q Zhao, W Xiong, T Huang, QL Han, and B Zhu SMURF. Spatial multi-representation fusion for 3d object detection with 4d imaging radar., 2023. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1109/TIV, pages 1--14, 2023

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    Radar for Fully Autonomous Driving

    Matt Markel. Radar for Fully Autonomous Driving. Artech House, 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    A review of sensor technologies for perception in automated driving

    Enrique Marti, Miguel Angel De Miguel, Fernando Garcia, and Joshue Perez. A review of sensor technologies for perception in automated driving. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 11 0 (4): 0 94--108, 2019

    2019

  18. [26]

    aimotive dataset: A multimodal dataset for robust autonomous driving with long-range perception

    Tam \'a s Matuszka, Iv \'a n Barton, \'A d \'a m Butykai, P \'e ter Hajas, D \'a vid Kiss, Domonkos Kov \'a cs, S \'a ndor Kuns \'a gi-M \'a t \'e , P \'e ter Lengyel, G \'a bor N \'e meth, Levente Pet o , et al. aimotive dataset: A multimodal dataset for robust autonomous dri...

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Automotive radar dataset for deep learning based 3d object detection

    Michael Meyer and Georg Kuschk. Automotive radar dataset for deep learning based 3d object detection. In 2019 16th european radar conference (EuRAD), pages 129--132. IEEE, 2019

    2019

  20. [28]

    Enhanced k-radar: Optimal density reduction to improve detection performance and accessibility of 4d radar tensor-based object detection

    Dong-Hee Paek, Seung-Hyun Kong, and Kevin Tirta Wijaya. Enhanced k-radar: Optimal density reduction to improve detection performance and accessibility of 4d radar tensor-based object detection. In 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pages 1--6. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    Multi-class road user detection with 3+ 1d radar in the view-of-delft dataset

    Andras Palffy, Ewoud Pool, Srimannarayana Baratam, Julian FP Kooij, and Dariu M Gavrila. Multi-class road user detection with 3+ 1d radar in the view-of-delft dataset. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7 0 (2): 0 4961--4968, 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    Nvradarnet: Real-time radar obstacle and free space detection for autonomous driving

    Alexander Popov, Patrik Gebhardt, Ke Chen, and Ryan Oldja. Nvradarnet: Real-time radar obstacle and free space detection for autonomous driving. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 6958--6964. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    A fast probabilistic ego-motion estimation framework for radar

    Matthias Rapp, Michael Barjenbruch, Klaus Dietmayer, Markus Hahn, and J \"u rgen Dickmann. A fast probabilistic ego-motion estimation framework for radar. In 2015 European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR), pages 1--6. IEEE, 2015

    2015

  24. [32]

    Raw high-definition radar for multi-task learning

    Julien Rebut, Arthur Ouaknine, Waqas Malik, and Patrick P \'e rez. Raw high-definition radar for multi-task learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17021--17030, 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Radar cfar thresholding in clutter and multiple target situations

    Hermann Rohling. Radar cfar thresholding in clutter and multiple target situations. IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, 0 (4): 0 608--621, 1983

    1983

  26. [34]

    Road scene understanding by occupancy grid learning from sparse radar clusters using semantic segmentation

    Liat Sless, Bat El Shlomo, Gilad Cohen, and Shaul Oron. Road scene understanding by occupancy grid learning from sparse radar clusters using semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, pages 0--0, 2019

    2019

  27. [35]

    Front radar sensor

    Bosch Mobility Solutions. Front radar sensor. https://www.bosch-mobility.com/en/solutions/sensors/front-radar-sensor/. Accessed: Nov. 11, 2024

    2024

  28. [36]

    Global positioning system: theory and applications, volume I

    James J Spilker Jr, Penina Axelrad, Bradford W Parkinson, and Per Enge. Global positioning system: theory and applications, volume I. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1996

    1996

  29. [37]

    Mimo radar for advanced driver-assistance systems and autonomous driving: Advantages and challenges

    Shunqiao Sun, Athina P Petropulu, and H Vincent Poor. Mimo radar for advanced driver-assistance systems and autonomous driving: Advantages and challenges. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37 0 (4): 0 98--117, 2020

    2020

  30. [38]

    Radar-pointgnn: Graph based object recognition for unstructured radar point-cloud data

    Peter Svenningsson, Francesco Fioranelli, and Alexander Yarovoy. Radar-pointgnn: Graph based object recognition for unstructured radar point-cloud data. In 2021 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf21), pages 1--6. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    3-d object detection for multiframe 4-d automotive millimeter-wave radar point cloud

    Bin Tan, Zhixiong Ma, Xichan Zhu, Sen Li, Lianqing Zheng, Sihan Chen, Libo Huang, and Jie Bai. 3-d object detection for multiframe 4-d automotive millimeter-wave radar point cloud. IEEE Sensors Journal, 23 0 (11): 0 11125--11138, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    o hler, Daniel Niederl \

    Michael Ulrich, Sascha Braun, Daniel K \"o hler, Daniel Niederl \"o hner, Florian Faion, Claudius Gl \"a ser, and Holger Blume. Improved orientation estimation and detection with hybrid object detection networks for automotive radar. In 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference ...

    2022

  33. [41]

    Rpfa-net: A 4d radar pillar feature attention network for 3d object detection

    Baowei Xu, Xinyu Zhang, Li Wang, Xiaomei Hu, Zhiwei Li, Shuyue Pan, Jun Li, and Yongqiang Deng. Rpfa-net: A 4d radar pillar feature attention network for 3d object detection. In 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pages 3061--3066. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  34. [42]

    Pixor: Real-time 3d object detection from point clouds

    Bin Yang, Wenjie Luo, and Raquel Urtasun. Pixor: Real-time 3d object detection from point clouds. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7652--7660, 2018

    2018

  35. [43]

    Mask4former: Mask transformer for 4d panoptic segmentation

    Kadir Yilmaz, Jonas Schult, Alexey Nekrasov, and Bastian Leibe. Mask4former: Mask transformer for 4d panoptic segmentation. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 9418--9425. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    A survey of autonomous driving: Common practices and emerging technologies

    Ekim Yurtsever, Jacob Lambert, Alexander Carballo, and Kazuya Takeda. A survey of autonomous driving: Common practices and emerging technologies. IEEE access, 8: 0 58443--58469, 2020

    2020

  37. [45]

    Raddet: Range-azimuth-doppler based radar object detection for dynamic road users

    Ao Zhang, Farzan Erlik Nowruzi, and Robert Laganiere. Raddet: Range-azimuth-doppler based radar object detection for dynamic road users. In 2021 18th Conference on Robots and Vision (CRV), pages 95--102. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  38. [46]

    Object detection and 3d estimation via an fmcw radar using a fully convolutional network

    Guoqiang Zhang, Haopeng Li, and Fabian Wenger. Object detection and 3d estimation via an fmcw radar using a fully convolutional network. In ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 4487--4491. IEEE, 2020

    2020

  39. [47]

    Tj4dradset: A 4d radar dataset for autonomous driving

    Lianqing Zheng, Zhixiong Ma, Xichan Zhu, Bin Tan, Sen Li, Kai Long, Weiqi Sun, Sihan Chen, Lu Zhang, Mengyue Wan, et al. Tj4dradset: A 4d radar dataset for autonomous driving. In 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pages 493--4...

    2022

  40. [48]

    Rcfusion: Fusing 4-d radar and camera with bird’s-eye view features for 3-d object detection

    Lianqing Zheng, Sen Li, Bin Tan, Long Yang, Sihan Chen, Libo Huang, Jie Bai, Xichan Zhu, and Zhixiong Ma. Rcfusion: Fusing 4-d radar and camera with bird’s-eye view features for 3-d object detection. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 72: 0 1--14, 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    Mmw radar-based technologies in autonomous driving: A review

    Taohua Zhou, Mengmeng Yang, Kun Jiang, Henry Wong, and Diange Yang. Mmw radar-based technologies in autonomous driving: A review. Sensors, 20 0 (24): 0 7283, 2020

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.